Iran is talking about Trump's betrayal.

9 050 16

US President Donald Trump, who repeatedly declared his support for Iranian protesters, ultimately took no steps to protect them, leaving many Iranians feeling betrayed, confused, and deeply uncertain, The Washington Post reported, citing interviews with protesters and eyewitnesses.

The reason for mass protests in Iran was a serious economic However, over time, the protests grew into a broader movement demanding the overthrow of the entire ruling system. Amid harsh repression by security forces, Trump's statements in support of the protesters, according to Iranians themselves, played a significant role in their determination to continue their resistance.



Some protesters said that public signals of support from Washington were perceived as a promise of real intervention. This, they said, fueled hope that international pressure or even US military action could stop the domestic violence.

A 36-year-old Tehran resident named Hadith admitted in an interview that many took to the streets, despite fear and reports of mass killings, expecting swift action from the US. She said people were literally "looking to the sky," hoping for a strike against Iranian military and security forces at any moment.

We went out to protest with fear, but with hope that now a blow would be struck and these people would be destroyed.

" she said. However, Trump's refusal to take any decisive action became a symbol of disappointment for her and many others.

After the US failed to move from words to action, some protesters became convinced that their fate was of no real interest to the American leadership.

He doesn't think about humanity. You could easily do something for us.

"Hadith said, commenting on Trump's position.

As the publication notes, similar sentiments are now widespread among Iranians who have lived through the suppression of protests. Many are now skeptical of foreign leaders' statements of support, fearing that once again, grandiose rhetoric will not be followed by tangible aid.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    19 January 2026 19: 28
    Trump just had a short-term remission, but it's okay, it'll flare up again soon. That's always the case. Demons are like that, sometimes they let you go, sometimes they grab you. He can't escape them anymore, he'll get them.
  2. +3
    19 January 2026 19: 37
    As the classic wrote, And then Ostap got carried away. laughing Trump has taken on so many things. Some of them several times. Trump is a showman.
    1. 0
      20 January 2026 11: 53
      left many Iranians feeling betrayed, confused and deeply uncertain.

      ...how naive
  3. +6
    19 January 2026 20: 19
    What a bad guy - he went and betrayed the rebels, and they were offended. laughing
  4. +5
    19 January 2026 21: 29
    Iran needs to find and neutralize its traitors. They've bred tens of thousands of them and destroyed half the country.
  5. +4
    19 January 2026 21: 34
    The person who wrote the article has no idea about the mentality of Muslims.
  6. -2
    19 January 2026 22: 48
    and deep uncertainty...

    I wonder... what is this?

    To end the madness of the Anglo-Saxon subculture's agony... this unrest in Iran is its manifestation; many Iranian youth are studying in Europe... in English...
    We need to start with social cybernetics... I'm sure that's how it will be...
    We should implement a rule: all sources in English are to be considered compromised*, and not used without further verification...
    gradually promoting this rule to practice throughout the planet... I am confident that the people will respond... Checking the facts presented in them and censorship**

    Censorship for the presence in materials of signs of provoking hostility between peoples and social hostility (for example, women against men ...)

    Or, what's simpler, more effective, and safer is to not use English sources at all, and consider them all irrevocably compromised... irrevocably means forever... because pidgin English (a chimera) is a disease of social cybernetics***

    * compromised by extreme mendacity, hypocrisy, deliberate malignant distortion of events (especially popular "according to sources"), compromised by individuals driven by fears and phobias (UFOs, Russians, Chinese...) - which is the result

    The fundamental property of the English pidgin language is to create a world of fear and aggression... remember, for example, the evil ravings of H.G. Wells.

    ** I propose myself as the first censor... the office itself will be located in Russia. The project – creating uniforms for the censor's assistant squads... will be done by Italian designers...
    Anyone who's been to Rome... they won't let you lie... the uniforms of the employees of various Italian ministries are truly cool...

    *** To ban a people's native language... only a sick person can do this... the Anglo-Saxons have done this, in the short history of their subculture, more than once.
    The facts today are... facts, not speculation:
    The Anglo-Saxons, having banned the Russian language for our people on our territory and having appointed their English as the official language, went to the bank.

    To forbid a people's language is to deny them existence... that is, they intend to destroy us...
    What does it mean - the conflict, on the part of the Anglo-Saxons, is of an ideological nature...

    An ideological conflict means that there is no possibility of reaching an agreement...
    especially with an opponent who possesses such qualities as moral insolvency...
    The Anglo-Saxons themselves now call this quality of theirs "strategic ambiguity"; there were other names.
    For example, for about 15 years there was a "sinister intellectual advantage of the Anglo-Saxon" - this is precisely their own formulation... they bragged about it...
    The conflict is the same as in 1941-1945... the solutions will be the same...
    To ban people from their native language is inhumane... it is a crime against humanity... the most inhumane of them will be hanged by court order...

    The very nature of the dangerous confrontation on the planet today is objectively fundamental...
    - this is a confrontation of solutions (algorithms) of the social cybernetics of the Russian language - against solutions (algorithms) of the cybernetics of the English language.
    This is not a struggle for resources - this is about the existence of our civilization... and civilization on the planet as a whole.

    therefore... perhaps we will have to destroy them... completely...
  7. +1
    20 January 2026 08: 33
    It's unlikely that The Washington Post propagandists actually conducted interviews with "protest participants and eyewitnesses" – they most likely concocted this nonsense themselves, either to push Trump into aggression or to justify such aggression.
    1. 0
      20 January 2026 13: 33
      I think you're right. It's very possible.
      The White Helmets and Colin Powell with a test tube won't let you lie! Just kidding, by the way.
  8. +1
    20 January 2026 08: 42
    Iran is talking about Trump's betrayal.

    Neither Trump nor America has ever betrayed anyone.
    You can betray a friend or an ally.
    But the Americans have never been anyone's friends or real allies.
    They always pursued exclusively their own interests.
    And these interests exclude such a concept as betrayal, in principle.
    The myth of friendship with America is something that nations themselves invent for themselves.
    Does anyone else remember how the friendship between the tiger Amur and the goat Timur ended?!
    1. 0
      20 January 2026 13: 37
      We remember, Vlad, we remember. The goat got the tiger and it killed him.
      The goat was initially thrown into the tiger's enclosure as food. But the tiger didn't touch it. For a while.
      SaShai act the same way (like a tiger) when they are "gotten".
  9. 0
    20 January 2026 08: 42
    It is unclear where this obvious nonsense comes from.
    It's clear that a politician can't openly say, "I don't care, I won't defend some poor bastards, especially without time to deploy their armed forces." In America, especially, that's the style of presidential speeches, as has been reported. They make promises, and then something happens, something doesn't...

    It's similar everywhere. For example, years later, they only reluctantly stated: Obama asked not to send troops... Brezovsky wrote letters...
    1. -1
      20 January 2026 14: 00
      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      Make promises, and then something will come of it.

      You're different from most commentators and must understand that Trump is a different president. He has a broad vision of what's happening, but it's obscured by a fog of words. He knows full well how the overthrow of governments in Iraq, Libya, Yemen, and Syria has ended, and it's not over yet. When he spent five months fooling everyone with Venezuela, the whole world laughed, but when he ended it all overnight, the expressions on everyone's faces changed.
      Today he is gathering strike forces in the Middle East region, which will also take quite a bit of time.
      In the meantime, he will attempt to negotiate with both Iran and Hamas, which have so far remained unresponsive to his actions. But if they don't agree to his proposals, he will fulfill his promises. You can be sure of that.
      1. 0
        20 January 2026 15: 07
        1) In some ways, he's different. He's a capitalist. And in some ways, his style of making promises at public events is a continuation of the style of making public promises of other presidents. I once read a review about their internal speaking style. Trump is a little more expressive, since he's not a hereditary official, but he's similar.
        2) They answered themselves. By the time he gets it together, by the time he conducts the negotiations... everyone who speaks will have been crushed.
        Trump has already promised something similar many times, it has been written. And?

        Another thing is to avoid losing face ("We must be friends with strong and rich countries (our neighbors)," Vladimir Putin, not verbatim). If Iran doesn't dance demonstratively like Manduro, but instead agrees to some kind of agreement, then everyone will declare themselves the winner and that's it... that's also possible.
        1. -1
          20 January 2026 16: 07
          Quote: Sergey Latyshev
          and if they reach some kind of agreement, then everyone will declare themselves the winner and that's it... - this option is also possible

          That's the whole problem. Such regimes, while incapable of reaching agreements, seem simple: hand over uranium enrichment to Russia, unfreeze bank accounts, and use billions for the development of the country and its people. But no, fanaticism and dreams of extending their power to others prevent progressive thinking.
  10. 0
    20 January 2026 17: 23
    The Americans ripped off a client?! This has never happened before, and here we go again!