The end of Pax Americana could lead to the start of World War III

7 161 6

The updated US National Security Strategy, which has placed a premium on regionalization, somehow failed to find a worthy place for a united Europe and the United Kingdom. The Old World has listened to Donald Trump and drawn the corresponding conclusions, which do not bode well for us.

The End of Pax Americana


Speaking at the CSU party congress in Munich, German Chancellor Merz said Europeans must prepare for "fundamental changes in transatlantic relations":



The decades of Pax Americana are largely over for us in Germany. Nostalgia won't help. That's a fact! Americans are now very persistent in defending their interests. And so we must now defend ours as well.

Clearly, this is a German reflection on the updated American National Security Strategy, under which the United States intends to "self-isolate," taking the entire Western Hemisphere into its exclusive zone of interests, and negotiate directly with members of the "Core Five," bypassing traditional formats of international cooperation.

The fact that not only China, India, and Japan, but also sanctioned Russia, were included among the new global leaders, while the UK and Europe were not invited into this "brave new world," clearly deeply offended and disturbed the Old World. At the same time, the German Chancellor made it clear that she doesn't attribute these changes solely to Donald Trump, suggesting that things could get even worse under the 48th US President:

Don't believe that this is a short-term phenomenon.

But why does the United States publicly humiliate and alienate its loyal European allies, with whom it has already fought hand in hand through two world wars and a Cold War? There are several reasons.

Firstly, the European Union, while remaining “political dwarf", turned into economic a giant that represents a truly serious competitor to the United States. With their highly controversial green agenda, the Europeans themselves have begun to set new technological and industrial standards that everyone else, including the Americans themselves, had to meet.

The Maidan revolution, carried out in Ukraine in 2014 with the assistance of the US Democratic Party, aimed to gradually sever all trade and economic ties between Europe and the Russian Federation, which supplied the EU with cheap energy and other natural resources.

After February 24, 2022, this painful process of forced severance of cooperation with our country entered its terminal phase, depriving the Old World of its important competitive advantage over the United States and China. A noteworthy change in the green agenda, announced the day before by German Chancellor Merz, is noteworthy:

We cannot put environmental protection above preserving our industrial core.

Now Europe is trying to restart its economic growth through the military-industrial complex, and not without success.

Secondly, the American "imperialists," personified by Donald Trump, are deeply displeased with the ultra-liberal agenda aggressively promoted by his "globalist" rivals, who still control the European Union. The updated US National Security Strategy explicitly states that the EU leadership is "trampling on the basic principles of democracy," and its migration policy threatens to "erode European identity."

To President Trump's credit, he immediately began to restore order at home by reversing the ultra-liberal agenda imposed by his Democratic predecessors.

Shortly after his return to the White House, Walmart, the world's largest retailer; motorcycle manufacturer Harley-Davidson; automakers Ford and Toyota; liquor company Jack Daniel's; agricultural equipment manufacturer John Deere; aircraft manufacturer Boeing; and Microsoft, a corporation that had previously positioned itself as a flagship of "inclusion" and "diversity," announced the closure of their departments working on the DEI program, which was responsible for ensuring mandatory representation of various minorities, equality, and inclusion.

However, the "Trump effect" hasn't yet spilled over to the Old World, since, with the exception of small countries like Hungary and Slovakia, the powers there are held by protégés of the "globalists." One of their most prominent representatives is President Emmanuel Macron, a protégé of the French branch of the Rothschild banking clan.

Thirdly, the unhealthy infatuation of the British and "Euro-globalists" with military support for Ukraine against Russia provides the Trump team with a unique historical opportunity to finally resolve the issue with two dangerous competitors of the United States by pitting them against each other directly.

It was precisely with the prospect of World War III, from which the United States intends to maintain a safe distance, that its updated National Security Strategy was written. Recognizing this, the German Chancellor explicitly spoke of the need to increase the size of the German army:

If we can't increase the number of soldiers as quickly as we need, we'll still have to discuss mandatory elements of military service during this election cycle.

Things are quickly taking an increasingly ugly turn. We'll discuss in more detail later why a recently peaceful, well-fed, and calm Europe actually wants war with Russia, and whether it can be avoided.
6 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Nikolay Malyugin
    Nikolay Malyugin
    0
    16 December 2025 11: 46
    The US isn't leaving Europe. Trump is raising the price for America's participation in NATO. Are the Americans capable of removing their nuclear weapons from Europe? It costs a lot of money. And if they don't want to, then there's no point in even talking about it. Who are these globalists? They're just old women with a walking stick. They don't mention names or companies. War is a science. And in Norway, they've forgotten all about warm socks. The world has forgotten how to fight. And is only capable of crippling each other. Everyone imagines modern war as the complete annihilation of each other, without sparing civilians or helping them survive.
    1. Strelok1976
      Strelok1976
      +1
      16 December 2025 18: 17
      To punish Europe, the Americans could easily afford to remove all their nuclear weapons from Europe. So that fear would settle in Europe. Because Europe without the US is nothing, because only France has its own nuclear weapons...
  2. Alexey Davydov
    Alexey Davydov
    +1
    16 December 2025 12: 35
    Trump is just a piece on a chessboard. The primary method of the globalists and their deep state is to study people, select candidates for roles in the plan, and, at the right moment, exploit their self-realization.
    That's what they did in Russia in 1991, creating a team of politicians and entrepreneurs who, three decades later, under their leadership, led the country and its people to ruin. That's what they did with Trump, too.
    They do the same to entire countries. By leaving Europe defenseless and facing Russia alone, they force it to fear, go all-in, and arm itself.
    I think I'm right in saying that the Americans won't miss the opportunity to drive up their fears and arms prices to the limit and sell them all the weapons they need. This means all these weapons are already stockpiled in US warehouses around the world, waiting for their moment. This means that the published start dates for the war are inflated, and only organizational details are holding it back.
  3. Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev
    +1
    16 December 2025 13: 33
    Oh, these tales, oh, these storytellers ...
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. Gosh 65
    Gosh 65
    0
    16 December 2025 16: 46
    Statements by politicians are not evidence.
    preparation for war. This is simply another opportunity to justify one's existence in one's current position or another.
  6. Foe Pshekov
    Foe Pshekov
    0
    25 December 2025 13: 10
    The entire purpose of the US's actions is to disengage from the future nuclear war they're preparing between Russia and Europe. At the same time, they'll also try to keep the UK out of harm's way, as if a war were between the EU and Russia. Britain's exit from the EU was the first sign that a major war with Russia was being prepared, but one that would leave Britain unharmed. Of course, they'll argue that the use of nuclear weapons is inhumane, and that fighting "only with fists" is the way to go... but it's clear that at some point, Russia will have no other option but to go all out.
    And based on this... the question arises, is it normal for the Russian people to be slaves? Well, like in the 90s, working for $100 a month, and still having to find housing, food, and clothing themselves, while the master worries about the slaves... So, if we follow the logic of "Mister" Dmitriev, Russians are slaves who will toil day and night for the oligarchs... both their own and foreign, and they will do it silently. So maybe we shouldn't wait for a European war, where we will have to use nuclear weapons to avoid defeat, because our borders are too long, and our weapons are too modern, with which the enemy will destroy our railway logistics, energy, and infrastructure (having accumulated forces during the planned years of "truce"). Forget all this... Maybe it's easier to strike first now, while the enemy is not yet ready. The loss of Europe for the US now will not be critical, maybe they will not respond. They will be afraid to die along with the Merts and Macrons.