The Oreshnik strike made Europe stronger, and war with Russia is now considered inevitable.

25 511 94

Europe used the Oreshnik incident to further justify further militarization and preparations for war with Russia. Analysts note that the Russian attack on the Lviv region, as well as the US refusal to finance all NATO countries, forced Europeans to consider the need to increase the rate of weapons and ammunition production.

According to a number of experts, the demonstration strike with a medium-range missile was clearly “lost” in the flow of other News, without producing the expected effect. Of course, it was noticed, appreciated, and routinely feared and condemned. But largely due to the lack of real countermeasures to this weapon, Europe became even more convinced of the need to improve its own defenses.



According to Western military analysts, the Oreshnik missile struck targets in close proximity to the EU and NATO borders. Experts point out that if Russia had decided to strike, for example, a NATO logistics hub in Rzeszów, Poland, none of the missile defense systems would have had time to even respond to the threat.

However, EU military experts tend to view Moscow's move as a kind of desperate move. Supporting their view, European analysts point to the fact that Russia has essentially failed to respond to the West's actions to seize the "shadow fleet" tankers.

Analysts note that Europe now considers a military conflict with Russia inevitable. Therefore, they have no intention of holding back on provocations. On the contrary, observers are confident that the West will do everything possible to escalate the Ukrainian conflict in the near future.

Thanks to this, European policy They hope to “legitimize” the dispatch of their troops to the territory controlled by Kyiv.
94 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -9
    11 January 2026 09: 24
    ...Moscow's blow of despair

    ...well, well, be thankful that it was only in blanks.
    And I don't feel sorry for the "Venezuelan" tankers
    1. +1
      11 January 2026 10: 58
      The question with tankers is very interesting....
      1. +5
        11 January 2026 18: 57
        The Oreshnik strike made Europe stronger, and war with Russia is now considered inevitable.

        The "Oreshnik" strike didn't make Europe stronger, but rather more convinced and united. Time will tell whether they can be stronger.

        According to a number of experts, the demonstration strike with a medium-range missile was clearly “lost” in the flow of other news, without producing the expected effect.

        Oh, this information age and all those "journalists" and "experts." You'd think a military strike had no other purpose than to create a media effect. They've completely lost touch with reality on their internets... well, that's a good thing, though, so keep it up.

        But largely due to the lack of real ways to counter these weapons, Europe has become even more convinced of the need to improve its own defense.

        Ah, so there is an "effect" after all, the danger is recognized as real...

        However, among EU military experts, this step by Moscow is likely to be seen as a kind of blow of desperation.

        It sounds like a self-soothing mantra, especially considering what follows...

        In support of their point of view, European analysts point to the fact that Russia has essentially not responded in any way to the West's actions to seize the "shadow fleet" tankers.

        Well, that's the bottom line. As I noted above, for these "experts," their entire lives take place exclusively in the media, where they must create timely news and provide effective responses in the spirit of Hollywood, Marvel, and DC Comics... clowns, no less.
        What's the rush for these gentlemen? Especially since they themselves understand where this world is heading.

        As for the "shadow fleet"... Russia can't respond directly precisely because the fleet is "shadow"... wow... But that doesn't mean there's nothing to respond with... there's just no need to rush, because revenge is a cold dish... everyone knows the rest of the saying )))

        As analysts note, a military conflict with Russia in Europe is now considered inevitable.

        Oh, wow! If that's the case, then Russia needs to prepare for this conflict too, and not waste time on trifles. Well, Russia is preparing. After all, everything has long been sorted out in detail:

        Europe: EU (510 million people) versus Russia and Belarus (150 million people)
        Asia: North Korea (26 million people) vs. the Republic of Korea (53 million people)
        Asia Pacific: USA (325 million people) in the AUKUS group (+100 million people) against China (1,3 billion people).

        And to ensure that all this splendor isn't disturbed by the Arabs and Africans, they'll be going all out there too. Some will say Israel is too small to hold back the Arab world, but the Arabs will be the ones to fight it out. Israel might not survive this, but time will tell.

        Pakistan will keep India from going against China... if both sides keep quiet, maybe they'll get away with it...

        It's precisely in the context of preparing for a confrontation with China that the US is doing everything it can to lay its hands on the resources of Venezuela and Greenland. The former borders the Atlantic coast of South America, the latter is located entirely in the Atlantic... meaning Chinese military access to these territories is geographically hampered. And if Russia is tied to a confrontation with the EU, these lands could be a source of resources needed in a war... For the same reason, they need control of the Panama Canal. So Trump isn't crazy at all, and deep-seated US forces are behind him.

        Therefore, they have no intention of holding back on provocations. On the contrary, observers are confident that in the near future, the West will do everything possible to escalate the Ukrainian conflict.

        International law has long been forgotten, so why the provocations? As soon as they're ready to escalate the conflict, they will... as has happened more than once.
        A well-known rule of any such game: the losing side, given the current balance of power, raises the stakes. The goal is precisely to change the balance of power. Raising the stakes doesn't guarantee victory, but it does open up opportunities...

        Thanks to this, European politicians hope to “legitimize” the deployment of their troops to territory controlled by Kyiv.

        This is already unnecessary. All that is needed is to convince 1-2 percent of the population to go to war. It is possible.
        Yes, Russia's massive use of nuclear weapons could negate these efforts. But they shouldn't be used for any reason (as is often called for here), but strictly at the right moment, and only not against the territories of states possessing their own nuclear weapons, which are all approaches to the borders of the former Ukraine... And let the elite of the countries possessing nuclear weapons make the difficult decision whether to initiate an exchange of strikes or not...

        hi
        1. +2
          12 January 2026 06: 26
          So, we should hand the initiative back to them? Let them strike first, destroying tens of millions of our people, and then we'll come crashing down, right?
  2. +8
    11 January 2026 10: 10
    Europe used the Hazelnut theme to further justify further militarization and preparation for war with Russia.

    So, if he weren't there, they would have become friends with us, right? Hmm...
    1. +5
      11 January 2026 13: 32
      Quote: Dart2027
      So if he wasn't there, would they have become friends with us?

      Having such "friends" you don't need any enemies.
  3. +4
    11 January 2026 10: 15
    We wanted the best, but it turned out as always. laughing
    Well, this sounds more like the truth than yesterday's "Europeans are trembling and terrified..."
    1. +1
      11 January 2026 16: 42
      So, do Europeans want hazelnuts and cashews to rain down on London and Paris?
  4. -2
    11 January 2026 10: 15
    The authors deliberately and hypocritically forget: "If you want peace, be prepared for war." But the Europeans, it turns out, remember
  5. SYG
    -1
    11 January 2026 10: 21
    Unlike their geographically and intellectually distant French, British, and German counterparts, Polish politicians understand that, if Russia so desired, it would be very simple and easy to inflict a strategic defeat on them by using a nuclear warhead at Oreshnik. Therefore, unlike others, they do not plan to deploy their military contingent to Ukraine.
    And we hit Ukraine with blanks only because we feel sorry for them.
    Because these are all our brotherly people, albeit with a lost soul. hi
    1. +16
      11 January 2026 10: 35
      Aren't you ashamed to write such bravura nonsense at the end of 4 years of the most difficult SVO???

      Soon the duration of the Second World War will be equal to that of the Great Patriotic War, and here we have only childish scare stories about how we will destroy everyone and everything...

      but in fact, in 4 years they haven't even come close to Slavyansk... and Kharkov is further away than in the first hours of the SVO.

      But there are continuous marches, dashes, and breakthroughs...the only thing missing is Shaman's "I'm a Guz" antics. But at least he's acting for money, and what are you doing???
      1. +10
        11 January 2026 10: 49
        Soon the duration of the Second World War will be equal to the duration of the Second World War.

        It seems like it was just today..
        1. -5
          11 January 2026 10: 59
          How much longer, in your opinion, can Zelensky's gang hold out? smile laughing
          1. +4
            11 January 2026 11: 09
            Who the hell knows.. request
            My father also started saying on the first day that Zelya got scared and ran away to Poland... to which I told him not to rush to conclusions...
            But back then, hardly anyone could have imagined that it would drag on for so long... and even after 4 years there are no signs of an end.
            So, it's possible that "Zelensky's gang" could very well hold out for as long as they want. We'll see how the sanctions pan out, what Trump does next with oil, and so on.
            1. -7
              11 January 2026 11: 19
              Why do they need someone else's land, whose population the Ukrainian Zelensky is trying to expel? smile
              1. 0
                11 January 2026 11: 20
                To whom??
                This question can also be asked to the other party to the conflict.
                1. 0
                  11 January 2026 11: 27
                  Zelensky and his gang. They've been shooting at Donbas and Luhansk for eight years. smile love
                  And they continue to do so. So how long will this pack continue to kill people?
                  1. -8
                    11 January 2026 11: 41
                    So it was you who decided that that land was foreign to them. But they consider Donbass to be their land. Just as we consider the Chechen land to be ours. request
                    1. +1
                      11 January 2026 13: 37
                      Quote: Roman070280
                      And they consider Donbass to be their land.

                      They never considered Donbas their land. They lived there according to their own rules: "Muscovites"—thieves, lazybones, and crooks.
                      Although the economy of Donbass was of great importance for the country 404, they were not at all interested in calling the people living there that way.
                      It was precisely because the people who lived in this territory considered themselves Russian and were not ashamed to admit it that all the Westerners had long had a grudge against them.
                      Well, if that's the case, then it's only natural that the territory and its inhabitants are returning to Russia, apparently just as Westerners dreamed, but not quite in the form they had envisioned in their dreams.
                      1. +5
                        11 January 2026 13: 39
                        People were called... but the territory is theirs...
                      2. 0
                        11 January 2026 13: 52
                        Well, the people left, along with the territory they lived on. Let those who remain rejoice where they feel so comfortable.
                      3. +5
                        11 January 2026 14: 10
                        Damn... you're like a child.
                        They didn't let them go with the territory.
                        Just as no one in the world voluntarily gives up territory to their neighbors.
                        What could be unclear here? request
                        People have been fighting for centuries over a piece of land, but for you everything is simple..))
                      4. 0
                        11 January 2026 14: 19
                        Quote: Roman070280
                        They didn't let them go with the territory.

                        And no one even asked them. And thank God. People themselves, with the right organization, are capable of making the right decisions.
                      5. 0
                        11 January 2026 14: 54
                        Initially the question was about something else... I answered the person...
                        Whether they asked or didn't ask is a completely different matter.
                    2. +1
                      11 January 2026 16: 44
                      They don't even consider their native Kryvyi Rih their land. Their land is Florida and Miami.
                      1. 0
                        11 January 2026 16: 53
                        And Ancient Rus' is the historical homeland of Russians. Yes
                      2. -3
                        11 January 2026 16: 54
                        And? Your historical homeland is the mythical Tartary and Hyperborea?
                      3. -4
                        11 January 2026 17: 01
                        Comrade, return the historical homeland to the Russian people.

                        Ukrainian Zelensky confused his historical homeland when he began to expel Russians from Ukraine. laughing love
                      4. -2
                        11 January 2026 17: 10
                        This isn't for me. Write to the Presidential Administration.
                      5. -2
                        11 January 2026 17: 45
                        Shame on Ukrainian Zelensky. So many people died. am
          2. +2
            11 January 2026 19: 26
            Zelensky's gang can hold out indefinitely. Judging by the past four years, the war isn't being waged for victory, but according to some unknown plan.
            1. -1
              11 January 2026 20: 04
              No. Zelensky is not a hohol. And he doesn't need pro-Russian Ukrainians. But we do; we are one people. smile
        2. -3
          11 January 2026 17: 11
          During the Great Patriotic War, there was a general mobilization, resulting in 38 percent of the USSR's population serving in the army. Today, less than one percent of the Russian population is serving in the army. If 38 percent of the Russian population (not to mention the 38 percent of the USSR) were fighting today, the situation would be over much more quickly.
          1. -1
            11 January 2026 17: 38
            then everything would have ended much faster.

            Well, the bigger the crowd on the parade ground, the faster it will end, that's logical.
            Now they are fighting with missiles and UAVs over thousands of kilometers... collecting 38% will most likely only increase the number of losses...
            And if we are going to compare the number of troops in the USSR, we must also remember the number of the enemy. request
            1. +1
              11 January 2026 17: 58
              There were more of them on the other side in WWII. Besides the Germans, Spanish, Romanian, Hungarian, Bulgarian, Finnish, French, Italian, Croatian, and Slovak regiments and units participated. Incidentally, the irrecoverable combat losses (excluding civilians) on both sides (excluding fighters from other countries) were roughly equal – 8 million each. Yes, they're currently fighting with extensive use of missiles and drones, but without assaults on enemy fortifications, victory is impossible. And following your logic, the fewer fighters the Ukrainian Armed Forces have, the more successful they are in the war (because there are fewer losses). Taking this logic further, if there's no combat-ready army, then there are no losses (they've already lost everyone).
              1. 0
                11 January 2026 18: 03
                There were more of them on the other side during WWII.

                So that's the thing..
                And at the beginning of their time, the crests had, if I'm not mistaken, an army of only about 200 thousand...

                And following your logic, the fewer fighters the Ukrainian Armed Forces have, the more successfully they fight (because there are fewer losses).

                You're right about the losses... if we're talking about the types of battles that were used in WWII.
                Try to repeat the Battle of Kursk with thousands of tanks. request
                The more successful ones are not those who sit in a field with a machine gun at 10, but those who control UAVs together.

                if there is no combat-ready army

                Combat effectiveness is no longer measured by the number of bayonets... that's what I wanted to say.
        3. +1
          12 January 2026 00: 52
          Quote: Roman070280
          Soon the duration of the Second World War will be equal to the duration of the Second World War.

          It seems like it was just today..

          Monday, January 12 (1418 days of the Central Military District and the end of the Great Patriotic War). The results are radically different.
      2. 0
        11 January 2026 10: 57
        What are you making fun of? Dollars? Euros? Pounds sterling?
        1. 0
          11 January 2026 11: 04
          He actually wrote on point... unlike you...
          1. 0
            11 January 2026 12: 02
            I didn't ask whether it was for a reason or not. I asked what currency exactly he was grimacing for here? Or was it for free? There is a category of individuals who are always dissatisfied with everything, but always know better than anyone what to do.
            These are well described in "The Twelve Chairs"...
            1. -1
              11 January 2026 12: 06
              is he grimacing?

              He actually wrote on point... unlike you...
        2. +5
          11 January 2026 11: 20
          No, they're just acting up for free.
          There is a type of defeatist who at one time sneered, barked and howled at the liberals and thieves and in the end lost the USSR
          And they snuck in here to grin and whine without any reward.
          In short, they are suckers; they could have gotten a job and been paid at the Central Intelligence Agency.
          1. -4
            11 January 2026 14: 46
            Quote: Sergey Mitinsky
            There is a type of defeatist who at one time sneered, barked and howled at liberals and thieves

            In one of the discussions, a "truth-seeker" who started to recall SMERSH was told that if SMERSH existed now, he would have been up against the wall long ago.
      3. +3
        11 January 2026 12: 17
        Quote: Nikolai Volkov
        Aren't you ashamed to write such bravura nonsense at the end of 4 years of the most difficult SVO???

        What else are they supposed to write? At least they're getting paid for this kind of stuff. It feels like, from the very beginning, events have been slated to follow a "the worse for Russia, the better" scenario.
        I'd like to be wrong.
        1. +3
          11 January 2026 13: 21
          No, you have to whine, whine, tear your hair out and scream:

          Boss, it's all gone! The cast is being removed! The client is leaving!
          1. -1
            12 January 2026 12: 45
            Quote: Grencer81
            No, you have to whine, whine, tear your hair out and scream:

            You shouldn't judge (by your character traits), and not seeing your shortcomings is dangerous. fellow
      4. +4
        11 January 2026 12: 22
        In fact, no one prepared the army for war. Just for a quick special operation. Some very influential friend of ours whispered into our commander-in-chief's ears that as soon as Russian troops entered Ukrainian territory, the Ukrainian Armed Forces would flee, and the entire southeast would greet the liberators with flowers. But something went wrong, and very soon Istanbul struck, followed by another scam involving a contract from cocaine simian Zelensky, who had received guarantees of his personal safety. So we've been fighting like this for almost four years now.
        1. -1
          11 January 2026 13: 45
          That's the whole difference..
          1. -3
            11 January 2026 13: 48
            If the SVO was not specially prepared, how could it have been started at all?
            1. -3
              11 January 2026 13: 51
              So you yourself described above how... laughing
              1. -2
                11 January 2026 13: 54
                I wrote this "as is," hoping that at least some kind of plan had been "drawn up," but it turns out there was no plan at all. Idiocy.
                1. -3
                  11 January 2026 14: 49
                  Quote: gxmlygw
                  hoping that at least some kind of plan was "drawn up"

                  And indeed it was. It's just that the enemy (not the Ukrainian Armed Forces, of course) managed to maintain control over Ukraine's leadership. Just recall Johnson's visit. And there were reports about Mariupol that there was a firefight at headquarters in the first days, when our forces were just approaching the city.
                2. -2
                  11 January 2026 16: 49
                  This isn't idiocy, it's the reality of life. Donbas could have fallen at Ilovaisk, but the Ukrainian Air Defense Forces also failed. As a result, they got their own Afghanistan, and then a full-blown war. So the situation here is twofold.
            2. 0
              11 January 2026 18: 15
              You've obviously forgotten that on February 17, 2022, the brutal shelling of the DPR and LPR began. Tens of thousands of their residents were forced to temporarily evacuate to Russia. And 200 Ukrainian Armed Forces soldiers were ready at the republics' borders for a blitzkrieg to the Russian border. It was precisely this circumstance that effectively triggered the launch of the SVO. Shouldn't they start it? Let them shell and seize?
        2. 0
          11 January 2026 16: 47
          So what now? The situation happened, and we need to act, no matter how much we wanted it to.
          1. 0
            12 January 2026 14: 44
            We have no choice but to act. But it's absolutely essential to conduct an investigation and find out who, and why, supplied Putin with disinformation about the state of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the readiness of Ukrainians to greet Russian troops with flowers. These people bear a large share of the blame for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Russian soldiers.
        3. +1
          11 January 2026 19: 29
          The Tsar has nothing to do with it, the boyars are to blame.
      5. -1
        11 January 2026 14: 51
        Quote: Nikolai Volkov
        Soon the duration of the Second World War will be equal to the duration of the Second World War.

        Well, it would have ended faster if everyone who was indignant had gone to the front, and the country had lived according to the nutritional standards of that time.
        1. 0
          11 January 2026 17: 42
          First of all, it is not those who are indignant who should go, but those who support...
          Then everyone would be in their places.
          1. -2
            11 January 2026 17: 47
            Quote: Roman070280
            First of all, it is not those who are indignant who should go

            But you are so smart and brave, you know so well how it should be done - so go ahead.
            1. +2
              11 January 2026 17: 51
              you know how it should be

              That is, you want to ride into heaven on someone else's back. laughing
              You support what's happening - now prove to yourself that this is a smart thing to do.
              And if I initially considered this a stupid adventure, and said that do not That's all - I don't want to die for you.
              1. -3
                11 January 2026 18: 25
                Quote: Roman070280
                That is, you want to ride into heaven on someone else's back.

                That is, everyone is smart only in words.

                Quote: Roman070280
                And if I initially considered this a stupid adventure, and said that all this is unnecessary - I don’t want to go and die for you...

                That is, you are for the Banderites and their masters.
                1. +3
                  11 January 2026 18: 33
                  That is, everyone is smart only in words.

                  It turns out like this ..
                  You will shout from the couch "Kyiv is ours, Odessa is ours, beat Bandera", but I should go and die for you near Kyiv... laughing

                  That is, you are for the Banderites and their masters.

                  I don't care about them..
                  And you, if you can't live on the same planet with them, then go kill them yourself near Kyiv... then I'll write here that you're not only against them in words, but also prove it with your actions...
                  1. -2
                    11 January 2026 19: 51
                    Quote: Roman070280
                    I don't care about them..

                    Yes, yes, yes... Those who don't care don't care; they're not interested in the topic at all. But those who start to come out with their valuable opinions, and very uniform ones at that (everything is bad, everyone has betrayed us, no one knows anything, etc.), they certainly do care. And whose side they're on is clear from their whining.
                    1. 0
                      11 January 2026 20: 04
                      Those who don't care don't care, they are not interested in this topic at all.

                      I'm not interested in this topic... You were the one who started talking about Banderovites here.

                      those who begin to emerge with their valuable opinions, and very uniform ones at that

                      Everyone has the right to their own opinion.

                      I believe that they betrayed me... I don’t want to die for traitors, I say this directly, and I have no disagreement with their words...

                      You have the same opinion that we need to go beat up the Banderites, liberate Odessa, etc. But you only want to do this in words from the couch, while I am the one who goes to die for you... It's clear from your empty talk whose side you are on. laughing
                      1. -1
                        11 January 2026 21: 13
                        Quote: Roman070280
                        I'm not interested in this topic at all

                        Then what are you doing here?

                        Quote: Roman070280
                        everyone has the right to their own opinion

                        But for some reason this opinion coincides with the opinion of those who are fighting with Russia.
                      2. +1
                        11 January 2026 21: 23
                        Then what are you doing here?

                        I'd like to ask you... laughing

                        But for some reason this opinion coincides with the opinion of those who are fighting with Russia.

                        I haven't heard Zelensky say anything about Putin betraying his people, etc.

                        Well, I'll repeat it again... my opinion coincides with what I'm doing... I don't want to go and die on foreign soil, I don't want to be interested in the Banderite issue, I don't want to save the whole world from fascists, I don't want to die for Putin or for you...
                        You talk nonsense about going to war, but you don’t move beyond the sofa... and you even persuade them to send me there instead of you... laughing
                      3. 0
                        12 January 2026 20: 31
                        Quote: Roman070280
                        I'd like to ask you...

                        Quote: Roman070280
                        Well, I'll repeat it again... my opinion coincides with what I'm doing... I don't want to go and die on foreign soil, I don't want to be interested in the Banderite issue.

                        That is, this topic really interests you, and all the talk about “what should I…” is just a lie.

                        Quote: Roman070280
                        I haven't heard Zelensky say anything about Putin betraying his people, etc.

                        Zelensky personally may not, I don’t know, but his fellow hosts are very much so.
        2. +1
          12 January 2026 01: 04
          Quote: Dart2027
          Well, it would have ended faster if everyone who was indignant had gone to the front, and the country had lived according to the nutritional standards of that time.

          Reading your opus like this leaves me stunned. Those who were supposed to prepare the army for war starting in 2014 are irrelevant, and those who don't understand why the world's second-largest army hasn't even liberated the Donetsk region are to blame. Another couple of years of war and sanctions will certainly force us to return to the dietary standards (as you describe) of that time. And our Chinese friends will decide they chose the wrong side; no one ever fights for the weak in this world.
          1. 0
            12 January 2026 20: 33
            Quote: Cmax
            I read your opus and am amazed. Those who, by virtue of their duty, should have prepared the army for war since 2014 are irrelevant, and those who don't understand why the world's second-largest army hasn't even liberated the Donetsk region are to blame.

            Judging by the fact that the support of the most powerful military bloc in the history of mankind has not helped the Ukrainian Armed Forces in any way, those who, by virtue of their duty, were supposed to prepare the army for war, have fulfilled their task since 2014.
    2. 0
      11 January 2026 20: 49
      not brotherly... even before '91 it wasn't like that
  6. +1
    11 January 2026 10: 48
    Some were frightened, while others were determined to keep up their provocations. But far more remained unaffected. They weren't frightened, and they weren't about to feign imperturbable resolve, pretending the hazel's blow had made them even stronger.
    This only proves one thing: Europe is not united, and if there is a war, they will have to fight with everyone, and not everyone will send their soldiers to the slaughter. And whether they will scrape together the necessary number of soldiers eager to go to the front is a big question. Most likely, they won't, even with such mobilization potential.
    And all these sentiments look more like bravado and the imposition of a narrative on society with the aim of twisting its tail that it should now focus on repelling the threat, and not fuss about the infringement of its rights, freedoms, unemployment, migrants and other despicable incomes.
    In other words, this is called tightening the screws by escalating horror stories.
    And if they hypothetically believe that Russia will not respond to their provocations, then Russia can be completely confident that their provocations will not unleash a major war after Russia responds.
    1. 0
      11 January 2026 13: 48
      Quote: Sergey Mitinsky
      They probably won't scrape together enough

      There was a poll in England: would people defend their country if it was attacked?
      The answers for the impudent were depressing; the majority refused such an honor.
      A similar survey was conducted in Germany with the same results.
      To be honest, this was a journalist polling people they met, not an official collection of opinions from the majority of the population, but it is still revealing.
      1. 0
        11 January 2026 13: 56
        An official poll would show 146,5%.
      2. +1
        11 January 2026 14: 09
        It's a long story to get your population to what's called passionarity, especially since this same passionarity doesn't come by choice.

        We must first reduce our people to a bestial state, fleece them blind and convince them that Russia is to blame for all their troubles.

        This was successful in Ukraine, but it is unlikely to be successful in Europe, especially to prove Russia's involvement in their troubles.

        In his time after the First World War, Hitler, in the wake of the humiliation and impoverishment of the Germans, managed to unite the people and create the most powerful army in Europe, but today, such a thing is impossible in Germany or anywhere else. In this sense, their train has long since left the station.

        On the contrary, the militarization of Europe has pitfalls and poses a danger to Europe itself, because old scores and skeletons in the closet have not gone away, they are alive and ready to rise again from oblivion.

        It was not without reason that Polish President Nawrocki, during his visit to Wroclaw, the former German city of Breslau, addressed his supporters and called for strengthening not the eastern, but the western (!) border of Poland, which provoked the anger and criticism of the liberal and globalist Tusk. In Germany, Nawrocki was understood correctly, but remained silent.

        They remained silent for now
        1. -3
          11 January 2026 14: 17
          Quote: Sergey Mitinsky
          In Ukraine, this was successful

          They followed the path of Hitler's Germany - impoverishment, propaganda, and added for better governance - the destruction of previously instilled values ​​(family, history, a single faith - the presence of many pseudo-churches and groups, etc.)
          1. 0
            11 January 2026 14: 27
            Absolutely right.
            Precisely along the path of Hitler's Germany
            but with its own peculiarities
            Their leaders prudently did not lead Ukraine in order not to stir up public opinion in Europe with their radicalism.
            They wanted to have their cake and eat it too, and to remain at the forefront of liberal Europe for the benefit of the economy, and to create a Nazi unitary state with a single ideology, a single nation, and a single language.
            To do this, they needed a main enemy in the form of Russia. For this reason, they agreed to become the West's forward base for its destruction.
            1. 0
              11 January 2026 16: 51
              Well, yes. And in the end, they themselves became targets at the firing range.
  7. -1
    11 January 2026 10: 56
    Is society in Europe ready to accept the corpses of its soldiers from the Ukrainian Reich?
    1. -2
      11 January 2026 13: 50
      Quote: Grencer81
      Society in Europe is ready to accept corpses

      The government is ready, that is, the top brass, who don't show up on the front lines. But society itself is unlikely to be, judging by responses to journalists in England and Germany.
    2. -1
      11 January 2026 13: 51
      Are you certain that the order will be given to destroy the Anglo-French contingent if it enters the rear areas of Ukraine? I can confidently say that it will not.
      1. +1
        11 January 2026 13: 55
        If England and France were sure that there was no such thing, then their units would already be there, and not only theirs.
        1. 0
          11 January 2026 13: 58
          Are you so sure they won't send their troops into Ukraine? I wouldn't say they were particularly frightened by "Oreshnik." The powers that be in the West won't send their children to a massacre, any more than our own will.
          1. 0
            11 January 2026 14: 10
            Quote: gxmlygw
            And you are so sure that they will not send their troops to Ukraine.

            Well, let's start with the fact that their representatives are still there, which doesn't stop us from destroying them. It's gotten to the point where the "Foreign Legion" is no longer a legion, and as such, it was simply disbanded, with the remnants sent to storm the front lines, where an inglorious end awaits them.
            Secondly, it was stated that the contingent would be deployed only after peace had been established and after the matter had been agreed upon with Moscow. Furthermore, after assessing its human resource capabilities, this contingent has already been reduced from the 150 previously announced to 60 currently, but I don't think this is the end of it.
            Well, whether they were scared by the Oreshnik, neither you nor I can know. But this weapon simply gives people capable of thinking in the West something to think about, and such people exist there, and they are also in power.
          2. +1
            11 January 2026 14: 58
            They have already said themselves when and under what conditions they will introduce it.
        2. 0
          11 January 2026 18: 30
          Quote: Grencer81
          If England and France were sure that there was no such thing, then their units would already be there, and not only theirs.

          Why would they risk their armies? For now, the Bandar-logs are doing well, and then they'll kick the Balts and Poles' asses to the east. Yes, I think there might not even be a war; they've started honing their precision operations. Fortunately, they have a huge training ground like Mexico, Cuba, Greenland, and Iran. Redhead and his friend Bibi will train their armies to pull off a maneuver against a powerful enemy without a single missile launching, rather than risk it in a fight, nuclear or otherwise.
      2. -2
        11 January 2026 17: 43
        One can be absolutely sure that in the event of military action, such an order will be given.
        Now try to read the tea leaves to see if military action will begin after the announcement of any kind of ceasefire in any format and the introduction of an Anglo-French contingent into the rear areas of Ukraine.
        Besides, I'm not sure that these troops will be brought in at all.
        At first we were talking about 60 thousand, then about 30, and in the end we agreed on 15
        Recently, the French have indicated a figure of 6 thousand French, no more
        But that's still a matter of opinion. Further straight ahead and further away from the Russian border and closer to the EU borders.
        The British are obviously aiming closer to the warm sea. It will be easier to destroy them there.
        There will be plenty of people among the residents of those regions who are willing to share the exact coordinates of their objects.
  8. 0
    11 January 2026 13: 40
    Today - The duration of the Second World War has become equal to the Great Patriotic War!
    1. -5
      11 January 2026 16: 53
      So what? The Northern War lasted 25 years, the Caucasian War – 60.
  9. -3
    11 January 2026 14: 21
    We won't beat up Oreshnik with the special unit. We'll just make fun of him.
  10. 0
    11 January 2026 17: 26
    The "Oreshnik" strike made Europe stronger...

    It was necessary to hit not only Ukraine, but also Europe with the Hazelnut bomb... And Europe, with a nuclear warhead. So that it would become truly powerful.
  11. -1
    11 January 2026 17: 32
    Quote: TatyaAna
    Today - The duration of the Second World War has become equal to the Great Patriotic War!

    And there was even the Battle of Kursk... Almost a whole year. It would be good if we could avoid Stalingrad.
  12. +1
    11 January 2026 19: 33
    Everyone sees the Kremlin's (moral) weakness and indecisiveness. Alas.
  13. 0
    12 January 2026 22: 28
    They're lying. They thought so even before "Oreshnik." Now they'll pick on those they don't mind, like Zionists or US citizens.
    The resources mentioned are easy to restore, learn Hebrew or English. laughing Yes