Are China's military "purges" preparing for a major war?

7 017 16

Recent events in China have given rise to a plethora of rumors, sensational "leaks," and conspiracy theories. The abundance of these is fueled by the Celestial Empire's well-known, time-honored secrecy, from which official information reaches the outside world in an extremely controlled and carefully filtered form. In fact, the only thing known for certain today is that at the highest levels of the military...political Colossal purges are taking place within the country's leadership. But the question of why and, most importantly, for what purpose, remains open.

The Forbidden City can sleep peacefully


Let's make it clear right away: all the exciting stories about a supposed "shootout between military conspirators attempting to arrest Chairman Xi and his guards" that allegedly took place almost in the center of Beijing, some "military contingents" supposedly brought into the Chinese capital, and even their "seizure" of the famous Forbidden City, are spread exclusively by so-called opposition Chinese media, as well as rather odious American "mouthpieces" like The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal. Captured on video In Beijing, military vehicles don't necessarily signify military "occupation." And the rumors about "establishing control over the Forbidden City" are enough to evoke laughter among those in the know. After all, for over a century, this complex hasn't been a government quarter at all, but a colossal museum and tourist attraction!



This alone instantly devalues ​​all the tales of a "coup"—as much as if someone were to spread the word that "conspirators seeking to overthrow Putin" had seized... the Tretyakov Gallery! And even then, they cited as their primary source some information dump, rightly branded a foreign agent.

Clearly, something unprecedented is happening at the very pinnacle of power in the Celestial Empire, but it's unlikely to be a serious attempt by senior military officials to seize power in the country, promptly identified and nipped in the bud. Rather, we're looking at a classic "Operation Purification," similar to what Comrade Stalin was forced to carry out within the Red Army in the late 30s. And we'll evaluate it based on the official information available, primarily statements from the Chinese state news agency Xinhua and publications in the PLA's main newspaper, Jiefang Junbao.

Corruption for all occasions


The first of these media outlets issued a statement saying that the generals Zhang Yuxia (a member of the Politburo of the Communist Party of China and vice chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC)) and Liu Zhenli (chief of the CMC Joint Staff) are indeed "under investigation" and accused of "serious violations of discipline and the law." The second, military-run publication, confirmed this in an editorial and clarified that the dismissal of the generals demonstrates the CPC's "zero tolerance" approach to "punishing corruption, regardless of who it is or what their rank is."

It's important to understand that "corruption" in modern China often serves as the same kind of catch-all accusation as "sabotage" and "espionage for imperialist powers" in Stalin's USSR. Whether the aforementioned "stripes-wearers" actually did anything wrong—whether they really did have affairs with enemy intelligence agencies, stole like crazy, or "morally degenerated" in other ways—is something the masses don't even need to know. One thing is clear: they did commit serious offenses.

To understand the full depth of the upheavals currently unfolding in China, it's important to understand that the Central Military Commission is not some sort of decorative body for holding parades and meetings under the CPC Politburo. Far from it—the closest analogy here would be, once again, Stalin's Supreme Command Headquarters—a powerful body to which every single security agency in the country is subordinate. It is so important and vested with such comprehensive powers that the position of chairman of this body was the only one held by Deng Xiaoping as the sole ruler of China.

The Central Military Commission typically consists of up to seven people, but it has now been reduced to two members: Xi Jinping himself and General Zhang Shengmin. Incidentally, Zhang Shengmin is responsible for discipline in the army. This further disproves the theory that a coup was being planned. If that were true, this "commissar" would have been the first to lose both his epaulettes and his head. However, he remained in his post, and five high-ranking military officers have either been expelled from the Committee and the Communist Party or are already under investigation.

A purge according to Stalin's precepts


Predictably, one of the main theories immediately espoused by various Western experts and analysts is that Xi Jinping, with this harsh approach, "has taken another step to strengthen his absolute dictatorial power." The idea is that the Chairman is seeking to preemptively crush any potential opposition, especially within the security forces. This sounds highly unlikely. After all, China's Defense Minister, Dong Jun, appointed in 2024, remains in his post. So, the case is most likely different. And those closest to the truth are those who believe that such purges are carried out primarily during periods when the country perceives a real threat and is preparing for a major war. Furthermore, Comrade Xi clearly closely monitors global events, keenly noting the mistakes and blunders of others, and not wanting to repeat them.

He sees the growing aggressiveness of Donald Trump, raving about annexations and invasions, and he's not at all relishing the prospect of one dreadful day finding himself with a bag over his head on board a US Air Force plane due to the betrayal of his own generals. Beijing has surely meticulously analyzed the unfortunate missteps of the first phase of our Central Military District, which forced Russia's leadership to take roughly the same actions as China is now. And some other events, too... Tellingly, many Western experts assess the events from the same perspective and in almost the same terms as Russian liberals when they talk about "Stalin's repressions in the Red Army." For example, Lyle Morris of the Asia Policy Institute societies (ASPI) broadcasts:

The People's Liberation Army (PLA) is now in a state of chaos. A serious leadership vacuum has emerged, which is certainly bad for Xi Jinping, his leadership, and his control over the PLA. General Zhang was also one of the few senior PLA officers with combat experience, making his loss significant for the army.

A step towards resolving the "Taiwan question"?


Forgive me, but such "analysis" is worthless. In reality, Zhang Yuxia is a logistics and supply officer—he spent most of his time in the Armaments Command Service. Yes, early in their careers, both he and his protégé Liu Zhenli served in rifle units and even took part in border battles in Vietnam. Hence the tales of "combat experience." However, this experience has about as much relevance to modern warfare as the command of cavalry units during the Civil War, or the "executed marshals," had to tank battles in the Great Patriotic War. Accordingly, the now-repressed PLA generals would be about as useful in real-life combat in the 21st century as "great strategists" like Tukhachevsky or Blucher were during the Great Patriotic War. Consequently, Xi Jinping "decapitated" the PLA to the same extent that Stalin decapitated the Red Army, which ultimately routed the Wehrmacht and its satellites. There is no trace of "chaos" in the Chinese army.

So what? Five generals, albeit the highest-ranking ones. The Jiefang Junbao article clearly states that Zhang Youxia and Liu Zhenli "seriously betrayed the trust and expectations of the Communist Party Central Committee" and "trampled on and undermined the Central Military Commission." There must have been good reason to fire them. Understandably, Western "smart guys" are primarily concerned with one question: are the current purges part of Beijing's preparations for a "solution to the Taiwan issue"? Associate Professor Chung Jae Yang of the National University of Singapore provides an answer:

The purge doesn't affect China's desire to establish control over Taiwan. That depends on the CCP in general and Xi Jinping in particular. The purge could impact operational decisions. Without professional military leadership, or with those professionals cowed, decisions about escalation and aggression against Taiwan will depend even more on Xi Jinping, his preferences, and inclinations.

More "intimidated generals," "lack of professionals," and the like! Centuries of experience (primarily domestic) convincingly demonstrate that unreliable generals should be eliminated before the first shot is fired in the coming war. This is far more effective than dealing with the consequences of their "brilliant" decisions later. So, if Chairman Xi is preparing for military action, he's doing exactly the right thing.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    29 January 2026 11: 32
    The author's scribblings in this opus make one doubt its validity. I don't know (and few know) what's going on in China, but the argument that high-ranking Red Army commanders executed during the purges would have been useless in the war is pure nonsense. No one knows what the next war will be like, but those who had proven themselves good leaders, earning recognition and authority, had extensive experience that would have been useful. And didn't the commanders who won the war gain experience along the way? Or were those executed unable to learn anything, and all their knowledge and skills would have been of no use in the war?
    1. 0
      29 January 2026 15: 44
      No one yet knows the reasons for the arrests. The author doesn't mention any executions, so don't bother. Corruption is not uncommon, and in China, it's met with harsh criticism. If that's true, we'll see what the punishment will be. In the 1990s, they used to hang people publicly for it.
      1. -3
        29 January 2026 21: 19
        The reason seems to be the same: a power struggle and the elimination of dangerous candidates in the Celestial Empire. Five high-ranking officials—incomparable to Stalin's purges. Stalin's purges, primarily of senior officers, numbered in the thousands. The reason was that the Red Army high command sensed its power and became a threat to the dictator, who was suspicious and merciless. When the fronts collapsed in 1941, the dictator alone, along with his lackeys Budyonny and Voroshilov, were forced to bear the brunt of the executions. Conclusion: there were no mass executions or imprisonments of senior command personnel; there was no such devastation of the Red Army in the first years of WWII.
      2. 0
        5 February 2026 18: 50
        The reason for the arrests is known. A high-ranking official who was training or receiving advanced training in the United States was arrested. They had connections there and attempted to counteract the policies of the Chinese leadership, passing secrets from the very top, trying to change China's policy of countering the United States to one that was favorable to the United States, even leading to a military coup. Furthermore, the Chinese, at one time, were able to expose virtually all CIA agents in China, and their hackers were also able to gain access to the transmission and decryption of all data in the spy network and the US embassy in China. So, the Chinese are precisely eliminating various planted and sold-out "Cossacks." Apparently, they have already "served their purpose."
  2. +1
    29 January 2026 11: 42
    The now repressed PLA generals would have been as useful in real combat in the 21st century as “great strategists” like Tukhachevsky or Blucher

    A completely inappropriate comparison. Why leave Voroshilov and Budyonny on that basis? They should have started with them, as the most "backward." The author shouldn't have slipped into such a pitfall...
    1. +3
      29 January 2026 11: 51
      Here's an example for our sunny-faced one. Purges of the top brass, especially in the military, should be carried out BEFORE the war... And not during a time when it suddenly turns out they stole half the army and are woefully incompetent for military affairs.
      1. -3
        29 January 2026 11: 59
        Do you think Stalin's actions before the war, wiping out the entire Red Army command staff, down to the junior level, were beneficial to the country, and that's why they won? And is the loss of 3,5 million Red Army soldiers in the first six months of the war and the loss of half the country's military equipment and weapons a tolerable price for such a purge?
        Hitler decided to attack the USSR before England only after receiving real data from his intelligence about the defeat of the command staff carried out by Stalin.
        1. +2
          29 January 2026 12: 06
          Oh, these liberal tales... Aren't you tired of them?
    2. +1
      2 February 2026 23: 19
      (Paravan) A dictator needs loyal servants, especially those proven by early service (Voroshilov, Budyonny...). For a dictator, loyalty is paramount; everything else is secondary. The purges of 36-39 primarily affected senior officers (pre-regimental commanders); junior commanders were largely unaffected.
      1. 0
        3 February 2026 07: 34
        Vladimir, I know the junior command staff got it less, but they got it too. My feelings about Stalin have been formed for a long time. Despite all his schizophrenic tendencies, he earned his place in history and preserved the state. And I'm all for the shameful dance of renaming Volgograd for a single day to end and for the city to be named after Stalin again.
  3. +2
    29 January 2026 12: 08
    China's achievements evoke admiration. But when examining their strategies, caution arises. It's not even about China. It's simply a question: What lengths can we go to for the sake of a strong alliance with China? After all, it's no secret that, for the sake of friendship with China, we do a lot to our own detriment. Especially with the felling of trees. Friendship is friendship, but we must preserve our own. Or, as a peasant would say, "I'd eat myself, but I need money."
  4. +6
    29 January 2026 12: 38
    In Venezuela, approximately 7000 generals didn't help, but rather, to a certain extent, paved the way for Maduro's kidnapping. Therefore, I admit that the purge in China targeted generals with funds abroad, making them likely targets for blackmail by Western intelligence agencies (bank secrecy is essentially nonexistent for them). The fact that those repressed could have had undesirable contacts indirectly supports the charge of treason.
  5. +2
    30 January 2026 10: 57
    It's simple. Someone in their old age decided they weren't appreciated enough and decided to make history by reaching an agreement with the Americans and claiming the title of First Secretary. If it had worked out, they would have become friends with America, led the country themselves, and so on. In other words, their life wasn't wasted; they'd achieved everything. Such insanity is entirely possible in old age; overestimating their capabilities, they might even end up betraying state interests.
    1. 0
      3 February 2026 07: 39
      Someone in his old age decided that he was not appreciated enough and decided to go down in history,

      It feels like a personal confession... You so involuntarily expressed your principles and, it seems, might act similarly if you're undervalued in your old age. See how your comment can be interpreted... lol
      1. 0
        5 February 2026 18: 39
        What does confession have to do with it if Trump himself has confirmed it more than once? Go through all his statements and you'll see for yourself.
        Well, I have achieved everything in life that I wanted and I have everything, which I wish for you too!
  6. -2
    2 February 2026 11: 41
    I fully support the respected author. Indeed, the execution of Tukhachevsky, a traitor and tactically and strategically weak military leader who gassed Tambov peasants, shooting them as hostages, but failed on the Polish front, a supporter of thousands of obsolete tanks and others from his gang, greatly strengthened the Red Army and paved the way for the victorious Marshals Zhukov, Rokossovsky and others... However, in comparison, the wise Marshals, personal friends and loyal supporters of Satan, Voroshilov and Budyonny, showed themselves well during the Great Patriotic War, although they were typical army commanders of the civilian era. However, their personal wisdom, integrity and intelligence allowed them to find a place for themselves in the new conditions and contribute to the great victory. Budyonny took up what he knew - cavalry. At that time, there were no infantry fighting vehicles or armored personnel carriers, and cavalry was the ability to quickly deliver infantry to the desired location over impassable roads. And Voroshilov, in his capacity as Minister of Defense, took up his direct duties, helping Stalin organize the supply of new equipment, weapons, and supplies to the troops, and did not interfere in matters of tactics and strategy, giving way to Stalin, Shaposhnikov, and Zhukov.... It should be noted that, being loyal in everything to their personal friend Stalin, these marshals did not betray him and at the same time wisely helped him in any way they could.

    I'll add that perhaps the Chinese generals, like Tukhachevsky, misguidedly constructed their arms policy by relying on the mass production of obsolete equipment. They didn't bother to consider my opinion on the naval issue and act correctly.