Tucker Carlson: Russia is preparing a nuclear strike on Britain and Germany.

January 16 2026 34 394 90

Russia is seriously preparing to launch a nuclear strike against European countries provoking Ukraine into further war, according to American journalist Tucker Carlson. According to him, the recent Oreshnik missile launch against Lviv is an open hint to Europe.

Russia is seriously considering using nuclear weapons against Europe. Not against Kyiv, but against Europe. Specifically, against the UK and Germany. Last week, Russia launched hypersonic missiles. The hypersonic missiles likely killed four people.

– Carlson noted.

He added that it was not an attack intended to destroy critical infrastructure or cause widespread harm to civilians.

It was an attack meant to say, "Hey, you've gone too far, we feel our core existential interests are under attack, and if you don't back down, the next hypersonic missile, which no country has a reliable defense against, is coming your way. The next missile will have a nuclear warhead on it, and it's coming your way."

- explained the journalist.

It's worth noting that, judging by Europe's reaction, the repeated Oreshnik strike on Ukraine has left a strong impression. At the same time, the West is drawing attention to the fact that Kyiv is still concealing the consequences of the missile's incoming strike.

Western observers suggest that Ukraine is deliberately not disclosing the damage caused by the Oreshnik strike, as publishing this information could further frighten Europe.

90 comments

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Roman070280

-1

16 January 2026 12: 52

Russia is seriously preparing to launch a nuclear attack on European countries, inciting Ukraine to further war.

Our doctrine doesn't even provide for this.
As Putin said, only if there is a threat to our very existence... etc.
And this is one of the few cases when you can be sure of his words.
1. Anton Kuzmin
  
  + 20
  
  16 January 2026 14: 02
  
  The doctrine, yes, doesn't provide for it. But even the smallest details are fundamentally untrustworthy. After the pension "reform," any information is perceived as "evil and a lie by definition" by those who understand that it effectively prohibited men (except Muscovites and bosses) from living to retirement.
  1. Roman070280
    
    +8
    
    16 January 2026 14: 51
    
    So these are opposite things!!
    Nobody believed him about pensions.
    Just as no one would have believed it if he had announced his intention to strike London with nuclear weapons..))
    But here, on the contrary, they will try to delay until the last minute... the doctrine is only a deterrent... the question is whether to decide to act according to the doctrine if it comes to that... here they can deceive, like with pensions, yes...
    1. alexandre II
      
      -9
      
      16 January 2026 19: 40
      
      I'm embarrassed to ask, but what's wrong with pensions?
      I live in adversity and don't know anything about it.
      1. k7k8
        
        -2
        
        16 January 2026 21: 37
        
        It's just that for this category of rights fighters, this is a favorite bone that they will not fail to gnaw on under any circumstances.
        
        Grei grin
        
        +3
        
        18 January 2026 08: 16
        
        Apparently, some group of whisperers and self-satisfied people have a fat pie and don't care about rights or pensions! Nadezhda, they've agreed to cancel their pensions, don't hesitate!
        
        k7k8
        
        -2
        
        18 January 2026 09: 45
        
        First of all, please remind me where I said that I was happy with everyone?
        Secondly, it is you who have the fat bone in the form of senseless "criticism" of the pension reform.
        Thirdly, where did I say I don't care about rights and pensions? Unlike you, the fighters, I'm against attacks and outright trolling.
  2. k7k8
    
    -12
    
    16 January 2026 19: 35
    
    Quote: Anton Kuzmin
    After the pension "reform"
    
    What a chore this reform is! Aren't you tired of chanting? This reform allowed hundreds of thousands of healthy people to live more or less decently, receiving a salary and a pension, instead of languishing on a meager pension. And yes, I'm a retiree (not a Muscovite and not a boss), who retired at 63.5 years old. I'd still be happy to work, but circumstances don't allow it, even though my bosses asked me to stay. Maybe you greenhorns should stop hyping this up?
    1. GN
      
      +8
      
      16 January 2026 19: 59
      
      You've missed the point! The chief bourgeois once promised not to raise the retirement age, and of course, as usual, he did the opposite. He's a common liar and cheat, and now, after fighting his fill, he wants a fixed game. It's a disgrace.
      1. Roman070280
        
        +6
        
        16 January 2026 20: 09
        
        He understood everything perfectly... it's just his job - to pretend...
      2. k7k8
        
        -2
        
        16 January 2026 21: 28
        
        I understood everything. It was you who didn't understand because of your age (your young age is easily guessed by your slang). Putin is a politician, not some kid from your neighborhood. Politicians' opinions on events and intentions can (and must) change depending on the situation. The most striking examples are Lenin and Churchill. In 1917, Lenin was an ardent and uncompromising supporter of the dictatorship of the proletariat, but by the end of the civil war, he had abruptly changed his views and proposed a transition to the New Economic Policy (NEP), i.e., state capitalism (leading industries remain in state hands, everything else is farmed out to private owners, i.e., capitalists). In other words, the Lenin of 1917 and the Lenin of 1921 are completely different people. As for Churchill, who in the 30s could have imagined that the British Empire would be an ally of the USSR in the war against the Axis?
        
        Anton Kuzmin
        
        0
        
        22 January 2026 15: 44
        
        Do they at least pay you enough for your servility?
        
        Or are you truly a victim of the Unified State Exam and the Bologna system, and don't you understand that your chances of living to 70, given the average life expectancy of 63, are slim? And for someone who's not a Muscovite or a boss, they're illusory. Or do you count everyone, like our elite?
        There will be no pension for most men. For the absolute majority.
        
        k7k8
        
        -1
        
        22 January 2026 16: 10
        
        Listen, you non-serf. Unlike you, I have a real high school diploma and a real college degree. Both from the USSR (even pre-Perestroika). So I understand perfectly well what I'm talking about.
        
        Anton Kuzmin
        
        0
        
        23 January 2026 11: 39
        
        Your conclusions are like those of a victim of the Unified State Exam and the Bologna system! So, either the diploma thing is a lie, or it's sheer insanity.
        I won't make such a diagnosis, because I haven't examined you. But even the remnants of my knowledge are enough to remember that a man is physically unable to work after 60. And in Soviet times, at 60, retirement was possible, at 62, the cemetery. Just statistics.
        And no one will be able to work until 70. Simply because they'll die at 63. If that's unclear, I'll admit it. Although I got a B in psychiatry, that's only because I got an easy ticket. And anyway. "Military medicine is the medicine of healthy people." (C) And my qualifications should be sufficient to suspect something and send me for a consultation next Thursday. And then let the hospital specialists sort it out!
        You don't have to know normal physiology, much less gerontology. But life experience should be enough to understand that even after 50, physical work is difficult, and after 40, not everyone can do it. And you can still move your hands in a state of dementia, as, I suspect, some people who pass such laws are.
        If this is not clear, then we are already talking about incapacity.
        Thanks to Tereshkova. Previously, only biology buffs (like me) knew that "Seagulls feed on carrion." (C) Now everyone knows!
        
        k7k8
        
        0
        
        23 January 2026 14: 17
        
        Quote: Anton Kuzmin
        Physically, a man cannot work at all after 60
        
        Brilliant! After such a fantastic passage, reading further is completely uninteresting. I know a ton of men who don't even think about retirement after reaching retirement age. There was even a blacksmith who was hammering at 82 and riding a bicycle like a pro. Even the labor inspectorate forbade him from signing an employment contract. He worked under an employment contract. And it's not even a question of money. And even at 30, you don't know anything except how to type and don't want to know anything.
        
        those interested in biology (like me)
        
        It's strange that you don't know that, according to modern medical standards, young people are considered to be people up to and including 60 years old. And this conclusion wasn't drawn by Russian doctors.
        
        Anton Kuzmin
        
        0
        
        23 January 2026 15: 37
        
        Quote: k7k8
        And even at 30 years old you don’t know anything except the keys on a keyboard and don’t want to know.
        
        Awesome. That means I was working from 1940 to 1945, before I was born! Because (according to the Social Fund data), I'm 34 years old and have 25 points.
        Thank you, you made me look twice as young!
        but in general, the further I go, the more doubts I have about your adequacy, age and education... :(
        
        Quote: k7k8
        It's strange that you don't know that, according to modern medical standards, young people are considered to be people up to and including 60 years old. And this conclusion wasn't drawn by Russian doctors.
        
        This conclusion wasn't reached by doctors, but by medical serfs. But Soviet doctors (myself included) don't share the serfs' conclusion.
        And anyway, you've gotten off topic. We were talking about our guarantor fulfilling his promises. He swore he wouldn't raise the retirement age. Then he formally raised it by 5, but in reality, taking into account pension points and all that other stuff, he raised it by 10 years. That is, to 70. Which, given the average life expectancy for men is 63, sounds ridiculous. Moreover, these statistics apply to all men. But if you subtract Muscovites and bosses, the average life expectancy for blue-collar workers drops to 53.
        The isolated examples cited speak to a lack of education and a lack of understanding of statistics. Or perhaps to the illusions of such a position on the part of the opponents. But it's no wonder I got a 5 in medical statistics 40 years ago...
        I can give you an example, too. I recently poured a drink for our "butler" to honor the woman who fed him. The woman is 32, with some kind of cardiovascular problem. But this isolated example doesn't change the fact that women live, on average, 10 years longer than men. So, for women to receive their pensions earlier and longer, men must die seven years before they do.
        So, getting back to our sheep. Will our guarantor also fulfill his promises on nuclear weapons, as well as on the retirement age? And on absolutely all his promises? I'm simply worried about the fate of the country in this time of danger.
        
        k7k8
        
        -1
        
        23 January 2026 16: 35
        
        Reading you, I constantly get the impression that you are delirious.
        
        Anton Kuzmin
        
        0
        
        24 January 2026 14: 08
        
        Well, actually, that's a quote from Shurik's "Ivan Vasilyevich Changes Profession," so it should be in quotation marks. Otherwise, other victims of the Unified State Exam and the Bologna system might not have watched it and don't know, and they'll think you're just too "smart as a duck" (C) :)
        
        k7k8
        
        0
        
        24 January 2026 16: 35
        
        Quote: Anton Kuzmin
        Well, actually, this is a quote from Shurik's "Ivan Vasilyevich Changes Profession"
        
        Yes, you're right. But most of you here know that and don't need your clever face.
        In general, I'm not interested in a doctor who, instead of giving a diagnosis, simply says, "Look at your passport." God forbid I get an appointment with you.
        Bye
        
        Anton Kuzmin
        
        0
        
        26 January 2026 12: 12
        
        You're cowardly ditching the topic again. I'm not claiming to be Dr. Aibolit! It's simply because official work now requires supporting official narratives. For example, that the coronavirus madness is true. Rumor has it that our AkaMedia chief was fired for inadequate coronavirus prevention. Essentially, for not getting dirty by playing along with the authorities on this issue. I most likely didn't know or see him, but I fully support him.
        And this again brings us to the original topic - everything that is official is "evil and a lie by definition" (C)
        Give me an example of at least one true statement that would genuinely improve the lives of more than 20% of the Russian population. I'm really curious, what if I'm missing something?
        
        k7k8
        
        -1
        
        26 January 2026 13: 14
        
        Quote: Anton Kuzmin
        I don’t claim the laurels of Aibolit!
        
        You should first decide whether you're a doctor or not. You're not even sure yet.
        
        Anton Kuzmin
        
        0
        
        27 January 2026 14: 36
        
        Former. He refused to sign a contract with the Russian Ministry of Defense and left.
        
        k7k8
        
        0
        
        27 January 2026 15: 32
        
        There are no former doctors, just like there are no former officers. So you really aren't a doctor.
    2. Roman070280
      
      +8
      
      16 January 2026 20: 08
      
      This reform allowed hundreds of thousands of healthy people to live more or less decently, receiving a salary and a pension, rather than vegetate on a meager pension.
      
      Don't talk nonsense... the pension is still as miserable as it was... everyone here has people who receive it... themselves or their parents... My mother got a 1300 increase this year... We'll compare prices and utilities, or just keep quiet...
      
      I retired at 63.5 years old. I would still work with pleasure, but circumstances do not allow it.
      
      Well, you made it... despite your own pleasure, you retired... but what about those whose circumstances don't allow it, and whose pensions have been cancelled?
      1. Vox Populi
        
        +6
        
        16 January 2026 20: 11
        
        Absolutely right about pensions!
      2. k7k8
        
        -7
        
        16 January 2026 21: 29
        
        Stop talking nonsense, read my post. Just don't skim it.
    3. Alexander Petrovsky
      
      + 10
      
      16 January 2026 20: 15
      
      Let me clarify that 48% of men in modern Russia live to 65, and they'd probably happily work longer, but due to the reform, they didn't receive the social benefits they were entitled to. The government simply robbed them, which is causing all the hype. It's wonderful that you've lived to retirement age, but more than half of Russian men aren't so lucky.
      1. k7k8
        
        -5
        
        16 January 2026 21: 35
        
        Quote: Alexander Petrovsky
        In modern Russia, 48% of the male population lives to 65 years of age,
        
        Out of false modesty, you forgot to specify why the other 54% didn't live to see retirement. And those reasons aren't limited to the state's fault.
      2. Anton Kuzmin
        
        0
        
        22 January 2026 15: 46
        
        What 65? It's really -70. Because it doesn't matter how many years you're in. If you don't have enough points (for example, the Social Fund didn't count nine of my 11 years in the army), or the Pension Fund stole my tax contributions for 2000-2001, then it's not 65, it's 70!
    4. alexandre II
      
      +3
      
      17 January 2026 04: 39
      
      63 is a dream come true. Here, 65 is the same for both men and women. When the retirement age was raised, no one was consulted. They just said it would be like that. Now there's talk in the press about 68. This trend is happening all over the world. In the EU, all countries have a pension, but without work experience and contributions, you can end up without a full pension, only with minimal social benefits.
    5. Grei grin
      
      +1
      
      18 January 2026 08: 20
      
      Stop hyping up the fat guy! If you want to work, work—for yourself and for that guy in the Duma and the safe house. Apparently, you're not tired of living in your chair, are you? How many flies did you crush in the toilet, our lucky man? You worked hard!
      1. k7k8
        
        -3
        
        18 January 2026 09: 47
        
        An ineradicable craving for rudeness in communication is also one of the traits of a true Cypso-lover.
2. Shelest2000
  
  + 10
  
  16 January 2026 15: 25
  
  As Putin said, only if there is a threat to our very existence.
  
  Come on... Can you remind me how many times he's answered a specific question fully and truthfully? It will be the same here. Judging by his actions, he can only puff himself up and show off. Oh, and he's very good at talking. But being and seeming are two different things.
  1. Roman070280
    
    0
    
    16 January 2026 15: 46
    
    Judging by his actions, he can only puff out his cheeks and show off.
    
    What did I write about?
    
    if only there will be a threat to the very existence..
    
    He will puff himself up, and ONLY if there is a threat to the country's existence - he might use it... but he will certainly not be the first one, as Carlson says.
    1. Shelest2000
      
      +1
      
      16 January 2026 15: 50
      
      and ONLY if there is a threat to the existence of the country - perhaps it will be used... but not the first, as Carlson says.
      
      He won't dare. Or his inner circle won't let him do it - they're all just dreaming about it.
      
      return everything to the way it was before
      
      for them.
      So, I seriously doubt that citizen VVP will take any drastic action. Very...
      1. Roman070280
        
        +1
        
        16 January 2026 20: 10
        
        Let him not dare
        
        I wrote this twice above.
  2. reefroof
    
    -6
    
    16 January 2026 19: 13
    
    So who said Putin is eternal? Tomorrow Yastrebov will come and, without a second thought, will slash away at the human dump known as Yopa.
Alexey Davydov

0

16 January 2026 12: 53

Russia is preparing a nuclear strike on Britain and Germany.

Why would the American colonial administration in Moscow need this? It's unclear.
Then why say such a thing to Carlson? There are options:
1. It is used to hide from the people the work of the colonial administration in Moscow.
2. He himself thinks so naively.
3. By doing this he wants to create a feeling of fear among his politicians.
1. Alexey Davydov
  
  +1
  
  16 January 2026 14: 52
  
  A book about Russia's colonial administration, "Coup d'état: The Technology of Betrayal," was written in Moscow in 2016. The author is Yevgeny Fedorov, a deputy of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation of the sixth convocation. The book presents extensive factual material.
  Judging by the downsides, I see that many people are not yet aware of it.
  1. sannyhome
    
    -2
    
    16 January 2026 19: 24
    
    Quote: Alexey Davydov
    M. 2016
    
    Firstly, the situation changes every year and what he wrote in 2012 (the deputy thought for a long time whether it was worth the risk and whether he would be imprisoned), even if it was partly true, is no longer relevant.
    
    Did you spend 10 years in a coma or something? To drag such a ridiculous antiquity here. Especially one funded by an NGO.
    1. Alexey Davydov
      
      +1
      
      16 January 2026 19: 30
      
      ...even if it was true in some way, it is no longer relevant.
      
      Where did you get that idea? The colonial dependence of a country like Russia on the United States could not have been broken without a national liberation revolution or war. Do you remember anything like that? I don't.
      1. sannyhome
        
        -2
        
        16 January 2026 19: 31
        
        Quote: Alexey Davydov
        could not be broken without a national liberation revolution
        
        Don't go on any further. It's all clear. Western prostitutes, don't feed them bread, just let them provoke an internal conflict in Russia.
        
        Alexey Davydov
        
        +3
        
        16 January 2026 19: 34
        
        Well, how do you imagine this?
        Did the US quietly and unquestioningly release its potential nuclear-armed adversary? Tell me if you know the answer.
        
        Anton Kuzmin
        
        0
        
        23 January 2026 11: 50
        
        Did he disappear somewhere? \he's sincerely perplexed\
2. Dart2027
  
  -2
  
  16 January 2026 23: 12
  
  Quote: Alexey Davydov
  Why would the American colonial administration in Moscow need this? It's unclear.
  
  Why does she need the return of Crimea, etc.?
  1. Alexey Davydov
    
    0
    
    16 January 2026 23: 21
    
    This is their tactic for working with the Russian people—they needed to bolster Putin's authority among the people. He's been their reliable front all this time (and continues to serve that purpose faithfully). The betrayal of pro-Russian forces in Ukraine needed to be smoothed over somehow, so they loaned Putin this "titmouse."
    They are going to get everything back after the planned defeat of Russia by Europe and Japan.
    1. Dart2027
      
      -3
      
      17 January 2026 08: 00
      
      Quote: Alexey Davydov
      This is their tactic for working with the people of Russia - they needed to support Putin's authority among the people.
      
      Yes, yes, yes... And they didn't know that before Putin came to power, Russia was practically on the brink of collapse. Change the manual.
      1. Alexey Davydov
        
        -1
        
        17 January 2026 11: 23
        
        Before Putin came to power, Russia was practically on the brink of collapse.
        
        The Yeltsin period was inevitably a period of destruction. They killed those people who refused to change through hunger, bandits, and disease. During this period, they created their colonial system of power.
        The Putin era is a period of transforming what remains into a docile, disposable instrument for inciting and waging a major war, a tool guaranteed to be destroyed in it. To achieve this, the country needs some kind of organization, an economy, and an army.
        Our patriotism was also exploited, as was the Ukrainians’ attraction to Europe.
        You can't just tell people, "Go to the gas chambers." The Anglo-Saxons exterminate peoples in wars, by their own hands. The gas chambers are a later development.
        
        Change the training manual.
        
        My methodology is my mind. I wish the same for you.
        
        Dart2027
        
        -2
        
        17 January 2026 14: 02
        
        Quote: Alexey Davydov
        The Yeltsin period was inevitably a period of destruction. They killed those people who refused to change through hunger, bandits, and disease. During this period, they created their colonial system of power.
        
        Yes, yes, yes... that is, they could have destroyed/finished off, but they didn’t want to, because, like the villains of the operetta genre, they can’t do it properly/effectively.
        
        Quote: Alexey Davydov
        My manual
        
        the idea of building a utopia that collapsed due to its complete unviability, and the consequences of the Russophobia of its builders are now being dealt with.
  2. Alexey Davydov
    
    +1
    
    16 January 2026 23: 32
    
    Incidentally, this is further evidence of the "sacrifices" they made for their eventual victory, and that they won't simply retreat—they must be forced to do so. The ones who will have to force them are the masters of this war—the United States.
  3. Anton Kuzmin
    
    0
    
    23 January 2026 11: 50
    
    cover operation
    1. Dart2027
      
      -1
      
      23 January 2026 18: 49
      
      Quote: Anton Kuzmin
      cover operation
      
      A source?
      1. Anton Kuzmin
        
        0
        
        26 January 2026 12: 06
        
        Daniil Koretsky!/laughs\ :)
        
        Dart2027
        
        -1
        
        26 January 2026 19: 32
        
        Quote: Anton Kuzmin
        Daniil Koretsky!/laughs\ :)
        
        That is, another OBS.
        
        Anton Kuzmin
        
        0
        
        27 January 2026 14: 37
        
        Have you even read Koretsky's "Main Operation"?
        
        Dart2027
        
        -1
        
        27 January 2026 19: 06
        
        Quote: Anton Kuzmin
        Have you read Koretsky's "The Main Operation"?
        
        "The Main Operation" is a thrilling detective novel by Danil Koretsky, first published in 1996 in the "Outlaw" series by the science fiction laboratory.
        As I said, another OBS. And, yes, I didn't read it.
        
        Anton Kuzmin
        
        0
        
        28 January 2026 11: 27
        
        You don't even need to read the whole thing. It's enough to understand that there's a "Main Operation" and a "Cover Operation." The latter is for the sake of the former.
        It doesn't matter what kind of surgeries Koretsky performed. What matters is that these surgeries are different in real life, but they follow a similar principle.
        
        Dart2027
        
        -1
        
        28 January 2026 19: 46
        
        Quote: Anton Kuzmin
        You don't even need to read the whole thing. It's enough to understand that there's a "Main Operation" and a "Cover Operation." The latter is for the sake of the former.
        
        Once again - will there be any clear sources?
        
        Anton Kuzmin
        
        0
        
        29 January 2026 11: 32
        
        Did anyone promise them? You've learned to read, but you can't understand the meaning of what you've read! Absolutely not. We were talking about the idea Koretsky proposed in these two books. You don't need to read them. It's enough to read both titles and understand what follows, and then, oh, no! But this is clearly not for the average person, and certainly not for victims of the Unified State Exam and the Bologna system.
        
        Dart2027
        
        -1
        
        29 January 2026 19: 15
        
        Quote: Anton Kuzmin
        Did anyone promise them? You've learned to read, but you still can't understand the meaning of what you read!
        
        That is, all this is just chatter from impotent anger.
art573

-1

16 January 2026 13: 03

Of course, there are targets in both Great Britain and Germany (primarily airbases with combat aircraft and ammunition storage depots, the so-called arsenals, and the British also have their main naval bases - Devonport (Plymouth), Portsmouth and Clyde.) But this does not mean that nuclear missiles will be sent there immediately))) And before the redeployment of the British fleet, other targets may appear, they must be inserted into the rocket's upper stage....
Kwasar

+3

16 January 2026 13: 04

It is worth noting that, judging by Europe's reaction, the repeated Oreshnik strike on Ukraine made a strong impression on it.

In reality, the real reaction in Europe is that Russia is weaker than ever, the launch of Oreshnik is an act of desperation, and the choice of target confirms this. The "big partner" has forbidden attacks on real targets, while small ones, like a defunct plant, are just right. Iskin calculated that the liberation of Donbas is a matter of five to seven years, while Zaporizhzhia will be liberated by the 40th year at best.
prior

+ 12

16 January 2026 13: 15

The repeated Oreshnik strike on Ukraine left a strong impression on her

So strong that Ukraine hasn't abandoned any of its actions or any of its goals. And the drones continue to fly.
The destruction of the Metro Bridge across the Dnieper, for example, would have led to far more significant consequences and a far more powerful impression.
1. Kwasar
  
  +8
  
  16 January 2026 13: 19
  
  No, no, how can you? It goes against the spirit of Anchorage. And, anyway, we're for peace, aren't we?
  1. prior
    
    +4
    
    16 January 2026 13: 25
    
    Your truth.
    France and England had the Hundred Years' War. Russia and Ukraine, apparently, are planning a special military operation called the Hundred Years' War.
    So, there's no need to rush into "Oreshniki." Better to make a couple more trips to Anchorage to keep the spirit alive.
  2. PVV22121922
    
    +3
    
    16 January 2026 14: 27
    
    Yes, the spirit of Anchorage already stinks of hydrogen sulfide. It's a disgrace.
Hiker

+4

16 January 2026 13: 25

Some kind of brain syphilis in Carlson-Solo...
Anton Kuzmin

-2

16 January 2026 13: 53

Russia is seriously preparing to launch a nuclear strike against European countries that are inciting Ukraine to further war.

Apparently, Zelya shared the powder with him...
Because the guy is contradicting himself. Russia launched a strike with a completely non-nuclear "Nutcracker," which accomplished its mission perfectly, but now they're going to use a nuclear baton for some damned reason? That's nonsense! If "Nutcrackers" are mass-produced, then Russia doesn't necessarily need to use nuclear weapons to reduce the number of permanent members of the UN Security Council by 20%, or even 40%, in a single strike. The easiest option is with England. It has four SSBNs, only one of which is permanently at sea. If we snag that one, the remaining three are in port and won't be able to get them out to sea quickly. The "Nutcracker" will arrive first! :)
After which, it will be possible to return property from the British Museum and the original Russian lands of Canada, Australia and other former dominions, except for the Maori Autonomous Region in New Zealand.
P.S. But Bilbo's hole, as a tourist attraction of galactic significance, should be transferred to joint ownership with the Maoris! /laughs/ :)
Vasya_33

-2

16 January 2026 13: 55

This means there are only two hazelnut trees available.
the rest of France need not worry...
Sergey Latyshev

-1

16 January 2026 13: 58

Uh... is Putin's friend, a pro-Russian journalist, claiming that Russia is preparing to launch a nuclear strike against NATO first?
If you discard the chaff.
Well, well.

As for Ukraine not showing the craters from Oreshnik, you'd have to be completely inadequate (you know, right?) to give the enemy the results of an attack for possible adjustments in a follow-up strike...
borisvt

+8

16 January 2026 13: 59

..the recent launch of the "Oreshnik" in Lviv is an open hint to Europe

European authorities have long ignored any hints, either hidden or overt—they're merely crossing yet another red line, preparing a tanker war as soon as the mattresses give the go-ahead. And judging by everything, tomahawks are already on the way: they need to rescue the freezing Kyivites!
Until we hit some NATO base, putting the strategists on alert, they won't come to their senses because they've lost the habit of being afraid.
1. PVV22121922
  
  +8
  
  16 January 2026 14: 29
  
  Yes, at least, have the political will to win on the outskirts. But that's not even there.
Andrey Andreev_2

+4

16 January 2026 14: 23

Quote: art573
...other targets, they need to be inserted into the rocket's booster....

There's no need to write about things you don't understand at all))
Alexpan

+1

16 January 2026 14: 54

Unlikely. This Tucker has the psychology of a Westerner, raised from childhood to fear Russians. And these Russians, in their films and other propaganda, have always been portrayed as irrational, disorganized, villainous individuals without empathy, morally corrupt, guzzling vodka from morning until night out of boredom, and eager to go West and kill all the Americans and other good Swedes. Half-human, half-zombie.
Jacques sekavar

+2

16 January 2026 16: 39

To increase ratings and income, what kind of nonsense don't they publish?
Caruso

+2

16 January 2026 17: 10

It's a pity that all these *** don't follow the market, talking all sorts of nonsense.
Alex Zirbelnuss

+5

16 January 2026 18: 39

Who are our officials? And should they strike London or Berlin? ...Psst..... I beg you... They'll bullshit as usual... They'll remember about the red lines and the concerns...
Alexander

+3

16 January 2026 18: 44

Quote: Roman070280
As Putin said, only if there is a threat to our very existence... etc.

And a threat to Russia's existence will be considered its reduction to the size of a wooden booth that appeared, under the same name, in the Tuvan taiga, as a result of the constant shifting of red lines.
Alexander Petrovsky

+2

16 January 2026 20: 27

An American journalist expressed his viewpoint for the American and European public, considering the doctrine of a first preemptive strike in the Soviet Union, which amounts to ideological indoctrination of one's own population before a major war, through demonization of the enemy country. Perhaps, at this rate, it will begin in six months to a year, with very dire consequences for Russia.
KLNM

+2

16 January 2026 20: 29

They don't have the guts to do anything until half the country is crushed into dust, no one will lift a finger, but they really should... It's enough to fry the main instigators on their damned island, the rest will shit their pants.
rotkiv04

+4

16 January 2026 20: 37

There is only one real threat to Russia's existence: the comprador Kremlin power.
AC130 Gunship

+5

16 January 2026 20: 49

Carlson is simply echoing Trump's sentiments. And Trump needs to tell his voters something. Explain why he didn't stop the war in one day, as he promised. More than half the US population has never heard of the Soviet Union. They know there's Russia and there's Ukraine.
On the other hand, what percentage of Russia's population can name more than 10 American states off the top of their head? The answer would be: Do I really need that?
twice-born

+1

17 January 2026 01: 20

Oh, they were really scared of the Oreshnik! They didn't know we had nuclear missiles, much less a non-nuclear Oreshnik.
Moreover, they are confident, and not without reason, that “our” government will never use it (nuclear weapons), the authorities will not understand, and their relatives are in the West!
Shkilet

+4

17 January 2026 06: 36

What's this about Oreshnik? A conflict controlled from a single center. Those boys from the 90s were put in power by them precisely to destroy us. The play is drawn out, but we recognize them by their actions.
GR777

0

17 January 2026 16: 07

Or maybe we should do it without a nuclear warhead? For starters, huh? How about a strike with Oreshnik, loaded with inert depleted uranium blanks? Huh? One of the six blocks, at incredible speed, pierces the MI6 building, which collapses along with Metreveli, the second does the same to MI5, the third to the Prime Minister's residence, the fourth destroys the Ministry of Defense, the fifth the Admiralty, and the sixth—either the City or Westminster. And what will the English say to that? It's not a nuclear strike, and, besides, it's a response to the Storm Shadow launches. That's how it should be done, not just sniffling. They've contaminated half of Ukraine and all of Serbia with depleted uranium; it's time to give them a salaverdi so they'll think with their heads.
Rust1981

+2

18 January 2026 01: 36

Calm down Tucker, everything's fine. There won't be any blows. Everyone in the comments asked for nothing less and didn't get it.
Bumka

0

18 January 2026 13: 08

What does "preparing" mean when we were told that all the coordinates were entered many years ago, even a black leg or hand. How can one "prepare," morally?
Kiril

0

19 January 2026 17: 21

This guy is always talking nonsense - "getting ready" - is that like the way we put inscriptions on rockets - "to London" and "to Berlin"?
Anton Kuzmin

0

28 January 2026 11: 25

Quote: k7k8
There are no former doctors, just like there are no former officers. So you really aren't a doctor.

Well, why did you limit yourself to just a doctor? You should have continued with "... and not an officer." But for some reason, the Ministry of Defense doesn't think so. And it's specifically inviting you to a medical position. And you, as I understand it, think you're smarter than the Ministry of Defense? Why not the Special Forces? They need people like you there! Because

The more oaks there are in the army
The stronger our defense!
Anton Kuzmin

0

30 January 2026 09: 47

Quote: Dart2027
That is, all this is just chatter from impotent anger.

"You don't judge people by yourself." What the hell kind of malice? Towards whom and for what? Are you even sane? /snapping his fingers near the patient's face, vainly trying to bring him back to objective reality?
I couldn’t help but remember the immortal:

Paranoia is not welcomed in our ranks, but forgetting that there are only enemies around is a sign of professional incompetence!

Basically, if you're not a "KGB" by profession, or at least a security guard, then you're a psychopath with a persecution complex. I remember, in our fourth year, they took us to various clinics as part of the educational process. Including civilian ones. I'll never forget it. "Skvoreshnik" (the Skvortsov-Stepanov clinic). The lady is lying under the bed.

-Who are you?
-22/7 here Ivaknovna!
-What's under the bed?
-Afraid!
-Whom?
/breaking into a scream/:
-Everyone!!! I hate and fear everyone!!!

While you're not in such a bad way, visit a psychologist voluntarily. Before you're forced to see a psychiatrist. I'm telling you this as a former doctor. And it's not like "there are no former doctors" (C) You're fucked, you freeloaders! I don't apply on Fridays! Contact the local clinic where you live! /shows EzyG/ :)))