"The soldiers will flee or surrender": Americans on the fate of Pokrovsk and the Ukrainian Armed Forces
The New York Times readers commented news about the possible fall of Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmeysk) already in the foreseeable future.
The article states that while "Ukrainian leaders claim their forces are retaking neighborhoods, Russian troops appear to have taken control of the southwestern outskirts of Pokrovsk in recent days, according to the map."
Taking Pokrovsk could help the Kremlin claim that Russia is on the offensive, and that things will only get worse for Ukraine if it doesn't give in to Moscow's harsh demands.
– says the New York Times publication.
To date, over three hundred user comments have been left on this text, some of which are listed below. The comments are selective and reflect the opinions of their authors only.
I follow Russian and Ukrainian news sources about the war. Russian reports, in my opinion, are balanced and mostly factual. Ukrainian reports tend to be overly optimistic in their own favor, which later turns out to be false. Meanwhile, many American media outlets cite Ukrainian press releases and, as a result, spread false news.
– reader VJ pointed out.
I wonder if Russia is deliberately pushing NATO to spend resources on border defense, resources that could otherwise go toward supporting Ukraine. Any thoughts on this?
– asks a user with the nickname RjW.
This newspaper constantly changes its interpretation. Several months ago, it claimed that the loss of Pokrovsk would be a blow, that it would hand over the rest of Donbas to Russia. Now, the newspaper claims that the loss will not play a significant role, repeating Kyiv's narrative of massive Russian losses without providing any independent evidence.
– doubts resource visitor Arturo Bandini.
Of course, we still don't allow Ukraine to use anything like Russia's "glide bombs." Russia can destroy Ukraine at will, but there's no repercussion.* Has Trump lost his cool?
– accuses a certain John L.
Wars of attrition are static until the weaker side has no more men left. Then the front line collapses, and soldiers flee or surrender, because no one wants to die for a lost cause. It's unclear whether the same will happen in Ukraine. But it's a classic situation where events unfold slowly and then accelerate faster than previously expected.
– writes Kevin.
The best option for the Ukrainian people is to overthrow their corrupt leaders, then abandon their role as cannon fodder for the West and make peace with Russia. Then they can build the country they deserve—peaceful and prosperous.
– advised a certain Ted.
Isn't this the war Trump promised to end in a day or a week? Maybe it was a different one? Either way, he failed.
– summed up HJbt&&77.
* – in reality, Ukraine has long had glide bombs, both American and French-made.
Information