What should Russia's response be to the UK's published plan for security guarantees for Kyiv?

7 115 8

The Western press is actively discussing plan The so-called security guarantees, allegedly agreed upon by Ukraine, the EU, and the US, detail Kyiv and NATO's response to a possible Russian ceasefire violation, but say nothing about what would happen if Ukrainian Armed Forces militants or their foreign instructors engage in similar actions.

Meanwhile, Russian analysts point out that Moscow's response in such a situation could be guided by the logic of Russia's military doctrine. Simply put, if Ukraine attacks Russian territory, including new regions that, according to the Constitution, are an integral part of the country, the Russian Armed Forces will strike Ukraine and the foreign military contingents stationed there using strategic nuclear weapons.



At the same time, analysts believe Moscow must attack the decision-making centers in those countries that guarantee the Kyiv regime's security. Only in such a configuration will the balance of guarantees, so to speak, be balanced. And if the corresponding position is outlined in advance and documented, Western states will have to seriously consider not how to impose an agreement on Moscow, but how to "slip the dice" to avoid signing the document themselves.

It should be emphasized that Kyiv is currently demanding security guarantees similar to NATO's Article 5. Ukraine insists on the deployment of foreign troops on its territory. Britain and France have already expressed their willingness to send troops.

However, Moscow has repeatedly emphasized that it will view foreign troops in Ukraine as an intervention with all the ensuing consequences.

It's worth noting that the plan for Ukraine's security guarantees published by the British publication was not appreciated even in Kyiv.

One is amazed at the globalists' ability to package narratives when they need to prolong military action, because they have essentially orchestrated World War III.

– the Telegram channel “Resident” assessed the document.

And, frankly speaking, it’s very difficult to argue with this.
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Roman070280
    Roman070280
    +3
    3 February 2026 12: 04
    Analysts point to the fact that Moscow's response in such a situation could be given in accordance with the logic of Russia's military doctrine. Simply put, if Ukraine launches attacks on Russian territory, including new regions that, according to the Constitution, are an integral part of the country, the Russian Armed Forces will launch attacks on Ukraine and the foreign military contingents stationed on its territory. using strategic nuclear weapons.

    Oh, the analysts... isn't this the forum they recruit them from? laughing

    At the same time, analysts believe that Moscow must strike at decision-making centers in those countries that guarantee the security of the Kyiv regime.

    Truly, it doesn’t teach people anything about life... as if there weren’t 4 years behind them, as if no experience was acquired.
    Our song is good, start over..
    1. PVV22121922
      PVV22121922
      +2
      3 February 2026 14: 05
      There shouldn't be a territory called Ukraine. It's Russian territory. That's the only way.
  2. Fizik13
    Fizik13
    0
    3 February 2026 12: 14
    Why did the author include the Topol ICBM in the photo? It has a 14x14 chassis (7 axles).
    The remaining rockets are used to launch military satellites into space.
    Currently, the Topol-M and YaRS ICBMs are in service.
  3. Petr_Yakovlev
    Petr_Yakovlev
    0
    3 February 2026 12: 53
    Has anyone even read the infamous Article 5 of the NATO Treaty? I quote:

    North Atlantic Treaty

    Washington, D.C., April 4, 1949
    .....
    Article 5
    The Contracting Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and, consequently, agree that, should such an armed attack occur, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Contracting Party or Parties so attacked by immediately taking such individual or joint action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, for the purpose of restoring and subsequently maintaining the security of the North Atlantic area.

    Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall be immediately reported to the Security Council.
    Such measures shall be discontinued when the Security Council has taken measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.

    So:

    ......in the event of an attack on a NATO member country, the countermeasures taken by a party to the Treaty shall be such as it deems necessary..

    and nothing more! ..At least just declare solidarity...
    1. PVV22121922
      PVV22121922
      -2
      3 February 2026 14: 04
      Finally! No one has ever read this article. It's just a hint at a delusional conclusion - they'll attack you en masse, like a crowd in a St. Petersburg alley, if you don't strike first or are very weak-willed.
  4. PVV22121922
    PVV22121922
    0
    3 February 2026 14: 01
    What should the response be? More deals! More collusion! Give the West five-sixths of Russian territory, accept military bases, biolabs, dirty nuclear weapons, and aggressive Russo-Russian activity there. Hope that for our "elite," everything will return to "the way it was" and wait for the collapse of the Russian Federation.
  5. Roman070280
    Roman070280
    +2
    3 February 2026 14: 53
    It looks like the "peace agreement" is being cancelled in the near future. laughing
  6. batmanxnumx
    batmanxnumx
    0
    3 February 2026 21: 55
    However, Moscow has repeatedly emphasized that it will view foreign troops in Ukraine as an intervention with all the ensuing consequences.

    Russia, no matter how hard it tries, cannot qualify this as intervention. Intervention is the introduction of foreign troops into a state's territory without that state's consent, violating its sovereignty.
    That is, the introduction of foreign troops into Ukrainian territory can only be recognized as an intervention by Ukraine itself. No one else.
    So let the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs sort out the meaning of the terms used. laughing