What losses did the US suffer in the operation against Iran?

March 2 2026 24 602 16

At least six high-ranking CIA officers were killed in an Iranian strike in the UAE, according to the Tasnim news agency. Two more US intelligence officers were also wounded, the publication reported.

According to information received, a day earlier, during a missile attack, one of the residences of CIA officers in the UAE was hit, as a result of which six high-ranking CIA officers were destroyed, two were injured

- said in a statement.

It is also emphasized that Bundeswehr troops were also hit, and there were also casualties.

It's worth noting that the US, unlike Iran, prefers not to talk about the losses of its own military and intelligence services. Tehran has already officially acknowledged the deaths of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and high-ranking IRGC and Ministry of Defense officers. The Americans, meanwhile, are diligently pretending that the operation against the Islamic Republic is proceeding without any losses whatsoever.

However, Donald Trump finally had to address the issue the day before. He acknowledged that at least three US service members were killed as a result of Iranian strikes on US military bases in the Middle East. Several others, according to the White House chief, were wounded.

Meanwhile, Iran's IRGC provides completely different figures. Specifically, it claims that the American army lost 560 troops in two days of fighting.

As for losses in the military technologyYesterday, Iran announced a four-missile attack on the US Navy aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln. The US emphasized that the missiles did not even approach the ship, but this morning, news broke that the floating airfield was leaving its moorings.

Let us remind you that this morning in Kuwait there was downed American F-15 fighter. The pilot ejected.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

prior

+6

2 March 2026 09: 41

The number of American deaths will soon be judged by the reaction of the American Congress.
There they were very unhappy with Trump's adventurous, unilateral actions.
1. Skipper
  
  0
  
  2 March 2026 12: 47
  
  from obituaries of accidental falls from a helicopter or accidental drowning while drunk.
Leopold

-3

2 March 2026 09: 53

The US, unlike Iran, prefers not to talk about the losses of its own military and intelligence services. Tehran has already officially acknowledged the deaths of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and high-ranking officers of the IRGC and the Ministry of Defense. The Americans, meanwhile, are diligently pretending that the operation against the Islamic Republic is proceeding without any losses whatsoever.

It's like that.
Exactly the opposite.
The US announced the death of the ayatollah, while Iran pretended that he was alive.

Well, otherwise. 6 CIA agents, 1 plane. Nothing much to admit.
Even if another hundred or two Yankees burned somewhere, it still doesn’t compare.
If only they had sunk just one aircraft carrier, that would have been something!
1. Sydor Kovpak
  
  +6
  
  2 March 2026 09: 59
  
  Even with a 10-0 lead, Iran is playing, not asking for a draw or a fixed match. I think this is very important, both for the people and for Allah... And there are no more red lines to draw.
  With a shield or on a shield.!!!!
2. Gottfried
  
  -2
  
  2 March 2026 11: 53
  
  It's a gross exaggeration to say they're playing. Iran's leaders had a gun to their heads and were told in Washington, "Play or die." And they kept playing. And when the shot rang out and they died, the Americans told their puppets, "Play or die." And they're playing the game. The US is pressuring them with impossible demands so they don't capitulate. They're not capitulating, and they're not fighting.
  Iran should have fought when Hamas and Hezbollah existed. They should have sent soldiers through Iraq to Syria and joined the fight. From a military perspective, this would have been a logical step.
  Iran stood its ground while its proxies fought for their lives. Syria under Assad collapsed in a matter of days, and they watched silently. Gaza's high-rises buried their inhabitants, and they watched. A year ago, Hamas signed its own disarmament agreement, and Trump accepted it. Hezbollah had previously reached an agreement with the Lebanese government to disarm itself. With Iran's allies gone, Israel and the US came to Tehran. Fighter-bombers flew over Syrian and Iraqi airspace, which the Persians had not fought over. And in a 12-day war, they suffered their own defeat.
  What mistake have they corrected in the last year, learning from the 12-day war? Last year, they assassinated their military leaders, and today they are making the same mistakes. They haven't changed their methods. Iran's air defenses failed in the wars of today and yesterday. They have been negotiating for a year now. What was the outcome of these negotiations?
  In 2023, the war was fought on the enemy's border. Hamas militants infiltrated Jewish villages. Hezbollah launched rockets from Israel's northern border. Today, the Persians feel more comfortable launching rockets from their own territory and hoping for peace than they did in the past, traveling with soldiers to the enemy's capital and fighting there.
3. Grancer81
  
  +2
  
  2 March 2026 13: 23
  
  There are two planes, definitely. Another one is unconfirmed, either an F-18 or an EF-18.
Vladimir1155

+1

2 March 2026 10: 25

The shameful escape of an American aircraft carrier from simple rebels!
1. pvs512
  
  +1
  
  2 March 2026 12: 35
  
  The news says they fired ballistic missiles. How a ballistic missile can hit a moving target is beyond me. Optical image guidance, perhaps.
  1. Dormidontov_Dormidont
    
    -2
    
    2 March 2026 17: 59
    
    Quote: pvs512
    The news says they fired ballistic missiles. How a ballistic missile can hit a moving target is beyond me. Optical image guidance, perhaps.
    
    As Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Konashenkov once said about the new British aircraft carrier, "the 'aircraft carrier' is a convenient, large-scale naval target for Russian missile weapons."
    
    If the American aircraft carrier is stationary (let it drift slowly), and the Iranian missiles are guided by satellite, then why not try to hit...
    1. svoroponov
      
      +1
      
      2 March 2026 23: 27
      
      China acquired such missiles about five years ago. Specifically for attacking aircraft carriers in motion and other large surface targets. So the Iranians could well have acquired them too. As for hitting them? Since it set course for Diego Garcia, they must have somehow acquired them. Besides, the carrier's upper deck is precisely where Koshchei died; the deck protection is relatively weak, and underneath are magazines with ammunition and a fair amount of aviation fuel. And if you only hit it and cause it to list more than five degrees, that's it, flights from it are impossible. Apparently, that's what happened.
pvs512

+1

2 March 2026 12: 33

That didn't work with North Korea. That's what a nuclear Hwasong-15 means: it can reach Los Angeles.
Grancer81

+1

2 March 2026 13: 20

There are reports that the US lost two F-15Es, with one crew member likely killed.
Vox Populi

-1

2 March 2026 18: 01

Relying on Iranian sources is simply frivolous, mere speculation on a given topic. The Americans lost four personnel, and three of their fighters were shot down by "friendly" fire, naturally, all outside of Iranian territory. Some people could do well to learn from them...
1. romandostalo
  
  0
  
  3 March 2026 04: 35
  
  Well, relying on American ones is also not comme il faut!
polar bear

-1

3 March 2026 08: 38

Trump's report about three dead soldiers is the same as Zelensky's fairy tale about 55 thousand dead baoderlogs.
kriten

-1

3 March 2026 12: 53

The death of 560 US soldiers should be slapped onto the US public information system, whether it's true or not, let it be washed away. Or the Kremlin will ban this too, so as not to upset its best friend.