Russia has proposed a solution to protect its merchant fleet from attacks.

20 172 45

After Ukraine's attacks on Tankers Russian shadow fleet and merchant vessel Russia has a pressing need to protect civilian shipping. Moreover, the vessels' nationality is irrelevant; the important thing is that they are carrying Russian cargo; everything else is secondary. This issue has been highlighted by experts from the Telegram channel "Two Majors," who believe that "citizen shipowners and beneficiaries of the oil trade" are not prepared to fork out the cash for equipped professional security guards who would protect their vessels and cargo from Ukrainian and other unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).

The publication notes that it's impossible to dispatch "marine" teams to every vessel, as they are needed elsewhere. However, this isn't necessary, as the tanker would then be considered a military target. Therefore, specialized private security companies (PSCs) could be considered a solution to this predicament.

Naval, strictly controlled and monitored by law enforcement agencies, including recruitment from among veterans demobilized due to injuries. It's possible to organize defense and maintain watch on a civilian vessel using firearms and a modern prosthetic. The problem is that legal documentation within the country is still difficult: there is no mechanism or law for this. Well, that is, you can't use something like "BARS" in this way, for now.

- specified in the material.

Therefore, these could become some kind of conditional combat deployment centers, legally registered in countries friendly to Russia but authorized to protect ships from pirates and terrorists. This is a way out of the difficult situation until the Russian legislative framework is updated to reflect the new reality.

And when the so-called Houthis, with their "810th Guards Separate Marine Brigade" tattoos, can confidently take down enemy terrorists' MBCs or even NATO helicopters in the Baltic Sea attempting to attack our fleet, then we can confidently talk about organizing the security of our merchant shipping. A guard ship can't be assigned to every tanker. And there is a need for armed guards. There will be many more setbacks along the way, but that's no reason to abandon modern methods of countering new threats.

– concludes the publication of the Telegram channel “Two Majors”.

In turn, the Telegram channel "Osveditel" drew attention to the consequences of the December 2 strike by a Ukrainian An-196 "Lyutii" kamikaze UAV on the moving tanker Midvolga 2 in the Black Sea, 80 miles off the coast of Turkey, captured in images by the Telegram channel Mash.

Russia has proposed a solution to protect its merchant fleet from attacks.



Analysts noted that without some Western assistance, the Ukrainians would hardly have hit the vessel. The vessel shows signs of extensive, though not critical, damage, and the wreckage of the attack drone has been collected on deck for viewing and examination by specialists.





It is noteworthy that this variation of the Ukrainian kamikaze drones is used to destroy stationary targets at pre-set coordinates, which indicates that the drone was modified in a similar way to the Ukrainian kamikaze drones used to carry out raids on Crimea, by installing a Starlink terminal (with an EO/camera and control system) or its equivalent.

– Telegram channel "Osvetitel".
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +26
    2 December 2025 19: 30
    The most radical solution is to cut off the pig farm from the Black Sea. This is exactly what our President stated.
    1. +6
      2 December 2025 19: 42
      "Citizen shipowners and beneficiaries of the oil trade" are not prepared to fork out the cash for equipped professional security guards...

      Then at whose expense?
    2. +1
      3 December 2025 14: 12
      Quote: duschman80-81
      The most radical solution is to cut off the pig farm from the Black Sea.

      This is the only real solution, everything else will lead to nothing.
  2. +11
    2 December 2025 19: 30
    A security team won't protect against UAVs and unmanned aerial vehicles unless it has adequate detection, target acquisition, tracking, and destruction capabilities. Or each vessel would need to be equipped with a certain number of completely non-civilian detection, tracking, and destruction capabilities. All of this can't be hidden, and it takes time to install. With such a set, it would no longer be a civilian vessel at all.
    1. -1
      3 December 2025 10: 53
      I disagree, an aerial drone launched from a ship within a 10 km radius can easily detect an approaching back-up, and the same kamikaze drone launched from a tanker can easily destroy an approaching back-up.
      1. +2
        3 December 2025 17: 48
        Alexey, how many drones would it take to detect a UAV within a 10-kilometer radius of a vessel? The answer is, at a minimum, four, one on each side of the compass, with wide-angle cameras, or better yet, eight. And fiber-optic drones are out of the question, because it's at sea. How many operators would it take? At least four, probably. Okay, we've detected it. But what about destroying it with an FPSO? What size would it need to be, and what kind of warhead, to destroy or at least immobilize, or, in other words, seriously damage, a UAV weighing a ton? And one more quick question. Who would allow you to carry weapons for attack on a civilian vessel, which is what a kamikaze drone is?
        1. 0
          7 December 2025 01: 06
          One drone is enough to fly a 10km perimeter around a ship. Why do you need one on each side of the ship? And where did you see me mention fiber optics? And yes, backdoors have been destroyed with regular FPVs for a long time now... Grandpa, take some pills...
  3. +6
    2 December 2025 19: 39
    The Danish investigative journalism agency Danwatch reports on changes on Russian shadow fleet vessels spotted by pilots while navigating Danish waters. Several civilian tankers were carrying personnel in military uniform, and the actions of the ships' crews are also exceptional and unusual.

    We already provide such protection in the Baltic, and we need to do the same in the Black Sea.
  4. +6
    2 December 2025 20: 10
    are not ready to fork out the cash for equipped professional security guards who would protect ships and cargo from Ukrainian and other unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)

    Are you kidding? Warships are of little use against unmanned boats. What security guards? It's equally impossible to counter a merchant vessel's underwater combat swimmers, even if you hire a couple of Rambos. Unless they attack from junks with Kalashnikovs.
    1. +13
      2 December 2025 22: 12
      Quote: AdeptV
      It is also unrealistic to put anything against a merchant ship and combat swimmers with underwater propulsion systems.

      If somehow "accidentally" the ships of the "wishers", especially London, start to sink, perhaps a "clearing of the minds" will occur, with a corresponding removal of mutual problems... Or "the whole world will fall to pieces."
      1. +2
        3 December 2025 09: 47
        The most correct decision!!! But it's useless to teach children, I've understood this since school.)))
  5. -2
    2 December 2025 20: 36
    The solution is simple: shoot the commander of the Black Sea Fleet in front of his subordinate.
    1. +12
      2 December 2025 21: 53
      It's not the commanders who need to be shot, but the military-political leadership that brought this situation to this point with their sniveling and drawing of red lines. These people only know how to put on a military uniform and pretend to be generalissimos.
      1. -5
        2 December 2025 22: 30
        Quote: rotkiv04
        It's not the commanders who need to be shot, but the military-political leadership that brought this situation to this point with their sniveling and drawing red lines.

        I wonder where you were with your proposals to counter the BEKs before February 22, 2022? And did the Ministry of Defense write to Putin about UAV swarms? A lot can be written up "in hindsight"... Every war brings new developments that leave the enemy stunned. Our Armed Forces, too, have some, even though they can't outmaneuver the Western military-industrial complex. Why aren't you suggesting shooting down NATO command? They can't really launch another offensive, despite their overwhelming superiority in space reconnaissance and control, with unlimited funding, to fulfill any of their desires.
        Try to think about it before the unfounded "execution of our command and leadership."
        1. +4
          2 December 2025 22: 43
          Did they write to Putin about UAV swarms in the Moscow Region?

          For example, about the problem of migrants who just knock out old women in underground passages - should Putin be told now, or was it worth it yesterday?
          Otherwise, in five years you'll be asking again who wrote and who didn't. request

          P.S., by the way, one of them appealed to Putin at one time, when he was the Minister of Defense of the DPR, and wrote to the Ministry of Defense... and now he’s sitting in prison with his proposals...
          1. +1
            2 December 2025 23: 00
            Quote: Roman070280
            P.S.. By the way, one of them appealed to Putin while being the DPR Ministry of Defense, and wrote to the Ministry of Defense... and now he's sitting in prison with his proposals...

            Criticizing and proposing are two different things. You can be a fly in the ointment, or you can become the drop that wears away the stone. Not everything, but some proposals, have been made since before 2014, although they could be considered "trends." Therefore, when you have good ideas, push them through, even to the laughter of idiots, at the initial stage.
            1. +7
              2 December 2025 23: 10
              Anyone who can write even a little has already written about how it's time to kick Gerasim in the ass, and about how you shouldn't keep your money abroad... and a whole bunch of other useful stuff.
              But if Putin doesn't want to listen to this, if he does things his own way, then he should be held accountable for it himself, and not blame the people.

              The people shouldn't be writing anything, really. Hundreds of highbrow generals are sitting there, feeding off that. Entire Grefs and Silanovs are milling around outside the office. There's no point in us understanding anything about economics or military affairs. They cut off our internet and tell us to be patient, because that's how it has to be. And they say it with such a smart air that you can believe they know what they're doing.
              Well, if you are so self-confident, then what can you expect from the people?

              P.S. No, it would be great, of course... if we had democracy... if we had the ability to influence, choose, change things... whether we want a mosque in our city or not, whether we want WhatsApp blocked or not, whether we want to give the gold to America for safekeeping or use it to build something inside the country, etc.
              But so far there is nothing like this in sight.
              1. +4
                2 December 2025 23: 35
                You wrote beautifully, everything was clear and accurate, expressing in words the thoughts and aspirations of the majority of the Russian people.
              2. 0
                4 December 2025 17: 04
                Roman, even judges who have the ability, and sometimes the desire, to ruin someone's life are not elected or removed by anyone other than other judges. And the concept of "democracy" has discredited itself. And the main reason is the principle of "secret voting." If you want to vote for someone, have the courage to vote openly, without hiding your face, and if you're being swayed, then hand over your power to those who aren't.
          2. 0
            3 December 2025 09: 59
            and the other one was blown up...
        2. +2
          3 December 2025 09: 57
          Don't slander - they wrote, but at the top there are impenetrable, corrupt, and incompetent people.
      2. +1
        3 December 2025 09: 48
        There are only "armchair generals" in the headquarters there.)))
      3. -3
        3 December 2025 22: 41
        You graduated from the military academy and are aiming for the General Staff. Don't you think you'll be singing when you walk across the charred earth, when humanity is no more. The whole world is in ruins, and the fool doesn't care...
    2. 0
      2 December 2025 22: 40
      And so on to the very, very top.. wink
  6. +6
    2 December 2025 22: 07
    Protecting the fleet from whom, or from what? We need to protect our own country, and now we also need to protect the fleet in the Black Sea. Punishments should be more severe, so that the enemy understands that this is not allowed.
    1. +9
      2 December 2025 22: 42
      The enemy must be destroyed, not talked down to. Now you're going to tell Ukraine and NATO to adhere to a code of honor.
      1. +1
        3 December 2025 09: 50
        To our two troubles of "fools and roads" we have added two more troubles: "we are NOT like that and brotherhood of nations."
  7. +2
    2 December 2025 22: 23
    As far as I know, private security companies have long been used to protect merchant ships, though not in the Baltic, but in the Horn of Africa region. These armed groups protected ships from Somali pirates, and guards escorted merchant ships to the Suez Canal. Therefore, such a practice should be introduced everywhere.
    1. +1
      3 December 2025 09: 51
      All this was already out of date yesterday!)))
      1. -1
        3 December 2025 22: 01
        Quote: AndrK72
        All this was already out of date yesterday!)))

        - and nevertheless! - or can you suggest something? - state it!
  8. +1
    3 December 2025 05: 19
    I would have hit Bankova a long time ago, and everything would have been resolved in one day. am
  9. +3
    3 December 2025 06: 32
    It's time to declare a hunt for the pig-hoofed animals from the Khokhloabwehr and the 00X agents from MI-6, they seem to have completely lost their bearings
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. +2
    3 December 2025 11: 18
    Do you know what Israel would do after an attack on its civilian ships? They'd fill a "neutral" tanker with ammonium nitrate and send it to the port of Odesa, where it would "accidentally" detonate, thus permanently solving the problem of Ukraine's access to the sea, the access of the backwaters, and the maritime supply of weapons to Ukraine from abroad... But such things wouldn't occur to a 72-year-old senior pensioner...
    1. +2
      3 December 2025 12: 25
      Don't confuse Jews living in Israel with Jews living in Russia. As soon as they move to Israel, they immediately become militant defenders of their homeland.
    2. -3
      3 December 2025 15: 29
      He would have filled a "neutral" tanker with saltpeter and sent it to the port of Odessa, where it would have "accidentally" detonated, and would have solved the problem of Ukraine's access to the sea forever.

      The alternative, and a very simple one at that: a strike with a tactical nuclear weapon into the port waters. With the right yield, the damage would be primarily to the port, with minor damage to the city.
  12. +1
    3 December 2025 17: 03
    There is only one solution for Ukraine in favor of the Russian people. The state of Ukraine must cease to exist. All of Ukraine's territory, within the 1975 borders, must return to Russia as regions. No one needs to ask permission; everything must be done unilaterally. There is no state, Ukraine, no debts, no Ukrainian government in exile, no legal Banderites, no Ukraine members in various international organizations, no hostile state on the Russian Federation's border. Russia will increase its economic and military-political influence in the world, with direct access to Tiraspol and Chisinau. The northwestern Black Sea will belong to Russia. NATO will no longer be able to use Ukraine against Russia.
    Even if part of the state of Ukraine is left, then today and in the future, Russia will always have an enemy in the person of Ukraine. Ukraine will definitely join NATO and will definitely attack Russia. Everything that is promised and will be spelled out in the Constitution of Ukraine, in its documents, Ukraine will change, in the way that is beneficial to the United States and its satellites.
    Any half-hearted decision is the defeat and capitulation of the Russian Federation to NATO.
    If there is no Ukraine, there is no problem of protecting ships from UAVs and unmanned aerial vehicles of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
  13. 0
    3 December 2025 18: 21
    Quote: duschman80-81
    The most radical solution is to cut off the pig farm from the Black Sea. This is exactly what our President stated.

    Since we're not really fighting a war, but rather performing careful surgical operations, it will take at least another four years to "cut off the pig farm." https://tass.ru/politika/25795469
  14. 0
    3 December 2025 20: 53
    Quote: duschman80-81
    The most radical solution is to cut off the pig farm from the Black Sea. This is exactly what our President stated.

    Well, such an operation requires resources, even special equipment, people, a plan, secrecy, and communications. I could sit down right now and think through what's needed. It would be an interesting mental workout. But I won't write anything, in case our guys are actually preparing something =)) The enemy can read and analyze, too, so why help them?
  15. 0
    3 December 2025 22: 43
    For the pig-headed people, the fact is that your people will die out in two generations.
  16. 0
    4 December 2025 11: 16
    As long as the Kremlin protects any British interests, those who stage these terrorist attacks will have no protection. Bombing Odessa won't help.
  17. 0
    4 December 2025 13: 52
    In reality, ending the tanker war isn't that difficult. It needs to be fought, and who's really organizing it? No unmanned aerial vehicle or drone without targeting and navigation systems can hit either a warship or a tanker. Therefore, the retaliatory strike should be directed not at Ukraine, but at Britain itself. Let's blow up an LNG carrier heading to the UK or rushing to Europe from the US, 300 miles from the coast, where the water depth is at least 1000 km.
    It would be perfectly possible to use multipurpose submarines for this purpose, and attack with torpedoes. There would be no trace left, the vessel would be at a depth of 1 km, making it almost impossible to determine the cause of the explosion. I assure you, everyone will understand immediately. It wouldn't be a bad idea to similarly puncture an oil tanker and the British coast. They did something similar to us, right? So, retaliation is a perfectly good thing. In response to the Crocuses, blow up a car loaded with explosives after a Premier League match between Liverpool and Manchester United. Terrorists should be dealt with accordingly. But that's where we're headed, it seems. Because the enemy is becoming more brazen, and if we don't take adequate countermeasures, even the SVO might not be completed.
  18. +1
    4 December 2025 16: 53
    Am I the only one curious to know if the ugly British aircraft carrier can repel a BEK attack on its own? I should try. If you don't try, you'll never know.
  19. 0
    7 December 2025 10: 21
    The only thing that could save us from attacks on our ships would be attacks by, say, the Houthis on all British tankers, anywhere in the ocean. Anything else is just talk.
  20. 0
    7 December 2025 19: 26
    Quote: Botrops
    An LNG carrier bound for the UK will explode

    Moreover, at the port of arrival.