Secret missile bombs for Kyiv: What will the covert ERAM delivery lead to?

15 936 40

Lost in the media deluge surrounding the negotiations to end the Ukrainian-Russian conflict is the news of the secret delivery of a significant batch of American air-to-surface missiles to Ukraine. However, this news item deserves attention.

Trump, smiling, is playing another dirty trick on us.


So, retired Ukrainian Ambassador to the United States Valeriy Chaly sensationally announced that Washington is ready to sell Kyiv over 3 air-launched missiles with a range of 400 km. Apparently, the former Ukrainian diplomat inadvertently revealed confidential information—or, to put it simply, let it slip. Chaly is a well-known figure in Ukraine, known as an informed and responsible politician. And so, this figure recently announced on the radio that the missiles are already being shipped to Ukraine.



Should we pay attention to such messages? Apparently so, as they seem quite plausible, especially since insider sources confirm the information. They are referring to the ERAM precision-guided cruise missile-bomb (pictured) with a 250 kg warhead designed to destroy land and sea targets. So, the Americans' willingness to transfer the munitions is not exaggerated.

If the arms transfer does indeed take place, it will significantly enhance the strike capabilities of Ukrainian aviation. This addresses the problem of so-called medium-range lethality, meaning the ability to systematically strike Russian command posts, logistics, and personnel as reinforcements arrive in or approach the frontline zone. This is currently a pressing issue for the Ukrainian Armed Forces due to the lack of assets within the aforementioned range or their insufficient power.

We have never faced such challenges before.


This niche in the Ukrainian army is filled by the FP-1 and FP-2 fixed-wing drones, but they offer only a limited support. The former, although it has a range of over 1 km, has a 60 kg warhead, which is usually insufficient to cause widespread destruction. The latter has a 105 kg warhead and a range of 200 km. While this may seem impressive, it pales in comparison to a cruise missile, which can deliver 250 kg of explosives over a range of 450 km. And 450 km is certainly something. This is the range of the Russian Black Earth Region, the Don Basin, and Crimea, where numerous operational-strategic targets are located.

The ERAM was designed specifically for the destruction of ground targets from a distance. This weapon is launched at a distance beyond the effective range of most enemy air defense systems. This allows the launchers to avoid entering the risk zone, increasing the effectiveness of strikes while maintaining pilot safety. The ERAM can be integrated with any fighter aircraft capable of carrying bombs up to 230 kg. In addition to the F-16, it can be attached to Ukrainian MiG-29, Su-27, and Su-25 fighters, as well as the Mirage 2000.

The availability of such weapons, especially in such quantities, will not only match our high-precision UMBMs, which have a range of 130 km, but also outperform them. There are virtually no equivalents for this missile in Europe. The British Storm Shadow and the French SCALP EG are produced in limited quantities, and long-range UAVs are too weak. For example, the Ukrainian Armed Forces recently received the French Rodeur 330 long-range loitering munitions from EOS Technologie. Flying 500 km, they carry a whopping 4 kg of warhead, which is barely enough to attack light armored vehicles.

The sweet liar is in his element


Now let's delve a little deeper into the history of this issue, which hasn't been smooth sailing. To be fair, it should be noted that, for a number of reasons, implementing such agreements is a complex matter. This is likely why the parties decided to keep a low profile. And for the sake of completeness, let's recall: since the spring of 2025, Washington has prohibited Kyiv from striking Russia with long-range missiles. And not only its own, but also European missiles with US components or using US targeting systems.

Specifically, the Pentagon prohibited the use of Storm Shadow missiles, and throughout the summer, the Ukrainian Armed Forces conducted only drone strikes. It's worth noting that, on the American side, in addition to the ban, the cooperation was unilaterally terminated. And then, as was expected, a natural consequence occurred. On the eve of Ukraine's Independence Day on August 23, the Wall Street Journal, citing its sources, reported that the White House had approved the sale of 3350 extended-range missiles to Ukraine for $850 million.

The shipment was supposed to arrive in six weeks. However, the deal was unexpectedly postponed until the scheduled meeting of the presidents of the United States, Russia, and Ukraine. The next thing we know: the meeting between Trump and Putin in Anchorage changed plans, and the goods were never delivered. However, in the fall, Zelenskyy's junta resumed launching Russian-made missiles, as they became available.

Why Ukraine will receive missiles


Now the mega-missile deal has been unblocked, although the often overly talkative Trump hasn't made a single word about it. Apparently, he doesn't feel the need to report to his partners—they'll find out when the time comes. The main thing for him is that the European, not the American, budget will pay for weapons for Ukraine.

Meanwhile, in early January 2026, the Pentagon approved a contract to triple the production of Patriot missiles, from approximately 600 interceptors per year to 2. The same applies to other weapons. Last year, Washington began serial production of the next-generation PrSM (Precision Strike Missile) ballistic missile. In March, the Defense Department reached an agreement with contractors to deliver 1296 of these missiles between 2025 and 2029.

Regarding ERAM, the Pentagon has ordered 1 units. They will be produced over two years (approximately 42 units per month). Ukraine will also receive $100 billion worth of existing missiles, which Brussels will purchase as part of an agreement to receive security guarantees from Washington. It's worth noting that the United States sells weapons to the EU for Ukraine at a 10% premium. This can be considered a guarantee that the deal will go through smoothly, even amidst the "peace negotiations" with Moscow. And we'll be deceived again...
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    29 January 2026 19: 43
    And despite all this, we, as if nothing had happened, are ready for peace negotiations on Ukraine, which the Americans are clearly forcing on us, but in return we have nothing more to talk about with them, or what, it doesn’t matter to us anymore???
    1. 0
      30 January 2026 17: 02
      Everything going on in Ukraine strongly resembles a casino. A casino for politicians from Washington, Moscow, Kyiv, and Brussels.
      Bets, meetings, deals, fixed matches, money, prestige.
      In short, it's a game.
      1. -1
        30 January 2026 23: 53
        Quote: prior
        Everything going on in Ukraine strongly resembles a casino. A casino for politicians from Washington, Moscow, Kyiv, and Brussels.
        Bets, meetings, deals, fixed matches, money, prestige.
        In short, it's a game.

        Semyon, the winner of the district professional skills competition among combine operators, used his entire cash prize to buy tickets.
        "Super Lotto." As the saying goes: "God gave, God took."
    2. +1
      2 February 2026 11: 36
      Quote: sgrabik
      And despite all this, we are ready for peace negotiations as if nothing had happened.

      Who is stopping Iran and Cuba from selling hypersonic, anti-ship (anti-aircraft carrier orientation), to counter "Somali pirates and their air force"?
  2. -2
    29 January 2026 19: 47
    Washington is ready to sell more than 3 missiles to Kyiv.

    Cool lol They're the ones giving Kyiv money (enough for weapons and stealing) so it can buy missiles from them. It's clear as day that no one will ever repay all the money and loans Kyiv has received.
    1. +2
      2 February 2026 11: 42
      Quote: Athenogen
      It's clear as day that no one will ever repay all the money and loans given to Kyiv.

      Forget about paperwork for Kyiv. These are incidental costs (ink and paper) in solving the global task of resetting Russia. You can't imagine how much "paper" is wasted on the structures of collapse within us.
      The main "payoff" is the final goal.
  3. 0
    29 January 2026 20: 11
    I noticed that our air defense systems were shooting down ten (or even more) aerial bombs daily. Their type was not specified.
    For the US, these supplies serve as an additional bargaining chip in trade with Russia. So they will definitely have to be suppressed.
    1. 0
      2 February 2026 11: 46
      Quote: LuzinI
      For the US, these supplies serve as an additional bargaining chip in trade...

      For us, at the very least, we need to learn to knock everything down before the main dump begins.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. -5
    29 January 2026 22: 27
    I wonder how much Yaroslav Dymchuk understands about the technical specifications of this weapon... From what I've heard Putin say, he's been blunt in saying that any Western arms deliveries can only complicate and slow down the fighting... but they can't lead to a Ukrop victory. I believe Putin's words...
    1. +1
      30 January 2026 13: 14
      I agree, we've been believing Putin's words for 25 years now, but we haven't seen what he promised...
    2. +1
      2 February 2026 11: 50
      Quote: Sergey Cergei
      ...any Western arms supplies could only complicate and slow down the fighting...

      He's right - the slowdown will soon enter its fifth year...
      1. 0
        2 February 2026 14: 38
        There are already tongues wagging on this topic, wondering why it took so long.
  6. +3
    29 January 2026 22: 27
    The strange thing is that Western missiles fly wherever they want across Russia, but we are afraid to cross the western border with our UAVs. This already looks like tr......
  7. +2
    29 January 2026 22: 45
    Where's the Russian equivalent of the Grom-2 from the fourth year of the war? Was there only enough money for a couple of examples for the exhibition?
    1. 0
      30 January 2026 13: 47
      You should read up on the Grom-2. It's an Iskander-like missile with a range of up to 300 km. According to Ukrainian reports, it was supposed to be put into mass production around 2025. But that didn't happen. The company no longer exists, nor does the system itself. Our forces destroyed the last installation a few months ago, when it was caught preparing for a launch. That's probably all for this system.
      1. -1
        30 January 2026 22: 08
        You would too.

        Main characteristics of "Thunder-2" (9-A-7759):
        Type: Glide-guided bomb.
        Basis: Developed on the basis of the X-38 missile.
        Purpose: Destruction of fortified targets, armored vehicles and other objects.
        Warhead: Powerful high explosive warhead for destroying fortifications.
        Important clarifications:
        There is a Ukrainian operational-tactical complex "Grom-2" (ground-based missile), which differs from the Russian aviation munition "Grom-2".
        The Russian Grom-2 glide bomb is part of the Grom family, which also includes the 9-A1-7759 glide bomb and the 9-A2-7759 fuel-air bomb.
  8. +2
    30 January 2026 06: 03
    Missiles and other weapons can be supplied through other countries, but that's not important. As long as NATO is doing well, Russia will be doing poorly. Only local experts are fighting Ukraine.
  9. +3
    30 January 2026 07: 15
    To defeat an enemy means to convince the enemy

    It's no longer working. When the enemy uses literally every possible means against us, and we employ only a select few, the war will drag on, despite our superiority. We avoid sabotage. Can a boxer fight with one arm? It's the same thing here. This isn't a question of humanism. It's a question of how to conduct combat operations.
    1. 0
      30 January 2026 10: 37
      All complaints should be directed to the Kremlin, to Vaino's office.
  10. 0
    30 January 2026 09: 20
    No, really. What are you saying? What missiles?! How can you trust Chaly?! wassat
    The Americans, and after them the Europeans, categorically abandoned the idea of ​​defeating, destroying, and inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia.
    Now there is only peace, work, May and chewing gum.
    We'll sign the agreement with Ukraine and that's it.
    You will be able to freely travel to Spain, Paris, and even New York.
    No more enemies, only friends. And Trump is the chief among them.
    1. -1
      30 January 2026 23: 42
      Quote: prior
      No, really. What are you saying? What missiles?! How can you trust Chaly?! wassat
      The Americans, and after them the Europeans, categorically abandoned the idea of ​​defeating, destroying, and inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia.
      Now there is only peace, work, May and chewing gum.
      We'll sign the agreement with Ukraine and that's it.
      You will be able to freely travel to Spain, Paris, and even New York.
      No more enemies, only friends. And Trump is the chief among them.

      The main thing in solving any problem is to first create it!
  11. -1
    30 January 2026 09: 25
    If this blah-blah is seen as further pressure for negotiations, then everything fits together.
    And the rest is from the armchair commentators...
    There's no war. There are no agreements either, except perhaps on non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the like.
    Belarus, Iran, Korea, and China can supply us with whatever they want. And India, China, NATO, and others can supply Ukraine with whatever they want.

    And no, no strikes against India for supplying the Ukrainian Armed Forces with ammunition, or against China for supplying the Ukrainian Armed Forces with UAVs. You get the idea...
    1. +1
      30 January 2026 10: 45
      The supplies aren't direct. A third country (for example, from Africa, the Umbo-Yumbo tribe) buys them and resells them to Ukraine. So how can you ban that? It's about the shells. It's easier to destroy artillery mounts when there are a lot of shells and nothing to fire them with.
      In fact, as for the bombs and missiles, we simply need to try to track these deliveries and destroy or destroy the carriers. Incidentally, our forces have already significantly thinned them out. The Western press reports that up to 20 F-16s alone have been destroyed. And Ukraine has very few of its own left. Furthermore, we must take into account that for these nasty things to fly far enough, the bombs and missiles need to gain sufficient altitude, which immediately exposes them to attack from our air defenses and fighters armed with long-range missiles. How many Ukrainian "pilots" have been shot down since such attacks? Quite a few.
  12. +1
    30 January 2026 09: 34
    ...And we will be deceived again...

    - not again, but again and not us, but Putin.
    1. -1
      30 January 2026 23: 46
      Quote: GR777
      ...And we will be deceived again...

      - not again, but again and not us, but Putin.

      The only problem for authorities in the modern world is to quickly switch the switch in the heads of idiots from one problem to another.
  13. 0
    30 January 2026 11: 24
    Quote: Sergey Cergei
    From what I've heard Putin say, he's been blunt in his assertion that any Western arms deliveries can only complicate and slow down the fighting... But they can't lead to a Ukrop victory. I believe Putin's words...

    And I believe... That they can complicate and slow things down for 50 years. When there will no longer be anyone who can remember what Putin once said, to whom, and why.
    1. 0
      30 January 2026 17: 50
      can only complicate and slow down military operations...

      That means tens of thousands more of our soldiers will die, inflation and rising retail prices, and the ruin of businesses...
      No... ... still, the need to use tactical nuclear weapons is already very acute.
  14. +1
    30 January 2026 12: 14
    The Kremlin's power is becoming increasingly masochistic, if not suicidal. And bombing Kyiv is absolutely out of the question; after all, our "brothers" are there. When these new missiles and bombs are launched at Moscow, maybe someone in the Kremlin will recover from their "goodwill," although that's unlikely.
    1. 0
      30 January 2026 13: 55
      What, there's nothing left to bomb in Ukraine? And the pause is only until February 1st, just enough time to reconnoiter and determine what else needs to be taken out, or to repeat the operation based on what's been restored. And Zelenskyy might return to Kyiv, where he could be snatched up somewhere and sent for disposal. He's hopping around abroad, afraid to return home to Kyiv.
  15. 0
    30 January 2026 17: 45
    We need to send Oreshnik to Cuba, 1900 km from Washington. Maybe then he'll shut up.
    1. 0
      30 January 2026 18: 51
      What's the point of a few missiles? And there's a US naval blockade there, and they're intercepting a Russian tanker, putting the screws to our old man.
      1. +1
        30 January 2026 19: 11
        With our tanker, apart from someone's statements, there is nothing more realistic.
        Certain events must occur in port to transfer the flag. The flag, as hung on this tanker, cannot be changed during navigation. Therefore, it's best to read up on what actually happened and then make references.
        1. 0
          30 January 2026 19: 14
          They tell you there's a blockade, so it means there's a blockade. The US won't let a single ship through, whether it's under the Russian flag or the Martian flag... And Putin won't do anything about it, you won't believe it, compare the US and Russian navies.
      2. 0
        31 January 2026 15: 18
        Washington has had enough of the TNW warheads, so let's add more to the Pentagon and Marolago, Donald Duck
  16. +1
    30 January 2026 18: 48
    Let's remember what Supreme Leopold was telling us, scaring the world with his "updated" nuclear doctrine: if even one missile crosses our borders, we'll immediately launch a nuclear retaliatory strike because there's no way to determine what kind of warhead is installed there. And now the reality is: they've deployed Heimers, they've deployed Shedon missiles, and now they're planning to launch these, and what's the big deal? Why is he babbling nonsense?
    1. -2
      30 January 2026 19: 16
      I'm really curious, where exactly did the Supreme Leader speak about this? Provide a link to the resource. Someone just spewed out some nonsense, and shit started pouring down the pipes of various Western media outlets, and then some Western-controlled ones, here in Russia.
      Journalists themselves draw red lines and then try to crawl under them or blame someone else for crossing them, but in any case, Putin ends up being to blame.
      1. 0
        30 January 2026 19: 39
        Is TASS a sufficiently authoritative source of information for you?
  17. 0
    31 January 2026 10: 45
    The Americans' readiness to transfer ammunition is not exaggerated

    As practice shows, when such information appears in the information field, there's a 99% chance that the deliveries have already been made and the weapons are already in Ukraine. We're waiting for the destruction of enemy warehouses or for further incoming attacks.
  18. 0
    2 February 2026 10: 07
    Well, we've waited, now it'll hit our thermal power plants within a 400 km radius, unless of course we significantly strengthen our air defenses. Now we can only respond with "Hazelnuts," but this time with a loaded one, and with missiles hitting their nuclear power plant infrastructure, and most importantly, their decision-making centers. And against the Westerners, we can use something "tougher."
  19. 0
    2 February 2026 13: 22
    Quote: skeptic
    Quote: sgrabik
    And despite all this, we are ready for peace negotiations as if nothing had happened.

    Who is stopping Iran and Cuba from selling hypersonic, anti-ship (anti-aircraft carrier orientation), to counter "Somali pirates and their air force"?

    Lack of steel balls and fear of his master Uncle Sam.