What are the risks for the US from the launch of the updated Su-57 fighter jet?

21 332 26

Russian troops have received another batch of fifth-generation Su-57 fighters with a new technical design. Meanwhile, Russian fighters were spotted in Algeria, and they will soon appear in the Middle East.

New technical The Su-57's appearance suggests upgraded onboard systems and weapons suite. In particular, observers noted the 101 KS-U module, which provides 360-degree ultraviolet (UV) surveillance. This allows for automatic threat detection and proactive countermeasures.



Footage of a Russian Su-57 fighter jet flying over Algeria, circulated online, provides further indirect confirmation of the information that Russia sold its first batch of such aircraft to that country last year. This is not surprising, as Algeria is a traditional buyer of Russian military equipment.

However, the US has already stated that it may impose sanctions on Algeria for purchasing Russian aircraft. Moscow, however, is unfazed by such statements, as all potential buyers who fear the Americans have long since severed all trade ties with Russia.

However, there are plenty of countries in the world that aren't afraid of the United States. And they're showing genuine interest in Russian weapons. Specifically, the first contracts for the supply of Su-57 fighter jets to the Middle East have already been signed. Although the buyer's details have not yet been disclosed, experts suspect Iran.

The fact is that the Islamic Republic's Air Force fleet is long outdated. Now, according to Western media reports, Tehran intends to purchase 48 Su-35S fighters and an unspecified number of Su-57 fighters from Russia. This, it has been noted, is an open challenge to the United States.

US Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Daryl Codel recently called for accelerating the development of the new F/A-XX carrier-based stealth fighter. He stated that the US Navy's primary F-18 fighters will no longer be able to operate freely in Iranian airspace within a few years due to the country's strengthened air defenses.

According to the military commander, China and Russia are sharing their technologies with anti-American forces, so there's no time to waste. The problem, however, is that the US has been discussing the need for a sixth-generation fighter, the F/A-XX, to replace the F-18 and complement the F-35 since 2008. But the funding for its development has never been found. And this year, the project appears to have been put on the back burner, with priority given to the development of another sixth-generation aircraft, the F-47.

Thus, the Americans are seriously concerned about Russia's ability to deploy Su-57s to the Middle East, which, by their own admission, have the potential to provide air superiority, thanks in part to their extensive combat experience, including suppression of air defenses, air combat, and operations in well-defended enemy airspace. This, in the United States' view, would be nothing less than a disruption of the balance of power in the region. And given that there are other buyers for the Su-57, the Americans' concerns become entirely understandable.

Analysts estimate that Ethiopia is another likely buyer of the Su-57. Its air force consists almost entirely of Soviet and Russian aircraft. Relations between Russia and Ethiopia are currently developing rapidly. Russia plans to build a nuclear power plant, a large aluminum smelter, and establish automotive production there.

Western analysts also suggest that the Su-57 will be delivered to Vietnam and North Korea, and plans for joint production with India have been reported several times.

For the Russian Federation these are very good news, since exports allow us to develop our own industry and create new weapons. It's no wonder the US is so actively pushing for sales of its products worldwide, trying to suppress competitors with sanctions.

However, the key to this story is the fact that Russia has overcome the difficulties of launching truly mass production of aircraft and has moved on to supplying its first large batches to its own troops, and is even building aircraft for export. There is simply no other country in the world today that could handle such a challenge alone.

26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -4
    18 February 2026 12: 45
    Most likely, nothing. They could easily disrupt Russian exports with threats.
    1. -1
      20 February 2026 12: 49
      Well, Russia is the world's second-largest arms supplier. Why hasn't it been thwarted yet?
  2. -2
    18 February 2026 14: 01
    As long as Moscow operates a covert American colonial administration, Russia will benefit from it. In conflicts fueled by the US, where the Russian people serve as its "fodder," the use of new technologies will only increase the budget of the American military-industrial complex.
  3. 0
    18 February 2026 15: 04
    What threat could there be from 10-20 aircraft? It’s a drop in the ocean from what’s needed.
  4. +3
    18 February 2026 15: 39
    Absolutely nothing.
  5. 0
    18 February 2026 19: 45
    What are the risks for the US from the launch of the updated Su-57 fighter jet?

    There is no threat not only in the near term, but also in the medium term, and most likely in the long term as well...
  6. +4
    18 February 2026 23: 02
    Let's briefly answer the article's title: There's absolutely no threat whatsoever.
  7. +2
    19 February 2026 00: 34
    We need to have many more Su-57s in our Aerospace Forces; 70-80 aircraft is too few to threaten the US. We need to have at least 380-400 of these aircraft, in which case they will truly have a significant impact in the confrontation with NATO.
    1. -3
      20 February 2026 12: 58
      Tell me, why bother with 300-400 Su-57s? It's a very specific aircraft, whose main advantage is so-called stealth technology. Therefore, it performs very specific tasks: reconnaissance, target assignment, destroying air defense systems, and destroying aircraft. Its internal compartments only hold so much air-to-air and air-to-surface weapons. If its strike power were to be increased, the weapons would have to be mounted externally, which would deprive it of its main advantage—invisibility. Moreover, the Su-34 and Su-35 are also available for strike missions, which are correspondingly cheaper. So, following the Americans' path and fishing with a golden hook is hardly advisable.
      1. +1
        20 February 2026 14: 13
        It's a strange way you reason. Why don't the Americans think this way and replace all their 4th generation fighters with 5th generation ones? Everyone knows that NATO has a multiple numerical advantage in combat aviation, and in order not to lose the battle for the skies, we need to neutralize this superiority as much as possible. What can 80-100 of our Su-57s do with at least 800-1000 NATO F-35s? I think the answer is clear to everyone in advance.
        1. -1
          20 February 2026 14: 52
          Well, it's not just the Su-57 that will fight the F-35. But also the Su-35 and Su-30. As well as the S-350 and S-400. As you can see from the example, the Air Defense Forces can and does have a say in the conflict. I'm simply against any imbalance in this direction. And unlike the US, Russia has to earn money to invest in building a new aircraft, while the US has to print it. Do you see the difference? So, it seems to me that instead of producing 500 Su-57s, it would be better to produce 100 Su-57s, 300 Su-34s, and 300 Su-35s. Basically, more good and diverse aircraft.
        2. -1
          23 February 2026 08: 15
          Chasing NATO alone is useless.
  8. 0
    19 February 2026 01: 46
    What the... are we selling a top-secret aircraft we so desperately need, and during a war, no less?! Have we already saturated our army with them? We already have at least 500 of them? Americans they laugh and rejoice!
    And, my God, what are Ethiopia up to? They've been climbing out of their palm trees for three days! What do they need a super-modern plane for? To sell our secrets to the Americans for pennies?!
    "Our" hucksters are constantly trying to sell the Indians a license, and even build an aircraft manufacturing plant! We're creating our own competition with our own hands! And what if we expand our own capacity, create new factories with jobs, and improve the lives of Russian workers?! And don't tell us that the Indians will assemble screwdrivers and our 57s in large components, and that it's profitable for us. Yeah, right. Is that why they demand a license and the transfer of top-secret technologies? And we'll literally get rich from royalties on every plane they sell? Who, the workers who won't work in our factories that haven't been built?!
    Thank God the Indians are screwing us over with this deal!
    1. -1
      20 February 2026 13: 04
      The aircraft is exported, like all weapons, with significantly reduced performance. Sometimes these are significantly reduced (the range of the Yakhont, for example, is only 300 km, compared to 800 for the Onyx). Well, no one is transferring combat aircraft technology to the Indians, which is why they chose the Rafale. But civilian aircraft—that's true. That's why they signed a contract to produce the Superjet in India.
      1. -1
        20 February 2026 14: 02
        That's just theory, but do you know how much they're cutting back on a top-secret aircraft for export, something about which nothing much is known anyway? The Indians had a lot of demands! Everyone knows these general assumptions, but only a few know what the reality is.
        And for now (for now!) they have refused ours not because they were not given the technology (“ours” have already agreed to this!), but because they were afraid of the shout of the Anglo-Saxon master!
        And besides, civilian technology isn't even a thing, so go ahead and take it! Especially since what kind of contract is there for the Super Jet ("an excellent name for a Russian aircraft!") if it's not even being produced here yet, hasn't been fully imported yet, the engines aren't ready, and it hasn't even passed all the tests!
        1. -1
          20 February 2026 14: 43
          Well, hello, here we go. The Superjet is already undergoing certification tests with the new PD-8 engine.
          The Rostec State Corporation expects to complete certification of the import-substituting SJ-100 aircraft in the first half of 2026.

          After this, active deliveries are planned to begin: 12 new aircraft of this model are expected to be delivered to airlines by 2026. Rostec CEO Sergei Chemezov announced this to journalists.
          The Tu-214 and Il-114 were certified back in December 25. So the contract with the Indians wasn't signed out of nowhere.
          As for the Su-57E, the US is selling its F-35. Why can't we?
          1. 0
            21 February 2026 13: 08
            Plans, plans... How many of them do we see every year? We've been scribbling plans for the Baikal alone for 15 years now. Now tell me about those 22-year-old plans for 1000 aircraft by 2030! Well, if Chemezov himself said so, then yes, it's God himself speaking! And then there's that hoarse-voiced Manturov, always declaring that they didn't send it? Where are the aircraft, where are the mass production and flights? Where is the mass production of the engines for them? When that happens, then "the contract wasn't signed out of nowhere." Don't say hop until you've jumped!
            And what's unclear to you about what I said, what don't you agree with? "It hasn't passed ALL the tests," when you yourself write, "It's already undergoing certification tests." Or do you think it's already passed them and is rolling off the assembly line by the dozens?
            Well, the example about selling the F-35 exclusively to its own servants, who also participated in its creation and paid for its development, is completely foolish. The US doesn't sell it to shady countries, certainly not to friends and servants who might pass on their technology to us!
            1. -2
              24 February 2026 11: 58
              Do you realize that after 90, our entire aviation industry had to be rebuilt from scratch? Do you realize that the development, production, and testing of new aircraft engines alone takes years of work, and only five countries in the world are capable of doing so? Do you realize that import substitution for just one composite wing for the MS-21, for example, forced us to create our own technologies (including investing a huge amount of money and effort into their scientific development), along with extensive testing and production. The strict sanctions that forced these challenges on Russia were adopted in 22. Since 2014, imported components have been arriving, albeit at best. And now, to create aircraft winglets entirely from domestically produced parts in four years is, in my opinion, a remarkable feat. And accomplished within a compressed timeframe.
              It's also worth noting that Russia faced more pressing challenges. The development of hypersonic weapons, the Su-57, SSBNs, space reconnaissance satellites, the S-400 and S-500. And let's not forget the Burevestnik and Posedon missiles. And Russia, unlike the United States, doesn't print money. So the funds had to be found and allocated. And the economic collapse due to sanctions had to be avoided. The scale of the effort is, to put it mildly, impressive.
              According to Chemezov, the Superjet needs to make 130 flights to receive certification. It recently underwent testing in Vorkuta for operation in icing conditions. It passed these tests successfully. And the majority of flights have been completed—in fact, they are in the final stretch. It's important to note that the Superjet 100 isn't the only aircraft in Russia in the narrow-body short-haul segment. The Tu-214 is in the same niche. It has a longer range (up to 6500 km, compared to the Superjet's 4600) and can carry over 200 passengers, compared to just over 100 for the Jet. And, as I noted above, it passed BME testing and received certification in December 2025, and its launch into production is a matter of the coming months. So, first it, and then, in the second half, the Jets will displace Boeings and Airbuses from the Russian market.
              Moreover, the Jet production technology has been transferred to India, and it is unknown how India will pay for the patent.
              Perhaps some of the produced planes will be sent to Russia as payment for the patent. Then their rarity will grow even faster.
              As for the Su-57E, what "bookmarks" they left there are still open to question. What engine will it be supplied with? Most likely, not a new one. So I see no reason to worry. Again, the export version is significantly inferior to the original in terms of performance.
    2. +1
      20 February 2026 14: 18
      I completely agree, the Americans still haven't sold their F-22 to anyone, even for big money; national security and defense capability are more important than any amount of money.
  9. 0
    19 February 2026 22: 16
    This is a magnificent fighter. Algeria has already acquired one, and its numbers continue to grow.
  10. +1
    22 February 2026 15: 54
    Ethiopia: What will they pay with? Coffee or women?
    1. 0
      22 February 2026 18: 20
      As always, it's a debt that will be written off in 20 years. Well, maybe they'll pay the interest with something else. Until then, they'll send their little black kids to study here for free! So yeah, they'll practically pay it off with women.
  11. -1
    27 February 2026 09: 48
    Is the Su-57 really capable of flying to the USA?!
    Then how can he threaten America?
    1. -1
      27 February 2026 10: 35
      Quote: prior
      Is the Su-57 really capable of flying to the USA?!
      Then how can he threaten America?

      It threatens to break the mold in the minds of Ukrainian propagandists. And to explode their asses.
      1. -1
        27 February 2026 10: 53
        If you have an ass instead of a head, you see Ukrainian propagandists everywhere.
  12. 0
    3 March 2026 09: 32
    I never saw the most important thing—the engine. If this applies to exports, then screw it, but I'm afraid it's the same for us.