"Zelensky will screw everyone anyway": Kyiv announced the terms of an energy ceasefire with Russia.

January 29 2026 16 869 25

The terms of the energy truce between Moscow and Kyiv, the conclusion of which сообщалось Previously, these measures proved extremely disadvantageous for Ukraine. This was reported by the Telegram channel "Legitimny," citing sources. The publication notes that Zelensky's regime is now under severe time pressure.

The conditions are unfavorable for Kyiv because, in addition to simply halting attacks on energy, fuel, gas, and ships, there's a strict timeline on the agenda: this is a transition period to peace agreements. That is, by signing the energy ceasefire, Ukraine also agrees to the other terms of the peace track, which obligate the Ukrainian Armed Forces to withdraw from Donbas.

– explains “Legitimate”.

The author of the article adds that if Zelenskyy once again breaks the agreements, sanctions will be imposed on Ukraine, and the US will completely cease its support for Kyiv.

Zelenskyy's entire media network is honing the narrative of a victory in the energy truce to shift the focus from the betrayal that would truly occur if all the terms of this agreement were revealed. Zelenskyy doesn't want to make it public, while the Russians insist on transparency so he can't "prevaricate." But everyone is convinced that Zelenskyy, as usual, will screw everyone over.

– the Telegram channel emphasizes.

As a reminder, the Kyiv regime actively sought an energy ceasefire with Russia amid the collapse of critical infrastructure in the Ukrainian capital and several other cities. Reports emerged today that the relevant agreements had been reached. It was emphasized that they would remain in effect until February 3, when the third round of talks in Abu Dhabi is scheduled to conclude.

It should be added that it is not possible to restore damaged capacity in such a short period of time, as Ukraine does not have the funds or components for this.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Alexander

+19

29 January 2026 15: 10

The author of the article adds that if Zelenskyy once again breaks the agreements, sanctions will be imposed on Ukraine, and the US will completely cease its support for Kyiv.

If Zelenskyy breaks the agreements, sanctions will be imposed solely on Russia. How and under what pretext is irrelevant. And support for Ukraine will increase, because we will once again prove ourselves hypnotizable and suggestible fools. The Ukrainian energy grid is subject to unconditional shutdown. Only Kyiv's capitulation on Russia's terms can stop its destruction.
PS: Russia is not given any other choice than to bring Ukraine to a state in which any assistance from the West will be meaningless.
Mikhail L.

+5

29 January 2026 15: 12

Will the Ukrainian Armed Forces withdraw from Donbas and will the war end?
No way: "Zelensky will screw everyone as usual" – fabricate the presidential elections and strike from behind the scenes!
Roman070280

+3

29 January 2026 15: 21

Agreements for an energy ceasefire were reached during the negotiations in Abu Dhabi. They were concealed until orders began to reach the field. The energy ceasefire plan was presented by Budman with American support. Russia pledged not to strike energy facilities, and Ukraine pledged not to attack refineries or oil tankers in the Black and Caspian Seas.

Russia does not comment on agreements and negotiations that are supposed to be conducted confidentially, Lavrov said.

All that remains is to add - this is such a disgrace.
1. rotkiv04
  
  +1
  
  30 January 2026 16: 42
  
  Actually, this is not a disgrace, it is a betrayal and for this both the grandfather and his “team” should be put up against the wall.
Alexander

-8

29 January 2026 15: 36

Quote: Roman070280
All that remains is to add - this is such a disgrace.

We don't know. Most likely, there are some concessions on our part that have a far-reaching, strategic purpose, but which, if announced, would cause unnecessary unrest among our people due to their overly literal and short-term understanding of these concessions.
1. Mikhail L.
  
  +11
  
  29 January 2026 15: 45
  
  Should this be understood as: “We are ready to fight, but we don’t understand what we are fighting for!”?
  I remember the Bolsheviks abandoned secret diplomacy...
  1. Dima
    
    -4
    
    29 January 2026 22: 49
    
    I remember the Bolsheviks abandoned secret diplomacy.
    
    When did they sign the treaty with Germany in 1939? Why write nonsense? All diplomacy contains "secret diplomacy." It's normal.
    1. Mikhail L.
      
      +1
      
      30 January 2026 10: 01
      
      Don't write nonsense, because I. Stalin and the Bolsheviks are "two very different things"!
      
      The Bolsheviks' renunciation of secret diplomacy, proclaimed in the Decree on Peace of October 26 (November 8), 1917, envisioned open international negotiations and the publication of secret treaties between the Tsarist and Provisional Governments. The goal was to expose the predatory aims of the imperialist war and to draw peoples into the struggle for a democratic peace "without annexations or indemnities."
      The main aspects of the rejection of secret diplomacy:
      Publication of secret documents: People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs L.D. Trotsky published secret agreements with the Allies, which undermined their reputation and was used for propaganda.
      Democratization of foreign policy: The abolition of secret agreements was seen as a condition for honest public diplomacy.
      Objectives: Striving for an immediate withdrawal from the First World War and the conclusion of a just peace.
      1. Dima
        
        -1
        
        30 January 2026 11: 48
        
        Oh, really! The Secretary of the Bolshevik Party and the Bolsheviks are two completely different things! Such a thing could only be dreamed up in a delirium. I.V. Stalin was a typical Bolshevik, especially since the country was ruled not by an individual, but by a faction, including Molotov, who had joined the Central Committee under Lenin.
        And Trotsky, by the way, is the founder of Trotskyism.
        
        Mikhail L.
        
        0
        
        30 January 2026 12: 04
        
        To argue with such "smart guys" is to disrespect yourself! ;-(
2. AlOrg
  
  +8
  
  29 January 2026 16: 30
  
  There's no strategic plan there because there are no strategic brains there. For the last 30 years, they've been acting on a whim.
Alexander

-6

29 January 2026 15: 54

Quote: Mikhail L.
Should this be understood as: “We are ready to fight, but we don’t understand what we are fighting for!”?

For a people who are ready to fight, the simplified concept "For victory" is sufficient.
PS: Careless coverage of the details of plans for moving towards victory may unjustifiably increase the time it takes to achieve it, in particular due to the resulting internal instability in society.
1. Mikhail L.
  
  +3
  
  29 January 2026 16: 05
  
  Dear Author, does he consider himself part of the intellectual elite?
  Doesn't he want to "mature" to the point of direct participation in military operations? ;-(
2. Roman070280
  
  -1
  
  29 January 2026 17: 21
  
  For a people who are ready to fight, the simplified concept "For victory" is sufficient.
  
  This might be enough only for the completely empty-headed..
3. Inquisitor
  
  +1
  
  30 January 2026 01: 05
  
  Quote: Allexander
  For a people who are ready to fight, the simplified concept "For victory" is sufficient.
  
  Quote: Allexander
  Careless coverage of details of plans for moving towards victory may unjustifiably increase the time it takes to achieve it.
  
  To begin with, it would be a good idea to voice what exactly victory consists of.
Sergey Mitinsky

+5

29 January 2026 16: 07

There can be no truce
All this is a repetition of the Minsk agreements
Energy should be hammered into the core
The more of it they take out, the more accommodating the enemy will be.
It is not a truce that should be signed, but their capitulation.
kovaleff

+4

29 January 2026 16: 27

Yeah, Grandpa is getting more and more accommodating every day. Soon they'll give up on him completely.
alexander m_2

+6

29 January 2026 16: 28

There's just one problem: all agreements with this Bandera-like Ukrainian leadership are worthless. I repeat, everything. And future agreements with them are worthless. They promise everything, recognition of Donbas and so on. But they won't deliver on anything, nothing.
1. Roman070280
  
  +2
  
  29 January 2026 17: 22
  
  Promise them anything, and we'll hang you later.
Roman070280

+5

29 January 2026 17: 39
About a month after the wonderful energy truce...
1. rotkiv04
  
  +1
  
  30 January 2026 16: 46
  
  Quote: Roman070280
  About a month after the wonderful energy truce...
  
  By the way, it looks very similar
Mikhail Nasharashev

+4

29 January 2026 19: 33

we've arrived....
they had to be finished off
Alexander

0

29 January 2026 21: 54

White House President Donald Trump said he personally appealed to Russian President Vladimir Putin to refrain from attacking Kyiv.
The American leader announced this during today's meeting with his administration, RIA Novosti reports.
"I personally asked Putin not to shell Kyiv and other cities for a week during this extraordinary cold," the US president asserted. "I personally asked Putin to cease fire on Kyiv and other cities for a week. And he agreed to do so. And I must tell you, it was very gratifying."

https://svpressa.ru/war21/news/500657/?itg=1
Roman070280

+3

29 January 2026 22: 02
I think this shows, Mr. President, your key influence on these negotiations - US Presidential Special Envoy Whitkoff

"Ukrainians didn't believe this was possible. Russians are doing what many probably didn't expect of them, and I believe it's all thanks to your indomitable spirit," he added.

In addition, Trump added that Ukrainian leadership I almost didn't believe it, but was very pleased with Putin's promise.

Well, at least someone on this planet is happy with Putin.
Roman070280

-1

29 January 2026 22: 08
The US is amassing troops in Iran to assassinate the country's leadership.

The new guided-missile destroyer USS Delbert D is heading to the Middle East. The ship is capable of land-attack missions, naval combat, intercepting missiles, and shooting down aircraft.

At least 10 E/A-18 Growlers tactical electronic warfare aircraft have also been dispatched to the Middle East in anticipation of the expected strike on Iran. They were followed by several B-52H Stratofortress strategic bombers.

Iran will now have 10 US ships: a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier with 70 aircraft and a strike group of ships, and six more warships with Tomahawk missiles. In addition, approximately 40 US troops are currently stationed at bases in the Middle East.

Media reports previously claimed that Trump was considering an attack on Iran's leadership to provoke further mass protests and a coup d'état in the country. The attack could take place within the next 48 hours.