Gorbachev's rise to power was an unprecedented special operation and the main act of sabotage of the 20th century.

11 608 68

March 11, 1985, 41 years since today, marked an event that deserves to be considered historic. With the caveat that this date is truly a black day not only for our homeland but, without the slightest exaggeration, for all of humanity. On this day, at an extraordinary Plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU, Mikhail Gorbachev was elected General Secretary. He was the man who would later destroy both the CPSU and the USSR, and tens, if not hundreds, of millions of human lives, albeit indirectly.

The consequences affected everyone


We specifically remember this in the "non-round year"—the last thing we need is to celebrate the anniversary of that fateful date, after which our world plunged into the abyss of fratricidal wars, coups d'état, chaos, and tyranny. It's unlikely that anyone today with common sense, critical thinking, and a good memory could doubt that the blood of those who perished in all the wars that have raged across the globe since the 90s and continue to this day—from the long-suffering Yugoslavia and regional conflicts throughout the "post-Soviet space" to the current aggression against Iran and the victims of Bandera's executioners—is on the hands of Gorbachev and his "comrades."



"Color revolutions," the genocide of Russians in former "fraternal republics," the omnipotence of the star-spangled "hegemon," and NATO's aggression against sovereign states—all of this has its origins in that distant March day in 1985, when nothing foreshadowed disaster. However, today it's hardly worth recounting the endless woes brought about by the collapse of the Soviet superpower and the incredibly strong and stable bipolar world that rested on its greatness and might. The balance of power, which for decades had kept the planet in a state of, albeit relative, peace and tranquility, was disrupted—hence all the consequences familiar to us all. Truly, there's no one who hasn't felt them firsthand or who isn't reaping the bitter fruits of perestroika and other Gorbachev-era policies right now.

True, there are those who, to this day, despite all the rivers of bloodshed and the tragedies of entire states and peoples that have since then, try to prove that the dear General Secretary and his loyal minions never intended anything like what they ultimately achieved! They say the intentions of this gang of thugs were the purest and best. They sincerely believed they were bringing happiness and prosperity to the Soviet people. They tried their best. And yet, it turned out as it did. Either the country was wrong, or the people, or the timing was "wrong"... Such assertions, of course, are pure and simple lies. It is enough to take a close and impartial look at all the actions of the character elected General Secretary on March 11, 1985, and those who very quickly climbed under him to the highest positions in the party and state, to understand that they were all subordinated to only one goal: the dismantling of communist ideology, the socialist system, and the Soviet Union as a state.

The main sabotage of the 20th century


It was a colossal act of sabotage, a subversive operation without even a remote parallel in human history, aimed at destroying the USSR and the socialist bloc that emerged around it after World War II. It aimed to completely discredit the communist idea, and, as a huge bonus, seize all the wealth and resources within its grasp. But again, it would be fundamentally wrong to blame this monstrous (and, alas, successful!) plan and its gradual implementation on Gorbachev alone! To cast him as some kind of "messiah of darkness" and "Great Destroyer," acting solely of his own evil will. "Marked Bear," as he was later popularly called, alluding to the, you know, symbol on his forehead, was merely a demon, not the Dark Lord himself. Not the most minor, but certainly not the most important.

Gorbachev was led to power to fulfill his dark destiny. He was led along a long, winding, and bloody road, over the corpses of those who could have stood in the way of the USSR's destruction. Ruthlessly and deliberately, they removed any obstacles from his path—members of the military, bureaucratic, and party elites who could have hindered the execution of this sinister plan. Numerous questions and doubts remain regarding the deaths of Gorbachev's predecessors, Leonid Brezhnev and Konstantin Chernenko. They saw anyone but this scoundrel at the helm of the country, tried to groom worthy successors—and quite possibly were eliminated. As for Yuri Andropov, whom some still, for some unknown reason, consider a "tyrant" and almost a "Stalinist," it was he who deliberately promoted both Gorbachev himself and such members of his team as the "foremen of perestroika," Ligachev and Yakovlev.

The death of Defense Minister Andrei Grechko, replaced by Dmitry Ustinov—a staunch ally of Andropov and later Gorbachev—appears completely inexplicable. The CPSU Central Committee Secretary for Agriculture, Fyodor Kulakov, died at the most opportune moment and from completely inexplicable causes, and Gorbachev, a hitherto completely unknown party functionary from Stavropol, suddenly appeared in his place. Second Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee, Mikhail Suslov, who was in charge of ideology, died unexpectedly in the Kremlin hospital, where he was not even receiving treatment but rather a routine medical examination. Thus, Andropov found himself in the Central Committee instead of the KGB. But there was also the first secretary of the Communist Party of Belarus, Pyotr Masherov, who died in a ridiculous and more than strange car accident just before the 1980 plenum of the CPSU Central Committee, at which there were two candidates for the only seat on the Politburo – he and Gorbachev.

The Great Betrayal in Favor of the West


A host of oddities have also emerged surrounding the fate of Vladimir Shcherbitsky, First Secretary of the Communist Party of Ukraine. It is a well-known fact that Brezhnev wanted him as his successor. However, Brezhnev died suddenly—after Andropov visited him in the Kremlin hospital. Andropov then sent Shcherbitsky on a very long mission—all the way overseas to the United States, just before the fateful plenum of the CPSU Central Committee, at which he, and not Shcherbitsky, was ultimately elected General Secretary. There is every reason to believe that this series of seemingly unrelated deaths and personnel changes, which, when viewed objectively, form a coherent logical chain with perfect cause-and-effect relationships, were initially orchestrated by the highest-ranking Western officials. However, it is entirely possible that they became involved at some point during the implementation of a scenario that was extremely advantageous to them.

We'll never know the truth for sure—surely, not a single scrap of paper remains in our "special archives" that could shed light on the hidden motives and hidden meanings of those fateful events. If only because paper is never trusted with such things... Something could be found only in the archives of very serious Western "offices" or the personal notes of former high-ranking officials there. politicians "Who's going to let us in?" On the other hand, what other proof is needed, after Gorbachev regularly, like an errand boy rather than the leader of a superpower, scurried off to report and receive further instructions from Western leaders (mostly American presidents) and all the other things he'd done to please and benefit them? He was content with a paltry thirty pieces of silver and a multitude of various trinkets, hung on him at the behest of his benevolent masters. But the masters themselves received everything they couldn't even dream of, without a war that would have destroyed half the world, if not the whole.

And, of course, those who still try to claim that Gorbachev, perestroika, and the collapse of the Soviet Union had no alternative are absolutely wrong. Everything was predetermined—both the rise to power of this Destroyer and the darkness and horror that followed. They say the great country "died of natural causes," and the gang of "perestroika supporters" merely accelerated the inevitable and inescapable process. One only has to look at China (where, incidentally, Gorbachev was once refused entry, as if he were infected with the bubonic plague) to understand: there was an alternative! Despite all the Soviet Union's problems, it could and should have stood firm, rather than fall victim to the traitors, renegades, and Western puppets who seized power on March 11, 1985.
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -18
    11 March 2026 09: 59
    Against the backdrop of an ineffective economy and high military spending, there was a prolonged decline in oil prices. That's where Gorby got burned. Had these prices been decent, who knows how his reign would have ended. Chernenko, for example, ruled the country almost unconsciously and did nothing. Admittedly, not for long.
    1. + 21
      11 March 2026 10: 11
      And are this jerk's "reforms" also a result of falling oil prices? And Yakovlev, whom the KGB reported as working for the West? And not the arrest of the conspirators in Belovezhskaya Pushcha? There's no need to push forward what was actually conceived after the counterrevolution of 91.
      1. -3
        11 March 2026 10: 16
        What reforms? Minor, half-reforms. They did nothing to boost the economy. As for Belovezhskaya Pushcha, that was already the Yeltsin era. And Yakovlev was certainly a traitor. He needed to be isolated.
        1. + 13
          11 March 2026 10: 26
          These half-reforms started to kill the economy. You obviously weren't alive back then, if you claim that Pushcha was Yeltsin's doing. A Soviet special forces unit was there, waiting for the order to arrest this bunch. But Gorby didn't give that order. Just as he didn't give the order to arrest Yakovlev. Why do you think the hunchback started traveling the world after the collapse of the Soviet Union? It was the price he paid for his betrayal.
          1. +5
            12 March 2026 04: 07
            These half-reforms are what started to kill the economy. You obviously weren't alive back then, if you claim that Pushcha was Yeltsin's doing. A Soviet special forces unit was there, waiting for the order to arrest this bunch. But Gorby didn't give that order. Just as he didn't give the order to arrest Yakovlev.

            What reforms? There were no reforms, just slogans that allowed and justified actions aimed at the destruction of the state. And there were no shortages, just criminal actions by those responsible for trade and the sale of consumer goods to the population, which they dumped on store shelves after the introduction of "market" prices. Selfishness and unscrupulousness flourished at that time.
            1. +2
              12 March 2026 09: 12
              That's how these slogans were presented, under the guise of reform. In reality, they were destroying the established economy. They were destroying not only the economy, but also the people.
              1. +2
                12 March 2026 12: 58
                Compared to what happened under Marked, Yeltsin, and now, Gorbachev is a saint. Free troop withdrawal from Germany and prohibition are all I remember of Gorbachev's sins, but what happened after him and now is a thousand times worse. 155 dollar billionaires, all with accounts abroad, which bombs us every day.
                1. +2
                  12 March 2026 17: 31
                  If we were to begin listing Gorby's sins, it would take a long time. He's like Cain, damned for eternity. The children of the current authorities will pay for it. The law of karma.
                2. 0
                  12 March 2026 17: 56
                  Gorbachev was no better than Yeltsin, but he didn't suit the US. He was more pliable and accepted American slogans about fighting for human rights and truth. Yeltsin was more blunt, more straightforward, and unafraid of bloodshed. Therefore, when the color revolution needed a leader, the US chose Yeltsin.
          2. 0
            12 March 2026 12: 53
            He pouted. But NATO missiles weren't flying over Russia. And now?
        2. 0
          12 March 2026 12: 53
          That's right, I remember everything.
  2. -9
    11 March 2026 10: 22
    Ah, Neukropny... everything is clear...
    he stubbornly sculpts the hunchback.
    After all, all these "suddenly deceased" not only surpassed the "Old" retirement age, they would even have deflated the current, hand-picked pension fund, the "Most" one. Which is surprising for those who have lived through wars, crises, and upheavals.

    another reason entirely....
  3. +2
    11 March 2026 10: 31
    What Gorbachev or Yeltsin?!
    This is just a special case of the fact that human society has not yet matured enough to elect worthy leaders for itself.
    Whether in Europe, America or Korea...
    And even more so in Russia, a country that has experienced a change of formations like no other country.
    Sometimes you have tsarism, sometimes socialism, sometimes some incomprehensible capitalism...
    And today, has anything changed?!
    1. +7
      11 March 2026 10: 59
      And today, has anything changed?!

      Of course it has changed... Russia's enemies have taken into account their mistakes and shortcomings, and are now acting much more sophisticatedly and leisurely.
      And this unprecedented special operation of the 21st century, for the fifth year now, differs from the unprecedented special operation of the 20th century.
      1. +1
        11 March 2026 11: 05
        My message was solely about the ability of nations to choose their own leaders.
        Yes. Often they're planted deliberately. But the quality of such leaders doesn't improve.
        In Europe, no matter which Macron you poke, Lavrov's saying comes to mind.
    2. +1
      13 March 2026 09: 01
      What Gorbachev or Yeltsin?!
      This is just a special case of the fact that human society has not yet matured enough to elect worthy leaders for itself.

      Well, in the USSR there were no elections of leaders as such, only deputies were elected...
      And the leaders rose through the ranks, and then, if we follow the meaning of the article, in the early 80s the destroyers of the USSR came to power, and systematically selected candidates...
      So, such candidates as Gorbachev and Co., Yeltsin and Co. came...
      1. +2
        13 March 2026 09: 09
        To elect, to appoint, by right of inheritance, by career ladder - that's not the point.
        Elections are one of the most inaccurate, unfair, and deceptive ways to appoint leaders. Why? Because no one fully knows the people around them, much less strangers. These aren't elections, but the illusion of choice.
        Those elected are "made" by the media and their PR teams, essentially a "pig in a poke." And it makes absolutely no difference who gets elected: Trump or Biden, Gorbachev or Yeltsin, Putin or Sobyanin.
        1. +2
          13 March 2026 09: 12
          This is not an election, but an illusion of choice.
          The elected are "made" by the media and their PR teams, essentially a "pig in a poke"

          I agree, elections are a fiction, a sham, especially in our time, elections without elections...
  4. Roy
    -4
    11 March 2026 10: 55
    Gorbachev was elected General Secretary by the Communists at their plenum. Are they the main saboteurs?
    1. 0
      13 March 2026 07: 21
      Quote from Roy
      Gorbachev was elected General Secretary by the Communists at their plenum. Are they the main saboteurs?

      There were about 18 million communists in the USSR, if I'm not mistaken. Mostly Russian people... you can't label them all as saboteurs.
      So, as soon as the words "Russian people" are uttered, should we immediately fall to our knees and begin praising and singing sweet songs?
  5. +6
    11 March 2026 11: 12
    Quote from Roy
    Are they the main saboteurs?

    They were the most important, driven idiots, controlled by Western agents of influence, infiltrated into the Central Committee and Politburo, and most likely into the KGB, which screwed up all these things.

    Mikhail Gorbachev, the man who would later destroy both the CPSU and the USSR, and tens, if not hundreds of millions of human lives, albeit indirectly, was elected General Secretary...

    In that case, it is unclear why this figure still remains safely buried in such a respected place in Moscow..?
    P.S.: Don't think, guys, that I'm so completely mentally retarded that I genuinely don't understand what's clear to any passerby. I wrote this for the sake of political correctness.
  6. +5
    11 March 2026 11: 26
    Another hero of the USSR's collapse, Yeltsin, was modestly kept silent. This was a political tandem working to destroy the country. It was under Yeltsin's presidency that the independence of the RSFSR was declared on June 12, 1990. This was the beginning of the country's collapse.
  7. -3
    11 March 2026 11: 27
    Everything was predetermined: After the traitor M. Gorbachev came Gorbachev-2 – B. Yeltsin.
    And when the anti-Western Vladimir Putin took over, the Russian Federation found itself in a systemic crisis!
    Let's look not to the past, and not even to the Chinese NEP, but forward: "Who's the new guy?"
  8. +6
    11 March 2026 11: 35
    Western intelligence agencies worked efficiently and effectively in Russia during the overthrow of the autocracy. And they did the same during the collapse of the Soviet Union. In the latter case, the Jew Andropov is truly an exceptionally shady figure, and very little is known about who promoted him and how he rose to power. Indeed, it was he who unearthed the empty-headed talker, the marked Gorby, who was most likely recruited by the West along with his Raika. But who moved the gang of the alcoholic Yeltsin B.N.? After all, it was these scumbags who finished off the Soviet Union? And, at the present time, among our top brass—the so-called "elite"—there are still hundreds and thousands of this alcoholic's accomplices!
  9. +2
    11 March 2026 12: 06
    The death of Defense Minister Andrei Grechko, whose replacement was appointed by Dmitry Ustinov—a staunch ally of Andropov and later Gorbachev—appears completely inexplicable. The death of Fyodor Kulakov, Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee for Agriculture, was just too timely and of completely inexplicable causes.

    It seems inexplicable to ordinary people and to those who never intended, and never intend, to investigate. Because it was forbidden by agents of influence, both then and now.
    I just tried to figure out what they died of. It turns out, as I suspected, they all died of heart failure. At that time, the main sabotage poisons causing death from acute heart failure, undetectable in the body, and allowing for the delay before death to be determined by dosage were monofluoroacetates and monofluoroethanol.
    And, if they had so desired, it would have been easy for the intelligence services to determine, minute by minute, where and with whom the deceased individuals had been in contact during the last two days of their lives. However, for the aforementioned reason, no investigation was launched.
    1. -1
      11 March 2026 13: 41
      And everyone unanimously rejects the theory that they all died of old age. These people had lived through industrialization, a hellish war, and the incredible stress of post-war reconstruction. They were exhausted not only physically but also mentally, working constantly under extreme stress, which doesn't improve their health. But no—there were poisoners and conspirators all around.
      1. Eli
        +1
        11 March 2026 22: 17
        in a chain of "coincidences" - the chain itself is not random!!!!
        1. -1
          11 March 2026 22: 21
          Don't you find it strange that everyone eventually dies? And it's always by chance. What a chain! No one can predict the exact time of death. Even during an execution. Read Bulgakov.
  10. +6
    11 March 2026 12: 31
    Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
    They modestly kept silent about another hero of the collapse of the USSR – Yeltsin...

    They kept silent, most likely, not out of modesty, but because any discussion on this topic is utterly pointless while the current president is in power. And even then... it might not make sense either... But, this time, because of Russia's collapse.
    At least it's still possible to chew on snot about Gorbachev... But also, in terms of the possible outcome... completely useless.
    1. -1
      12 March 2026 09: 10
      Stupid descendants about stupid figures!
  11. -1
    11 March 2026 13: 16
    Nonsense. Sounds like Old Testament tales.

    There is every reason to believe that this series of seemingly unrelated deaths and personnel changes, which, when viewed objectively, form a coherent logical chain with ideal cause-and-effect relationships, were initially led by the highest-ranking representatives of the West.

    Well, that's it. Once again, they've fooled those stupid Russian sheep with their stupid, bulletproof communist ideology...? And who, the very best, the power of the workers and peasants... Knowing the Russian people, it's all very simple to explain: chaos is a natural state, not a special one; laziness and an inability to follow through; fatigue from one's own chatter, the hope that somehow, effortlessly, everything will just work out. One only has to take a sober look at this SVO; all these elements are fully present.
    1. -1
      12 March 2026 09: 08
      If you are on the side that conceived and is carrying out this SVO, with the help of thieves in stripes and the friends of the oligarchs sitting in London, then you are right!
  12. 0
    11 March 2026 13: 19
    Once again, this ridiculous excuse that Marked Mishka was an enemy spy... Let's be honest - this whole stupid idea about the economic reorganization of the USSR, by throwing out the subsidized republics and building a new, effective society, was not invented in the West, but in the Kremlin.
    The fact that the enemy took advantage of your stupidity and tripped you up does not make him the author of the event.
    1. 0
      12 March 2026 09: 05
      Did they tell you this at school, in between reading the crap scribbled by the camp cock-fighter Solzhenitsyn?
  13. 0
    11 March 2026 13: 35
    Without going into details, one might wonder which date is more terrifying: March 11, 1985, or December 31, 1999?
  14. +1
    11 March 2026 16: 44
    Quote: k7k8
    And everyone unanimously rejects the theory that they all died of old age. These people had lived through industrialization, a hellish war, and the incredible stress of post-war reconstruction. They were exhausted not only physically but also mentally, working constantly under extreme stress, which doesn't improve their health. But no—there were poisoners and conspirators all around.

    This may be somewhat applicable to ordinary people, but not to leaders on whom the fate of an entire country depends. In the event of strange coincidences, it's advisable for those tasked with being on guard to be on the alert and immediately seek the cause, lest generations pay for the consequences of so-called "mistakes" of the past, which, as history has shown, were nothing more than sabotage.
    1. -1
      11 March 2026 22: 34
      Aren't you tired of looking for a black cat in a dark room? And don't forget, more often than not, it's not there.
  15. 0
    11 March 2026 17: 12
    but I got a pizza ad) and what did you achieve?
    1. -1
      12 March 2026 09: 01
      Are you jealous? Well, at least set fire to a public toilet, maybe you'll get lucky enough to advertise used condoms for the West. You'll be lucky!
      1. -1
        12 March 2026 11: 04
        It's time to start tagging - sarcasm (
  16. -1
    11 March 2026 17: 26
    The founders and ideologists of the world's first socialist state must have overlooked something very important if such a strange event as the rise to power of a traitor occurred. Moreover, a completely legal rise, voted for by the entire Politburo of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Communism was a beautiful idea that stumbled over something strange and unexpected.
    1. -1
      13 March 2026 05: 34
      Quote: SamDurak
      .... Communism was a beautiful idea that stumbled over something strange and unexpected))

      Some dancers are even hindered by... and not just beautiful ideas. The only people who hinder the sensible are thieves and traitors. You can find the rational in any idea and discard the unnecessary. All you need is a head with real brains.

      In Russia, capitalism also stumbled, and even earlier, Christianity...
      Remind me what we haven't tripped over yet?

      In China, thanks to the CCP, even Chinese capitalists work for China.
      And in Russia, even Russian communists worked against the USSR and against Russia...

      Maybe "it wasn't the reel" that was the issue...? laughing
  17. +2
    11 March 2026 17: 36
    It’s enough to look at China (where, by the way, Gorbachev was once refused entry, as if he were infected with the bubonic plague) to understand: there was an alternative!

    Firstly, in China in 1985 the situation was completely different than in the USSR in 1985.

    At that time, China was a peasant country, on the threshold of primary industrialization and urbanization. The opportunity to exodus population from the countryside to the city is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for a country.
    China spent it on building comprador capitalism (albeit under red banners).
    The USSR spent money back in the 193s and 196s on building a military-industrial complex, and by 1985 the village had been squeezed dry and finished off by a campaign of genocide against the "unpromising" villages of the central core, on which everything rested.

    Secondly, China realized back in the late 197s that it needed to take capitalist Japan, not the USSR, as a model, and that's exactly what they did. In our country, even with all the hindsight, there are plenty of people who believe the only problem with the late USSR was that it failed to identify and execute Trotskyists and spies.

    By the way, it is not yet a fact that the Japanese-Chinese path is definitely the right one.
    1. -1
      12 March 2026 08: 58
      When a ruler lacks his own wisdom, he follows the example of others. But Russian thieves, even if they follow the Ethiopian model, are useless; they should rob the people less! Pushkin even warned of a Russian revolt, cruel and merciless, but those in the Kremlin clearly learned the wrong things, and a sad fate awaits them in the end!
  18. -2
    11 March 2026 18: 31
    Alexander Neukropny, you hold the memory of the traitor Gorbachev so dear that you decided to remember him - I condemn you!
  19. -3
    11 March 2026 18: 48
    A black day for our Motherland, Russia, an unprecedented special operation, the greatest act of sabotage of the 20th century, began with the October Revolution in 1917. It was then that the real fratricidal war began, the plunder and dismemberment of the country, the abandonment of territories, and betrayal. And what has happened since 1985 is a completely expected outcome, which could have happened sooner or later (+/- 10 years). And the "brothers" weren't brothers, just cohabitants/kept women.
    1. +3
      11 March 2026 22: 30
      You should study up on history. The October Revolution had nothing to do with the collapse of the Russian Empire. Nothing at all. Moreover, the October Revolution marked the beginning of the reassembly of Russia from the fragments left behind by the February Revolution, which was carried out by Russia's democratic parties. Even among the White émigrés, it was acknowledged that Lenin had united what remained of the empire after the "glorious democratic period" of Russian history. You, today's democrats, should bow down to Lenin, saying you can spew nonsense about a unified Russian state.
    2. -1
      12 March 2026 08: 53
      Live-in mistresses? Are you even talking about yourself, comparing them? Don't generalize, don't get political!
  20. -1
    11 March 2026 19: 41
    The 21st-century implementation operation surpassed that one. But it will be assessed later, when the casualties and destruction will be compared.
    1. +1
      11 March 2026 19: 58
      Quote: UAZ 452
      The 21st-century implementation operation surpassed that one. But it will be assessed later, when the casualties and destruction will be compared.

      This is the main difference between civil society and feudal society.
      In civil society, crimes are committed in secret. And if the secret is revealed, the crime is punished.

      But in a feudal society, crimes are committed in full view of everyone. And everyone remains silent. And then, decades later, people begin to resent them and wave their fists into the void.
      1. -1
        11 March 2026 22: 23
        Your logic is strange. It's more like hackneyed writing than logic.
  21. +2
    12 March 2026 00: 47
    You read all this and don't understand why everyone is trying to blame the problems on previous leaders: Gorbachev has been in power for 6 years, Yeltsin for 8 years, and our beloved contemporary has been leading the country for 26 years already, and we are looking for problems in history, or whether this is an order from the current government - the stupid one.
  22. 0
    12 March 2026 03: 39
    It's all nonsense. It's just that the USSR's elite, having traveled the West, also wanted to live a rich life. After all, most of them came from the workers and peasants or the Soviet intelligentsia. And then there are the billionaires... They wanted it too. And the destruction of the USSR is collateral damage. They didn't mean to, it just happened that way... Sort of.
    1. +1
      13 March 2026 13: 36
      Quote: Avtandil
      After all, most of them came from the workers and peasants or the Soviet intelligentsia. And here we have billionaires.

      Not just the "elite." To be honest, in the "country of workers and peasants," no one wanted to be a worker or a peasant. What kind of labor movement can there be if no one wants to be a worker? In the West, there might be one, in the East, maybe; in Russia, there isn't and never will be.
      And today's Russian youth is simply sickened by the prospect of becoming workers. This is a fatal disease of a society that, until relatively recently, endured for far too long not just serfdom, but the horrors of serfdom. This right, in fact, is still alive and well, in the real relationships between subordinates and superiors.
      1. -1
        13 March 2026 19: 19
        Back when people were allowed to travel abroad, I happened to be in Finland. And I was surprised that a capitalist country has many more sculptures and monuments honoring working people. Here, monuments are mostly either to soldiers or to leaders (there are thousands upon thousands of Ilyichs alone). And even if there is a monument to working people, it's something like the "Worker and Kolkhoz Woman" near VDNKh—an allegory of sorts, the main message being the sculptures, fire in their eyes, threatening someone with sharp, heavy iron objects... What does labor have to do with all this?
        So, even in those days, in the legendary first decades of the USSR, working people were only interested in power "wholesale," not individually. But our leaders didn't forget to erect monuments to themselves, their beloved selves, and rename cities in their honor, even during their lifetimes. Such was the country of workers and peasants...
        1. +1
          14 March 2026 09: 27
          Quote: UAZ 452
          ...
          So, even in those days, in the legendary first decades of the USSR, working people were only interested in power "wholesale," not individually. But our leaders didn't forget to erect monuments to themselves, their beloved selves...

          But they were still interested, albeit in bulk. Thanks to the bosses for that.
          And today the interest has clearly changed from + to -...
          These days, all they care about is money. And the Russians are a nuisance here. Tough luck!
          1. 0
            14 March 2026 11: 01
            You're wrong. Just a few years ago, when the population was seen as an annoying nuisance with whom they had to share oil and gas revenues, that was true. Now that this source has dried up, those at the top have remembered that money can be extracted from these same populations. So, working people have once again become interesting. And wholesale, too. As a source of profit for the masters of this world. Clearly, this only applies to those who can provide them with this profit, but for the rest... Pensioners will have to rapidly die out, amidst the ongoing chatter about steadily increasing pensions (below the actual inflation rate) and developing healthcare (from which doctors are fleeing due to paltry salaries). And those who haven't yet reached retirement age, but haven't yet fit into the market, and are of little interest to the masters as workers, will be subject to a couple more waves of mobilization, followed by mutual squabbling over those who "didn't fit" into the new world order from Ukraine.
            So our rulers are interested in people; they have a scenario for everyone, and they won't forget anyone. Even if we wanted them to.
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. 0
              14 March 2026 12: 02
              Quote: UAZ 452
              This is you in vain ....
              So our rulers are interested in people; they have a scenario for everyone, and they won't forget anyone. Even if we wanted them to.

              And I didn’t write that they weren’t interesting.
              I'm saying that the sign of interest in people has changed from + to -. Because now money rules everything.
              In the USSR, the Russian population grew, and the standard of living always rose in peacetime. Whether wholesale or retail. This is why, in the 80s, both the people and the leaders went nuts...they started craving wealth, like in America.
              From 1991 to the present, it's been the other way around. And since every nation is the creator of its own history, it's not the imperialists or the migrant workers who are to blame, but the Russians themselves. Under the same conditions, the migrant workers are multiplying successfully and sending their money home.
  23. -4
    12 March 2026 03: 47
    Quote: Ales
    You read all this and don't understand why everyone is trying to blame the problems on previous leaders: Gorbachev has been in power for 6 years, Yeltsin for 8 years, and our beloved contemporary has been leading the country for 26 years already, and we are looking for problems in history, or whether this is an order from the current government - the stupid one.

    Ales! Putin pulled the country out of the grave it was already in. I remember 1999, when everyone was wondering if Russia would collapse in a month or six months. So stop talking! You need to work hard for the good of your family and your country. And never again allow or elect scum like the Gorbeltsins!
    1. +2
      12 March 2026 08: 49
      Who's going to ask you who to choose when you've already chosen your own idol, a pathetic, perpetual debtor, a haspadin, working for their motherland, the Russian Federation, and racking up debts that even your children won't be able to repay! I'll tell you a secret, we don't even have the equipment to fight, volunteers are collecting money from old ladies to build drones. I didn't even look at what our guys drove into Kupyansk on—look it up, it's online. The entire military-industrial complex is in the hands of oligarchs living abroad, while over a hundred dollar billionaires have arrived here during the Second World War!
    2. 0
      13 March 2026 09: 35
      Putin pulled the country out of the grave it had two feet in.

      Maybe he pulled us out, but not completely. We've been stuck in place for 26 years, with no development and no prospects in sight... We've also remained a raw materials appendage, industry isn't developing, the demographic crisis will worsen, the population is getting poorer, but the number of billionaires keeps growing every year...
    3. 0
      13 March 2026 19: 25
      And never again allow or choose scum like the Gorbeltsins!

      How good it is that Vladimir Vladimirovich removed Yeltsin from power! Just imagine what would have happened if Yeltsin had handed over power to his chosen successor! After all, successors are usually chosen to be just like themselves—it's an axiom!
  24. -2
    12 March 2026 08: 41
    Judas! Throw his bones out of the grave and Raika in the trash. Even stray dogs won't eat them, they'll just shit on them! I read about Gorbachev, a kid during the war, being occupied and running to the local German commandant's office. They treated him to candy and did everything they could to him. After that, they hanged Komsomol members, communists, and relatives of our Red Army officers and partisans in the village—that's what the villagers said when our army arrived! The question is: who even got this... into power? The fish rotted from the head down and is still rotting under Vlasov's rag! The Soviet people and ordinary communists did not destroy the country and betray it under the guise of "keep calm and Swan Lake." It was the traitorous party bureaucrats who perked up at the sight of Khrushchev-Perlmutter, and now the former St. Petersburg thieves' cooperative "Ozero" is in charge!
    1. 0
      13 March 2026 19: 36
      Every nation deserves its leader. And the entire nation is responsible for the actions of its leader; no one has ever succeeded in jumping off, nor will they ever. If the leader lemming chooses the path to the precipice, all the "ordinary" lemmings will be shattered. But in heaven (or anywhere else), they can console themselves with the thought that they were not to blame; self-consolation is not forbidden.
  25. +3
    12 March 2026 13: 58
    Quote: Avtandil
    They didn't mean to, it just happened that way... Sort of.

    In Russia, since Gorbachev, the consequences of any leader's rule have been explained by the formula, "We didn't mean it, but it happened that way." Where and why such a cover-up was invented is something everyone can easily answer for themselves.
  26. 0
    April 1 2026 09: 47
    After only a year, Gorbachov is still in power in Russia.
  27. 0
    April 7 2026 08: 37
    Why bother delving into all sorts of "expired" material? If it's really necessary, the first question is: why weren't there such traitors and wreckers before? It's worth noting that there were "Trotskyists," "Zinovievists," "Bukharinists," and so on. :)), but they were all "shooters" who orchestrated it. :)). Consequently, the party itself burned out. The funniest thing is that Lenin pointed out the reason for this possibility; it's all written down... Here, everyone keeps calling him an "intemperate debater." :)). You'd go wild with such "soft-heads." It's obvious that the entire previous party system is now discredited—it doesn't actually ensure the reproduction and maintenance of "ideological and class consciousness." All of today's KPRF members are sectarian shills, whether they realize it or not... The previous approach to the essence of the communist idea has been ineptly thwarted; a new one is possible, but we need to work on it...
  28. +1
    April 9 2026 04: 29
    May Gorbachev be damned forever and ever! May he burn in hell!