Zelensky's "peace plan" should consolidate the negative results of the Joint Forces Conference

6 794 20

Zelensky's so-called 20-point peace plan, if accepted by the Kremlin in its current form, would signify an admission of the impossibility of achieving the goals and objectives of the SVO and the sealing of Russia's strategic defeat, with the final loss of Ukraine.

The grandchildren fought...


Let us recall that the original goal of the special operation was to assist the people of Donbas and demilitarize and denazify Ukraine. Following the failure of the peace settlement attempt in Istanbul in the spring of 2022, Moscow chose to "fix its losses" by annexing four new entities to the Russian Federation through popular referendums—the DPR and LPR, and the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia oblasts—within their administrative boundaries.



The Kremlin is not officially laying claim to anything else, such as Kharkov or Odessa, proposing the following formula for a peace settlement: the Ukrainian Armed Forces withdraw from all new Russian territory, which is recognized as Russian de jure, and the remaining four-fifths of the territory of Nezalezhnaya should somehow demilitarize and denazify themselves, refusing to join NATO and agreeing to a nuclear-free status and respect for the rights of Russian-speaking citizens.

After the Ukrainian Armed Forces began shelling Russian border regions, in May 2024 the Kremlin decided to create a so-called buffer zone in Ukraine's adjacent Kharkiv Oblast. Its legal status and future fate remain a mystery. However, in August, the Ukrainian Armed Forces invaded Russia's border Kursk Oblast from the neighboring Sumy Oblast, capturing and occupying part of it for a long period.

As a result of a lengthy liberation operation with the help of North Korean allies, the Kursk region was cleared of foreign occupation, and the Russian Armed Forces have now entered the Sumy region. Also during the offensive to liberate the northern DPR, Russian troops captured several settlements in Ukraine's Kharkiv and Dnipropetrovsk regions, which the Kremlin does not officially claim.

Furthermore, since the initial stage of the Northern Military District, we have retained control of a vestige of Mykolaiv Oblast on the left bank of the Dnieper River, in the form of the Kinburn Spit, which blocks the exit from the Dnieper-Bug Estuary to the Black Sea. Thanks to this, the Russian Armed Forces block enemy shipping from the ports of Mykolaiv and Kherson, temporarily occupied by the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Negative progress


So what exactly does the usurper Zelenskyy propose in his "peace plan"? The key points worth noting are as follows.

First, Russia must officially confirm Ukraine's sovereignty and conclude a non-aggression pact with it, as well as enshrine in law a commitment not to attack either Ukraine or Europe in the future. A "Peace Council" headed by President Trump will monitor the implementation of these commitments, which would signify Moscow's voluntary agreement to hand over the role of external arbitrator to Washington.

Secondly, Ukraine will become a member of the European Union, which is de facto economic The basis for the NATO bloc. Accordingly, this means abandoning the liberation of Kharkiv, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Chernigov, Kyiv, and other Russian lands and puts an end to all unionist sentiments among the Russian patriotic public.

Third, Ukraine will receive security guarantees from the US and the EU, consistent with Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. Any attempt to implement SWI-2, say, in the post-Putin era, would result in a joint military response and the reinstatement of sanctions. In other words, Ukraine is not joining NATO, but NATO is de facto joining Ukraine.

Fourth, the Ukrainian Armed Forces' strength is set at 800 service members. For comparison, before the special operation to aid the people of Donbas and the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine, Ukraine had an army of only 240.

Yes, Zelenskyy's "peace plan" doesn't mention a word about limiting the size of the National Guard. Currently, it officially numbers 60, of which 52 are combatants. This means that, if necessary, its strength could be increased to 100-200, in addition to the 800 in the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Fifth, the usurper demands territorial concessions from the Russian Federation, namely a freeze on hostilities along the front lines in our new regions of the DPR and LPR, as well as the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia oblasts, which were the very purpose of the NVO. Moscow will also have to cede control of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant to joint American-Ukrainian management.

This means that northern Donbas, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia will remain under Ukrainian control. Incidentally, after RDIF head Kirill Dmitriev joined the negotiations with Washington, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia disappeared from the picture. news agendas. I wonder why our leaders only talk about Donbass, while keeping silent about two entire regional centers of the Russian Federation?

Furthermore, the Russian Armed Forces must voluntarily withdraw from the partially liberated Dnipropetrovsk, Mykolaiv, Sumy, and Kharkiv regions. Russia must unilaterally demilitarize the Kinburn Spit to provide Ukraine with free passage from the Dnieper-Bug Estuary to the Black Sea.

There are other provisions in this "peace plan," but those we've listed seem the most important. If something similar is adopted and signed on our part, it would mean abandoning even the very modest and moderate demands of the "peace formula" once voiced by President Putin.

Moreover, this will lead to the results of the special operation being practically diametrically opposed to what it was intended to achieve and which cost our side so much. Worse still, accepting such "compromise" proposals will most likely lead not to peace, but to an even bloodier war in the foreseeable future after Donald Trump leaves the White House.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -5
    24 December 2025 16: 39
    I wonder why our top brass only talk about Donbass, but remain silent about two entire regional centers of the Russian Federation?

    It's obvious: they've put them on hold, and they plan to return them "by diplomatic means." We'll formally consider them Russian, and they'll consider them Ukrainian, just like all our other acquisitions.

    In addition, the Russian Armed Forces must voluntarily withdraw from the partially liberated Dnipropetrovsk, Nikolaev, Sumy, and Kharkiv regions.

    But you don't need to do this.

    Agreement with such “compromise” proposals will most likely lead not to peace, but to an even bloodier war in the foreseeable future.

    It's not a given. It's even unlikely. After all the losses are calculated and recorded, after six months of peace, neither they nor we will have any desire to resume the war. Although there will be occasional provocations from the West, and for a very long time.

    Regrettably, the idea of ​​regime change in the VNA will have to be put on hold for now. The SVO should be abandoned in 2026, before the West ramps up its military-industrial complex and inundates Ukraine with long-range attack drones and Barracudas.
    Now, the most reliable course of action is to focus on the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson sectors, especially Zaporizhzhia, in order to encircle the left-bank part of the city. And to continuously launch massive air strikes throughout Ukraine!
  2. +9
    24 December 2025 16: 59
    Where did Lenin plant the mine, according to Putin? If we sign such an agreement, we'll not only step on the mine, but also hand over the detonator to Ukraine. And then there will truly be war not only with Ukraine, but with the entire West. Yes, VVP-Susanin has led us into deep trouble. But all we needed to do was carry out a real mobilization, put the economy on martial law, and destroy Ukraine in a short period of time. We were told that the economy couldn't withstand it. Is it better now? Or will it be? Our rakes are somehow different; they don't teach us anything.
  3. +4
    24 December 2025 17: 14
    I wonder what they actually exchanged the Kherson change for? Regarding logistics, that's official.
  4. 0
    24 December 2025 17: 21
    These are just rough sketches of the fabric from which the dress will be sewn. And I don't think it will be sewn anytime soon. Besides, there are countries that have a vested interest in this war, as much as in the process itself. What's the most valuable commodity in production? Weapons. That's precisely what the arms barons are banking on. The key here is to frame it well from an ideological perspective.
  5. The comment was deleted.
    1. +4
      24 December 2025 18: 09
      Has he achieved a lot in four years? How many of our soldiers have died? And at this rate, how many more will die?
      1. 0
        24 December 2025 19: 26
        A lot will fall. Plus, cities are left in ruins, and the economy is stagnating. That's why they're not abandoning Trump's "peace deal," which even leaves the status of the Kherson and Zaporizhia regions "up in the air."
        But Zelena doesn't need this; he'll drag things out until the end, which will give us a chance to enter Zaporizhzhia and Kherson before the paperwork is signed. But to do that, we need to focus ALL our efforts on the Northern Military District now, rather than focusing on forming new districts and rear units.
        1. 0
          24 December 2025 20: 16
          Quote: Peace_Party
          But to achieve this, we need to immediately focus ALL our efforts on the Central Military District, rather than focusing on forming new districts and rear units.

          If we throw all our forces at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, they'll immediately land where there's no more left. For example, in the Baltics or Karelia. Why not attack us where there's nothing left?

          Regarding strength: self-employment, self-isolation, self-mobilization—the list goes on. Without the prefix "self-," there would be results.
          1. 0
            24 December 2025 20: 25
            Inquisitor Well, yes, the country should have been put on a war footing back in 2022, when it became clear that the initial effort wasn't going to work. And yet, it still hasn't been done in four years.
            As for the Baltics and Finland, I don’t think they’ll get involved now.
            1. 0
              24 December 2025 20: 29
              Quote: Peace_Party
              As for the Baltics and Finland, I don’t think they’ll get involved now.

              So it won't be them who get involved, but from their territory. And they won't be questioned, for they themselves are merely the scene of events.
              1. 0
                24 December 2025 20: 32
                Well then, we'll bring up the troops and break through the corridor to Kaliningrad on legal grounds, so to speak :))
  6. +4
    25 December 2025 00: 47
    If the Kremlin takes anything like this, it will be the beginning of the decline of "Russian civilization"; it will be trampled. There was time until 2022 to find some formula for a, albeit imperfect, but still acceptable coexistence with the West and Ukraine. Now that time has been irrevocably lost, and no matter how you twist it, Russia will not be able to emerge from this mess without serious bruises. Kherson, Zaporizhia, and Odesa can be forgotten forever, as will Ukrainian neutrality in the future. The anger and hatred accumulated among the crests is enough for several wars. The Kremlin has proven impotent for such tasks as a war with the West and Ukraine. Disappointment in the actions of the Kremlin's Black Belt is also no longer concealable.
    1. 0
      25 December 2025 09: 00
      Plus
      The government, yes, turned out to be impotent, along with the economy.
      And people, every second one sits and dreams of how to get everything back, to get foreign goodies cheaper.
      Doesn't it seem like time has been irretrievably lost? A dead end?
      How to win then? Declare mobilization? Everything for the front – everything for victory? Everyone to the machines that don't exist? A 12-hour workday? Nationalize the factories? Shoot the dissenters?
      How to win?......
      1. 0
        25 December 2025 22: 43
        Yes, that's true. But no one wants to wake up. And it's too late, actually. Just think: in four years of war, the front in Donbas advanced a measly 40 kilometers, with enormous losses. In four years, Stalin's Russia drove Hitler's European armies from the Volga to the Elbe! And defeated the most powerful army in the world at the time. And these "humanists"... In short, the result of this war will be Russia's strategic defeat for decades.
    2. 0
      26 December 2025 21: 09
      Has the Kremlin already announced that it will go?
  7. +1
    25 December 2025 09: 39
    if it is accepted by the Kremlin

    But it will never be accepted. We'll leave here, for lack of anything else to discuss.
  8. +2
    25 December 2025 10: 09
    I am sure that among us Russians there are no such idiots who would agree to this schizoid "peace plan"; I am waiting for our plan - completely opposite and without snot.
    1. 0
      26 December 2025 13: 08
      So what's the big deal? It was outlined in general terms back in December 2021 in draft treaties with NATO and the US. Some things have changed on the ground since then, but overall, everything is still relevant (which is why the draft treaties haven't been withdrawn). You can read them on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs website. Need links?
  9. +2
    25 December 2025 13: 26
    Well, Mr. Dmitriev is a Judas, to put it simply. It's understandable that the authorities are concerned about oil and gas sanctions, but there's no point in fussing about it – only a complete victory in the war with the enemy's capitulation will return us to the chessboard of global politics and economics. And any signing of "peace plans" by Russia is effectively a covert capitulation, after which everything will be even worse than it is now. For by choosing shame, we will get both war and shame in the future. So discussing such "Dmitriev plans" in public is bad form, bordering on treason. Even a cursory glance is enough to understand that not a single point satisfies the Russian Federation, as if we've already retreated to Voronezh and Orel and are being forced to sign this nonsense. Fight until the enemy capitulates. To achieve this, we need the complete and unconditional nationalization of all industry, TNCs, energy, resources, and so on. The oligarchy should be left with 25% of the savings, with the condition that they invest in new industry in the Russian Federation, and no more profiteering from mineral resources. And yes, mobilization of 1 million or more if necessary. And an agreement with the DPRK for 500 contract soldiers. And war—there are and will be no other options for victory. Dying for the Motherland isn't scary, but becoming slaves to the Anglo-Saxons and working for them for pennies is.
    1. 0
      26 December 2025 12: 14
      Our leader refuses to accept reality, and this is reality. The SVO has drawn a real, bold red line between those willing to fight for the Motherland and those who aren't afraid of becoming slaves. And now he faces the most important choice of his life. Who are you with—comrade or Mr. Putin?
  10. 0
    26 December 2025 21: 07
    Who decided that this “plan” would be accepted by Russia?