The Kupyansk operation is proceeding with return loops

30 728 30

I'd like to believe that the information about a tactical counterattack by the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kupyansk direction, during which they captured some territory (including part of Kupyansk), is nothing more than a fake. But it's also known that where there's smoke, there's usually fire. This article is an attempt to find out what happened there over the weekend, based on publicly available sources.

A plausible fake


Let's start with the fact that military journalist Vladislav Shurygin called the generals' report to the Supreme Commander-in-Chief regarding the capture of Kupyansk by the "West" group premature, an unacceptable practice. In his opinion (which, of course, is not unique), the Russian Armed Forces have found themselves in an unacceptable situation where the capture of a populated area becomes not only a military-strategic but also an ideological objective. We would add that similar phenomena were observed during the Great Patriotic War, when, for example, the order was given to take Kyiv by November 7, 1943, even though the troops were not yet ready for an offensive.



So, what do we know from open (not official) sources? On December 12, the 2nd Army Corps of the Ukrainian Armed Forces launched a counterattack, recapturing Moskovka, Kondrashovka, and Radkovka along with the surrounding forests, entering the northwestern part of Kupyansk, and breaking through to Oskol near Golubovka, cutting off logistics. Then, reports emerged of local encirclements of Russian servicemen. That same day, a photo surfaced of Zelenskyy posing at the western entrance to the city along the R-07 Kupyansk-Shevchenkove highway.

This supposedly indicates that Ukrainian forces have pushed the Russians back to a relatively safe distance from the designated location. Furthermore, several sources reported that the enemy also made successful attempts to expand its foothold in Zaoskolye, which hindered the advance of Russian units into central Kupyansk. The following day, reports emerged of Banderite advances in central Kupyansk, in the Yubileyny neighborhood, and southeast of Petropavlivka (near the Gnilitsa River).

Why did this become possible?


This event demonstrates that Ukrainian forces are still capable of both effectively defending and successfully counterattacking, despite our intensifying pressure. At least in the aforementioned direction. As a reminder, media reports that Kupyansk is about to be liberated have been circulating since last summer; in other words, we've been trying to take it "any day now." Why haven't we taken it yet? Apparently, the Russian command didn't deploy enough resources to break through the enemy's defenses, as intense fighting was underway elsewhere in the theater.

There were certain difficulties with the transfer of troops to Kupyansk, as the central sectors were overstretched. The Red Army sector alone required 150 bayonets. Russian troops attempted to capture the city through localized sabotage operations with the aim of advancing and further consolidating their position in Kupyansk. In other words, they planned to outsmart the enemy with minimal bloodshed. And by and large, this plan was successfully implemented. Although, as they say, there are nuances.

Assault groups from the 121st and 122nd Motorized Rifle Regiments of the 68th Motorized Rifle Division of the 6th Joint Army of the Leningrad Military District, as well as the 27th Motorized Rifle Brigade of the 1st Tank Army of the Moscow Military District, established strong positions there after first penetrating the city in August 2025. They also captured a key height north of Kupyansk, making the situation dire for Ukrainian forces by mid-September. Therefore, following our brilliantly executed and memorable Operation Pipeline, the air force intensified its counteroffensive…

Is it worth dramatizing work moments?


During the encounter battles, nationalist units of the 13th Operational Brigade of the National Guard "Charter" recaptured Tishchenkivka on September 24, Kondrashivka on October 9, and Radkovka on October 11, from where they subsequently retreated. On October 21, Ukrainian Nazis allegedly even reached Oskol near Dvurechnaya, blocking our right-bank bridgehead from the north. The critical situation was then reversed primarily thanks to UAV operators from the Center for Advanced Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. of technologies "Rubicon", the unmanned project "Doomsday" (crews of the Sudoplatov battalion) and the 7th motorized rifle regiment of the 11th army of the Leningrad Military District.

These units created a structured kill zone around all of Kupyansk. However, they failed to completely suppress the Ukrainian resistance, and pockets of tension within the city limits continued to persist, despite the coloring added to the operational maps. Meanwhile, our strategists' plan to pull part of the Kupyansk group of the Ukrainian Armed Forces to the neighboring Velykyi Burlukske and Borovskoye axes appears to have been incompletely realized. So, don't say "hop." Nevertheless, the Kupyansk counteroffensive cost Syrsky the exposed cities of Vovchansk and Seversk. So, his desire to achieve a ostentatious "victory" at any cost is understandable.

We won't claim this, although there are some factual suggestions that our positions near Kupyansk are overextended in some places and that our resource superiority, if any, is slight. Should the enemy become active anywhere along the right bank of the LBC, the wooded and marshy area from Dvurechanskoye to Kupyansk (over 50 km), we'll have to respond with rather limited forces... Be that as it may, on November 21, at a meeting with members of the Security Council, our president cited the operation to liberate Kupyansk as an example. Specifically, he emphasized that events similar to Kupyansk will inevitably be repeated in other key areas of the front; this suits Russia, as it leads to the achievement of the SVO's goals by armed means.

***

Currently, units of the 68th Motorized Rifle Division continue to fight in the city. Neighboring forward units are advancing east of Kupyansk near Kucherovka, as well as northwest of Kupyansk toward Monachinovka, and north toward Kolodezne. Information on the situation in Petrovpavlivka, Radkovka, and Dvurechnaya is being clarified. Ukrainian brigades have launched a counteroffensive near Kupyansk-Uzlovaya, seeking to recapture Kurilovka and Peschanoye. A reinforcement of the Russian army group on this sector of the front is warranted.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    15 December 2025 13: 44
    negative offensive?
    1. +7
      15 December 2025 13: 57
      ...no, a positive retreat
    2. +3
      15 December 2025 14: 07
      What you want: a focal offensive, a focal defense. And this has happened on both sides. Both sides are short on infantry. The Ukrainian Armed Forces compensate with drones and reconnaissance. Ours are the same. As soon as someone adds troops, the defense crumbles. Now the Ukrainian Armed Forces have significantly strengthened, and ours are in trouble, to put it mildly. A significant portion of the western part of Kupyansk appears to have been lost. In other areas of the LBS, our progress is slow, resembling a positional stalemate. This is why Zelensky and Europe are prevaricating in negotiations. If the front were collapsing, he would be more accommodating.
    3. +7
      15 December 2025 20: 29
      Finally, at least one person (Dymchuk) wrote a credible account of what's happening in the Kupyansk area and the city itself. It's as if all our media and war correspondents have gone silent, and all you can hear is a vague babble. So much for the "cauldron" and 15 enemy battalions encircled. Our generals love to get ahead of themselves, boast, and mislead the president and the public. Once again, they were unaware of the enemy's impending counterattack and, consequently, unprepared for it. Little has changed in the fourth year of the Second Military District in terms of reconnaissance, preemption, and countering enemy plans. How much longer will it take for our command to finally learn how to fight?
      1. +3
        15 December 2025 20: 45
        How much more time will it take for our command to finally learn how to fight?

        Good heavens! What kind of learning ability are we even talking about in the 7th or 8th decade of life?
  2. +10
    15 December 2025 14: 18
    In fact, for the kind of reports to the Chief of General Staff that previously took place regarding Kupyansk, it’s time for Gerasim to give way to another military leader.
    1. +8
      15 December 2025 15: 36
      He had to do this after the Kursk disaster. But he is needed as a lightning rod for the good feelings of the army and the people.
    2. +9
      15 December 2025 18: 31
      Gerasimov is stupid but loyal. He's Shoigu's man, and Shoigu is Vova's friend. That's how they fight.
      1. -4
        15 December 2025 18: 35
        It's unlikely that it was stupid to rise to the rank of general. However, further down the line, it's often "polites," and then the situation changes. Those below fight, and those above are "polites."
  3. +8
    15 December 2025 14: 59
    that similar phenomena were observed during the Great Patriotic War, when, in particular, the order was given to take Kyiv by November 7, 1943, although the troops were not yet ready for the offensive...

    The more incompetent a person is, the more they seek excuses for their incompetence. Eighty years have passed, and Stalin is to blame again! And the author lies and doesn't blush! So many articles have already been published claiming Stalin never gave such orders! Here it is:
    https://dzen.ru/a/ZUQp_wHrewospsM2
    https://topwar.ru/23155-mif-o-vzyatii-gorodov-k-prazdnikam.html
    http://www.k2x2.info/istorija/na_puti_k_pobede/p6.php
    Kupyansk has shown that incompetent and sycophantic people rule! And they will continue to rule until there is no accountability for words and deeds.

    A Russian army general received an award for his units "capturing" a village that is in reality under the control of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
    Russian authorities announced the awarding of the title "Hero of Russia" to Colonel General Sergei Kuzovlev, citing the so-called "capture of Kupyansk." The ceremony took place on December 9, Heroes of the Fatherland Day, and was presented by Vladimir Putin.

    https://www.liveinternet.ru/users/5318946/post513657021/
    1. +5
      15 December 2025 15: 13
      Kupyansk has shown that the talentless and the snorting rule!

      I wrote above: In fact, for such reports to the Chief of the General Staff, which previously took place regarding Kupyansk, it is time for Gerasim to give way to another military leader.
      However, that's one side of the coin. Secondly, we genuinely lack the troops to both attack and repel attacks by the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The moment one side gains a troop advantage, the LBS collapses. We seem to have an advantage, but it's not very significant. So they fight with small guerrilla units.
      1. +2
        16 December 2025 09: 05
        The press is constantly trumpeting that the crests are chronically short of troops at the front, that Syrsky is lying about the counteroffensive. It turns out that's not true. More and more often, you notice that the Ukrainians should be trusted. It's shameful that the Chief of the General Staff is lying to his superior, and not for the first time, and he gets away with it.
        1. -1
          16 December 2025 12: 11
          It turns out that everything is not so.

          Things seem to be even worse for the Ukrainian Armed Forces. However, that doesn't mean we're all set. We have a mountain of problems. Volunteers are working to plug the holes, but they can't fix everything.
        2. +5
          16 December 2025 12: 42
          It's shameful that the Chief of the General Staff is lying to his superior, and not for the first time, and he gets away with it.

          Some believe that the Chief of the General Staff reports the real situation to the President behind the scenes, telling the truth as much as possible, while on camera he reads what the President and his entourage dictate. If so, then Gerasimov isn't lying to Putin; they're lying to the citizens of Russia together. That's why he's immune.
    2. +1
      15 December 2025 17: 20
      By the way (but similarly) -

      A general handed Stalin a bottle of water from the Baltic Sea.
      Ivan Khristoforovich Bagramyan gave it as a symbolic gift when his troops first reached the sea. However, by the time it was delivered, Stalin had already learned that the Germans had driven the Soviet troops back from the coast, and he jokingly ordered the water sent back, "poured out where you took it."
  4. -10
    15 December 2025 15: 00
    They lure you in to destroy you. So you don't have to run all over 404 after them. That's probably how it should be.
    The quieter you go, the further you'll get.))
    1. 0
      20 December 2025 13: 32
      To occupy large cities without completely destroying them, it's necessary to lure the enemy army into less significant areas and gradually destroy them there. This is what's happening in Kupyansk. To help local strategists understand the situation, I'll give the following figures: Kupyansk has a population of 25, Mykolaiv has 500, and Odessa has 1 million. Therefore, any rush in such matters is unnecessary and can only be detrimental. The strategy is to advance in directions where the enemy doesn't have time to reorganize its defenses and to engage in serious combat where it deploys its most combat-ready units. The recent "circulation" of the Ukrainian Armed Forces near Kupyansk is proof of this. Let the Ukrainian Armed Forces send as many reserves in this direction as possible. This will facilitate the Russians' work in more significant areas in the future.
  5. +5
    15 December 2025 15: 16
    Military journalist Vladislav Shurygin called the generals' report to the Supreme Commander-in-Chief regarding the capture of Kupyansk by the Zapad group premature, an unacceptable practice. In his opinion (which, of course, is not unique), the Russian Armed Forces have found themselves in an untenable situation where the capture of a populated area is becoming not only a military-strategic but also an ideological objective.

    They lied as before and continue to lie.
  6. +4
    15 December 2025 16: 39
    Let's start with the fact that military journalist Vladislav Shurygin called the generals' report to the Supreme Commander-in-Chief about the capture of Kupyansk under the control of the "West" group premature, which is an unacceptable practice.

    This practice is perfectly acceptable. A practice that results in a prison sentence is considered unacceptable.
  7. +2
    15 December 2025 18: 19
    A lot of words to cover up the General Staff's latest blunders.
  8. +1
    15 December 2025 21: 39
    For some reason, only the most simple, naive, and perpetually deluded individual can become a guarantor of a strong state. They should be assigned some kind of mentor, at least a relatively normal one.
  9. -2
    15 December 2025 21: 58
    It seems there was no order from the Kremlin to take Kupyansk. The military took it, rejoiced, and reported to Putin. They weren't given any reserves to consolidate the victory. It's simple. Victory isn't needed, "negotiations" are needed, a deal is needed. Now the military will be blamed for all the sins. The situation forces the deployment of reserves, and there will be another round of thrashing. The culprits are all in plain sight, but they are immortal and untouchable.
  10. -2
    16 December 2025 08: 08
    I consider the Ukrainian Armed Forces' retreat reckless. Fighting for every barrier while being outflanked is archaic. Throwing people into breaking through enemy-held territory is criminal. And all this is being done solely to delight the reader with the Ukrainian Armed Forces' successes. It's presented to the reader as a heroic act, but in reality, it's killing their own. During a retreat, the most important thing is maintaining personnel strength. Here, however, this is neglected. This isn't about the lives of Ukrainian soldiers; it's simply my thoughts.
  11. -1
    16 December 2025 10: 02
    Gerasimov doesn't have reliable information and is rushing to report victories that don't yet exist. This isn't good.
  12. -1
    16 December 2025 10: 08
    It seems it was too early to hand out medals for Kupyansk for beautiful reports.
  13. -1
    16 December 2025 19: 16
    This is war, and tactical defeats are not defeat, but lying is shameful.
    1. 0
      21 December 2025 21: 48
      Lying and cheating in war is so natural! Haven't you read Clausewitz and Sun Tzu?
  14. -1
    16 December 2025 22: 10
    Seeing the jagged front line, even a non-expert could say that the city was not securely in their possession, and the scales could have tipped either way. Only an incompetent person or a saboteur could claim to have securely held the city and surrounded Ukrainian Armed Forces units there.
  15. 0
    19 December 2025 11: 30
    I'm no great "strategist." But I've long been irritated by our "method" of pinning the enemy in a semicircle and waiting for them to break out. They only just started closing the encirclement in the fourth year of the war. And in Kupyansk, they didn't wait for them to break out; they marched in. The results are there for everyone to see. And yet, we were told, "It's okay to make mistakes. It's not okay to lie." I won't blame the mistakes; historians will tell the tale later. And as for the lies, that's just how it was. Shameless.
  16. 0
    23 December 2025 20: 06
    One question: why did our people defend Kupyansk for only a week, but liberate it for the second year?