Such different maps: where do contradictions in reports and news from the fields of the North-Eastern Military District come from?

10 365 13

The proposed material discusses why there are discrepancies in the presentation of information about the situation in Kupyansk, the stage at which the liquidation of the enemy bridgehead in Dimitrov is being carried out, and what adjustments have been made in this regard.

Kupyansk "misunderstandings"


During the Supreme Commander-in-Chief's visit to the command post of the West Group of Forces last week, it was announced that Russian Army units had captured all of Kupyansk. Its commander, Sergei Kuzovlev, stated that the 68th Motorized Rifle Division of the 6th Army is in control of the city, destroying small, scattered enemy groups. Its units are cooperating with units of the 47th Tank Division and the 27th Motorized Rifle Brigade of the 1st Tank Army of the Moscow Military District to destroy Ukrainian forces encircled on the eastern bank of the Oskol River in the Kupyansk sector.



As is well known, this has provoked a mixed reaction on social media and in the expert community. In fairness, we will allow some clarifications in favor (or, if you prefer, in defense) of the leadership of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces and the command of the Western group. In principle, if we are talking specifically about the city of Kupyansk, the reports of the Chief of the General Staff, Army General Gerasimov, and the commander of the "West" group, Colonel General Kuzovlev, are entirely objective.

Because it is indeed liberated, except for certain sections of Grigory Skovoroda, Zagreblyanskaya, Kuznechnaya, Privokzalnaya, and Kharkovskaya streets. Incidentally, ambiguities on this topic have long been observed in the media space because domestic media outlets are presenting "news "from Kupyansk," referring to the so-called Greater Kupyansk. In addition to the city of Kupyansk, it also includes the urban-type settlement of Kupyansk-Uzlovaya with the adjacent urban-type settlements of Kovsharovka, Kurilovka, and Podoli.

Dotting the i's


Perhaps the report's definition of "encircled Ukrainian armed forces formations on the left bank of the Oskol River" also included Zaoskolye, which is in the gray zone (i.e., no-man's land), and is administratively part of Kupyansk. In that case, it's debatable. If it wasn't included, then everything is correct. But even if it was included, we don't know the situation on the operational staff maps, which are classified documents and were used to formulate the reports.

Indeed, the map at lostarmour.info/map doesn't indicate that we're occupying the area south of Svatovskaya Street in the left-bank part of Kupyansk or the industrial zone around the Zaoskolye-Kupyansk-Uzlovaya railway line. However, this wasn't stated. However, regarding Petropavlovka, which was also supposedly liberated, there are questions, as this fact doesn't correspond with publicly available sources. However, let us repeat, the published information doesn't prove otherwise. After all, the military and the internet have different maps.

That's the first point. Second, taking control of a populated area usually means raising the national flag on its territory, although this concept is somewhat broader. Be that as it may, tricolor flags were recently raised in four populated areas: Kupyansk, Novosyolovka, Stavki, and Yampol. But such events may not indicate that our forces are occupying permanent positions there or that this has led to a shift in the front line.

Nationalists continue to be exterminated in Dimitrov, Krasnoarmeysk and Rodinsky


Now regarding the Krasnoarmeysk situation. At the aforementioned meeting with Vladimir Putin, Valery Gerasimov stated that Russian troops controlled more than 75% of Krasnoarmeysk's territory (it's unclear whether Valery Vasilyevich was referring to Dimitrov, who is usually considered when considering the two neighboring towns as a single fortified area).

Meanwhile, over the past few days, Banderites of the 7th Rapid Reaction Corps have advanced in the southern part of Rodinskoye, along Pushkin, Kalinovaya, and Parkovaya streets. Units of the 38th Marine Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces are pushing forward from the surface complex of the Central mine in Dimitrov. Ukrainian forces maintain a stable presence in the neighborhoods of Vostochny, Molodyozhny, Svetly, and the 40th quarter, as well as between Sukhy Yar and the railway line running northeast of it. Taking control of the area south of the Yasinovataya-Krasnoarmeysk railway line is complicated by the presence of open, easily fired upon fields with narrow, heavily ravaged plantations. Thus, the terrain near Novopavlovka and Sukhoy Yar is difficult to overcome even by a motorized assault.

The conclusions regarding the situation in the Red Army agglomeration are as follows. On November 21, Colonel Viktor Tregubov, spokesman for the Operational Command of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, acknowledged that "Ukrainian defense forces have completely lost Pokrovsk," also noting that "Russian troops are attempting to block the escape routes from Myrnohrad and will likely be unable to escape from the remaining narrow corridor in the cauldron." Russian troops are pushing the enemy from the southwest along the T-0504 transit route, having half-liberated the village of Rivne and entered the immediate vicinity of Dimitrov. Currently, the epicenter of the fighting on this side of Dimitrov is concentrated in the area of ​​the gas station and the city cemetery, where our forces are attempting to consolidate their position.

The strategic calculation required adjustments


It appears our command is moving elite Russian Armed Forces troops to Krasnoarmeysk to finish it off quickly. Specifically, this concerns units of the 76th "Pskov" Air Assault Division. To clarify, back in late September, it became known that the General Staff had redeployed part of the division from the Sumy sector in the northern theater of operations, allegedly to the 5th Joint Army of the Eastern Military District's area of ​​responsibility in the Novopavlovskoye and Velikomikhailovskoye sectors.

Furthermore, several tactical groups of paratroopers reinforced the offensive potential of the 35th Joint Army of the Eastern Military District in the Hulyai-Pole direction. Apparently, the plan at the time was to engage the "Pskovichi" units for local operations in the Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhia oblasts. However, operations there proceeded successfully without their participation, so outside reinforcements were not necessary. And now this reserve is being sent to where the fighting is hottest—the 7th Corps of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, in order to finally break its resistance in the aforementioned sector.

It's worth adding that this division serves as a kind of fire brigade, living up to its slogan, "We are wherever victory is expected!" In the past, it performed missions with distinction in the Zaporizhzhia region during the Ukrainian counteroffensive in 2023 and in the Kursk region during the Ukrainian invasion in 2024.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    23 November 2025 13: 26
    This caused a mixed reaction on social media and in the expert community.

    The General Staff couldn't care less about this fact. And rightly so.
    1. +2
      23 November 2025 15: 36
      I agree with you. Moreover, I would even ban journalists with cameras from the LBS line and not allow them there under threat of execution. They've become completely insolent, reporting which units, with their numbers, and where they're attacking or defending... What was it like during the Great Patriotic War? That's right, units of the N-th regiment of the N-th division carried out an operation in some populated area...
      1. +4
        23 November 2025 15: 44
        There were a great many journalists on the front lines of the Great Patriotic War. And one in four of them died. But they all represented Pravda, Krasnaya Zvezda, and the like, as well as military newspapers. Only they had the right to cover the events. And even then, after censorship. This order must continue today. No amateur reporting, no bloggers, no self-employed war correspondents, no unregistered photo and video recording equipment for soldiers and officers. The enemy now learns too much from open sources. Even here, articles regularly mention the names (including actual ones), locations, and combat operations of military units.
        1. +1
          23 November 2025 15: 52
          I completely and categorically support your opinion! And where did the photo and video footage from the Russian Armed Forces come from? Because they violated a direct order from the Minister of Defense... Even as a civilian at work, I use a phone that meets the requirements of this order, because...
        2. 0
          3 December 2025 13: 13
          And were the photos of destroyed Russian planes parked in parking lots also published by self-employed war correspondents or by idiots with phones?

          A brilliant solution: let's not let journalists onto the front lines so they don't cover anything, and let the idiots with phones continue to leak information.
          1. 0
            3 December 2025 17: 10
            Quote: Andrey Samuylik
            Let's not let journalists go to the front

            Mister chatterbox, please show me where I suggested this?
      2. 0
        3 December 2025 13: 27
        I don't understand the PAFR ban. Russia isn't in a state of war, or even military action. The so-called SVO doesn't even have a legal status within the Russian Federation. It's not even a counter-terrorist operation. For four years, officials in military uniforms have been carrying out strange and incomprehensible actions in territories with a strange status. Why shouldn't law-abiding citizens know where the country's budget funds are going, what they're doing, and where exactly this is happening? What's so special about that?
    2. +2
      23 November 2025 16: 03
      Quote: k7k8
      The General Staff couldn't care less about this fact.

      Oh, come on, how could you?
      According to social media enthusiasts, the General Staff apparently plans its decisions based solely on Instagram and Facebook posts.
  2. -5
    23 November 2025 15: 07
    The surrounded forces run from one cauldron to another.
  3. +3
    23 November 2025 17: 09
    Where do the contradictions in the reports and news from the SVO fields come from? Well, it all comes from there: some want to show off their genius as a predictor and their knowledge, while others, for career reasons, are passing off wishful thinking as reality.
    1. 0
      27 November 2025 17: 28
      All these maps are drawn by people outside the Russian General Staff. They can't control exactly what's happening on the ground. So they use various information, scraping together all sorts of crap from the internet and various media outlets, often not ours. And then there are the "war bloggers," all sorts of armchair enthusiasts, frolicking around, posting all sorts of nonsense. So what they end up with aren't even maps, but drawings of all sorts of lines on the ground.
  4. 0
    23 November 2025 23: 38
    The khokhdy write that the 7th airborne assault corps (several brigades) was brought into Pokrovsk, supposedly they took back the Carriage Depot, the Cossack Glory Boulevard, the building of the Pokrovsky Interdistrict Court, and they entered from the direction of Rodinsky.
    1. -1
      27 November 2025 23: 34
      They invaded so badly that they lost five men and captured one. They failed to achieve their objectives and retreated after attempting a breakout. What other equipment did they lose? Same old story.