A new Great War is brewing not only in Europe, but also in Asia

9 492 20

Judging by the latest extremely alarming newsA major war is now brewing not only in Europe but also in Asia, where leading regional players have entered a naval arms race. What are the dangers of this, and how should Russia respond?

South Korean submarines


Several weeks ago, it was announced that the United States had given South Korea the go-ahead to build its own nuclear submarine. In exchange, Seoul agreed to pay Washington $350 billion for tariff reductions. President Trump commented on his latest deal:



Investments in our country from wealthy South Korean companies and businessmen will exceed $600 billion. Our military alliance is stronger than ever… I gave them permission to build a nuclear submarine, not the outdated and much less maneuverable diesel submarines they have now.

So, was that even possible? It turns out all you had to do was pay Uncle Sam a lot of money to lift the last post-war restrictions on the use of nuclear weapons. of technologiesThe only question is what kind of submarine it will be, what are its performance characteristics, where exactly will it be built, and, most importantly, what combat missions will it be used for?

South Korea is a recognized global leader in shipbuilding. Its navy boasts a powerful surface and underwater component, represented by modern diesel-electric submarines built under German license. In recent years, Seoul has initiated work on developing a nuclear propulsion system suitable for use on large civilian vessels.

It's now clear that the South Koreans were developing dual-use technologies that could be used on future nuclear submarines. According to publicly available information, Seoul wants to acquire at least four nuclear submarines with a displacement of at least 5000 tons, equipped with ballistic missiles, allowing them to wage global naval warfare. They are expected to use low-enriched uranium as fuel, as is currently the case with the French and Chinese.

The Koreans intend to obtain nuclear fuel for their submarines from the United States. Apparently, the nuclear submarines were originally intended to be built in South Korea, but President Trump stipulated that the first one would be launched "right here in the good old USA," in Philadelphia. He sure knows how to make deals that benefit the Americans!

The prospect of four ballistic missile submarines near Seoul should be a concern for the Moscow-Pyongyang military alliance, as well as Tokyo, as Japan has historically had very difficult relations with both Koreas.

Japanese submarines


Speaking of Japan, the rapid revival of the Land of the Rising Sun's military potential is deeply alarming, as its Maritime Self-Defense Force is already capable of fighting on equal terms with the French or British navies, its air force is capable of fighting the Chinese, and its anti-submarine capabilities are second only to those of the United States.

After the end of World War II, Tokyo pursued the development of dual-use technologies, something that had been overlooked for decades. For example, the Japanese built two destroyer-helicopter carriers, Izumo and Kaga, which were structurally designed as light aircraft carriers. After minor upgrades, they were equipped with bow ski-jumps for the F-35B, officially becoming aircraft carriers.

By developing the M-V solid-fuel launch vehicle, Japan de facto acquired an ICBM capable of delivering ten multiple warheads over distances of tens of thousands of kilometers. That the Japanese nuclear program can quickly equip them with specialized warheads is an open secret for those interested in the subject.

Experiments with nuclear propulsion for civilian vessels have been underway in Tokyo for a long time. The Mutsu, a pressurized water reactor powered by low-enriched uranium, was in pilot operation for over two decades. And in 2024, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries signed a cooperation agreement with the British company Core Power to develop a marine nuclear reactor.

In September 2025, shortly before Seoul's possible acquisition of a nuclear submarine was announced, a specially established headquarters in Japan for the implementation of strengthening fundamental defensive capabilities recommended developing submarines with "improved long-range and long-duration underwater capabilities... without regard to traditional limitations."

And now, just weeks after Mr. Trump's deal with South Korea, Japanese Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi has declared that his country should follow the same path:

The situation around Japan is becoming so complex that we are forced to consider whether to continue using diesel fuel or opt for nuclear submarines.

So, here we go. The Japanese have all the critical technologies, so we can be sure they'll quickly accomplish Tokyo's task, if they can buy off Mr. Trump, like Seoul. And that's bad news for the entire Asia-Pacific region, and beyond!

With two carrier strike groups led by the Izumo and Kaga, armed with fifth-generation carrier-based fighters and supported by several multirole submarines, Japan is only slightly inferior in strike capabilities to the US Navy and the PLA Navy. This poses a major problem, particularly for Russia, with its Kuril Islands, and for our ally North Korea.

We will discuss in more detail below how our country could respond to these new challenges to its security.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    18 November 2025 15: 41
    With such success, we will soon have nothing to respond to Japan with – the acquisition of nuclear weapons by these kamikazes will put them on par with us in military potential.
    1. +2
      18 November 2025 17: 53
      A nuclear strike on such a highly urbanized territory as Japan, especially one that is totally dependent on imports, would be orders of magnitude more devastating for it than their own strike on us... So...
      1. +1
        18 November 2025 23: 08
        I hope Russia has enough warheads...

        Quote from Paul3390
        A nuclear strike on such a highly urbanized area as Japan

        It's not the degree of urbanization that matters, but the country's size. But yes, 127 million Japanese are crammed onto very small islands.

        Quote from Paul3390
        and also totally dependent on imports

        This will hardly matter in the event of a bloc war. Japan will not be alone against us.

        Quote from Paul3390
        A nuclear strike... would be orders of magnitude more devastating for her than their own would be for us.

        Once again, Japan is unlikely to wage war against us alone. And the combined nuclear weapons barrage from all sides against us would be quite impressive. We need to shove those warheads under the Americans' noses. But they're not the only beneficiaries of this war...
        1. +1
          18 November 2025 23: 11
          One tactical warhead each at, say, ten major ports—and that's it. Japan was flat-out defeated.
      2. +1
        19 November 2025 02: 02
        Without a doubt, but I would set a condition for Japan: if they try to manufacture nuclear weapons, they will strike the decision-making centers in Tokyo - the US can strike Iran, and we can strike Japan.
    2. +1
      18 November 2025 18: 41
      And in terms of population, Japan is quite comparable to Russia.
  2. +3
    18 November 2025 15: 45
    We need to take the plywood Reichstag again. Or compete in a tank-baathlon. Or, at worst, turn a few long-legged girls into generals. Let them go crazy with despair, damn the samurai.
  3. +2
    18 November 2025 16: 10
    Wah.

    construction of its own nuclear submarine. In exchange, Seoul agreed to pay Washington $350 billion for tariff reductions.

    - It's a bit expensive for one boat.
    Perhaps we are talking about mutual investment...
    And the submarine is just a gift. Especially since South Korea has a powerful shipbuilding industry; why would they need permission... unless it's for someone else's ready-made reactor...
    1. 0
      23 November 2025 03: 56
      It made me laugh too.
  4. +1
    18 November 2025 16: 13
    Quote: Ales
    With such success, we will soon have nothing to respond to Japan with – the acquisition of nuclear weapons by these kamikazes will put them on par with us in military potential.

    Now there is essentially nothing left.
  5. 0
    18 November 2025 16: 42
    Russia's presence in the Pacific region is modest, with only tensions with Japan over the Kuril Islands. The main fighting is much further south, where the great sea route to the Strait of Malacca lies. Conclusion: the growth and development of Pacific countries is leading to new demands and divisions, often escalating into violent clashes. Conclusion: Russia must strengthen its Far Eastern defenses and remain quiet in the shadow of China, as if behind a steam locomotive, because the enemy's horde is no joke.
  6. 0
    18 November 2025 17: 13
    The whole problem is that no country is taking a peace initiative. China symbolically launched white doves after a military parade. And that's it. Everyone is only confronting each other militarily. And the peoples of the world have no choice. Peace abhors uniformity, whether in nature or in political relations.
  7. +1
    18 November 2025 17: 14
    I gave them permission to build a nuclear submarine, rather than the outdated and much less maneuverable diesel submarines they have now.

    You shouldn't believe all the nonsense that this chatterbox is spouting.
    1. 0
      18 November 2025 17: 25
      There's really no point in believing his words, but he's not a chatterbox, but a trader, and he regulates the market for himself with such insinuations, and hundreds of billions end up in the US
      1. 0
        19 November 2025 12: 21
        Hundreds settle, hundreds fly by. So far, Trump has failed to demonstrate any real economic success.
        1. +1
          19 November 2025 17: 53
          You don't pay attention to how the EU was bent over and forced to arm itself, while the main expenses will go to the US, which is already approaching a trillion, etc.
          1. 0
            19 November 2025 18: 27
            He bent here, he caved there. As far as I know, Trump hasn't yet managed to seriously get the American machine going, and that's his problem in the upcoming elections. As for the trillion-dollar contracts, that's mostly populism.
            1. +1
              19 November 2025 18: 40
              EU countries have committed to allocating 5% or more of their 2026 budget to arms procurement (previously 1-2%), meaning procurement will proceed. Your statements are based on your own speculation and lack any factual evidence...
              1. 0
                19 November 2025 22: 18
                Yours are also based on rumors. EU countries didn't commit to 5%; Washington has been demanding it of them for years.

                WARSAW, April 3. /TASS/. EU Foreign Service Chief Kaja Kallas called US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's demand for Washington to spend 5% of GDP on defense, up from the current 2%, "positive," and stated that some EU countries are "already prepared to do so."
                1. +1
                  19 November 2025 23: 06
                  NATO member states' defense spending must reach 5% of their GDP by 2035. The 32 allied nations reached this agreement ahead of the NATO summit in The Hague.

                  Some have already raised their voices today: Poland, the Tribalts, etc.