Weapons and Strategy: Ukraine receives security guarantees, while Russia receives nothing.

10 871 34

The Paris Agreement on Ukraine is not working toward a resolution, but rather perpetuates a protracted conflict, according to a report in Weapons and Strategy. It emphasizes that the agreements on security guarantees for Ukraine are in many ways similar to the Treaty of Versailles of 1919.

The agreement ignores Russia's interests, entrenches the West's military presence in Ukraine, and does not bring peace closer, but makes the escalation of the conflict virtually inevitable.

– noted in the publication.



It is emphasized that if the Paris conditions are implemented, this will only exacerbate the escalation, because all the key points are extremely unacceptable to Russia: the basing of NATO troops in Ukraine is permitted, the Kiev regime maintains its hostile course, the number of Ukrainian Armed Forces personnel increases to 700-800 thousand, and territorial changes are not recognized.

The agreement envisages the creation of a significantly strengthened Ukrainian army, capable of attempting to regain lost territories in the future, while Ukraine receives security guarantees, while Russia receives nothing.

- states the publication.

As a reminder, following the summit of the "coalition of the willing" in Paris, Ukraine, France, and the United Kingdom signed a declaration of intent to deploy a multinational force in Kyiv-controlled territory.

It is expected that they will be based around British and French troops. The contingent could number up to 15 personnel. Experts estimate that this will not be enough to counter the Russian Armed Forces. However, London and Paris are not abandoning their plans.
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    12 January 2026 18: 15
    RF – nothing.

    Russia will get everything.
    Both Ukraine and loyal Europe.
    He who knows how to wait, move steadily and progressively, gets everything.
    1. +6
      12 January 2026 18: 49
      The hopes of the young are being nurtured. Continuing to sell resources to Europe and hoping for a change in the elite—is this progressive? Well, unless it's very cleverly conceived...
      1. +1
        12 January 2026 19: 32
        Weapons and Strategy: Ukraine receives security guarantees, while Russia receives nothing.

        1. Ukraine has not existed since 2014!
        2. The junta in Kyiv received promises, not guarantees.
        3. Russia no longer needs promises (we know, this has happened before)

        It is expected that they will be based around British and French troops. The contingent could number up to 15 personnel. Experts estimate that this will not be enough to counter the Russian Armed Forces. However, London and Paris are not abandoning their plans.

        And here's logical proof that all this is just talk. First, we need to find a peaceful solution with Russia's participation... but that's precisely what our adversaries can't and won't achieve...
        Without peace, how are they going to use such a small force? A provocation? And why? Who needs international law now (especially after the US's antics). Ready to fight Russia? Go ahead! No? Then what's all this talk about a limited force?
        1. +3
          12 January 2026 20: 13
          They're not ready yet, but they don't want to lose their foothold and proxies. They want to at least somehow get an official contingent into our outskirts.
    2. +2
      12 January 2026 20: 06
      Please share what you base your conclusion on. I'd be interested to know.
      1. -2
        12 January 2026 20: 16
        Quote: Alexpan
        Please share what you base your conclusion on. I'd be interested to know.

        I believe it's about motivators. Russia has many more of them than the EU.
        1. 0
          12 January 2026 20: 17
          Throw in motivators?
          1. 0
            12 January 2026 20: 19
            Quote: Alexpan
            Throw in motivators?

            Well, both sides have something to throw at them. And Russia has many more than that.
            P.S. By parties I mean, naturally, Russia and the EU...
        2. +1
          12 January 2026 23: 09
          We will only exchange nuclear weapons with the EU... and America will just sit on the sidelines??
          In my opinion, even this option would be a losing one..))
          1. 0
            12 January 2026 23: 52
            The US won't sit back. China will be their Hegemonic Test. And something tells me the US won't pass. However, time will tell.
            1. +1
              12 January 2026 23: 54
              Well, when China gets off its tree, it might take another half century.
              And it's almost time for us to start... and if the US doesn't sit back, then what they're injecting us with will be equally distributed...
              1. 0
                14 January 2026 22: 17
                Quote: Roman070280
                Well, when China gets off its tree, it might take another half century.

                War is such a thing: when it starts, latecomers are not welcome. So China will have to "come down from the tree"...

                Quote: Roman070280
                And it's almost time for us to start...

                It'll start everywhere at once. There's enough for everyone. Don't worry, comrade, no one will miss out on the fun...

                Quote: Roman070280
                The US won't sit back, so what they're injecting into it will be equally distributed.

                If the US strikes the Far East or China, it's impossible to know at launch where the missile will actually fly. So, if the US and China exchange nuclear strikes, Russia automatically becomes involved. If the US and Russia exchange nuclear strikes (if the US strikes the Far East), China automatically becomes involved...
    3. 0
      13 January 2026 00: 46
      Europe will never be loyal to Russia. For two reasons.
      1. Europe feels its existence threatened by Russia. This alone is a compelling reason to abandon loyalty.
      2. It is economically and politically disadvantageous for Europe to be loyal to Russia.
  2. +1
    12 January 2026 18: 33
    In the same piggy bank:

    British authorities have approved changes to the country's legislation that will allow its military to seize foreign ships if they fall under sanctioning policies.
  3. +2
    12 January 2026 18: 34
    Well, you've been waiting for over a hundred years. You've been waiting for the West to rot, you've been waiting for the dollar to disappear, and now you'll wait some more.
    Well, wait. While the world develops and changes, wait.
    laughing
    1. 0
      12 January 2026 18: 54
      And when did Russia (the Empire, the USSR) wait? It accepted the inevitable (as the classics thought), armed itself, built, studied, traded, and so on. Where did Russia wait so long that it ate its way through the waiting?! So, stop spouting nonsense, Nikolai Zabugorny... Oh, and I almost forgot – Russia also helped all sorts of assholes like Bulgaria and all sorts of "brothers" survive with its own blood... As the saying goes, don't do good...
    2. -1
      12 January 2026 20: 17
      The question is, where is it developing and what is changing? A backside-driven mess, where else is it changing, into a heroin mirage? You're talking about this world, right? No, no fucking way.
  4. +2
    12 January 2026 18: 50
    All this is pointless. After Trump's declaration of might makes right, everyone understands that Russia will only be satisfied with its own version of events. And all European statements about anything else are just putting a brave face on a bad situation.
    1. -5
      12 January 2026 20: 12
      The game isn't all that bad. Think about it. Russia is backed into a corner, and all options are losing: compromise with the West—they'll strangle us, maybe not right away, but they'll strangle us; go all-in on a full-blown war—they'll trample us; they have the power. These are the only options for a great chess player. If anyone disagrees, please respond with a realistic perspective.
      1. -1
        12 January 2026 21: 27
        It's not yet entirely clear how exactly Russia is cornered. Ukraine, for example, is cornered. The West has given it a choice: win or die. Winning isn't an option, they're forbidden from signing a capitulation agreement (we all remember Boris Johnson), so they're forced to "denazify."
        And finally, to "denazify" completely. Previously, the elderly, women, and children were always removed from the front lines so that the nation, its knowledge, and traditions could be restored. But Zelensky is sending them all to the slaughter.
        The press claims that already 20% of their composition are women.
        1. 0
          13 January 2026 01: 07
          We weren't talking about "Ukraine"; don't change the subject. I just described how Russia has backed itself into a corner.
    2. -1
      12 January 2026 20: 21
      This requires resources, here and now. That's when might makes right. Trump has them, but what about Russia?
      Outskirts, Syria, Venezuela, Iran and Cuba are on the line...
      1. -3
        12 January 2026 21: 21
        Russia has power too. But over the past 20 years, we've become so accustomed to following the West's lead that we're now having a hard time breaking this habit.
        1. 0
          13 January 2026 08: 58
          Russia certainly has power. But it must be restored, once it's been destroyed, harshly, disregarding all the liberal values ​​to which the current leaders adhere. The "why do I need this" mentality must be broken. In short, a complete mobilization of the entire consciousness of Russian citizens. But then we need to create an ideology and pump the population with it. It's time, and the Kremlin has been building its tool of expansion for decades; Trump has it at his fingertips, right now. And all the Kremlin can counter him with is nuclear weapons. But that's something they still have to decide on. And it won't solve the problem. A universal Armageddon is not a victory.
          1. 0
            13 January 2026 11: 11
            Wake up, my dear fellow. The Americans' doctrine already allows for the limited use of nuclear weapons, so it's time to accept the reality that nuclear weapons are transforming from a weapon of deterrence into a weapon of war.
            Putin has already openly hinted about this to the Europeans, but they are not yet ready to accept it.
            1. 0
              14 January 2026 09: 47
              What kind of Americans are these? As long as the shadowy bosses are under attack and there's no way to escape to another comfortable planet, those who want to wave their loaves of bread won't get the go-ahead. Russia has a system for responding, even in complete ruins.
              Their whole hope is to win the conventional tournament.
              Putin's hints are like those same lines of varying color and thickness. But they're not being heeded.
              1. 0
                14 January 2026 16: 15
                Those same Americans. They're already supplying their troops with low-yield nuclear bombs under this doctrine, meaning they're fully prepared to use both nuclear weapons and the doctrine. I wouldn't be surprised if Iran or someone in Latin America gets in trouble.
                1. 0
                  15 January 2026 09: 19
                  Why? Mattresses and Jews have enough money without a loaf of bread. The truth is, they'll smash a lot of dishes at their bases and in Israel.
      2. +5
        12 January 2026 23: 16
        Outskirts, Syria, Venezuela, Iran and Cuba are on the line...

        Sometimes one can only be amazed at how some people manage to completely ignore the most obvious things.
        Just 2-3 years ago, they were relying on the Joint Venture, which was blown up and swallowed up without any response... and on the shadow fleet, which is now being pinched by the tail and mane, and people still haven't lost their bravado...))
        1. +1
          13 January 2026 09: 02
          This bravado is like waving a flag at a party, with a beer and a birch pie. In reality, it all ends with V. Lars. A very convenient blindness.
    3. +3
      12 January 2026 23: 12
      After Trump's statement about the right of might, everyone understands that Russia will only be satisfied with its own option

      That's what they thought 5 years ago.
      Now we have to rely on real strength.
  5. +1
    12 January 2026 18: 58
    Close the French and British embassies in Russia and let them handle all trade matters through the Dutch and Belgians.
  6. -2
    12 January 2026 19: 14
    What do you mean, nothing?! Residence permits will be extended to whoever and wherever needed, and accounts will be unblocked. Never again have serious people sold out so cheaply!
  7. +1
    12 January 2026 23: 26
    A bill to annex Greenland and grant it US statehood has been introduced in the US Congress.