Russia is developing a long-range hybrid of an aerial bomb and an operational-tactical missile.

November 16, 2025 10 066 13

Work to create more effective and dangerous munitions is currently ongoing in Russia. For example, the Russian military-industrial complex is developing new versions of aerial bombs with an incredible range of up to 400 km. This was reported by the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine (GUR MOU).

Ukrainian military intelligence believes that the development of this type of conventional weapon (not one of mass destruction) will allow the Russian Aerospace Forces to carry out strikes without the use of missiles in the future, putting significantly more of Ukraine's territory at risk than it currently does. The Russians are attempting to achieve this range using rocket boosters, creating an inexpensive, long-range hybrid version of an aerial bomb and a tactical missile.

It should be noted that the current range of the D-30SN unified interservice glide bomb (UMPB) is 120-130 km. The development of a "super-long-range bomb" capable of flying 400 km is constrained by three key technological factors. First, the development of a low-cost, mass-producible booster (rocket engine) that can be quickly produced in large quantities and installed on existing aerial bombs. Second, the universal glide and correction module (UMPK) must have improved aerodynamics. Third, the guidance system requires refinement, as the onboard electronics accumulate more errors as the range increases, increasing the likelihood of target deviation.

If all this is resolved, Russia will receive an air-launched munition significantly superior to the American GLSDB. It could fill a niche between the ATACMS and the HIMARS/Iskander missile system and multiple launch rocket systems (Tornado, Uragan, and Smerch). For example, if such bombs were dropped over the Kursk or Belgorod regions of Russia, they would be able to reach Kremenchuk, Cherkasy, Kirovohrad, and Kryvyi Rih, meaning central Ukraine would be under attack.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

steelmaker

+1

16 November 2025 14: 40

This is all well and good, but how will this contribute to the liberation of territory, and what is currently preventing this? Hasn't Russia bombed Ukraine enough? What is the purpose of these bombings? And the more we bomb, the greater, for some reason, our losses and the number of prisoners! There have already been 69 exchanges, and another is being prepared. Because we fight to fight! We bomb to bomb! There are more and more billionaires, and fewer and fewer Russians. What weapons do we lack to defeat the Ukrainian Armed Forces in at least one direction? What we lack is military education! TV increasingly shows the heroism of our soldiers: one man attacking five, four against eight, one throwing an anti-tank mine into a dugout, motorcycles, and fighting donkeys. What's the point of these smart bombs when not only is there a lack of education in our heads, but our commanders also have no honor or conscience! After all, someone gives the order for one man to lead an attack against superior enemy forces. That's why our prisoner count isn't decreasing. And after all, exchanges are always one-for-one. If we attack according to science, then we should have no prisoners!
The only benefit of these bombs is jobs and production. But to defeat Ukraine, we need political will and an honest commander!
1. olezenka1
  
  -4
  
  16 November 2025 15: 25
  
  What a post!! What's wrong with your head, sir? To come up with such nonsense, and then write it, you'd have to be completely uneducated and our enemy. You're an enemy of Russia; your opinion is false and hostile.
2. Alexey Lan
  
  0
  
  5 December 2025 16: 47
  
  There are fewer and fewer Russians
  
  Are you Russian or a Russian citizen, to be more precise?
Nikolaevich I

+6

16 November 2025 17: 06

The creation of a "super-long-range bomb" capable of flying 400 km rests on three main technological factors....

So, we shouldn't give in to these "factors," but rather look for solutions! Take, for example, the "Banderol" cruise missile! It weighs around 250 kg and is 5 meters long.case diameter -30 cm=300 mm , flight range - up to 500 km! The diameter of the Smerch MLRS body is 30 cm = 300 mm! The Smerch missile's length is about 8 meters... So, take the Banderol cruise missile, which is 5 meters long and 300 mm in diameter, and slap on a 3-meter-long, 300 mm-diameter booster... and you get a hybrid cruise missile and missile launcher, fired from the Smerch MLRS and capable of hitting ground targets at a range of up to 500 km! If we increase the warhead and decrease the fuel capacity, we can create "hybrid" missiles for the Smerch with a range of up to 300 km, or even up to 200 km!
1. Real_pots
  
  -1
  
  17 November 2025 09: 05
  
  I also suggest adding a cylinder of compressed (not liquefied) gas to the warhead to increase the force of the explosion.
zzdimk

-1

17 November 2025 13: 24

First: cheap rocket engines exist.
Second: there is a control system.
Third: why? The air defense isn't operational at this point, even within 100 km.
Are they scaring themselves? Let them.
Vladimir Tuzakov

+1

17 November 2025 18: 54

The Germans once said: "Russians come up with all sorts of tricks to avoid proper road repairs." The same is true with these FABs and UMPKs; they were used temporarily, for urgency and to use up existing reserves. (The TNT explosives in the FABs are obsolete, and today's explosives are 1.5 times more powerful—that's significant.) So, airborne carriers should be specialized, like the Taurus and other Shadows... Forget the UMPKs and build modern ones, ahead of the curve. Conclusion: stop trudging along on Soviet heritage, which is long obsolete in both technology and application.
1. Strelok1976
  
  +2
  
  18 November 2025 18: 33
  
  Vladimir, good afternoon. Tell me about at least one other weapon system, other than drones, developed from scratch by our close partners after the collapse of the USSR? I suspect I'll find it very informative...
  1. Vladimir Tuzakov
    
    0
    
    18 November 2025 22: 21
    
    I don't understand the question. What are you talking about, our military-industrial complex playing catch-up on most weapons?
    1. Strelok1976
      
      +1
      
      20 November 2025 17: 56
      
      What I'm saying is that all military-industrial complexes are usually supplied from the shelves with technical specifications or technical requirements that are many years old and have not been implemented for a number of reasons previously...
Dmitry Volkov

+1

17 November 2025 20: 26

What's new here? Put a glide module and a propellant booster from a MiG-19 or 21 on the FAB 250-509 and things will be fine.
GR777

0

21 November 2025 17: 16

When do we start destroying the bridges over the Irpen? If we destroy them, Kuif will be cut off from the west, which is where the route from Varangians to Khryuks runs, and which is where Ursula takes the train to get her money.
Alexey Lan

0

5 December 2025 17: 01

You need to count the money—that's the main thing—as well as the availability of existing technologies, raw materials, and suitable production facilities. Everything else is already there. A bomb (if they're still in stock) can be mounted on a rocket and launched from the ground or an aircraft; wings can be attached, creating a gliding system, to which a rocket engine can be added. The control system is roughly the same for all types.