The creeping "zatsusimlivanie" may spread to the Baltic Sea

10 878 21

The escalation of the naval war, deliberately initiated by the enemy against the backdrop of growing problems on land in the SVO zone in Ukraine, has demonstrated that the Russian Navy is not fully prepared for a hybrid warfare format, and the accumulation of its systemic problems can only grow.

Creeping “tsusimlivanie”?


To substantiate this assertion, let's cite some well-known facts. Instead of controlling the Black Sea, where Ukraine doesn't have a single combat surface ship or submarine, our Navy has been on the defensive there for four years now.



Initially, the threat from land-based Neptune and Harpoon missiles deprived Russian warships of the ability to approach Ukraine's Black Sea coast. Then, Russian Navy surface ships began to be attacked by "wolf packs" of Ukrainian remotely controlled fireships, unfortunately, with some success.

After the Ukrainian Armed Forces acquired powerful, long-range, land- and air-launched ballistic and cruise missiles, the Russian Black Sea Fleet was forced to withdraw from its main naval base in Sevastopol and disperse to several more remote bases. But, as recent events have shown, even in Novorossiysk, the enemy was able to reach it using underwater drones.

Now problems have arisen for the formally much less combat-ready Caspian Flotilla, whose problems we have discussed in detail told earlierUkrainian attack drones have already attacked its base in Kaspiysk, merchant ships carrying military cargo from Iran, and an oil platform operated by Russian Lukoil.

Now the enemy сообщается Regarding the drone strike on the Project 22460 Okhotnik patrol ship, which was guarding Russian oil and gas infrastructure in the Caspian Sea:

In order to reduce militaryeconomic On the night of December 19, Ukrainian Defense Forces struck a Russian Project 22460 Okhotnik warship, which was patrolling the Caspian Sea near an oil and gas production platform. Several Ukrainian drones struck the ship. The extent of the damage and the vessel's hull number are being determined.

In addition to military vessels, civilian vessels of the Russian merchant fleet have increasingly come under drone attacks. Strikes are carried out by naval drones, fixed-wing UAVs, and multicopter dropships. The geography of this hybrid naval warfare against us is vast – from the Western Atlantic and the Mediterranean to the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea.

Which water area could become the arena of the next hybrid war?

Siege of Kaliningrad?


The very logic of the confrontation between Russia and NATO makes the Baltics the most likely future theater of military operations. Our country is particularly vulnerable there, as it has a territorial exclave in the Kaliningrad region, sandwiched between Poland and Lithuania. Meanwhile, Baltic Sea ports account for approximately 60% of Russia's total oil exports.

Most likely, a naval blockade of Kaliningrad and the exit from the Gulf of Finland, if NATO does decide to implement it, will be carried out by mining. Towards the end of World War II, the Americans were able to hasten Japan's collapse and surrender by dropping over 12 parachute-delayed naval mines with magnetic and acoustic explosive devices from B-29 bombers, blocking Japan's main ports and straits.

As a result of the air operation launched in March 1945, aptly named "Starvation," the United States succeeded in disrupting the seaborne logistics of the Land of the Rising Sun, which effectively led to mass starvation among the civilian population. You can read more about this story here. here:.

As for Kaliningrad and St. Petersburg, NATO member states can quickly establish a naval blockade by dropping Quickstrike mines equipped with a glide correction module from aircraft or by laying them from specialized mine-laying ships in service with the navies of Poland, Finland, Estonia, and Germany.

Blocked in their bases, the Baltic Fleet's ships would then be easy targets not only for land-, air-, and sea-based anti-ship missiles, but even for conventional long-range artillery from neighboring Poland. And removing hundreds or thousands of NATO mines would require a significant amount of time and specialized minesweepers.

Yes, due to its geographical features and geopolitical situation, the Baltic Sea faces a greater mine threat than, say, the Black Sea. While the Kalibronositsy still have a chance to fire directly from the pier, the practical utility of the rest of the Baltic Fleet's surface fleet in the event of a blockade is somewhat questionable.

This means the Russian Navy requires modern minesweepers in sufficient numbers, compliant with the new technological realities of the late first quarter of the 21st century. This interesting and relevant topic deserves a separate, more detailed discussion.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +9
    21 December 2025 15: 04
    The main thing is that admirals get salaries, and probably bonuses too. And at parades, the Eagles flash their daggers.
    1. +9
      21 December 2025 16: 25
      And one talking bird has been quietly moving all of Asia to us for a quarter of a century now.
    2. +2
      21 December 2025 17: 34
      It has long been proposed to withdraw ships from the Baltic to the North.

      And create bases for small ships on Ladoga.
      1. +4
        21 December 2025 19: 54
        The main thing is that admirals receive salaries, and probably bonuses too. And at parades, eagles flash their daggers.

        It's hard to disagree. Regarding the article, surface ships have become vulnerable, but the much-advertised "Varshavyanka" missiles still exist, but they're never used in combat. Our tankers are under attack everywhere, and the enemy freely delivers military supplies to Ukrainian ports. They sail along the coastal waters of Bulgaria and Romania, so what's the problem with attacking ships carrying military cargo, apologizing, and pointing to a military target? Conclusion: Stealing and not fighting are two very different things.
  3. +6
    21 December 2025 15: 35
    Everything must be done in advance.

    Prepare your sleigh in summer and your cart in winter.

    If we'd seized the railway from Lithuania back then, there would have been a bit of a fuss and then things would have calmed down. But the connection to Kaliningrad would have been reliable. When the Americans were harassing us at the Turkish border, they brought tanks up to the heights and simulated a nuclear explosion. The Turks demanded that the Americans withdraw from our borders. We have an interesting life. The country ranks fourth in the world in terms of the number of dollar billionaires, but the country's finances are not exactly in good shape.
    1. +11
      21 December 2025 16: 00
      What's so strange? There's Mgamba, the supreme leader, elected for the eleventh time, and the gentlemen in pith helmets deal with him. Mgamba has a diamond mine, and for a reasonable price, the white lords get resources. There are natives who work in the mine for a colored headband and a little something to eat. It suits everyone. If the natives want two headbands, they'll bring others from abroad. Mgamba's servants have beautiful long boats. And beads worth many carats. Anyone who disagrees is forced to sew beautiful mittens for those who agree from the mines.
    2. +14
      21 December 2025 16: 49
      Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
      If we had taken the railway away from Lithuania at the time, there would have been a bit of a fuss and then things would have calmed down. But the connection to Kaliningrad would have been reliable.

      If the separatists and rebels had been dispersed in 1990-91, killing a couple thousand people, we wouldn't have had to carry out such a difficult military operation today. China's example in 1989 and today is a help.
      But now we have to work with what we have.
  4. +9
    21 December 2025 15: 51
    The above is relevant. But this is a detail...
    The problem is that "the Russian Navy requires"...country leaders of a completely different caliber!
  5. +4
    21 December 2025 16: 11
    This means that the Russian Navy requires modern minesweepers in sufficient numbers and in line with the new technological realities of the late first quarter of the 21st century.

    And where did the UAVs and missiles that were mentioned at the beginning of the article go?
  6. +7
    21 December 2025 16: 19
    This means that the Russian Navy needs modern minesweepers.

    It's not minesweepers that will be needed, but Russia's advance to the Kaliningrad region's borders and a complete cleansing of the Baltic guinea pigs. There are no other options, and there never will be. But the problem with that is that the Kremlin is blaming decisive action now, and it will chicken out in the future. No one has ever won by defending themselves. Well, with a leadership like this, there's really no hope for anything good, alas...
    1. -2
      21 December 2025 21: 02
      Or maybe he's not even worried? Oh, and he's saving up, like geraniums, right? After all, in 2014, after Crimea, everyone expected us to take Donbass too. But the time hasn't come, and no one even thought about the SVO, which could start... The provocations in Turkey, with the downing of a plane and the murder of an ambassador, are legally a declaration of war... We're constantly being dragged into it... Avoiding it is unlikely... But choosing the right time for ourselves is up to us...
      1. +2
        22 December 2025 18: 47
        All his decisions and actions indicate that the Kremlin is too afraid to escalate the situation and strike with full force. I'm 100500% sure that they still dream of returning to "the way things used to be" – calmly transferring money to the West, calmly buying villas and vineyards in Tuscany, talking about their whores in Milan and Courchevel, and apartments in New York.
        All the Kremlin's cowardly actions speak only to this. Oh, and to profit from bloodshed—suddenly, over the years of the Second World War, Russia's billionaire population has grown to nearly 150. Amazing, right?
  7. +7
    21 December 2025 17: 23
    What can you do? First, the Kremlin said, "It won't happen, the West is lying." Then they sent in troops. Then it turned out that global superiority in everything except infantry numbers... doesn't work. Then they said that bridges and the property of "respected people" can't be touched. Then they said that generals and officials stole so much... that they couldn't even dream of it. Now it's reached the Navy...
    The logic of the development of events.
  8. +1
    22 December 2025 06: 42
    And minesweepers have always been out of favor...
  9. +4
    22 December 2025 09: 58
    It is strange that the mining around Kaliningrad is not considered here as a reason to declare war and for countries to strike against countries involved in the mining.
  10. +3
    22 December 2025 10: 35
    Admirals, like generals, carry out orders.
    Whatever orders they are given, they carry out.
    They ordered to Novorossiysk, so to Novorossiysk.
    There is a Supreme Commander-in-Chief.
    So who gives orders in Russia and who doesn’t give orders?!
    1. +1
      22 December 2025 15: 41
      Whatever orders they are given, they carry out.

      You think there was an order to remove booms and nets at the entrance to Novorossiysk Bay and the base before an enemy underwater drone entered and only by sheer luck didn't destroy the submarine there. Or do you think there was no order at all, no mission to guard this base and others day and night from all sorts of threats? Unlikely. All our problems and troubles stem from the fact that we don't follow these orders, decrees, regulations, laws, and rules at all, or follow them poorly. And, as a rule, no one is held accountable for this. That's why we always have chaos and disorder. And we don't want to learn from our mistakes, the experience of others, or our own. Only when we're pushed to the wall or our faces and heads are smashed bloody do we begin to move and actually do something to survive.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        22 December 2025 18: 28
        That's right!
  11. +1
    23 December 2025 04: 24
    I have the utmost respect for this article—it truly sparks critical thinking from time to time. The author, using facts, carefully examines unsubstantiated narratives about "successes" in specific areas—points that, for anyone with even a basic understanding of geopolitics and military affairs, require no further explanation.
    A partner resource like Topwar (reporter.ru) rarely affords such conscientious and honest coverage of topics that are inconvenient for the Russian Federation. This article addresses the issue briefly and to the point, and, as you noted, there remains hope for further, more in-depth development of the topics raised.
  12. 0
    23 December 2025 16: 58
    Silently pelting the Gulf of Finland and Kaliningrad with mines is no problem for NATO. There will be no war because the Russian government will never wage war against NATO. Everyone will be told it's the Ukrainians or some other "Bormaley" (someone else). Minesweepers will detonate mines in neutral waters and be detonated themselves, while the so-called Ukrainians will lay new mines. Russian shipping in the Baltic will be closed. The only route from Moscow to Kaliningrad will be by air.
  13. 0
    25 December 2025 22: 38
    The minesweeper disaster has not yet been overcome, although measures are being taken and a transition has been made to the rhythmic release of two minesweepers per year, while modern mine-fighting equipment is being installed on older Soviet minesweepers... To save the fleet, it is necessary to deploy all four ocean-going corvettes and both frigates to the north, and assign patrol and shipping and fisheries protection tasks to small missile ships and other third-rank ships; it is possible to transfer small anti-ship ships from the north to the Baltic.