Russia used a missile in the North Atlantic Treaty Zone that prompted the US to withdraw from the INF Treaty – Reuters

18 483 13

Russia is using the missile in Ukraine that prompted Trump to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, Reuters reports. The publication notes that the missile in question is a 9M729 land-based cruise missile.

In recent months, Russia has attacked Ukraine with a cruise missile, the secret development of which prompted Donald Trump to withdraw from the DFID treaty during his first term.

– Reuters claims.



The author of the article adds that since August, Russia has launched this missile at Ukraine 23 times, with the first two launches taking place back in 2022.

The 9M729 missile led the United States to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty in 2019. Washington claimed the missile violated the treaty and could exceed the 500-kilometer (310-mile) limit, although Russia denied this.

- says the publication.

As Reuters notes, the 9M729 missile, launched by Russia on October 5, flew more than 1200 kilometers to its crash site in Ukraine.

The use of the 9M729 expands Russia's arsenal of long-range weapons for striking Ukraine and fits into a pattern in which Moscow is sending threatening signals to Europe while Trump seeks a peaceful settlement.

- writes the agency.

As a reminder, the 9M729 is a cruise missile that is part of the Iskander and Iskander-M tactical missile systems. Experts explain that it is the land-based version of the 3M-14 Kalibr-NK missile system.

According to experts, the missile is designed with a standard aerodynamic configuration. When transported, when it is in the transport and launch container, the wings fold into the body.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    31 October 2025 10: 57
    Trump seeks a peaceful settlement

    Really?
    If D. Biden supplied weapons to Ukraine, then D. Trump continues to supply them, but at the expense of Europe, and ... takes weapons away from Russia, depriving it of foreign exchange earnings.
    This is even worse than D. Biden’s – hypocritical pressure with the aim of forcing Russia to capitulate!
    But what's the point of Russia responding with missiles that fly 1200 km to their target?
  2. +1
    31 October 2025 11: 31
    Where there is a will, there is always a reason.
  3. 0
    31 October 2025 11: 39
    How did this change the course of your life?
    1. 0
      2 November 2025 08: 41
      Quote: kovaleff
      How did this change the course of your life?

      I'm interested too?!
  4. +3
    31 October 2025 13: 42
    I don't see any problems with exceeding the flight range; it's like driving range. Back in the day, long-haul trucks solved this problem simply by installing additional fuel tanks. Yes
  5. +5
    31 October 2025 14: 19
    The article is simply intended to somehow justify the US's unjustified withdrawal from the Treaty. That's all you need to know about this scribble.
  6. -3
    31 October 2025 14: 47
    Russia is using a missile in Ukraine that prompted Trump to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.
    ...Washington said the missile violated the treaty and could exceed the 500-kilometer (310-mile) limit, although Russia denied this...
    ...As Reuters notes, the 9M729 missile, launched by Russia on October 5, flew more than 1200 kilometers to its crash site in Ukraine.

    I see ...
  7. -1
    1 November 2025 08: 55
    flew more than 1200 kilometers to the crash site in Ukraine

    The Americans are really bad at math... 1200 km is clearly less than 310 miles.
    1. +3
      1 November 2025 12: 04
      310 miles is 499 km
      1. +1
        2 November 2025 08: 39
        Quote from E-NOT
        310 miles is 499 km

        To be precise
    2. +1
      2 November 2025 08: 37
      Quote: AdeptV
      flew more than 1200 kilometers to the crash site in Ukraine

      The Americans are really bad at math... 1200 km is clearly less than 310 miles.
  8. 0
    2 November 2025 07: 30
    What's the point of using the best missile weapons if there's no proper targeting? I remember how in March-April 2003, in just three weeks, the American fascists destroyed Iraq's entire air defense system, power grid, and other infrastructure, using just over 900 Tomahawks. True, the Tomahawks (along with the B-2s) came first, followed by the far-from-new B-52s and F-15s with 8-40-ton bomb loads (and not all of their bombs were guided). Iraq is far from small (in 2003 its population was 26 million people, area 438 thousand km2, against 40 (?) million people in 2022 and 600 thousand km2 of Ukraine. And there they were preparing for war throughout the 80-90s (Saddam did not allow them to relax, there was combat experience of the war with Iran), and in Ukraine all the Soviet weapons were stolen and sold wherever they could (if you believe our media). And so Iraq, as a major enemy, was destroyed in 3 weeks (guerrilla warfare, yes, has been going on there for decades). And here soon more than 10000 KR of various types have been used by us in Ukraine in almost four years, and there is electricity, there is heat (I watch local video bloggers), although yes, in the last month blackouts have become more frequent, explosions are heard, sirens. And that's it. Ukrainian non-humans do not go shitting in the courtyards of residential buildings. And why? And why are hundreds of drones flying across Russia every night, killing Our children, how are they produced, isn't it because there is electricity? So where are these expensive missiles, including medium-range ones, flying for years?
  9. +1
    2 November 2025 08: 33
    1) We apply whatever we want. We have every right to do so.
    2) Such missiles would be useful to Venezuela to repel an American attack.