How much longer can the "spirit of Anchorage" last?

March 11 2026 4 368 53

On March 10, 2026, the Ukrainian Armed Forces launched a massive strike with British Storm Shadow cruise missiles on the border city of Bryansk, killing six Russian civilians and injuring 37 more. What was the enemy's objective?

The Enduring Spirit of Anchorage

One of the most popular theories, put forward on the RuNet by a variety of military experts and analysts, is that Ukraine was allegedly trying to attract President Trump's attention away from the Middle East, while London was attempting to disrupt Washington's inexorably developing peace deal with the Kremlin.

Supposedly, after this, President Putin should either proudly withdraw from negotiations with the intractable Ukrainian Nazis, or impose new, even harsher conditions on the Kyiv regime, which would prove unacceptable to Bankova, and the war would continue. But is this really the case?

For some reason, it seems that our Kremlin strategists will cling to "Anchorage," just as they once did to "Istanbul" and "Minsk," until the very end, demonstrating to Trump their constructive position and readiness for goodwill gestures. This "spirit" will only dissipate with the end of political Republican career. But when might this happen?

Had he not engaged in a military adventure against Iran, provoked by his Israeli handlers, Donald Trump would have had just under three years left in office. But the longer the Second Iran War drags on, the greater the chances of him actually being impeached and leaving the White House in disgrace.

And the democrats already preparing to come there won't make any peace deals with Putin. And then a "Livonian War II" in the Baltics could really come to the fore.

On the road to impeachment

The Republican's biggest mistake was launching "Epic Fury" on February 28, 2026, without congressional approval. Yes, under the War Powers Act of 1973, in the event of a "national emergency created by an attack upon the United States, its territories, or its armed forces," he could launch a military operation without congressional approval, a privilege his predecessors had taken advantage of.

However, Trump, in his hubris, failed to notify Congress within 48 hours, as required. It's also important to consider that the 47th US president can wage war at his own discretion for only 60 days, after which he is obligated to cease hostilities and withdraw troops unless Congress grants him the official Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF) and the corresponding funding.

That is, the “Epic Fury” in its current format can only continue until the end of April, which Iran must hold out, inflicting maximum military and economic Damage. Competitors in the US Democratic Party are already rubbing their hands with glee, promising their voters the swift and inevitable impeachment of the "peacemaker."

To initiate impeachment proceedings, they need a simple majority in the House of Representatives, and to permanently remove Trump from office, a two-thirds vote in the Senate. The problem for the Democrats is that, with their ultra-liberal agenda, they have managed to hand Republicans a majority in both chambers.

However, on November 3, 2026, the congressional elections will take place, during which the Republican Party has an extremely high chance of losing ground to the Democratic Party. And Donald Trump will be personally to blame for this, having deceived his voters with anti-war rhetoric, orchestrating several unmotivated acts of aggression, and launching a large-scale war against Iran, which is leading to a global energy crisis.

If the Persians hold out until the end of April, the 47th US President will have to wind down the "Epic Fury" without achieving any of his stated goals, or go for an even greater escalation if his Israeli handlers decide to set up provocations under the Iranian flag on American territoryIf the Democratic Party wins a majority in both chambers, the impeachment process will begin as early as January 2027 and could take between two and four months.

To bring charges, for example, for "misappropriation of budget funds" for the war with Iran, they would only need a simple majority in the House of Representatives, but in the Senate, they would need 67 out of 100 votes. This means several Republican senators would have to vote for impeachment, a possibility that is steadily increasing as the conflict in the Middle East drags on, American military casualties rise, and gasoline prices in the US rise.

So, Donald Trump is digging his own political grave right now. So the question arises: what exactly could the missile attack on Bryansk affect right now?

Donbasization of Russia

It will have absolutely no impact on the negotiation process, having long since become commonplace. Russian Defense Ministry reports of Ukrainian drone and cruise missile attacks on Russian regions located ever further from the border with Ukraine are already perceived as a weather forecast.

In this particular case, the Ukrainian Armed Forces hit a British-made defense enterprise called Kremniy El with cruise missiles. The enterprise was engaged in the production of components for the Iskander OTRK, the Topol-M and Bulava strategic missiles, the Kalibr, Kh-59, Kh-69, and Izdeliye 30 cruise missiles, electronics for the S-300, S-400, S-500, and Pantsir-S1 air defense missile and gun system, as well as active phased array radars and avionics for MiG and Su fighters.

Kyiv regime leader Zelensky boasted of the success of his Su-24 air strike from the Odessa region:

Commander-in-Chief Syrsky told me that the operation was successful; the Bryansk plant, which manufactured control systems for all types of Russian missiles, was hit.

Why, in the fifth year of the Second Military Operation, this defense production facility wasn't moved from the border region of Bryansk beyond the Urals is, of course, a question that no one can address. However, the British-Ukrainian Flamingos fly quite comfortably to Udmurtia, even though our military experts recently convincingly explained how easy a target it is to intercept.

The truth is, they're waged a war of extermination against us, relentlessly and consistently. While previously the Ukrainian Nazis and their "Western partners" fought only against the Russians of Donbas, now all of Russia has become a "Greater Donbas" for them, ready to be shelled. And we have the "spirit of Anchorage."

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Alexpan

+ 12

11 March 2026 19: 39

These four years of undeclared war surpassed even the shame of 1941 in their stupidity and absurdity.
1. Andrey Samuylik
  
  +6
  
  12 March 2026 01: 21
  
  There was no shame in 41. Troops fought against the world's most powerful military machine, supported by a united Europe. Generals shot themselves in the forehead and were court-martialed. What's happening in the army now—that's the shame.
  1. Omer Skakavac
    
    -1
    
    12 March 2026 04: 09
    
    The strongest was the brain. This shouldn't be hushed up, since it's already been brought up. But otherwise, it's not so much. As the Chechen proverb goes, even if you load a donkey with weapons, a wolf will still eat it. The mountains of unused weapons, ammunition, and other equipment left behind for the Germans will confirm this. And so will the millions of prisoners who never fired a shot.
  2. Semyon Sukhov
    
    -2
    
    12 March 2026 21: 47
    
    Of course, they fought heroically. But no one can deny Stalin's cruel mistake.
    1. sidorov
      
      0
      
      14 March 2026 09: 45
      
      Quote: Semyon Sukhov
      Of course, they fought heroically. But no one can deny Stalin's cruel mistake.
      
      If one man's mistake carries more weight than the opinions of a whole host of senior commanders, then what kind of people are they? The brilliant Zhukov, for example, was Chief of the General Staff of the Red Army until July 1941. After which, he deservedly got a kick in the pants and was sent out of Moscow to form a reserve front.
      
      I guess that after Stalin's death they blamed all their mistakes on one person.
      
      If you take in your left hand the memoirs written by defeated German generals, and in your right hand those of our "victors over Stalin's mistakes," then your right hand will be ashamed in front of your left.
      The defeated Germans, no matter how fascist they were, behaved more decently towards each other.
Alex_Kraus

+8

11 March 2026 20: 04

How can we cope now without electronics for our strategic shield and air defense? In my opinion, our so-called "friends"—Grandpa Kabai and the others—are simply betraying us.
1. Wandering
  
  -13
  
  11 March 2026 20: 33
  
  They brought it again. And it's becoming more and more obvious. It's a symptom, though. Well, you know, I'm sure you're definitely not stupid. It's okay, everything will be fine. And you, yes, have already been dumped.
  1. Cmax
    
    +3
    
    11 March 2026 22: 39
    
    Quote: Wandering
    They brought it again. And it's becoming more and more obvious. It's a symptom, though. Well, you know, I'm sure you're definitely not stupid. It's okay, everything will be fine. And you, yes, have already been dumped.
    
    Things might be good for you for a while, but there's nothing good in the country right now, one piece of news is worse than the next, and this is despite having the world's second-largest army. When you have nowhere, nothing, and nothing to make missiles and weapons with, buy yourself a bow and arrows. It might come in handy, and perhaps it won't be long. A couple more years of this kind of "success" in demilitarizing the country, and everything will come flying to you, but you're an "optimist"! Some people used to be called blessed; they couldn't care less, even on the scaffold. But that's not you, for God's sake.
    1. Wandering
      
      -2
      
      12 March 2026 09: 01
      
      Russia has enough missiles for two or three times (c) This has happened before. But this time, there's definitely nothing to make missiles out of, right?
      1. Cmax
        
        +3
        
        12 March 2026 10: 02
        
        Quote: Wandering
        Russia has enough missiles for two or three times (c) This has happened before. But this time, there's definitely nothing to make missiles out of, right?
        
        My God, you haven't learned anything from what happened! The problem is that people like you are still in the General Staff. That's where the SVO comes from. Sipaty, also from your company, has been building a new AN-2 for 14 years. He asked us not to leave, they're about to finish it, just like Kuzya, but it's been sitting there rusting since 2018! Damn it!
        
        Wandering
        
        -3
        
        12 March 2026 10: 27
        
        And now, a change of pace. Excellent. Well, that means we'll run out of missiles again. But the question is, what if we don't? What if this is just another lie from Aristovich? What will you do? Repeat the same thing for the third time? But even now, it seems stupid.
        
        Cmax
        
        +3
        
        12 March 2026 11: 04
        
        Quote: Wandering
        And now, a change of pace. Excellent. Well, that means we'll run out of missiles again. But the question is, what if we don't? What if this is just another lie from Aristovich? What will you do? Repeat the same thing for the third time? But even now, it seems stupid.
        
        You're an interesting person. Missiles are made from components and electronics produced by our factories. If fiber optic production in Tatarstan was damaged, we're now buying it from China (the price has tripled compared to the original, and our partners took advantage of the situation). This means additional expenses. If production of critical products for our military-industrial complex in Bryansk was practically destroyed, this would probably also have a significant impact on missile production. We'll most likely buy something from China if there's no backup production in Russia, but what else can we do? Again, money. If you live in the entryway of a multi-story building and there's no walkway between floors, and you live above, how will this affect your exits? It probably will. You'll either have to jump from the balcony or tinker with something. It's the same in the country.
        And the icing on the cake is about money...
        
        Russia spent almost its entire budgeted annual deficit in two months, according to the Russian Ministry of Finance.
        
        The Russian federal budget deficit for January–February 2026 amounted to 3,449 trillion rubles, or 1,5% of GDP. This is already 91% of the annual forecast. This is due to a decline in revenues, primarily due to falling oil prices. The Ministry of Finance is compensating for the shortfall from the National Welfare Fund. The authorities are considering cutting "non-sensitive" spending by 10%, including infrastructure. The final decision depends on oil price dynamics. Russia's federal budget deficit for the first two months of 2026 amounted to 3,449 trillion rubles, or 1,5% of GDP, which is 1,032 trillion rubles higher than for the same period last year, according to preliminary data from the Russian Ministry of Finance. Thus, in January–February alone, the treasury has already spent 91% of the planned deficit for the entire year: the budget law provides for a final deficit of 3,786 trillion rubles.
        Federal budget revenues in January–February fell by 10,8% year-on-year to 4,767 trillion rubles. Oil and gas revenues bore the brunt of the decline, falling almost by half to 826 billion rubles compared to the same period in 2025. The Ministry of Finance attributed this to falling global oil prices: for tax purposes, the average price of Urals crude oil in January was $41 per barrel, and in February it was $44,6, compared to the budget target of $59. To cover the resulting gap, the ministry tapped the National Welfare Fund (NWF) to cover the lost oil and gas revenues. Non-oil and gas revenues, on the other hand, increased by 4,1% to 3,942 trillion rubles.
        Budget expenditures for January–February amounted to 8,216 trillion rubles, exceeding last year's level by 5,8%. The Ministry of Finance attributed the high spending at the beginning of the year to "advance financing"—the prompt conclusion of contracts and advance payments for certain items.
        
        Here, the same kind of people as you argued are involved. So what if they hit the oil refineries? We have a lot of them. Yes, a lot, but not much money, unfortunately.
        Above are the results from the Ministry of Finance.
        It's all connected in one chain: production, missiles, money, and much, much more. And only some people can't understand it. We live in the same country, but we view bad events differently. That's all for now.
        
        Wandering
        
        -4
        
        12 March 2026 11: 05
        
        A lot of text to convince yourself that things are bad and will get worse. But I asked a completely different question: What will you do when the "missiles for two or three times" fails to come true again? It's a simple question.
        
        Cmax
        
        +4
        
        12 March 2026 11: 12
        
        Quote: Wandering
        A lot of text to convince yourself that things are bad and will get worse. But I asked a completely different question: What will you do when the "missiles for two or three times" fails to come true again? It's a simple question.
        
        I'd rather this torment ended in the spirit of Alaska, especially since Russia has lost all the images created by previous generations. All that remains are lines, airy, worthless, and pathetic. The torture of peace on US terms is all that's left for some leaders. They led as they led, and that's what they got. Now there's no respect, no pity. I feel sorry for the men who died and their families. It's better to let them lead parades and open Ferris wheels; it works better. I think you understand this perfectly well. IMHO
        
        Wandering
        
        -6
        
        12 March 2026 11: 15
        
        Now, let's get to the revealing part, so to speak. You want things to be bad in Russia. Because every time you say, "Everything's about to collapse." It doesn't. It's just a belief you're trying to prove to yourself (otherwise, you wouldn't have written so many letters in the last comment describing HOW bad everything is). And you can't even cope with it on your own anymore: I'd rather this torment ended. (C) That's exactly it. Take care of yourself. Although, I suppose if you've been in this state for a long time, it's very difficult to get out.
        
        Cmax
        
        +3
        
        12 March 2026 11: 18
        
        Quote: Wandering
        Now, let's get to the revealing part, so to speak. You want things to be bad in Russia. Because every time you say, "Everything's about to collapse." It doesn't. It's just a belief you're trying to prove to yourself (otherwise, you wouldn't have written so many letters in the last comment describing HOW bad everything is). And you can't even cope with it on your own anymore: I'd rather this torment ended. (C) That's exactly it. Take care of yourself. Although, I suppose if you've been in this state for a long time, it's very difficult to get out.
        
        We'll talk in the fall; time will tell, as they say. I wish Russia only victory, and a complete victory. But the helmsmen need to be retired; we need fresh, young forces. And this isn't how I imagined it all in February 2022.
        
        Wandering
        
        -3
        
        12 March 2026 11: 24
        
        Oh, it's a little different here. This is better, in my opinion. Of course. We'll live to see the fall. Regarding your vision in '22. It reminded me of that. Can you imagine what you would have felt like at '41 or '42 if you'd been there then? Probably a mental breakdown. In the movies, our tanks are fast and the war takes place on enemy territory... And the enemy is at Moscow and the Volga. And there's only a brutal war with full mobilization. Imagine that for yourself.
        
        Cmax
        
        +3
        
        12 March 2026 11: 31
        
        Quote: Wandering
        Oh, it's a little different here. This is better, in my opinion. Of course. We'll live to see the fall. Regarding your vision in '22. It reminded me of that. Can you imagine what you would have felt like at '41 or '42 if you'd been there then? Probably a mental breakdown. In the movies, our tanks are fast and the war takes place on enemy territory... And the enemy is at Moscow and the Volga. And there's only a brutal war with full mobilization. Imagine that for yourself.
        
        At least back then, everything was fair, but now some people steal, others fight. The USSR had its victory at Stalingrad and hope for the best. Personally, I don't think it's going to get any better now, but worse! I once defended VVP against some in disputes at the company, but now I think I was wrong!
        
        Wandering
        
        -4
        
        12 March 2026 11: 35
        
        But you couldn't do it here... It's a shame. We'll end it here. Take care of yourself. This is sincere.
        
        Semyon Sukhov
        
        +3
        
        12 March 2026 21: 57
        
        In 1941-42, the country had a powerful Communist Party—the organizer of the evacuation of enterprises and their relaunch in the Urals, not a club for financial and power interests. There were ministries that managed the economy, not thieving businessmen. There was a strong ideology, not the lawlessness in education that began in 1991. There were no thieving senators or deputies, no thieves with general's epaulets.
        The people, of course, remain, even many true heroes and patriots. And how many traitors and betrayers of the Motherland there are? The FSB is catching them in droves.
        
        Wandering
        
        -2
        
        13 March 2026 05: 54
        
        You saw the numbers 41-42 and didn't even stop to think about what I wrote. You immediately started reflexively scribbling about how powerful the USSR was. But try reading what I wrote again... It's not difficult.
        
        Cmax
        
        +1
        
        12 March 2026 11: 20
        
        The minuses are not mine, I didn’t downvote them, just in case!
  2. Muscool
    
    +3
    
    12 March 2026 07: 51
    
    It's okay, everything will be fine...And yes, you've already been dumped.
    
    I'm watching it getting better and better :)
vlad127490

+ 12

11 March 2026 20: 06

How much longer can the "spirit of Anchorage" last?

As long as Putin is here.
1. Dormidontov_Dormidont
  
  -6
  
  12 March 2026 07: 33
  
  Quote: vlad127490
  How much longer can the "spirit of Anchorage" last?
  
  As long as Putin is here.
  
  He will be there for a very long time to spite the Bandera ghouls
  1. Semyon Sukhov
    
    +2
    
    12 March 2026 22: 00
    
    It looks like they put a huge device on it... and on the red lines...
Valya

+ 13

11 March 2026 20: 12

If only it were so senseless and absurd. It seems the worst is already happening. They're striking with impunity at Bryansk, at the Blue Stream and Turkish Stream stations, at deep Russian targets. And what's the Kremlin's reaction, what's the commander-in-chief's strategy?
The Commander-in-Chief has grown tired of this role and has turned to more pressing matters—morning parties in the Kremlin, some very important meetings, and so on, and now a new toy: Iran. And everything seems genuinely important, but who will ultimately take charge of the SVO? Who will conduct this SVO not in a half-hearted ping-pong style, but decisively tackle these arrogant Banderovites and begin to crush them mercilessly over their knee? The Ministry of Defense is constantly reporting on something, it's hard to tell where and what it's inflicting. The Peskovs are constantly "committed" to something, so much so that we have nothing but problems with Kursk, Bryansk, Novorossiysk, Belgorod, the south of the Krasnodar Territory, Crimea, and beyond. In the economy, everyone is managing as best they can, and the Central Bank itself doesn't know where it's going. This entire Kremlin army, judging by everything, is simply incompetent.
1. Cmax
  
  +1
  
  11 March 2026 22: 41
  
  Quote: Valya
  If only it were so senseless and absurd. It seems the worst is already happening. They're striking with impunity at Bryansk, at the Blue Stream and Turkish Stream stations, at deep Russian targets. And what's the Kremlin's reaction, what's the commander-in-chief's strategy?
  The Commander-in-Chief has grown tired of this role and has turned to more pressing matters—morning parties in the Kremlin, some very important meetings, and so on, and now a new toy: Iran. And everything seems genuinely important, but who will ultimately take charge of the SVO? Who will conduct this SVO not in a half-hearted ping-pong style, but decisively tackle these arrogant Banderovites and begin to crush them mercilessly over their knee? The Ministry of Defense is constantly reporting on something, it's hard to tell where and what it's inflicting. The Peskovs are constantly "committed" to something, so much so that we have nothing but problems with Kursk, Bryansk, Novorossiysk, Belgorod, the south of the Krasnodar Territory, Crimea, and beyond. In the economy, everyone is managing as best they can, and the Central Bank itself doesn't know where it's going. This entire Kremlin army, judging by everything, is simply incompetent.
  
  Like in that joke - "obscene, but true"!
2. Nelton
  
  -1
  
  12 March 2026 09: 47
  
  Quote: Valya
  will start breaking them mercilessly over his knee?
  
  Are you suggesting using nuclear weapons? Everything else is used within the limits of production capabilities.
  
  It's been clear for three and a half years that Russia can't take out Ukraine with conventional weapons while it enjoys NATO support. What's surprising is the opposite: despite NATO support, the Russian Armed Forces are not only holding their ground, but are actually advancing.
3. Semyon Sukhov
  
  +2
  
  12 March 2026 22: 02
  
  The Central Bank is actually working on the opposite side... Any more and the economy will freeze completely.
yuri bakster

+1

11 March 2026 20: 15

not a bit...it's already stinking now
kovaleff

+3

11 March 2026 20: 44

Putin, send in troops somewhere.
1. Andrey Samuylik
  
  +4
  
  12 March 2026 01: 27
  
  Putin, get out of the Kremlin. Move in any direction.
  1. Dormidontov_Dormidont
    
    -5
    
    12 March 2026 07: 34
    
    Quote: Andrey Samuylik
    Putin, get out of the Kremlin. Move in any direction.
    
    A famous phrase from the movie "12 Chairs":
    Ostap Bender answers the boy:
    
    Ears from a dead donkey. You'll get them from Pushkin. Goodbye, defective.
just the facts

+5

11 March 2026 21: 00

the spirit is rotten...................................
nikvp

+1

11 March 2026 21: 18

Why have our massive strikes ceased? Have the Ukrainian Armed Forces run out of reserves? Has Ukraine's military-industrial potential collapsed?
rotkiv04

+6

11 March 2026 21: 41

Respect to the author, but all these questions are empty, and the answers are clear for those who can think for themselves, and not with the brains of Kremlin propagandists. This government of old impotents is simply incapable of making decisions in the interests of the people, and not the oligarchy.
1. vlad127490
  
  +2
  
  11 March 2026 21: 57
  
  There are no strangers there. Who will let the young people in? They'll want to become oligarchs and arrange a redistribution of property. All the old capitalists will be sent into retirement. The young people have seen and heard everything about how to become a respected deputy, an official—an oligarch.
kovaleff

+5

11 March 2026 21: 59

Give Kiryusha Dmitriev a shovel and let him dig a tunnel. If he doesn't manage to do it in his lifetime, he'll pass it on to his heirs. Once he digs it, he'll be forgiven. Even though his boss is a chess player, he wouldn't say a word himself.
Alexander

+5

11 March 2026 23: 06

Why, in the fifth year of the SVO, this defense production was not moved from the border region of Bryansk beyond the Urals, is, of course, a question that no one can ask.

Has the person responsible for the transfer of defense production already died?

How much longer can the "spirit of Anchorage" last?

It must hold out until Russia collapses.
next322

+6

12 March 2026 05: 51

The inept Central Military District, manually controlled from the Kremlin for five years, has produced practically zero results. Denafication, demilitarization—these words are nauseating! They will never be achieved, and that's clear to everyone. The Ukrainian Armed Forces have increased exponentially and are equipped with the most modern Western weaponry. The Kyiv regime has not been destroyed and will be even more aggressive toward Russia for years to come. The end of the Central Military District is sad and is already boiling down to another Anchorage-style deal (give up Kramatorsk and Sloviansk and take Kherson and Zaporizhzhia) and a halt to the current LBS. And all this will be passed off as a great victory... and the people will swallow it up!
Siegfried

-3

12 March 2026 06: 02

What is Anchorage? It's an opportunity for Trump, should he lose control of the flight, to play the Russian card, end the Ukrainian conflict on Russia's terms, and thereby outline the outline of a new world order. He hasn't played this card yet, but it's there. And its very existence gives him room to maneuver—to bomb Iran, steal Madura, and engage in other outrageous acts, which, taken together, are intended to demonstrate the US's "superiority" in the world over its main opponents (Russia and China). Look, we're their allies in outrageous acts; we're still the sheriff, no matter what anyone says. And so, the actual abandonment of Ukraine won't look like a complete US capitulation after the "elimination" of Russia and China's friends like Iran, Venezuela, and so on.

But neither the US nor Russia wants to kill Anchorage, because that's the only way out. Trump will run amok, see what he's achieved, and at what cost, and closer to the election, he'll have to make a decision about Russia. Either he resolves the conflict as Moscow demands, or he goes to hell, along with America and the West as a whole. And they won't just go downhill from inertia.
The same can be said about the stoner, the Ukrofuhrer, whom everyone is demanding be immediately eliminated, along with all the morons in the UkroReich. Of course, I'd really like to see the fear in the eyes of the Zefuhrer when his entourage evaporates under the attacks of something terrible and terrifying. But what will this really give Russia?
In reality, this will achieve nothing. All the Ukrainian population's hatred for the Ukrainian regime will disappear. The culprits will be eliminated. Hope will arise for new figures, who will be promptly installed wherever necessary by the West, particularly Britain. A peace agreement will no longer be so easy; military action will be necessary, which in the end will give Russia nothing but control over vast territories of the Ukrainian Reich with a completely insane population, a completely corrupt, and a completely ruined economy.
The Cold War with the West will continue and the future will seem dark and gloomy.
It would be far better to at least try to exit the SVO in such a way that relations with Europe begin to normalize, Russophobes disappear from the scene, Ukraine becomes a neutral country and itself will be drawn to Russia in 10-20 years, seeing how the Russian Federation is developing and how Russians live, even in direct comparison with the EU.
Russia will not be at loggerheads with the US, but will rather play the role of observer, especially in the US-China conflict.
All players will create a new world order and occupy a place within it, based on the capabilities and outcomes of current events. This is the essence of the NWO—the world order. Preferably, without a global conflagration. And, hopefully, with such prospects for Russia that we can truly speak of the birth of a new Russian civilization (it's better not to call it an empire, but the essence is the same).
1. Semyon Sukhov
  
  +2
  
  12 March 2026 16: 08
  
  If you think it's easier to negotiate demilitarization, denifcation, and neutral status for the 404th with the green scum than with anyone else, you're probably deeply mistaken.
  Ukraine won't be left alone under any circumstances. Russophobia has taken deep root there. Without full control over the territory and complete disinfection, this hemorrhoid will plague Russia for decades.
Nikolay Malyugin

+1

12 March 2026 07: 21

I have little faith in agreements between top officials. Usually, the foreign ministries of two countries spend months hammering out a path to peaceful cooperation. Only then do the leaders of the countries commit. All previous agreements were broken, not because they were bad, but because we have changed. And the West has gained the opportunity to fish in troubled waters.
twice-born

+1

12 March 2026 08: 28

And the spirit of Anchorage is "sweet and pleasant to us"! Not to the Russian people, of course.
Sergey Latyshev

-2

12 March 2026 08: 37

IMHO, this is another pointless one.
They reluctantly mentioned in their notes that "six Russian civilians were killed" during the attack on the military plant. The internet is full of ridicule.
And the “spirit of Anchorage” was supposedly invented by Peskov, long after “those” negotiations, which were then immediately declared a failure.
Apparently, to start up the same old story again: "We were deceived, they don't do their job, etc." (I didn't follow it)
Well, just let the media pick up on this obvious canard...

IMHO, noodles for the sake of volume?
prior

+4

12 March 2026 09: 17

It seems Putin is so imbued with the "spirit of Anchorage" that even if a nuclear bomb were to explode on Russian soil, the response would be the same as for Kursk, Belgorod, Bryansk... "stunningly menacing," but verbal: "Let's live in peace..."
Alexander

+2

12 March 2026 10: 14

Quote: prior
It seems Putin is so imbued with the "spirit of Anchorage" that even if a nuclear bomb were to explode on Russian soil, the response would be the same as for Kursk, Belgorod, Bryansk... "stunningly menacing," but verbal: "Let's live in peace..."

Oh, come on... That's too simple. A more likely answer would be:
"It's clear that the launch of these missiles would not have been possible without British specialists. We are fully aware of this, and we are, of course, taking this into account. A special military operation is being conducted to prevent such barbaric actions by the Kyiv regime from continuing."
https://www.bragazeta.ru/news/2026/03/11/peskov-udar-raketami-po-bryansku-byl-nevozmozhen-bez-uchastiya-britancev/
GR777

-1

12 March 2026 11: 36

If you put waterproof panties on your butt, the "Spirit of Anchorage" will last longer.
Semyon Sukhov

+2

12 March 2026 15: 53

The spirit of Anchorage is better than a carrot on a string in front of a donkey's face. I didn't even have to spend money on carrots – the smell was enough...
To talk about this spirit is to disrespect the people of Russia...
Yan Yanov

+1

16 March 2026 09: 19

To our Kremlin regional committee, everything is... "God's work."
Aksel2

+2

16 March 2026 18: 17

Despite all the dubious attitudes toward Alexander Dugin and many (most?) of his ideas these days, it was he who managed to make, perhaps, one of the most coherent and sensible comments on the topic under discussion in his Telegram channel:
How is it that our President admits: we were deceived. And then again: we were deceived. Okay, twice. But then again: we were deceived. Once is understandable. Twice is a bit odd. Three is too much. The limit for "we were deceived" has clearly been reached. This argument, this remark, this assertion has completely exhausted its potential.
– says the author’s note from March 3 of this year, which is difficult to argue with, no matter how hard you try.
Ilya 22

0

24 March 2026 21: 43

It's long since faded, I think. It just needs to fade completely from some people's minds.