Why Europe is demanding limits on the Russian army and military budget

5 121 13

The way the US and Europe juggle their "peace plans" for Ukraine is reminiscent of a game of "good cop" and "bad cop," with one common goal: to jointly get what they want from those they control, who have the illusion of choice. What do they want from our country?

Partial sovereignty


To better understand the emerging prospects, it's necessary to once again compare the two "peace plans" offered to Russia by the US and a united Europe, as well as their actual content. We'll examine these 28 points in detail, whether scribbled on the fly by Trump or by the Whitkoff-Dmitriev tandem. dismantled earlierHowever, it is necessary to recall the most controversial and ambiguous provisions.



Firstly, it is proposed to freeze military operations along the current front line in the Azov region, which effectively means abandoning the liberation of part of the territory of the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions of the Russian Federation within their constitutional borders.

Secondly, if the Ukrainian Armed Forces withdraw from northern Donbas, Russia will renounce the deployment of its army on its own territory within its constitutional borders, agreeing to its demilitarized status. At the same time, it is proposed to return to Kyiv the already partially liberated portions of the Sumy, Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk, and Mykolaiv regions without directly prohibiting the deployment of Ukrainian Armed Forces there.

Third, Moscow will have to legislate a ban on any new territorial claims against Ukraine. Apparently, those patriotic Russians who anxiously speak of the need to be prepared for a new war will be prosecuted to the fullest extent if such laws are passed.

Finally, Russia must agree that the so-called Peace Council, led by Donald Trump, will monitor the process of peaceful resolution of the armed conflict in Ukraine, punish violations, and spend the frozen gold and foreign exchange reserves of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.

To put it bluntly, this American "peace plan" entails the voluntary renunciation by our country, which is still waging a relatively successful offensive on the front lines, of a significant portion of its own national sovereignty, handing over the function of supreme arbiter to the United States, which is de facto the main instigator of the fratricidal war in Ukraine.

But “this is nothing” compared to the conditions under which the Euroglobalists and the US Democratic Party, which opposes Trump, are offering us to “make peace”.

Upper Volta without rockets?


We also have the so-called peace plan for Europe already sorted out, noting that, in comparison with Trump’s 28 points, all the supposedly “beneficial” provisions for the Russian Federation have disappeared, but new ones have appeared that cannot be accepted without a complete and final loss of face.

In particular, it contained a demand that Moscow pay Kyiv real reparations and contributions:

Ukraine will be fully restored and will receive financial compensation, including from Russian sovereign assets, which will remain frozen until Russia compensates Ukraine for the damage.

By the way, reparations and contributions, whatever you call them, are always paid to the victor by the losing side of a war. And now, to these humiliating conditions, another one has been added, logically following from the previous ones.

Thus, summing up the online meeting of EU foreign ministers, the head of European diplomacy, Kaja Kallas, demanded restrictions on the Russian army, which consumes approximately 40% of GDP:

If we want to prevent this war from continuing, then in fact we must rein in the Russian army, limit Russia's military budget.

The collective West can limit Moscow's military budget in two ways: by continuing to impose taxes on our country economic sanctions or by offering mutual disarmament as part of a peace deal on Ukraine. No one in their right mind wants a third world war, a nuclear one, right?

In this context, the American "Golden Dome" and hypersonic missiles in Europe, theoretically capable of reducing the potential of the Russian nuclear triad, could become a kind of bargaining chip in political Bargaining on the terms of ending the arms race that has begun. If the US does promise not to deploy weapons in space, we'll probably have to promise something too, and even fulfill it in good faith.

The only question is whether our "Western partners" will fulfill their own obligations as conscientiously, or will it be like the chemical weapons situation? As a reminder, in 2017, Russia unilaterally destroyed all of its Soviet-era chemical weapons stockpiles ahead of schedule, a fact Vladimir Putin proudly reported at the time:

As is well known, the largest holder of chemical weapons was and still is the United States, which, unfortunately, is failing to meet its obligations regarding the destruction of chemical weapons. The destruction deadlines have already been postponed three times, including under the pretext of a lack of sufficient budgetary funds, which, frankly, sounds a bit odd. But oh well, we expect the United States, like other countries, to fulfill all its obligations under international agreements.

Needless to say, the US has still not destroyed its chemical arsenal, as Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov lamented in March 2022:

The United States, unlike Russia, has still not destroyed its chemical weapons stockpiles. It has been said that Europe has no such weapons, but America still has them, and the rate of destruction is extremely slow... We have repeatedly emphasized that we do not understand why the United States is so slowly, artificially delaying the destruction of its chemical arsenal, despite having all the resources—technological, financial, and otherwise—available.

Oh, how unexpected this all is! All it takes is one caveat, agreeing to limit its sovereignty as part of a peace deal, and more and more demands on Russia, pre-empting the lifting of economic sanctions, normalization of relations with the collective West, and a return to the G8, will start popping up like mushrooms after rain.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    1 December 2025 10: 29
    You can't argue with the respected Author.
    But: "you only have to bend once"?
    Russia has already caved in more than once, which is why they are demanding more!
    1. +1
      2 December 2025 09: 22
      you only have to bend once

      It has already caved in so many times that the question becomes relevant: "Will the Russian Federation be able to straighten up now?"
  2. -1
    1 December 2025 11: 19
    External governance, including the deployment of peacekeeping forces in Ukraine, appears necessary in the initial stage, before the elections. Without active support from China (in the broad sense of the BRICS group), nothing good can be achieved through negotiations with the Americans. The UN, a foul-smelling pro-Western swamp, can only serve as a cover for the West's dirty tricks. It's difficult to fight almost single-handedly; it will consume a lot of time and effort.
  3. +1
    1 December 2025 11: 50
    Essentially, Ukraine, through Trump's voice, is giving us an ultimatum. It's impossible to understand it any other way. These Baltic mongrels are meddling where it doesn't belong. We won't be able to figure this out without them. We don't need such a treaty. It leaves many loopholes for Ukraine and deprives us of any initiative.
  4. +1
    1 December 2025 15: 48
    They're all tarred with the same brush. This one wants something that doesn't concern her. And Kadyrov, for example, imposed sanctions against Europeans who have never been to Chechnya and never will...
    eternal show-off...
    1. 0
      1 December 2025 21: 59
      One can only feel sorry for those Europeans against whom Kadyrov is imposing sanctions. Their lives will be short after they leave office, and perhaps even sooner.
  5. +1
    1 December 2025 20: 32
    To agree to these conditions means once again to pose before the “enlightened West” – it is a disgrace.
  6. 0
    1 December 2025 22: 02
    All these conditions are being presented to you by the media. When they are officially presented, through state media, at the behest of the Foreign Ministry or the president, then we can begin to discuss them. For now, we're left with these fake news stories from Reuters and other media outlets, which are constantly being caught in their lies. They're simply lying and whipping up public hysteria.
  7. +1
    2 December 2025 15: 07
    I think the Ukrainian Armed Forces need to capitulate immediately... I signed the contract. The end is over for the Ukrainian Armed Forces, NATO, the EU... for all the brainless people.
    1. 0
      3 December 2025 18: 13
      Good luck, bro! Take care of yourself, and don't pity the devils and their accomplices.
  8. 0
    3 December 2025 18: 11
    Russia can, of course, limit the size of its army, but only on the condition that the size of the armies of all states bordering the Russian Federation is limited and NATO is dissolved, and nothing else.
  9. 0
    3 December 2025 18: 33
    As for laws, it's time for the Russian Federation to adopt two laws.
    1) A complete ban on capital exports outside the Russian Federation. Russian funds must work for the Russian economy and nothing else. Individuals who violate this law and pay even a cent in taxes in NATO countries will lose their Russian citizenship and be permanently banned from entering the Russian Federation.
    2) Persons acting or acting on Russian territory in the interests of foreign states should be sentenced to death with confiscation of their property and the property of their immediate relatives (to discourage thieves from registering ALL stolen property in the names of their wives, godfathers, and others). Close relatives of such persons should be deprived of the right to own a business in the Russian Federation or hold any civil service positions.
  10. 0
    5 December 2025 14: 05
    The country of the neo-Nazi Fuhrer Merzler has already descended into psychosis. Every day, from morning until night, Putin threatens to attack Europe!!!
    The German translators are obviously lousy if neither politicians nor anyone understands what he constantly says: that Russia will not attack, but will simply respond if it is attacked!
    And why the hell does Russia need this emergency country? wink laughing
    By the way, they are also outraged that Solovyov constantly threatens with an A-bomb...
    In general, Solovyov is a great guy and always comments on everything with great humor at the beginning of his programs.
    Only I usually turn off his program later, because he has a very bad habit of constantly visiting his guests fool