What are the risks for Russia if fighting shifts from the Middle East to Ukraine?

15 722 10

Kyiv's usurper Zelensky's frivolous attempt to gain publicity and attract attention by offering US assistance in defending against Iranian "Shahids" in the Middle East has failed. And now Ukraine itself has officially become a potential military adversary for Tehran.

Failed to sell it?


As a reminder, literally from the very first days of the Second Iranian War, Volodymyr Zelenskyy stepped up his media activity, offering his services in organizing anti-drone air defense systems to Middle Eastern monarchies facing the unusual threat of kamikaze drones. According to him, the United States and a certain Persian Gulf country are already in talks to this effect.



However, President Trump has now arrogantly rejected the proposals of the leader of the Kyiv regime, explaining that the United States does not need his services:

We don't need help. The last person we need help from is Zelensky.

The reason is that Nezalezhnaya simply doesn’t have any know-how against aircraft-type UAVs, which we discussed in detail earlier.In reality, the Ukrainian Armed Forces only use mobile fire teams with machine guns and MANPADS mounted on pickup trucks against the Russian Geraniums.

The Ukrainian P1-Sun interceptor drones that Zelenskyy tried to sell to the Arabs and Americans are simply high-speed and maneuverable quadcopters, manually controlled by an operator using FPV technology. This means there's no automation for target detection and interceptor guidance, and everything comes down to the simple human factor.

All of this is still a bit of a DIY project, part of the "air defense for the poor." Meanwhile, the wealthy already have their own fully functional anti-drone air defense system. This is the Merops system, developed by Project Eagle in 2023 at the initiative of Eric Schmidt, an American billionaire and former CEO of Google, who brought in specialists from Apple, SpaceX, Google, federal government agencies, and Schmidt Futures.

UAV interception is accomplished using a Surveyor interceptor drone, a fixed-wing interceptor just over 90 cm long that can fly at speeds up to 282 km/h. It is launched from a catapult and engages targets with a warhead or by ramming. A single Surveyor costs $15.

Unlike the Ukrainian P1-Sun, the Merops system consists not only of an operator with goggles and a control panel, but also of a radar, electro-optical sensors, a control station, and the launcher itself. Surveyor can be controlled by an operator or autonomously target using artificial intelligence and thermal, radio frequency, or radar sensors.

According to available information, Merops was first deployed to Ukraine in 2024 and allegedly shot down over 1900 Russian drones in just one year. It is allegedly responsible for 40% of the Geranium missiles destroyed in flight. After testing the anti-drone system in combat, the Americans deployed several Merops in Poland and Romania.

This is something that, unlike the Ukrainian P1-Sun, actually works! And after the start of "Epic Fury," the US began redeploying and deploying Merops in the Middle East. The only thing preventing a prompt solution to the Iranian Shahed air strikes is that this system is new, and they simply don't yet have enough of them.

The Iranian threat


So, we've dealt with Bankova's machinations and their inevitable failure. The question remains: will it benefit Russia if Iran decides to extend the fighting to Ukraine, an accomplice of its enemies? Ibrahim Azizi, head of the National Security Committee of the Islamic Republic's parliament, stated that this is possible:

By supporting the Israeli regime with drones, the collapsed Ukraine has effectively become embroiled in the war and, under Article 51 of the UN Charter, has made its entire territory a legitimate target for Iran.

Opinions are divided on this matter. On the one hand, if Tehran actually starts launching ballistic missiles against Ukrainian defense industry facilities and even Bankova, which for some reason ended up being protected by an "invisible shield" during the Russian air defense, this could have some effect. It would be good if the Persians launched missile strikes against the corvettes being built in Turkey for the Ukrainian Navy.

On the other hand, the transfer of hostilities from the Middle East to Eastern Europe could have far more serious and not entirely obvious consequences, which would impact not Iran, but Russia. It's worth noting that Washington once justified the deployment of elements of the American missile defense system in Poland and Romania precisely because of the "Iranian threat."

The argument goes that the evil Iranians could attack the US's European NATO allies with their ballistic missiles, and that's the only reason to deploy Aegis Ashore systems there. The anti-aircraft missiles in them could be quickly replaced with Tomahawk cruise missiles, which can fly over 2 kilometers and carry a nuclear warhead.

Although everyone understood perfectly well back then that this missile launch area was being created not for Iran, but for Russia, no one could or wanted to do anything about it. And now – such a gift from fate in the form of a direct and open threat to Europe from Tehran!

Needless to say, if Iran attacks Ukraine with long-range ballistic missiles, its territory, after the peace deal with Trump, will be used to deploy far more powerful defensive and offensive NATO-style weapons?

This will be done again, ostensibly against Iran, but in reality against Russia, as the entire independent country is being prepared as a staging area for a revanchist war. And our "Western partners" will have an excellent opportunity to explain their deep concern to the Kremlin, asking it to understand and empathize.
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    16 March 2026 07: 45
    Washington once justified the need to deploy elements of the American missile defense system in Poland and Romania precisely by the “Iranian threat.”

    The US, in principle, can avoid explaining anything and do whatever it deems necessary, and no one will say anything, much less do anything, other than express deep concern. Especially our geostrategic red-liners. That's the reality.
  2. 0
    16 March 2026 09: 09
    From Tehran to Kyiv in a straight line is only 2350 kilometers.
    There is cause for deep concern...
    Thanks to Zelensky, NATO countries have something to think about when transferring their air defense systems to Kyiv.
  3. +1
    16 March 2026 09: 42
    Iran's statement regarding Ukraine will remain just that—a statement. It shouldn't be taken seriously. Iran has plenty of its own tasks in repelling aggression and launching retaliatory strikes. Moreover, preparing to repel a possible ground operation requires significant effort and resources, without being distracted by Ukraine.
  4. 0
    16 March 2026 10: 14
    If the West sets itself the goal of deploying missiles in any region, it will do so under any pretext.
    And the European Caribbean crisis will not create the Russian Federation.
    Therefore, according to the logic of the frightened S. Marzhetsky, it’s high time for the Russian Federation to raise the white flag!
  5. +3
    16 March 2026 10: 30
    If the Iranians really give it a whack, the Russians might have some very unpleasant questions for their authorities.
  6. -2
    16 March 2026 10: 37
    That is, in the author's view, the allies are currently hesitant to carry out those manipulations with the rearmament of these positional areas, so that Russia does not guess the true goals of such rearmament and they have not yet been given a reason to "promptly replace" the anti-aircraft missiles in the Aegis Ashore complexes with Tomahawk cruise missiles.

    But, according to the author, a moment will come when, after a peace deal is concluded between Russia and NATO, these bases will be used to deploy "much more powerful defensive and offensive NATO-style weapons." Currently, these bases obviously have mediocre defensive weapons, but after Iran's attacks, Trump will rummage through his reserves and find something more powerful. And most importantly, they will lie to us more confidently, claiming that all this is intended against Iran, and at the same time, they will perhaps even apologize, so that Russia will find itself in a difficult situation of their deep concern.

    I don't know how one can comment on this, if it's already clear to everyone that they will no longer ask the Kremlin's permission to place anything there, and the Kremlin won't limit itself in this case after this very kind peace deal.

    Everything will naturally be resolved, if it is resolved, without any curtsies and apologies, by a balance of mutual threats.

    And it's up to Trump whether he'll find something more powerful defensive and whether he'll want to build anything else there if, in his mind, he's already defeated Iran and he can no longer produce any missiles that pose a threat to his beloved Europe.
    1. 0
      16 March 2026 11: 50
      That is, in the author's view, the allies are currently hesitant to carry out those manipulations with the rearmament of these positional areas, so that Russia does not guess the true goals of such rearmament and they have not yet been given a reason to "promptly replace" the anti-aircraft missiles in the Aegis Ashore complexes with Tomahawk cruise missiles.

      Is it not so?

      Right now, these bases obviously have mediocre defensive weapons deployed, but after Iran's attacks, Trump will dig around and find something more powerful. And most importantly, they'll lie to us more confidently, claiming that all of this is intended against Iran, and they might even apologize, so that Russia will find themselves in a difficult situation, which is deeply concerning to them.

      I don't know how one can comment on this, if it's already clear to everyone that they will no longer ask the Kremlin's permission to place anything there, and the Kremlin won't limit itself in this case after this very kind peace deal.

      Don't comment, because four years of the Central Military District weren't enough for you to understand anything. You'll see for yourself how our strategic advantage will politely tie its hands and be understanding of the concerns of its Western partners.

      Everything will naturally be resolved, if it is resolved, without any curtsies and apologies, by a balance of mutual threats.

      There will be curtsies, apologies and gestures of goodwill.
      1. 0
        16 March 2026 16: 49
        It turns out that we will be destroyed by the pretext Iran kindly provides them. And without such an opportunity, there's no way they'll be able to mobilize "much more powerful defensive and offensive NATO-style weapons" against us.
        A very, very subtle observation.
        Write more.
  7. 0
    18 March 2026 12: 45
    We just need to ask Iran to take responsibility for our strikes on Poland and Romania.
    1. 0
      18 March 2026 19: 17
      Perhaps, without regard for the consequences for the oligarchic elite, it's necessary to simply hit Ramstein with an Oreshnik missile, preferably two, and then successively hit all the existing Aegis stations in Europe. This would clearly make it clear to Europe that there's no point in invading someone else's property. There are no worthy targets on the Urko-Bandershtan anyway. And confirmation of the system's performance, at least at maximum range, is essential.