Riot in France: Macron received a "black mark"

3
Young and energetic Emmanuel Macron triumphantly won the election in May 2017 and became the French president. He immediately showed himself to be a bold and independent politician, aspiring to leadership in the European Union. He had high hopes both in France and abroad.





If on the world stage he managed to gain a certain authority, then in his country he restored against himself virtually all sections of the population.

What Macron did not please the French

Over the 10 months of his reign, the new president made a number of unpopular decisions that caused a storm of discontent among the inhabitants of the country.

Already in September last year, mass demonstrations were held in Paris against amendments to the Labor Code that infringe on the interests of workers.

In February, Macron diverted farmers from himself by his decision to significantly reduce EU subsidies in agriculture, and to use the released funds to create a pan-European armed forces. Not a single French president dared to infringe on the rights of small and medium landowners, the backbone of the French nation. To avoid the farmers coming to Paris, he invited thousands of protesters to negotiate.

And last week, retirees protested in France. The French, like most Western European peoples, are an aging nation, so there are many elderly people in France. But they are actively participating in the elections. On the part of Macron, it was reckless to annoy the 15 millionth army of politically active people with a lot of free time.

The elderly French were outraged by some innovations, some of which did not even concern them directly. Pensioners were especially outraged by the increase in taxes for ordinary people while reducing them for corporations and oligarchs.

Macron managed to rally representatives of various professions: physicians, railway workers, teachers, air traffic controllers. They are united by the fact that they are all civil servants. Previously, these people were considered a privileged caste, having a lot of advantages over employees of private companies. But that all changed with the advent of Macron.

Not only was there a massive reduction without compensation, their contracts were also replaced by temporary employment contracts. This design makes the employee socially vulnerable to the employer.

Mass protests

On March 22, seven French unions went on strike. During it, flights and trains were canceled, schools closed. It is planned that the strike will last quite a long time. For example, railway workers plan to go on strike until June 28.

The strike was timed to coincide with the 50th anniversary of strikes and street battles in Paris. Then, after the unrest of 1968, the great Charles de Gaulle had to leave his post. Such parallels should make the incumbent French president think about his future.

Already, the capital of France begins to resemble Paris of the 1968 model. On its streets you can already see, as then, smoke bombs, broken shop windows and car windows, policemen dispersing protesters with batons and tear gas.

I think some elderly Parisians, having seen this, remembered their stormy youth.
3 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    27 March 2018 08: 21
    Yes, the French had a great labor code. Previously, it was practically impossible to fire a Frenchman from public service. With any dismissal, there must be a decision by the tripartite commission that this dismissal is necessary. Upon dismissal, the following was paid: a three-month salary, plus length of service (up to 7 monthly salaries), plus 75-95% of the annual salary was paid, and even if there was a "ban on the profession" (for health reasons, the inability to find such a profession at the place of residence, etc.), then retraining was paid. Now it all flew away to nowhere. Now the so-called "international" rules have been adopted, that is, the dismissal is carried out only with the notification of the trade union and the protest of its legality in the usual court order (if the dismissed has such a desire and money for the trial). Upon dismissal, only 3 months' wages are paid. The length of service is replaced by a dismissal allowance, depending on the hours worked and age, and this amount depends on the capabilities and desires of a particular employer (length of service is generally removed as a concept, since the contract is now not permanent, but annual with prolongation) and .... everything. The motivation for these changes is interesting. This was allegedly done in response to the “numerous complaints” of migrants who complained about discrimination in their labor contracts (“international” type) compared to “French” ones. And now all the contracts have led to the same "denominator". Migrants are probably "happy" now, yeah.
    1. +2
      27 March 2018 15: 02
      Yes, with such reforms, he can play out. At least for the next term he will definitely not be re-elected, or maybe he will have to leave earlier.
  2. +1
    April 1 2018 22: 04
    I look at the elections in different countries and am surprised. For some reason, they vote not for those who have done at least something in this life, but for those who promised more. It is also bad that without money it is simply impossible for an ordinary person (even seven inches in the forehead) to run, which means that you need to attract a "bag of money", which means this is already deliberate corruption.
    Macron will still show itself. France with the filing of the United States enters its troops in Syria.
    Let's see what happens. After all, this is a clash with Turkey. Some beat the Kurds, others will protect them, because this is a protectorate of the United States. We are waiting.