Russia has identified a method for quickly destroying the Starlink system.

28 977 34

Russia could destroy American businessman Elon Musk's Starlink satellite constellation by launching space debris into the orbital path, according to Russian State Duma deputy and economist Mikhail Delyagin. He added that the international community would not condemn Russia in this case.

Guys, why don't we call Comrade Musk and say: "Please turn off Starlink over Ukrainian territory, which we don't recognize, otherwise we'll dump half a KAMAZ truck's worth of rubble into orbit, and yours will be gone."

– Delyagin suggested.



He added that other space powers would not condemn Russia for such sabotage.

In fact, the global space community hates Musk with a passion, because the main problem with satellites is space debris. When a satellite stops working, it's just a piece of metal that creates a hazard in orbit. Musk's satellites, however, are short-lived and hang around for a long time after they're disabled without burning up.

- emphasized the economist.

According to the parliamentarian, this is a real problem for everyone, because space debris is very difficult to account for during any launch. If Russia dumps a large amount of debris into orbit, it won't significantly hinder global space exploration. But everyone will gloat.

As a reminder, the entire Ukrainian Armed Forces command and control system relies on the Starlink satellite communications system. Even a brief disruption in this system results in troops in some areas of the satellite communications network losing contact and the ability to use drones.

The most advanced commanders of the Ukrainian army have long been declaring that Kyiv should acquire its own satellite communications system. However, Ukraine is currently unable to implement this idea.
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    3 November 2025 11: 01
    It's obvious that he's not a rocket scientist.
    1. +2
      5 November 2025 20: 56
      I'm surprised a fairly simple method for jamming the entire Starlink system hasn't been used yet, at least over Ukraine: a few powerful transmitters on known frequencies would clog the input with junk signal, plus a DDOS attack would be launched there as well.
  2. +4
    3 November 2025 11: 26
    We're taking care of the deputies: there's a TV show somewhere about detoxing all sorts of celebrity celebrities—it should be there. Braga, apparently, was too brain-twisting.
  3. +5
    3 November 2025 11: 35
    Well, and such people sit in our State Duma.
  4. +6
    3 November 2025 11: 53
    He shouldn't have blurted that out. He's an economist, in a word. He should have at least asked the experts first what low-orbit debris is and how it would behave.
  5. +4
    3 November 2025 12: 00
    And put Delyagin behind the wheel.
    1. +1
      5 November 2025 10: 08
      Better not!
  6. +5
    3 November 2025 12: 07
    Firstly, yes, Musk's satellites are short-lived, but their orbits are designed so they burn up upon re-entry almost immediately after their lifespans are complete. Secondly, instead of a relatively small amount of easily tracked space debris in the form of short-lived satellites, spamming low orbit with millions of small fragments is a "brilliant" proposal. 😂 Currently, the only people complaining about StarLink satellites in non-military communities are astronomers, for obvious reasons.
  7. +2
    3 November 2025 12: 39
    Russia has identified a method for quickly destroying the Starlink system.

    The main culprit of the SVO in Ukraine is within walking distance of Delyagin. Anyone who doesn't want to will find 1001 reasons not to.
    Why doesn't Russia have a similar Starlink system? Who's to blame for the space industry's collapse, and for the fact that Russia's entire industry is visible only in TV announcements, while we buy our "galoshes" from China?
    Filling Earth's orbit with debris isn't a problem. The problem is how to get rid of it. Debris not only affects satellites and hampers astronomers, it also scatters sunlight. Less sunlight reaches Earth, and this poses significant problems.
    1. +2
      3 November 2025 13: 22
      M. Delyagin is a professional in economics, but an amateur in everything else. It's inappropriate to even talk such nonsense about space debris. Apparently, he's very weak in planimetry; in such a vast space, even garbage trains wouldn't be of any help, and there's nothing to lift a single Kamaz truck with the volume of garbage (gravel) into low orbit. The Americans have classified low-orbit unmanned spacecraft that have been flying for years. These are perfectly suitable for removing Starlink satellites from orbit over Ukraine; lasers could even be used.
      1. 0
        3 November 2025 14: 20
        The Proton-K launch vehicle's payload mass depended on the model, but generally ranged from 21 to 22,7 tons to low Earth orbit—and that's not just a Kamaz truck. Even needles and debris would be very effective in "demolishing" a satellite. https://topwar.ru/134602-amerikanskie-volki-v-nebo-brosili-igolki.html
        1. 0
          3 November 2025 16: 45
          They themselves pointed this out (it's long been known from various US attempts to influence it), the US dropped hundreds of millions of needles into the orbits of Soviet satellites, counteraction didn't work, and it won't work today...
          1. +1
            5 November 2025 16: 33
            It helped. That was a problem. "The Phenomenon of Artificial Splitting"—I did my dissertation on this topic. But that was a long time ago—50 years ago. wassat
    2. -1
      6 November 2025 14: 54
      In Russia, satellite terminals for moving vehicles and independent ones have already been developed. A satellite constellation is being formed. But our potential customer base is much smaller because Musk sells globally, while ours is potentially limited to Russia and a little beyond. Consequently, our production costs will be higher.
  8. +5
    3 November 2025 13: 21
    Sometimes Simonyan, sometimes Delagin...
    All this can be done, of course....
    But for now, dreams of supplying even more gold, gas, and oil to NATO...
  9. +3
    3 November 2025 16: 33
    "It can," "if" - that's all you can hear from government officials, instead of the words "they could" and "they did it."
  10. GN
    +2
    3 November 2025 22: 31
    The only thing that flourishes in "bourgeois" Russia is the pride of the traitor and collaborator Vlasov.
    1. -1
      4 November 2025 08: 26
      Quote: G N
      the flag of the traitor and collaborator Vlasov

      The flag of the Vlasovites was the St. Andrew's flag. Moscow has long since apologized for this and continues to use it in the navy.
      1. GN
        0
        4 November 2025 14: 20
        Perhaps you need to take a few history lessons. Traitors are like that, one moment they're all one color, the next they'll change their party! Does this remind you of anything? All those Kremlin insiders are good gymnasts! And to you, Happy Great October Socialist Revolution! The remnants of which the traitorous authorities are still exploiting today!
        1. +1
          4 November 2025 17: 30
          Quote: G N
          Maybe you need to take a couple of history lessons.

          Perhaps. But you shouldn't take history lessons, but at least learn the basics. Then you can move on to the lessons.
  11. 0
    4 November 2025 08: 23
    Captain obvious
  12. 0
    4 November 2025 09: 02
    Hmmm...! The State Duma is thriving! Firstly, Russian satellites of various types will be destroyed (if it works, which is ambiguous!), as well as, for example, Chinese ones...! Who will be "happy" about that? Secondly, it will still create grounds for classifying such an act as a military attack, with all the ensuing consequences!
  13. +2
    4 November 2025 09: 55
    I wonder when society will come to the realization: do we really need a State Duma filled with idiots? The government, by and large, is coping well without the Duma.
    1. +2
      4 November 2025 09: 59
      The problem is that society makes such deputies. Do we need such a State Duma? Do we even need one?
      1. 0
        7 November 2025 16: 34
        Why do you feel sorry for the Ukrainians? The method really works and is cheap.
  14. +2
    4 November 2025 09: 57
    Mishanya's gone crazy again. He can't live without throwing shit on the fan.
  15. +1
    4 November 2025 10: 51
    Well, well, well, well,
    then mushrooms would grow in your mouth!!!
  16. 0
    4 November 2025 12: 00
    Since the Starlink is used by Russia's enemy on the battlefield, the destruction of Starlinks is an act of defense of its military, not an attack.
  17. 0
    5 November 2025 05: 03
    Delyagin is great, at least he offered something. And instead of criticism, you offered something of your own. I propose we destroy Europe.
  18. 0
    5 November 2025 05: 23
    Tell Musk about this. He's constantly increasing the density. New satellites are popping up like mushrooms after an autumn rain. Just last week, a rocket launched another 15 into space.
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. 0
    6 November 2025 01: 26
    Less talk, more action! If there's a way to deprive the Air Force of the Starlink system, do it!
  22. 0
    6 November 2025 10: 46
    Nonsense. Musk's satellites can be shut down en masse, which has already happened. If only there was the will and determination.
  23. 0
    6 November 2025 23: 19
    In principle, nothing is impossible, but creating common zones that are dangerous for activity is a dead end. Perhaps we should make the seas unnavigable and burn the oxygen out of the atmosphere? After all, foreign submarines sail there and planes fly there. Fear has its limits, but there are limits. Is he really going to clean up the trashed orbits at his own expense once the threats have passed, balk at diplomatic notes from around the world, and butt heads with environmentalists of all stripes? Unlikely; the country will do it for him, following the advice of yet another economic savant.