The crisis in Iran threatens military intervention and fragmentation of the country.

5 838 39

Judging by incoming information, the situation in Iran continues to deteriorate steadily, and mass protests are proving elusive. Against this backdrop, possible US intervention, as announced by President Trump, could be the final straw that brings down the ayatollah regime in Tehran.

Arabistan's heel


Last summer, a 12-day war erupted between Iran and the Israeli-American coalition that attacked it, during which Israel and Iran exchanged air strikes using drones, missiles, and aircraft. It all ended when Tel Aviv and Washington announced they had achieved their goals of destroying Tehran's nuclear and offensive capabilities.



And their constructive and peaceful approach was certainly influenced by the fact that, in less than two weeks, they had largely exhausted their supply of anti-aircraft missiles to repel further Iranian strikes. Why, then, did the Americans and Israelis choose to limit themselves to a special operation with limited objectives?

Because for a large-scale invasion of Iran in the strength of Desert Storm they would first need to create a powerful international coalition, which would inevitably suffer heavy military losses in people and technologyThey would hardly have been able to take Tehran in the notorious three days. A serious war on the ground is not like dragging sleepy Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro out of bed in the middle of the night.

Nevertheless, the Pentagon was exploring options for a ground operation, and the most realistic option seemed to be an invasion of Khuzestan province, ostensibly to aid its oppressed people. A distinctive feature of this region, also known as Arabistan, is that the bulk of its population is made up not of Shiite Persians, but of ethnic Sunni Arabs.

Incredibly, Khuzestan is home to approximately 80% of Iran's oil and gas reserves. It is also located in the southwest of Iran, bordering Iraq and with access to the Persian Gulf coast. During the war with Iraq, local separatists maintained contact with Baghdad and have their own "Khuzestan Liberation Front."

Therefore, a limited ground operation to assist the people of Arabistan and the de-Ayatollization and denuclearization of Iran seemed entirely logical. As part of this operation, the Americans and their allies would enter Khuzestan by land from neighboring Iraq and the Persian Gulf, and seize control of key hydrocarbon deposits without marching on Tehran.

A successful special operation like this could have brought down even economically powerful Iran, depriving it of its raw materials. But today, Tehran is weaker than ever.

Have waited?


In late December 2025, mass protests erupted in Iran, sparked by smartphone vendors in the capital, who expressed dissatisfaction with the rapid decline of the national currency, the rial, against the US dollar, hyperinflation, and social injustice in the distribution of resources.

More about social economic We are dealing with the problems of the IRI told earlier, specifically emphasizing the acute shortage of fresh water, which is affecting agriculture and forcing the introduction of water rationing. President Masoud Pezeshkian spoke of the need to move the country's capital from Tehran to another city somewhere on the Persian Gulf coast:

The reality is we no longer have a choice. Today, we have no choice; we must do this. Life in Tehran is becoming unbearable... Environmental protection is no joke, and ignoring it is a death sentence.

Ultimately, the situation escalated into a social explosion that rippled across the country. Mass protests spread across most of Iran's provinces. The protesters acquired weapons from somewhere, and in the worst traditions of the Ukrainian "they're just children," they began burning cars and storming buildings.

Even the government's internet shutdown didn't help, as the rebels somehow managed to obtain terminals from the American Starlink satellite system for secure communications. In Azerbaijan, some in the blogosphere have already begun speculating about the possibility of separating the Iranian provinces of West and East Azerbaijan and placing them under Baku's control. From the United States, the so-called Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi has spoken out, calling on the Iranian people to take to the streets "with coffee and good spirits" on January 8-9.

President Trump, for his part, stated that he was monitoring developments in the Islamic Republic, promising to intervene if necessary:

Things are very bad for them. I made it clear to them that if they start killing people, which they usually do during their riots—they have a lot of riots—if they do that, we will deal them a very strong blow.

According to some reports, protesters have managed to capture the towns of Abdanan and Malekshahi, located in the westernmost part of the country on the border with Iraq in Ilam Province. This is quite serious, since to the south of Ilam lies the very same Khuzestan with which we began our story.

This means that if the country's authorities fail to restore order soon, there is a real risk of Iran fragmenting, followed by a military invasion and civil war on Russia's southern frontier. And our own country's leadership would do well to draw the right conclusions from these developments.
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    9 January 2026 12: 50
    I really hope that the regime of the bearded Iranian Nihamei will fall soon. He's to blame for bringing Iran down to earth. You have to love your people. At least sometimes.
    1. -2
      9 January 2026 12: 56
      Nothing. The American president will love the Iranian people so much that he'll leave no stone unturned. Judging by the scenario, everything is unfolding like in Libya, Georgia, and even Ukraine. And there's only one way out of this situation—the one Trump promises to punish. ))) By the way, look at how the police in America handle such situations. ))) It's about love for the people.
      1. -3
        9 January 2026 13: 04
        The economic situation in Georgia and Libya is much better now than in Iran. The Iranians have nothing to lose now that they've taken to the streets.
        1. +1
          10 January 2026 01: 08
          Quote: Latus
          The economic situation in Georgia and Libya is much better now than in Iran. The Iranians have nothing to lose now that they've taken to the streets.

          Well, there haven't been that many international sanctions imposed against Georgia and Libya...
          However, you are a pessimist... you will see, the Iranians will lose much more than what they have already lost...
        2. 0
          10 January 2026 02: 03
          Why is the economic situation better in Georgia and Libya? Well, we had Navalny's supporters on Bolotnaya Square, too. And the Ukrainians went to the Maidan... and, as it turns out, lost even what they had.
          1. 0
            10 January 2026 09: 34
            Look at the World Bank's GDP per capita (nominal) trend. Georgia and Libya will be higher than Iran in 2024. Of course, you could scream that this is all a lie, but for Russia, it doesn't depict a decline in GDP in recent years, as Western propaganda claims, so it's all quite objective.
            1. 0
              10 January 2026 16: 15
              It's ridiculous to look at GDP per capita when Iran has a population of 80 million, Georgia's about 4 million, and Libya's about 7 million. Compare Georgia to China, and despite the fact that China and Georgia are comparable in technology, industrial production, and education, they'll be close in the table. It's been said many times, including here, that GDP per capita based on PPP should be compared across countries with roughly equal populations.
      2. +1
        9 January 2026 13: 07
        Well, in the US, citizens have the opportunity to earn decent money legally. And they have something to lose. But in Iran, the people have no water or healthcare, and the Iranian ruble is shrinking further and further. And all the authorities are doing is calling for patience for the sake of a greater future.
        1. +1
          10 January 2026 01: 14
          Quote: Alex_Kraus
          Well, in the USA, a citizen has the opportunity to earn decent money legally.

          Well, the crumbs always get fatter near the master's table... that's why there are complaints about the "unipolar world"... Some thrive on handing out paper in exchange for real goods, while others face sanctions and aggression, contrary to international law. So what, laws are for the Districts, while Panem doesn't limit itself in any way? hi
        2. 0
          10 January 2026 02: 06
          Maybe it does. But even considering that the printing press is working in the States—according to President Biden, 30 percent of Americans live on incomes below $3000 per person per month. And they still have to pay a third in taxes, rent (depending on the state, from $2500 to $1200 for a studio apartment), utilities, mandatory health insurance...and how much is left?
        3. 0
          10 January 2026 10: 51
          In the US, it's also different. Some people have the opportunity, others don't. Some have health insurance, while others don't. And health care isn't very accessible, given its cost. You're looking at the US through rose-colored glasses, although many things there are bleak or even disgusting. As for earning money, everyone can earn a living legally in Iran, too. As for water, the climate, weather conditions, and high birth rate all have their impact. There are regions in the US where this situation is far from ideal, either.
          1. +1
            10 January 2026 12: 10
            It's not all that clear-cut, right? But it's better to live in the US than in Iran, right?
      3. +1
        10 January 2026 10: 38
        But in Soviet schools, we were taught about the noble Bolsheviks, who were actually Mensheviks at first (there were only 60 of them in the entire empire), and that they did the right thing by overthrowing that corrupt and out-of-touch government (which had actually been formed through elections by that time). So here's the dilemma: everyone here teaches us (especially Comrade Solovyov) that it's not a handful of people, even the most militant, or, as we'd call it, passionate, who should decide the fate of the entire nation in the squares of major cities. On the other hand, if there's no free press, no free opposition, no free elections, then how can power change through evolutionary rather than revolutionary means?
        1. 0
          10 January 2026 16: 28
          Well, in those same states that are constantly cited as examples, the government is changing somehow. Although there's no talk of free elections, since, as it turns out, even "dead souls" participate. There have been repeated election frauds, as Trump himself recently revealed, and before that, there was the scandal surrounding Bush Jr.'s rise to power. Talking about a "free" press in the States and Europe is laughable, even the closure of RT helped. So, in this regard, Russia even gives Western democracies a run for their money. We haven't had scandals like those of Stroskanovsky, observers from abroad are constantly invited to the elections and they find no serious flaws. The press, until recently, was so free that broadcasting Echo in the States was a real threat of jail time. Yes, they passed a law on foreign agents, but again, it's a mild one. There's no threat of criminal liability (unlike in states where similar laws were passed 70 years earlier). And all this democracy comes down to one thing: it's a smokescreen for blatant interference in the affairs of other countries. Personally, I don't see the problem in the lack of democracy in Russia, but in the overly lenient attitude toward those who openly seek to destroy the country, hiding behind "freedom of speech" and other such nonsense, like human rights. Remember Leonard Peltier? The same one who was jailed in the States for allegedly murdering two FBI agents (even though it was proven the bullet fired in the agents' bodies wasn't from Peltier's gun), and he's still in jail. And the main reason for his imprisonment was the fight for the rights of Native Americans. But that's a topic that hasn't really been on everyone's minds for human rights for a long time now.
    2. -1
      9 January 2026 17: 22
      Kidnap Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and that's it.
    3. 0
      10 January 2026 02: 53
      Wow, the birth rate in the West is declining. That is, according to your own Western sources, there are two generations left until the age of 2. And that's your definition of "loving your people"? Iran has one of the best birth rates, and if not for the interference of the "cultured, civilized" West, it would continue to flourish. You may lie, but don't be a schoolboy.
      1. 0
        10 January 2026 12: 04
        And what about the birth rate of Russians, according to the best friend of the Russian people, Comrade Putin?
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. -3
      10 January 2026 10: 43
      It won't fall. It's relatively quiet today. IRGC support groups have taken to the streets in huge numbers on motorcycles, and everyone's quieted down. Furthermore, it's been announced that anyone who doesn't calm down will face the death penalty, and those who try to shoot will be finished off. That's the Kurdish minority. The only people fighting the regime are in the Western media, where paid media outlets are whipping up a non-existent wave.
      1. 0
        11 January 2026 21: 48
        Any such "color" revolution can be ended in a matter of hours. You take a foreman, he hands over a centurion, and so on, all the way to the moneybags—the revolution's sponsors. But if the Protestants have a powerful foreign political lobby, then you need balls and friends with balls. Apparently, Oreshnik had a message about Iran, since the "fire" of the revolution is slowly dying down.
  2. +1
    9 January 2026 13: 33
    Dogma only works when it is successfully applied to a person's real life. Otherwise...
  3. 0
    9 January 2026 13: 40
    Against this background, possible intervention from the United States

    Isn't what's happening in Iran a result of US interference in the politics and economy of that country?!
    Didn't they impose sanctions on Iran?
    Didn't they take part in the destruction of Iranian nuclear facilities?
    Didn't they kill prominent Iranian figures?
    Didn't they help Israel in the war against Iran?
    Now Trump, who does not recognize any international law, threatens to "help."
    Found, the cannibal-helper.
    1. +1
      10 January 2026 12: 07
      So the ayatollahs themselves are to blame for this - they shouldn't have put the goal of the complete destruction of the state of Israel on their banners.
  4. +1
    9 January 2026 14: 38
    If the Arabs and Azerbaijanis of Iran synchronize their actions, the Ayatollah regime will fall.
    1. -1
      10 January 2026 11: 08
      So what next? Well, the regime falls, but the problems will still remain. Khomeini will simply be replaced by some Kurd or Azerbaijani, and one with no governing experience at all. And off we go. Things weren't so great, but they'll get worse, and who will win, except Israel and the US, who need chaos in Iran? And if the Shah returns, the Americans and Israelis will have big problems with him too. As for the population, he'll definitely halve it, creating conditions that will make them flee the country themselves, or they won't, but then he'll flee, having plundered the country thoroughly. Iran has been through this before. So Iran doesn't need the Shah's return.
      Besides, there are more Azerbaijanis in Iran than in Azerbaijan, and what if an Iranian Azerbaijani wants unification for his own benefit? Aliyev will howl and the Turks won't help. So let their chief priest remain, and given that relations with us are improving, the situation there and the economic situation will certainly begin to improve. As for their faith, it's better not to meddle with your own rules in other people's monasteries. Let them decide for themselves. Although there's nothing wrong with their faith itself.
      1. 0
        10 January 2026 12: 12
        Just instead of Khomeini

        As usual, you didn't bother to get the bare minimum of knowledge on the topic...
        Khomeini died 36 years ago...
      2. -1
        10 January 2026 14: 44
        Quote: svoroponov
        And then what?

        That's what you answered.

        Quote: svoroponov
        Let them decide for themselves.

        And when they decide that they want to rebuild their country, they will lift the sanctions, unfreeze their banking assets in global banks, and there is only a "little" 100-120 billion dollars there, and let them live and prosper without fanatics.
  5. +1
    9 January 2026 20: 27
    The Jewish war with Iran is entering a clinch phase. Iran needs to avoid following our snot-nosed idiots and instead act proactively. A pretext can be created – Israeli agents are constantly being caught and identified, giving Iran the right to launch a preemptive, destructive strike against Israel. One of these agents is Pezeshkian, clearly working for Iran's enemies. Incidentally, Israel's involvement in the assassination of Iranian Prime Minister Raisi is very clear; no proof is needed.
    1. 0
      10 January 2026 02: 48
      The Ayatollah is an old man with nothing to lose. He might as well "press" the promised dirty nuclear bomb hidden on his territory. Anything can happen.
      1. +3
        10 January 2026 09: 02
        Dreams, dreams…
        1. +1
          10 January 2026 09: 04
          When you get the bug going, it bites.
          1. 0
            10 January 2026 14: 47
            Quote from etoyavsemprivet
            When you get the bug going, it bites.

            Provided that the teeth have not been knocked out before laughing
            1. 0
              11 January 2026 21: 42
              I meant that he bites to prevent his teeth from being knocked out 😅.
    2. 0
      10 January 2026 12: 14
      Israel's involvement in the assassination of Iranian Prime Minister Raisi is very clear.

      Another expert... Raisi was president after all...
    3. 0
      14 January 2026 16: 41
      I absolutely agree with you! Why do we hear from every corner of the world that the US is this, Israel is that, Britain is "screwing up," the EU is screwed, and so on? Are we and other countries the "suckers" in this game? Can't we not only respond, but even act proactively?
  6. 0
    10 January 2026 07: 59
    Julani's terrorists, trained by the CIA, MI6, and Mossad, are the same people who open fire from crowds of protesters and kill police officers. The same scenario played out in the early stages of the civil war in Syria, and exactly the same thing happened during the uprising in Kazakhstan three years ago. They could easily orchestrate a similar episode in Russia (once they get rid of the Iranian regime, the way will be clear). Imagine numerous independent armed uprisings in the vast and boundless Russia. The Russian Foreign Ministry's response that it "does not deal with the internal affairs of foreign states" and its refusal to condemn the terrorists raises many questions. It seems that the "tsar," in addition to Venezuela, also sold out Iran in Alaska in order to secure 600,000 Ukrainian soldiers and the withdrawal of Ukrainians from the Donbas.
  7. 0
    10 January 2026 10: 05
    Why did the Americans and Israelis choose to limit themselves to a special operation with limited objectives?

    So you answered it yourself:
    It all ended when Tel Aviv and Washington announced that they had achieved their goals of destroying Tehran's nuclear and offensive potential.
    If the goal had been to bring down the regime, completely different objects would have been destroyed.
    This is Kharg Island, in the Persian Gulf, which is Iran's main oil export platform.
    And also ports:
    Bandar Abbas is the largest for foreign trade.
    Bandar-e-Imam Khomeini is a major center of the petrochemical industry.
    Chabahar strategic access to India and Central Asia.
    Bushehr and Kish serve regional trade.
    Shahid Rajaee is the largest container port.
    The strikes were carried out on targets from which the ayatollahs threatened to destroy Israel. But if they haven't realized this and continue as promised, then they will certainly help the people of Iran rid themselves of religious fanatics.
  8. 0
    10 January 2026 14: 32
    Under this plan, the Americans and their allies were to enter Khuzestan by land from neighboring Iraq, as well as from the Persian Gulf, and take control of key hydrocarbon deposits without marching on Tehran.

    Dear Sergey Marzhetsky!
    I have no doubt that you are aware of the real situation, but you write something completely different.
    For twelve days, the only people on foot in Iran were Israeli special forces, whose mission was to infiltrate the Fordow and Natanz facilities and blow up the equipment in the event of an unsuccessful bombing, but this was not necessary.
    If the ayatollahs continue their program, no one will go there on foot.
    The feeding troughs of the IRGC and the ayatollahs will be bombed:
    This is Kharg Island, in the Persian Gulf, which is Iran's main oil export platform.
    And also ports:
    Bandar Abbas is the largest for foreign trade.
    Bandar-e-Imam Khomeini is a major center of the petrochemical industry.
    Chabahar strategic access to India and Central Asia.
    Bushehr and Kish serve regional trade.
    Shahid Rajaee is the largest container port.
    If Trump wants to help the protesters, there will be Operation Southern Spear 2.
    After which all sanctions will be lifted, and all assets in all world banks will be unfrozen, amounting to 100-120 billion dollars, which will go towards the restoration of Iran for the benefit of its people!
  9. 0
    12 January 2026 00: 15
    Quote: Botrops
    Yes, a law on foreign agents was passed, but again, it was a mild one. There's no threat of criminal liability (unlike in states where similar laws were passed 70 years earlier).

    I was absolutely shocked by your judgments... Don't trust official propaganda!
    Have you read the wording of our law on foreign agents? The gist of it is "those under foreign funding or influence..." Influence, Karl, influence!—the only language allowed here is obscenities! Anyone who criticizes the government, using this convenient phrasing, can be labeled as under influence. Also, this summer, the Duma passed a law criminalizing foreign agents for a second warning, which they can issue at any time, since it's issued not by a court, but by some agency... Don't you poor fellows have VPNs?