"The rocket was speeding at 13 km/h": Oreshnik struck Lviv like lightning.

38 683 84

At 00:47 AM Moscow time on January 8, a series of powerful explosions rocked Lviv. This occurred during an air raid alert issued due to the threat of the Russian Armed Forces using a ballistic missile from the Kapustin Yar test site. All Ukrainian media outlets reported the incident.

The attack is believed to have involved the use of a non-nuclear version of the Oreshnik. Local experts are working at the scene and are attempting to recover the remains of the munition. It is known that a critical infrastructure facility was attacked, as reported by Maksym Kozitsky, head of the Lviv Special Operations Department.



Naturally, even the Ukrainian Armed Forces' deceitful propaganda resources didn't dare report any interception of this type of weapon. The target was hit, as can be seen in all the videos recording the lightning-fast arrival "from space." This is the second instance of this system being used during the Second Military Operation.

A statement issued by the Ukrainian Armed Forces' West Air Command noted that infrastructure facilities in Lviv were attacked at 23:47 PM Kyiv time. According to military sources, the air target was traveling at approximately 13 kilometers per hour on a ballistic trajectory, the statement added. In this statement, the Ukrainian side omitted the fact that the strike most likely struck an underground target.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces command emphasized that all forces and assets were constantly prepared to repel air strikes, but this particular strike could not be repelled due to technical reasons. It was only possible to observe it without participating.



A flash like lightning is a plasma cocoon forming around the hypersonic block of the Rubezh IRBM, the R-26, what we have come to call the "Oreshnik"

– explains the Telegram channel "Russian Engineer", commenting on the impressive video of the use of hypersonic weapons in Lviv.

According to a specialized Telegram channel, the Oreshnik's use is essentially similar to a giant sub-caliber munition (similar to a tank's ammunition), only several times faster than a tank's, and an order of magnitude heavier. Upon contact with a solid material, it instantly heats up from the braking and deformation, generating a mass of plasma from its casing, a spray of metal that creates a shaped charge effect, and some of the plasma creates a shock wave (but most of the energy is used for penetration).

Therefore, the weapon in question is primarily designed to penetrate something very serious and powerfully fortified underground.

– the authors of the TG channel believe.

For example, a layer tens of meters thick could be located above underground structures, a gas storage facility, a bunker, or a tunnel. Hitting an area target with them is completely pointless. Nor is expecting any miraculous atmospheric phenomena, like those seen with a nuclear missile, the experts concluded. The missile traveled from Astrakhan to Western Ukraine in approximately ten minutes.

The Oreshnik missile could have previously hit the Bilche-Volicko-Uherske underground gas storage facility, which has a capacity of 17 billion cubic meters, which is more than 50% of the total capacity of all storage facilities in Ukraine.
84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -13
    9 January 2026 06: 24
    So, here's our response to the tanker's capture, and the attack on the presidential residence. And as they wrote... as they said... they said we're incapable of anything... That we're weaklings... That some Leopold is leading the country, and so on. Of course we are. In response to the next tanker, we're attacking the Beskydy Tunnel. And so, lo and behold, Ukraine capitulates just in time for the anniversary of the Second World War.
    P.S.: The main thing is that the Americans continue to seize our empty tankers, so that we have constant pretexts for continued effective action. And, for that purpose, I would specifically send another dozen empty tankers to Venezuela.
    P.S.: Well, there you go... and the results immediately appeared... And people began to respect us again: https://news.mail.ru/politics/69363937/?frommail=1&md=1
    So, we only need to send a maximum of ten empty tankers to Venezuela to become the world's leading superpower. I think that after the second tanker, Trump will open regular air service with the United States and restore our embassies.
    1. +13
      9 January 2026 06: 54
      In response to the next tanker, we're already targeting the Beskydy Tunnel. And so, lo and behold, Ukraine capitulates just in time for the anniversary of the Second World War.

      Thank you for having fun. laughing
    2. +4
      9 January 2026 08: 05
      What does the tanker have to do with the attack on the underground storage facility near Lviv?

      Is this like beating your wife when your mistress stole your Mercedes?
      1. +4
        9 January 2026 11: 09
        What are you doing... beating a woman... or do you have another... alternative wife... scoundrel... we'll find out...

        PS, this show of force must be backed up by the dismissal of all those who like to talk to the enemy in the enemy's language - English...
        will be removed from all positions... because only a narrow-minded person, a very narrow-minded person... can believe that it is possible to conclude an agreement with an Anglo-Saxon that the Anglo-Saxon will not break...
        They broke all the agreements and promises they had made before and threw them in the trash... everything and everyone...

        The Anglo-Saxons consider the Russian conscience – keeping one’s word – to be our weakness… and they use this in practice by giving us our word… as they did to the Indians back then.
        There is only one option here - we defeat them... and we will defeat them...

        I was really worried... and still am worried that these negotiators... and other English-speaking people, whispering to the enemy in English, will betray us... "smoke the pipe of peace" with the Anglo-Saxons... left over from the Indians...

        With the Anglo-Saxons, they are enemies – we should speak only Russian… exclusively Russian… to be respected – we must respect ourselves…

        and such demonstrations of capabilities are also helpful..
    3. -6
      9 January 2026 09: 20
      Do you really think so, or is it your job to try to shape public opinion?
      1. 0
        9 January 2026 13: 16
        Learn to recognize banter..))
    4. -3
      9 January 2026 10: 34
      A healthy man beats you up, and in response you kick his child and shout that you got revenge!
      1. -1
        9 January 2026 12: 15
        and the revenge of the current Kremlin thugs consists only of this! SHAME!
    5. +1
      9 January 2026 12: 06
      And Moscow will be moved to Novye Vasyuki and it will become New Vasyuki, where Trump will come for a global chess tournament!
  2. +18
    9 January 2026 09: 47
    I'll be honest. I don't care why they hit me with "Oreshnik." The main thing is that they hit me, and there are results.
    1. -1
      9 January 2026 10: 28
      There was no point in beating them. In Uherské, there's a 100x50 meter compressor building in a field, along with a shed for technical equipment, and all the gas pipes run vertically into the ground. No matter what they hit us with, everything was repaired and working. And the blows were just a ploy, a charade. Did they ever show any results? None.
      1. +6
        9 January 2026 11: 44
        There is an underground factory nearby for producing long-range drones and a buried command post for NATO troops, and possibly a shelter for Zelensky, where he usually receives various Western riffraff (simulating meetings in Kyiv). It is possible that, in addition to the storage facility, these objects were also hit.
        Well, one more thing. The fact that a small house on the surface is one thing (and it's not really a house, but an entire infrastructure for lifting, pumping, and transferring gas), but the fact that the entire infrastructure for lifting this gas to the surface and pumping it into pipelines was destroyed is something else entirely, and that's what happened as a result of the Oreshnik strike. Restoring it won't be possible; it's easier to build from scratch. And they also locked up a fair amount of gas from Western countries in storage. Given that European gas reserves are low compared to usual, and costs are high due to the freezing temperatures, someone in the West will have some serious problems with consumers. They'll have to buy gas from outside, and pay a huge amount of money. So for Ukraine and some EU countries, this is a blow below the belt. And rightly so, they'll have to spend less on weapons.
        1. 0
          9 January 2026 22: 28
          Where did you get the information about the destruction of "the entire infrastructure"? Did you inspect it in person? It seems childish to say such irresponsible things.
      2. -3
        9 January 2026 12: 53
        You read the comments of these clowns from their bedbug-infested couches and you're not surprised that the liberals and their audience have the brains of hamsters...
    2. -1
      9 January 2026 11: 09
      So, here's the thing: is there a result? Based on the material being commented on, there's no way to assess the missile's effectiveness. Hasn't any data emerged in the intervening time to evaluate the success of this very expensive weapon?
      1. -9
        9 January 2026 11: 16
        Well, then. You'll take the speaker above you as your partner, along with provisions, ammunition, surveillance equipment, a parachute, and a Budyonovka pistol, and you'll set off to exercise objective control over Galicia. Good luck.
        1. 0
          9 January 2026 11: 19
          If you have something substantive to say, say it. And if you want to show off your wit, you really need to have it.
          P.S. To put a Budyonovka on someone, you first have to put it on yourself. Or are you writing from the trenches?
          1. +1
            9 January 2026 11: 23
            No, not from the trenches. Neither did you, by the way. But unlike you, I don't tell the military what to do, although I have some right to do so.
            1. +3
              9 January 2026 11: 40
              To indicate that some kind of confirmation of a strike's success is necessary when declaring it a success doesn't require any special right. It simply requires being on good terms with, or at least not conflicting too much with, basic logic and common sense.
              1. -5
                9 January 2026 12: 12
                You're wasting your time putting on a smart face. It doesn't suit you.
        2. -1
          9 January 2026 12: 13
          But if you don't know what hit it, there's no point in shouting victory! Maybe the toilet was knocked down by a hazelnut tree!!!
          1. -1
            9 January 2026 12: 22
            Maybe. Quite possibly. So you can go there yourself and check it out. And then expose the Russian Ministry of Defense's lies.
            1. -2
              9 January 2026 12: 37
              You don't even need to go anywhere to expose the lies; this constant lie is visible to the naked eye!
      2. +3
        9 January 2026 11: 52
        Yuzhmash is out of commission; everything there needs to be rebuilt or rebuilt from scratch. Almost all underground infrastructure and utilities have been destroyed. Doesn't that impress you?
        1. -1
          9 January 2026 13: 16
          He didn't work anyway without Oreshnik; post-Soviet managers in both Ukraine and Russia are more frightening than the consequences of nuclear strikes.
          1. +3
            9 January 2026 13: 35
            You can tell the workers there that it wasn't working (the engineers) who were fired and came to us, to the West. A lot of things were in operation, produced, and stored there. Now, all we can think about is Yuzhmash. It's simply a dangerous facility to be in because of the risk of collapse, and it's simply impossible to move around the underground workshops and utilities.
            1. 0
              9 January 2026 14: 13
              This is a crater left by an inert ICBM warhead at a test site. Roughly comparable to a crater left by a FAB-500.
              Lord, when will you, the flock of Brain Hazel, understand the laws of physics? Even under the most optimistic scenario, the kinetic energy of a bomb's impact is calculated to be equivalent to approximately 300 kg of TNT. What underground facilities are you planning to destroy? All bunker busters are armed with a massive amount of explosive, not just dummies.
        2. 0
          9 January 2026 22: 30
          Words, words. Empty chatter.
    3. -1
      9 January 2026 12: 08
      Well, tell us why they hit us, how many transformer boxes and toilets were demolished in Areshnik?
    4. 0
      9 January 2026 13: 17
      I'd like to know the result..
    5. 0
      10 January 2026 13: 33
      The result is when Bankovaya is demolished along with all its contents, or Narkoman is disintegrated into atoms.
  3. -1
    9 January 2026 10: 30
    It was time to do it
    1. -2
      9 January 2026 12: 10
      I still don't understand why they did "that". Well, they hit me with a nut, but what did they hit me with?
      1. +1
        9 January 2026 13: 11
        Write to the General Staff of Russia and order them to report on the exact location of the strike and the results of objective control.
        Targets for such weapons are chosen very carefully in order to inflict very, very great damage on the enemy.
        1. -1
          9 January 2026 22: 33
          The Russian Ministry of Defense knows how to steal, but not how to fight. They don't know how to choose their targets carefully. They can afford their own cottages.
  4. 0
    9 January 2026 11: 20
    Testing and trial runs of the new weapons continue. The Ukro-Mountaineers are ordered to prepare the testing ground for further product acceptance! 🎉🔥♥️
    We will prepare an excellent recycling product for NATO members.
  5. -5
    9 January 2026 11: 47
    According to the military, the air target was flying at a speed of about 13 thousand kilometers per hour along a ballistic trajectory, the report says.

    When striking Israel, the Iranian Fattah missile has a speed of Mach 15, which is more than 18,000 km/h.
    The Palestine-2 missile can reach speeds of up to Mach 16, approximately
    19,600 km/h with a smaller warhead and a weight of 500-800 kg, speeds up to Mach 9 (about 11,000 km/h)

    The Yemeni movement said in a statement that a Palestine-2 hypersonic ballistic missile with multiple warheads was launched at the Tel Aviv area.

    "After sirens sounded in several areas of Israel recently, a rocket launched from Yemen was intercepted."

    Clearly, for Ukraine, these are not interceptable missiles. But there's no scientific or military advancement in this. It's just standard medium-range ballistic missiles.
    1. +6
      9 January 2026 12: 16
      Ballistics, yes, but our missile pods don't go into space, but rather travel through the atmosphere at such speeds in flat arcs, and they're also controlled and maneuvered. The Americans' whole problem is that they can't teach their similar pods to operate in such conditions, and they haven't yet been able to steal the technology. Furthermore, an object traveling in plasma is visible, but radars can't detect it. The plasma interferes with wave reflection, and because of its elongation, it's impossible to visually determine the pod's location within this cocoon, even by its brightness, which makes it impossible to aim for engagement. Moreover, the speed and maneuverability of these pods make it impossible to calculate the target's location for subsequent engagement with interceptors. Therefore, targeting such pods is very difficult, and if they maneuver slightly, it's completely impossible, unless it's by chance. Furthermore, our pods are deployed very quickly, and they no longer move toward their targets as a single unit. So, the Oreshnik is truly a formidable weapon. And if its submunitions are also nuclear-tipped, then I don’t envy whoever gets its “nuts”
      1. -3
        9 January 2026 12: 30
        You've described the Burevestnik's operating principle. However, according to fragmentary and unreliable information from open sources, the Oreshnik is based on the developments of the Pioneer and Topol missiles. Furthermore, even the launch vehicle is practically identical to the Pioneer, but slightly shorter due to the development of new types of propellant. So, most likely, the Oreshnik is primarily a ballistic missile.
        Naturally, this is all just speculation and rumor. We won't know anything more or less definitive anytime soon.
        1. -1
          9 January 2026 12: 59
          I don't care about the specs, which are mostly guesswork. The main thing is the result. No one can shoot it down because of its low altitude of 40 km, its incredible speed, and its maneuverability. The Yankees know the operating principle, but they don't have the materials; they haven't invented it yet.
          1. -3
            9 January 2026 13: 39
            You can spit as much as you like. It doesn't affect objective reality. But you'll drive people away with your drool.
            1. -1
              14 January 2026 03: 53
              It's a figure of speech, not to be taken literally. But if you really get to the root of it, I'm right: no one can shoot it down, it reaches its target, 13 km/h, according to the Ukrainian pigs, which is why Ryzhiy... didn't go after Iran, etc.
              I don't care about the rest))) (sorry). The rest is up to snobs, since no one has the information. They're just guessing))).
        2. 0
          9 January 2026 13: 29
          Even a slightly curved straight line becomes ballistic. Any missile launched from the ground toward a target elsewhere on the Earth's surface is forced to follow a ballistic trajectory. But altitudes, speeds, and flight conditions can vary. Furthermore, new concepts in missile design are usually based on old concepts.
          But there's a lot that's new in Oreshnik. First, the hypersonic strike vehicles themselves, which travel through the atmosphere rather than space. Second, the control and deployment units, as well as the control and signal reception systems, aren't from older missiles but are based on new technologies. And the materials used are Russian-developed. And the booster is most likely not from Rubezh or Sineva, but rather like the one on a Moscow anti-ballistic missile—you can watch their launch; it's online. But even there, they have a new missile for intercepting warheads, developed and tested in Russia, not the USSR.
          1. 0
            9 January 2026 13: 42
            Quote: svoroponov
            The blocks for receiving and transmitting signals are also not from old missiles.

            After this slap, it’s not interesting to read further.
      2. 0
        9 January 2026 15: 55
        Quote: svoroponov
        Ballistics, ballistics, but our rocket blocks don't go into space.

        I understand your point: if it was stated that we build missiles that defy the laws of physics, you can confidently assert that ballistic missiles don't fly on ballistic trajectories. But the problem is that the missiles themselves don't know this and continue to fly on ballistic trajectories. And of course, this applies to the Oreshnik missile, and like all ballistic missiles, they are perfectly visible to radars while flying in space and are intercepted by missile defense systems. This was confirmed in the 12-Day War.
        What you are writing about concerns hypersonic glide vehicle which are installed on heavy intercontinental ballistic missiles as warheads. These include the Avangard, which is delivered by ICBMs and already differs from traditional ballistic missile warheads in that it is capable of maneuver and operate at lower altitudes.

        Quote: svoroponov
        And if its submunitions are also nuclear-tipped, then I don’t envy whoever gets its “nuts”

        "What goes around comes around."
    2. -3
      9 January 2026 12: 17
      Yes, you're right. It's most likely just conventional ballistics. The trick is using a kinetic warhead to destroy targets. Cheap and effective. And don't worry about how to preserve the explosive/nuclear warhead in the plasma and hollow casing until detonation. A crowbar is still a crowbar, no matter where you are. And as we all know, there's no defense against a crowbar unless you have another crowbar.
      1. -2
        9 January 2026 16: 03
        Quote: k7k8
        Yes, you're right. It's most likely just conventional ballistics. The trick is using a kinetic warhead to hit targets.

        It's entirely possible. We don't know all the details. But a "crowbar" requires high accuracy. And all these missiles were designed for nuclear weapons, where such precision isn't necessary.
        I can make a guess that combat tests are underway without a warhead.
        1. 0
          9 January 2026 18: 12
          Quote: vitgusin
          All these missiles were designed for nuclear weapons, where such precision is not needed.

          You're mistaken. Accuracy is once again a pressing issue for special warheads. To minimize their size and weight, which ultimately leads to smaller delivery vehicles, accuracy must be improved, as the power of the charges is significantly reduced.
          Besides, the underground gas storage facility and Yuzhmash are not such pinpoint targets.
          1. -1
            9 January 2026 18: 17
            Quote: k7k8
            In order to minimize their size and weight, which ultimately leads to the minimization of carriers,

            I agree, it is quite possible that they have switched to a "crowbar" with point guidance, using the kinetic principle of the missile defense system.
            1. -1
              9 January 2026 18: 29
              The minimization is clearly evident. The Pioneer ground-based system had a six-axle launcher chassis, while the Oreshnik launcher, with the same range, has a five-axle chassis (this is evident in the recently published photos). In other words, the transport and launch vehicle with the missile has become 3 meters shorter. This means that the missile, with the same range (both are intermediate-range missiles) and payload, has become shorter and lighter. This is most likely due to the use of new high-energy fuels. Furthermore, the 15Zh53 missile had three warheads, while the footage of the UGS strike near Lviv shows six incoming missiles, all from a single missile. This means the warheads have become lighter, and their nuclear yield will accordingly be lower. This requires a significant reduction in the CEP to maintain combat power and combat effectiveness. That's the simple explanation, so to speak.
              1. -1
                9 January 2026 18: 33
                Quote: k7k8
                This is, so to speak, an explanation on the fingers.

                I agree, this is a perfectly acceptable explanation.
    3. +1
      9 January 2026 12: 52
      Why are you pissing yourself off and making excuses so early? The UGH was guarded by the best air defenses in the West, better than your assholes. So don't confuse Oreshnik with Papuan crafts.
      1. -1
        9 January 2026 16: 05
        Quote from etoyavsemprivet
        The PGH was guarded by the best air defense systems in the West,

        Please, announce the whole list. Without the list you talker!
        1. 0
          10 January 2026 01: 49
          Holy shit, someone explained it to you there and you agreed))).
          1. -1
            10 January 2026 09: 26
            Quote from etoyavsemprivet
            Holy shit,

            Well, now they have confirmed that you are just a snitch on the keyboard, and the people Chatterbox!
            1. 0
              14 January 2026 04: 03
              You were given a literal explanation of k7k8 above, just read it. And you agreed without proof))). So who are you? A hypocrite, a guy with "violations," a cavalier who just wants to snitch?
              I'm telling you the fact that the underground gas storage facility was attacked and destroyed (see video), and that's a pretty damn strategic facility. There's €9 billion worth of gas there, and the profit from it should be at least quadrupled. And they're going to leave this stuff in the open?
              Better get some sleep.
              1. 0
                14 January 2026 09: 17
                You wrote it:

                Quote from etoyavsemprivet
                The underground gas station was guarded the best air defense systems in the West, better than your ass.

                This is what I asked for:

                Quote: vitgusin
                Please, announce the entire list. Without a list you are a chatterbox!
                1. -1
                  15 January 2026 03: 57
                  But you agreed with it even without the "list" in the post above 😂. There, they explained it to you in layman's terms. It's funny and pathetic how someone as feeble as you justifies it.
                  1. -1
                    15 January 2026 09: 31
                    Quote from etoyavsemprivet
                    It's funny and pathetic how a weak person like you justifies himself.

                    Don't shift the blame onto others, "the boy said, the boy did."
                    1. The comment was deleted.
    4. 0
      9 January 2026 18: 21
      It is clear that for Ukraine these are not shoot-down missiles. But there's no scientific or military advancement in this. It's just standard medium-range ballistics.

      Are you denying the fact that Western air defense systems have been supplied to Kyiv? Or are you admitting that all these Patriots, Irises, and other SAMP-TIs are ineffective against Russian weapons? What are they guarding there, if there are blackouts all over the 404, and Kyiv Mayor Klitschko is calling on residents to leave the city? And by the way, even after the first use of the Oreshnik missile, Putin offered anyone like you who doubted its effectiveness a duel against any of the existing air defense systems, but no one has volunteered to test their mettle.
      1. -1
        9 January 2026 18: 53
        Quote: Stanislav Bykov
        Patriots, Irises, and other SAMPs are incapable of anything against Russian weapons?

        Of course, they're not capable of dealing with missiles (IRBMs) like the Oreshnik. Everything you listed can only have a positive effect in a layered defense, and only partially, since they work on the target when atmospheric entry where the warhead, due to high air resistance and technical design features, begins to move chaotically.
        Such missiles must be shot down when they are located in space They fly along a known ballistic trajectory, are perfectly visible to radars at a distance of up to 4000 km, and the Arrow3 missile defense system liquidator missile finds it at a distance of up to 2000 km and kinetically destroys it.
        1. -1
          9 January 2026 19: 01
          This is all theory, practice proves and shows everything, let Israel give its "Dome" at least to Kyiv and shame Russia or... shame itself
          1. -1
            9 January 2026 19: 04
            Quote: Stanislav Bykov
            "Dome" at least for Kyiv

            Please first understand the performance characteristics of air defense/missile defense systems, you might be embarrassed to write nonsense.
            Israel sold the Arrow 3 missile defense system to Germany for nearly $4 billion. After receiving and inspecting it, they immediately signed a contract for another one.
            1. -1
              9 January 2026 19: 11
              Okay, let's not... it's all about who's thicker and who's longer, I'm not really a fan of that kind of thing.
              1. -2
                9 January 2026 19: 15
                Quote: Stanislav Bykov
                all this is from the category of who is fatter and longer, I'm not really into that kind of thing

                It's a shame, both suit me. lol
            2. -1
              9 January 2026 19: 47
              The Germans simply subsidized the Jews by purchasing this. I remember the Americans, having sunk 60 million into a dubious deal to buy a miracle system, after testing it, declared that the missiles were of the wrong type. Then they tried to sell it to the swindlers and deal with the initiators of this purchase.
              1. -1
                9 January 2026 20: 13
                Quote: AndreykaGM
                The Germans simply subsidized the Jews by purchasing this.

                The Germans are not the Turkish sultan, buy and sell.
                The Germans bought two complete sets:
                • Interceptor missiles
                • Super Green Pine Radar
                • Launchers
                • Battle Management System (BMS)
                • Exoatmospheric interception: designed to intercept ballistic missiles in space, outside the Earth’s atmosphere at an altitude of over 100 km at a distance of up to 2000 km
                All countries located around Germany will only acquire launchers, and Germany will control them.
                Ask your toad not to choke you too much when you hear the word Israel.
                1. -1
                  9 January 2026 20: 19
                  When the Americans bought this, they also thought about a strangling toad and tried to sell this miracle to the Ukrainians.
  6. +2
    9 January 2026 11: 56
    The results of the strikes - in the studio. So far, only words.
    1. -3
      9 January 2026 12: 15
      There, a group of exceptionally gifted individuals is gathering in Galicia to conduct an objective audit. Right on your way.
      1. -4
        9 January 2026 12: 38
        There is no point in shouting about victory in vain!
        1. -3
          9 January 2026 12: 55
          Well, compared to the recent test of the Sarmat, which crashed a few seconds after launch, the fact that the missile more or less reached its target can already be considered a victory, there's no arguing that.
          1. +1
            9 January 2026 13: 05
            SARMAT wasn't launched. Something happened during preparation, at the test site. An explosion in the silo before launch. If you're providing information, be more precise. Besides, a number of these missiles are already in test operation. So the one in the silo most likely had some design improvements, which is why it was placed there for testing.
            The Americans (British) have had their on-duty systems malfunctioning for a long time now. Why don't you mention them as an example?
        2. -3
          9 January 2026 13: 03
          Several large thermal power plants, removed by the Ukrainians themselves, are burning. The underground gas storage facility "ran out," according to the drug addict himself. What more do you need? If this is a response to the tanker, then that's quite the response. It's more likely a hint at Iran, the Anglo-Saxons.
          1. 0
            9 January 2026 13: 24
            These thermal power plants should have been burning even before the tanker... and the underground gas storage facilities are at a depth of 700 meters, it’s difficult to talk about them yet.
            So there's nothing to laugh about here... the only good thing is that they at least decided to actually strike.
            1. 0
              14 January 2026 04: 28
              Well, if you think Oreshnik's goal was specifically gas, a gaseous substance found 400 meters underground, then I don't think you're worth talking to.
        3. 0
          9 January 2026 13: 35
          So no one is shouting about victory except you.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  7. 0
    9 January 2026 13: 13
    The Kremlin's snotty motto: spectacular, but ineffective. Somehow, I'm not surprised that the entire retaliatory strike ended like this. The CEP is 10-30 meters, and the warheads are inert. The crests will go and count the holes and then launch drones and blow up bridges.
  8. 0
    9 January 2026 14: 44
    The Bilche-Volicko-Uherske UGS facility, which has a capacity of 17 billion cubic meters, is more than 50% of the total storage capacity of all Ukrainian gas storage facilities. The question is, how much gas was actually there? A couple of cubic meters? There was no explosion. There should have been one, and what a collapse it would have been—a surface collapse of tens of square kilometers.
    1. +2
      9 January 2026 18: 31
      The underground gas storage facility is located at a depth of 700 meters.
      In principle, nothing can get deep there... so it’s logical that there was no explosion.
      At most, the surface infrastructure is destroyed.
  9. +3
    9 January 2026 16: 07
    The answer is certainly dire. But why, in response to his assassination attempt, did Putin use hazelnuts not on Zelensky and his gang, but on the gas storage facility? After all, Zelensky wouldn't care, but the ones who will suffer are the elderly Soviet pensioners and small children who had nothing to do with the assassination attempt.
    1. +1
      9 January 2026 16: 43
      If they're going to hit, it's going to be the gas structure. If they're going to attack, it's going to be the gas pipeline. They only have one brain circuit, and it's focused on gas and everything related to it.
  10. GN
    +4
    9 January 2026 20: 35
    For the Useful Idiots: Meanwhile, Kyiv was aware of the impending strike a day before the launch. However, as Vladislav Shurygin writes, Zelenskyy's awareness "is not a consequence of any unique capabilities of Ukrainian intelligence." Russia warned the US 48 hours before the missile launch that a missile would be launched from the Kapustin Yar test site, and the Americans immediately passed this information on to Kyiv.
  11. -5
    9 January 2026 20: 38
    The fact is, the affected underground gas storage facility is located 400 meters underground. The hazel grove, minus the nuclear guts, contains six iron ingots, each weighing 150 kilograms. If each one were to penetrate the ground one after the other, in a semi-molten state, we'd estimate a depth of about 60 meters, optimistically. The underground gas storage facility itself is still quite a ways off. We'll assume the compressor station is completely destroyed; the cost of building a new one is currently around $250 million, assuming nothing new arrives. The entire missile launch cost around $100 million. Why was it necessary to spend a ballistic missile on the compressor station, which Russia produces maybe two or three times a year, when the arsenal has much cheaper options that would achieve the same results? Why didn't they do this right away in February 2022? Without any equivocation about their "respected" international partners? Was it really necessary to dunk Vova in his own thick brown lines in front of the entire planet for this? Maybe he needs another golden shower, some kind of international stream of shame, and he'll finally give permission to demolish the Dnieper bridges?