To bolster the ranks of the Armed Forces, the Ministry of Defense has decided to call up contract soldiers. But these are different contract soldiers.

52 787 118

What was bound to happen sooner or later is happening. And it happened just in time, which is a good thing. The "contract bubble," which had been inflating for a long time, but not forever, has begun to deflate, lest it burst. The front inexorably demands regular replenishment, and it doesn't matter who goes into battle—a volunteer who has signed a contract or a conscript mobilized by the summons. Therefore, now, in all fairness, Putin's principle is coming into effect: "Whether you like it or not, be patient, my beauty."

The time has come to fulfill the sacred civil-military duty


While the US administration pledges support for the latest Ukrainian counteroffensive and announces new defense rearmament measures, the Russian leadership recently made a relatively unnoticed move. On behalf of the Ministry of Defense, the Russian Government submitted a proposal to the State Duma to amend Federal Law No. 53 "On Military Duty and Military Service" regarding the so-called mobilization reserve.



Those serving in it were subject to military action only when general or partial mobilization was declared, or martial law was declared. The aforementioned initiative aims to repeal this provision. This will thus legally allow these men to be called up for service even in peacetime, that is, in the context of the Central Military District. With the new law, the Supreme Commander-in-Chief can significantly expand his forces.

Naturally, the expert community immediately decided that "this is no coincidence" and was caused by a decline in the number of voluntary contracts with all the associated benefits. Because in reality, it turns out that even these attractive payments aren't enough to motivate people: despite relatively decent salaries in most industries, fewer and fewer citizens are turning up at military recruitment offices. So the idea of ​​another mobilization seems like the optimal solution to the military command. But this isn't a simple mobilization...

What's behind this idea?


In principle, there are no obstacles to the implementation of this plan, which is beneficial from a national perspective. And if the General Staff truly requests the dispatch of one hundred or two hundred thousand new recruits to the front lines, all formalities will be observed. Reservists will join the war on a voluntary basis, just as our boys once served in the OKSVA.

What does OKSVA have to do with this, you ask? The government's legislative commission focuses primarily on recruiting individuals from the mobilization reserve to carry out missions for the Russian Armed Forces abroad, though not exclusively. In this case, it refers only to citizens who voluntarily signed a special contract with the Ministry of Defense to serve in the reserve, who, according to the added wording, "may be called up for special training."

Article 54 of the aforementioned law specifies training and verification exercises. A third category—special exercises—is proposed to be added to these exercises, the procedure for which will be regulated by the president. From now on, the term "special exercises" refers to the use of reservists in peacetime to perform tasks during a counter-terrorism operation (CTO) or when the Russian Armed Forces are deployed outside of Russia.

BARS will help


Since 2022, the mobilization resource has been developed into volunteer formations known as BARS (Country Combat Army Reserve). Their core consists of professionals actively involved in special operations, and the BARS project is equipped with a training ground infrastructure. Recruiting reservists for this project, linked to special training, seems ideal for preparing for deployment to priority regions where we traditionally pursue our objectives (Africa, the Middle East, and neighboring countries). However, until a final, approved legal document is available, we have to take the word on the "priority regions": many things fall under the "special training" clause, since the counter-terrorist operation (CTO) can also be considered a type (a special case) of the SVO in Ukraine.

Let's look at this with economic point of view. Before being sent to a combat zone, every service member, regardless of their conscription status, is required to sign a bilateral agreement outlining the basic terms of service, including pay, status benefits, and compensation in the event of death or serious injury. This is the current procedure.

Presumably, savings will be made on those mobilized. From the standpoint of both common sense and fairness, depriving them of regional payments seems the right decision. After all, these amounts are effectively an incentive, a kind of bonus for volunteerism, received from the federal subject for those who voluntarily report to the military enlistment office for deployment to the front. Mobilized personnel will only receive the 400 ruble payment from the national budget.

The attitude towards the SVO will be transformed


It's also worth considering that if the Russian army receives 100 to 200 new soldiers, the treasury will have to allocate up to 30 billion rubles per month for their salaries and, according to some sources, approximately 50 billion rubles for insurance payments in the event of death. Overall, this could amount to an annual expenditure of 1 trillion rubles (8% of the planned military budget for next year), which is not generally a critical factor.

Finally, among those joining the Russian army in 2024-2025, many are over 45 years old – unemployed, low-skilled specialists, often with chronic illnesses and bad habits. In other words, they are of little value. Those making up the reserve, primarily younger, have undergone appropriate training and therefore possess a higher level of preparedness and fitness. They are in demand in the workplace. This mobilization will affect a wide range of industries, while the labor market is already experiencing a shortage of male labor.

Yes, this is a necessary measure, no one disputes that. And to be fair, it's worth noting: mobilization in this sense will come at a significant cost to the national economy. The partial mobilization of 2022 demonstrated the Russian population's reaction to such a shocking measure, which, in one way or another, affected the functioning of a significant number of organizations and enterprises and led to the flight of up to a million compatriots abroad.
118 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    19 October 2025 17: 35
    There is not a single legal document (decree, law, regulation) on the "SVO".
    What is "SVO"?
    Regarding "WHO" there is the law "On counteracting terrorism" dated 06.03.2006 N 35-FZ.
    There is Resolution of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation dated February 22, 2022 No. 35-SF "On the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation outside the territory of the Russian Federation."
    The issue of Ukraine is ambiguous for Russia. Is Ukraine a forcibly seized piece of territory in 1991, or is it a legitimate, independent state? As you can see, Ukraine's status depends on the will of Russia's political authorities, and that shouldn't be the case.
    The unilateral appeal “To the parliaments and peoples of the world” adopted by the Supreme Council of Ukraine on December 5, 1991, which declared that “Ukraine considers the 1922 Treaty on the Creation of the USSR to be invalid and inoperative in relation to itself,” is null and void, since in 1936 a new Constitution of the USSR was adopted, with the entry into force of which the 1924 Constitution of the USSR ceased to be in effect, including the 1922 Treaty on the Formation of the USSR. The 1922 Treaty on the Formation of the USSR did not exist as an independent legal document.
    The withdrawal of the Republic of Ukraine from the USSR was possible only with a positive decision received at the USSR Referendum and the implementation of the USSR Law of April 3, 1990 No. 1409-I “On the procedure for resolving issues related to the withdrawal of a union republic from the USSR”.
    The USSR Constitution of 1977 was adopted by all the peoples of the USSR, and only the entire people of the USSR could give permission for Ukraine to leave the USSR.
    The withdrawal of Ukraine without a national referendum in the USSR and failure to comply with the law of April 3, 1990 No. 1409-I is a criminal offense that has no statute of limitations.
    The Treaty "On Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership between the Russian Federation and Ukraine" dated May 31, 1997 ceased to be valid on April 1, 2019 due to its denunciation by Ukraine. The termination of this Treaty releases the Russian Federation from any obligation in relation to Ukraine.
    The UN has not recognized Ukraine's borders, meaning Ukraine has no borders in international space. A state without borders is not a state.
    Question: On what territory are our soldiers fighting? Is this the liberation of Russian territory or the occupation of foreign territory? When will the Russian government decide? Or is it afraid to acknowledge either side.
    1. -10
      20 October 2025 05: 40
      Reading the comments feels like a return to the days of Alyosha Ovalny, with the same old propaganda clichés about how the government didn't give something to someone, and therefore...
      1. +10
        20 October 2025 07: 21
        The government is afraid of mobilization. The army and home front could easily support a second "Prigozhin." But the government can't help but implement it. So it's squirming like a snake in a frying pan. During the first mobilization, they didn't close the borders and allowed all "opponents of the SVO"—or, more accurately, opponents of the government—to leave the country undisturbed, so as not to give weapons to those millions of people who, from the government's perspective, are shady. And they won't disturb the home front either. Under their cover, the government even evacuated its children. As for "legal/illegal," that's all nonsense. Any law or bylaw can always be written. That is, any desire can always be legitimized simply by writing it under the word "law." And all this is happening due to the government's own fault—they've stolen, lied, and still haven't decided who they are: patriots or temporary occupiers.
        1. +1
          20 October 2025 16: 08
          Comrade Dymchuk writes something similar. You should ask how many signed up for contract service but weren't sent to the SVO; they simply weren't needed there, and were simply registered at military registration and enlistment offices as reserves. Now, for various reasons—losses, expiration and non-renewal of contracts, injuries with temporary or permanent withdrawal, the emergence of new combat specialties—this contingent is being called up and sent to the SVO. So, these same contract soldiers are being used to reinforce or strengthen the force. The process is entirely planned and there's nothing special about it; the article isn't worth it, although, of course, if they're paying for it, then yes, it could be written.
          1. +3
            21 October 2025 06: 16
            Take a stroll through the cemeteries at your leisure. The first wave of mobilization was also long denied, and then, all of a sudden, it happened. The Kremlin's statements, however, have long since been discredited. You can disbelieve all the "Dymchuk" hype, but you can simply, without denying reality, apply logic, compare the few known facts, and a forecast will emerge. The material and moral state of the home front is generally easy to verify.
        2. +2
          20 October 2025 21: 37
          The authorities should fear not mobilization, but rather the implementation of the SVO's objectives. They should fear their own incompetence and indecisiveness, a war waged at half strength, not a battle fought at full force. They will be overthrown if the sacrifices are in vain.
          1. +2
            21 October 2025 06: 21
            ...the authorities should fear their own incompetence and indecisiveness, a war waged at half strength, not a battle fought at full force. They will be overthrown if the sacrifices are in vain.

            Isn't that what I was talking about?! It's precisely this that will be torn down by the mobilized if they feel cheated, as happened in 1917, when the front abandoned its trenches en masse and went home. And then the population will remember all the grievances they suffered at the hands of the authorities, and the weapons are right there in their hands.
    2. -7
      20 October 2025 07: 34
      Quote: vlad127490
      There is not a single legal document (decree, law, regulation) on the "SVO".
      What is "SVO"?
      Regarding "WHO" there is the law "On counteracting terrorism" dated 06.03.2006 N 35-FZ.
      There is Resolution of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation dated February 22, 2022 No. 35-SF "On the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation outside the territory of the Russian Federation."
      The issue of Ukraine is ambiguous for Russia. Is Ukraine a forcibly seized piece of territory in 1991, or is it a legitimate, independent state? As you can see, Ukraine's status depends on the will of Russia's political authorities, and that shouldn't be the case.
      The unilateral appeal “To the parliaments and peoples of the world” adopted by the Supreme Council of Ukraine on December 5, 1991, which declared that “Ukraine considers the 1922 Treaty on the Creation of the USSR to be invalid and inoperative in relation to itself,” is null and void, since in 1936 a new Constitution of the USSR was adopted, with the entry into force of which the 1924 Constitution of the USSR ceased to be in effect, including the 1922 Treaty on the Formation of the USSR. The 1922 Treaty on the Formation of the USSR did not exist as an independent legal document.
      The withdrawal of the Republic of Ukraine from the USSR was possible only with a positive decision received at the USSR Referendum and the implementation of the USSR Law of April 3, 1990 No. 1409-I “On the procedure for resolving issues related to the withdrawal of a union republic from the USSR”.
      The USSR Constitution of 1977 was adopted by all the peoples of the USSR, and only the entire people of the USSR could give permission for Ukraine to leave the USSR.
      The withdrawal of Ukraine without a national referendum in the USSR and failure to comply with the law of April 3, 1990 No. 1409-I is a criminal offense that has no statute of limitations.
      The Treaty "On Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership between the Russian Federation and Ukraine" dated May 31, 1997 ceased to be valid on April 1, 2019 due to its denunciation by Ukraine. The termination of this Treaty releases the Russian Federation from any obligation in relation to Ukraine.
      The UN has not recognized Ukraine's borders, meaning Ukraine has no borders in international space. A state without borders is not a state.
      Question: On what territory are our soldiers fighting? Is this the liberation of Russian territory or the occupation of foreign territory? When will the Russian government decide? Or is it afraid to acknowledge either side.

      Ukraine's status has long been determined. It is an independent state. And Russia's whims won't change anything.
      1. +4
        20 October 2025 13: 15
        Why hasn’t the UN approved Ukraine’s borders for 34 years (since 1991)?
        In international law, Ukraine has no borders.
        Who gave Ukraine independence? You call the seizure of territory by separatists—terrorists—legal. Are you a terrorist?
        Wars in the post-Soviet space will continue until a Greater Russia emerges in the entire post-Soviet space.
      2. 0
        20 October 2025 16: 19
        Are you sure Ukraine is an independent state, given how it's governed by various bad people from outside? I understand that decisions are made by the ruler of a state independently, based on the interests of the people. It's quite another thing if this ruler follows the lead of some Brit who's making a tidy profit off of it. And now he's making money off of war and the burying of those whose lives he's supposed to protect, not to mention the destruction of the enclave (there's no other way to describe it) he's supposed to lead and preserve.
        1. +1
          23 October 2025 07: 50
          Quote: svoroponov
          Are you sure Ukraine is an independent state, given how it's governed by various bad people from outside? I understand that decisions are made by the ruler of a state independently, based on the interests of the people. It's quite another thing if this ruler follows the lead of some Brit who's making a tidy profit off of it. And now he's making money off of war and the burying of those whose lives he's supposed to protect, not to mention the destruction of the enclave (there's no other way to describe it) he's supposed to lead and preserve.

          Was Russia an independent state in the 90s? If so, why did it follow MBF's financial directives? He who pays the money dictates the rules of the game.

          Quote: vlad127490
          Why hasn’t the UN approved Ukraine’s borders for 34 years (since 1991)?
          In international law, Ukraine has no borders.
          Who gave Ukraine independence? You call the seizure of territory by separatists—terrorists—legal. Are you a terrorist?

          Was the Bolshevik seizure of power in 1917 legal? It's impossible to seize power in a country if the population is against it. Yanukovych brought the country to a point where everyone was against him. And then he fled. Furthermore, after that, there were parliamentary and presidential elections. And more than once. And Russia recognized them. So Yanukovych's legitimacy has long since evaporated.
          1. 0
            23 October 2025 18: 40
            The Bolsheviks simply seized power in 1917 and prevented the country's collapse. You need to know the country's history. Consult the documents, of which there are many online, but not the various reprints by different commentators. Read the works of Lenin and others, including those written by White generals of that time. You'll learn what the situation was like in the Russian Empire, why the Tsar abdicated, and so on. Then you won't want to write nonsense. You'll learn for yourself what happened and how it happened, and that's quite interesting, of course, if you're interested in the history of Russia, the USSR, and so on.
            1. +1
              24 October 2025 06: 43
              Quote: svoroponov
              The Bolsheviks simply seized power in 1917 and prevented the country's collapse. You need to know the country's history. Consult the documents, of which there are many online, but not the various reprints by different commentators. Read the works of Lenin and others, including those written by White generals of that time. You'll learn what the situation was like in the Russian Empire, why the Tsar abdicated, and so on. Then you won't want to write nonsense. You'll learn for yourself what happened and how it happened, and that's quite interesting, of course, if you're interested in the history of Russia, the USSR, and so on.

              I know the history of Russia and the USSR very well. You're the one interpreting the Bolsheviks' seizure of power as a "rise of power." And the country did fall apart, but the Bolsheviks later used military force to put it all back together.
      3. +1
        20 October 2025 16: 34
        Ukraine's status has long been determined. It is an independent state. And Russia's whims won't change anything.

        Ukroreikh is a quasi-state under the external control of the EU, Great Britain and the USA.
      4. +3
        21 October 2025 06: 09
        Ukraine had the opportunity to truly become an independent state several times in its history. All it had to do was maintain its neutral status and respect the other nations within its multinational state, rather than attempt to forcibly Ukrainize everyone. But Ukrainian nationalists (Movniuks) each time slid into Nazism and fascism, threatening their neighbors and fueling civil war within Ukraine itself, where at least half the country had never spoken the language for a generation. The liquidation of the Ukrainian fascist state isn't a whim of Russia; it's an objective necessity. This time, it must be done completely and permanently, with no possibility of rebirth. The Movniuks must either be physically exterminated or forced to leave Ukrainian territory forever and move to Nazi preserves like Canada.
    3. +3
      20 October 2025 09: 40
      Our government still doesn't know how to get out of this mess without losing face and what to do next to send their children back to Europe for permanent residence. And you're asking questions about the legal status of the territories where fighting is taking place. Russia recognized Ukraine's sovereignty back in 1991 based on the declaration of independence it adopted when leaving the USSR, and supports its territorial integrity, provided it maintains its non-aligned status, Lavrov noted at a press conference following the 78th session of the UN General Assembly in September 2023.
      1. +1
        20 October 2025 16: 29
        Where have you been living all this time if you don't know that Ukraine itself renounced its non-aligned status, thereby violating its agreement and effectively and legally calling into question its sovereignty. Furthermore, Ukraine had no agreed-upon borders with Moldova, Belarus, or Russia. Only the borders along the former Soviet Union's borders were official; the rest were control lines. Incidentally, Russia's border with Estonia is also a border line, as there is no legally recognized Border Treaty. The situation with Ukraine is similar.
        1. +2
          25 October 2025 17: 10
          I know where I lived. But you, apparently, came from Mars. On January 28, 2003, during Russian President Vladimir Putin's visit to Kyiv, the Treaty on the State Border between the two countries was signed, demarcating its land border. Ukraine ratified the agreement on April 20, 2004, and the Russian Federation on April 22, 2004. And Ukraine hasn't yet been accepted into NATO; its non-aligned status remains de jure intact.
          1. -2
            25 October 2025 18: 20
            If the treaty is not ratified, then it is an agreement of intent and nothing more.
      2. -6
        20 October 2025 16: 36
        Our government still doesn't know how to get out of this mess without losing face.

        Your Bandera Nazi government should have been hung on a hemp rope long ago.
        1. +1
          25 October 2025 17: 13
          It's not my power. By the way, what about yours?
  2. +19
    19 October 2025 17: 57
    As you read, your hair gradually stands on end, as all the fears of those criticizing this ill-considered swindle are vindicated. The government entered this war thoughtlessly, unprepared, with only a haphazard knowledge of the enemy's capabilities, as if going for a stroll. And now, having waged war almost as long as the Great Patriotic War, this strange government is only beginning (one hopes) to understand the full gravity and seriousness of the situation into which it has plunged the country through thoughtlessness and imperial arrogance. Of course, what's needed is full mobilization, a complete transition to martial law, a freeze on prices and wages for the upper bureaucratic class, savings on social projects, strict discipline in the workplace, a complete purge of all illegal immigrants from society; and not forgetting to reintroduce the death penalty, as it was under the USSR.
    1. So, the old-fashioned way? The government is taking revenge on the people for not winning the war for them?
      1. +8
        19 October 2025 18: 32
        The government isn't taking revenge on the people. The government must organize the people. The government should have prepared the people for war, not marched on Kharkiv and Kyiv in a parade. The government should have fully studied the socio-political situation in Ukraine. The government should have worked with civil society, not just poured money into businesses. The government has done none of this. But whether the people like it or not, the government must correct its mistakes. Otherwise, it's not a government, but a bunch of prostitutes.
        1. Well, we have an infinite amount of trust in her, so maybe she'll have fun picking her nose for another 10 years, we'll support her.
        2. +1
          19 October 2025 19: 55
          The government does not take revenge on the people.

          They're bringing in millions of migrants, and at the current rate, the minimum wage will be 27 rubles, along with healthcare, education, and so on. If this isn't revenge on its own people, then what should the government do to make you say, "The government is taking revenge on the people!" For example.
    2. +3
      19 October 2025 21: 56
      In my opinion, to win on terms acceptable to Russia, either normal mobilization or a nuclear strike on Ukraine is needed to clear the minds of Ukrainian and European people.
    3. -10
      20 October 2025 05: 41
      Quote: Watching
      As you read, your hair gradually stands on end, as all the fears of those criticizing this ill-considered swindle are vindicated. The government entered this war thoughtlessly, unprepared, with only a haphazard knowledge of the enemy's capabilities, as if going for a stroll. And now, having waged war almost as long as the Great Patriotic War, this strange government is only beginning (one hopes) to understand the full gravity and seriousness of the situation into which it has plunged the country through thoughtlessness and imperial arrogance. Of course, what's needed is full mobilization, a complete transition to martial law, a freeze on prices and wages for the upper bureaucratic class, savings on social projects, strict discipline in the workplace, a complete purge of all illegal immigrants from society; and not forgetting to reintroduce the death penalty, as it was under the USSR.

      I want to tell the critics on the site: the Cossack is a plant (from the Central Intelligence Agency)! The same comments about how bad everything is here.
      1. +4
        20 October 2025 08: 31
        The Cossack was planted (from the Central Intelligence Agency)

        Who screams the loudest?
        "stop thief" -
        You'll find the one with the bag near the fence.
        Who never tires of exposing a thief?
        Only the one who steals something himself.
    4. +5
      20 October 2025 09: 49
      Full mobilization, you say. But who will stand at the modern machines, grow grain, treat, teach... transport? Do you personally trust this government? Do you think they will send their children into battle, to the front lines, like the members of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) in the Great Patriotic War? The sons of Stalin, Mikoyan, and Khrushchev died defending our Motherland. https://aif.ru/amp/society/history/kremlyovskie_deti_v_boyu_kak_srazhalis_s_nemcami_synovya_sovetskih_vozhdey But the children of the current leaders in power will not go to the trenches. You can be sure of that.
      1. -2
        20 October 2025 21: 45
        Unemployment in the country is 2%—2,800,000 people. To complete the Second World War, it's enough to mobilize 1,000,000. For victory, whose children fight is irrelevant; it's important for conscience and for status after victory.
      2. -3
        21 October 2025 16: 57
        Hundreds of thousands of retirees are fully employed! They're ready to return to work. I'm a retiree, in perfect health, with a medical degree and practical experience. I also have experience as a fourth-grade hydraulic and pneumatic equipment repairman in a steel rolling mill at a metallurgical plant. I can operate machine tools—I'm very skilled and can be trained quickly!
        1. +3
          23 October 2025 07: 57
          Quote: makeyev
          Hundreds of thousands of retirees are fully employed! They're ready to return to work. I'm a retiree, in perfect health, with a medical degree and practical experience. I also have experience as a fourth-grade hydraulic and pneumatic equipment repairman in a steel rolling mill at a metallurgical plant. I can operate machine tools—I'm very skilled and can be trained quickly!

          Do you seriously believe that a 60-70 year old pensioner will work as productively as a 30-40 year old?
          1. +1
            25 October 2025 17: 05
            Why laugh at a sick person?

            laughing
    5. +3
      20 October 2025 10: 40
      And who will do this? If it is the current government, then it is they who brought this situation to this point, which means that they are the first to face the death penalty, but this is impossible.
      1. -3
        21 October 2025 06: 11
        Quote: rotkiv04
        And who will do this? If it is the current government, then it is they who brought this situation to this point, which means that they are the first to face the death penalty, but this is impossible.

        It is possible to destroy the Bandera government and there will be significantly fewer such comments.
        1. 0
          29 October 2025 23: 15
          So far, no one from this government has been eliminated. Do you know why?
    6. -2
      20 October 2025 16: 41
      Based on all of this, the Soviet military operation should have been launched anyway. They tried to delay it back in the 40s, too, and they got it done. 27 million dead and the destruction of the national economy.
      Obviously, taking into account this experience and the intelligence data with which our leadership is fully supplied, they decided not to allow this.
      And one more thing. You simply don't see it, but by eliminating such an enemy as Ukraine, represented by its Bandera population, we are weakening the EU economy, eliminating the threat from that direction as well. Don't let the fact that the military is beating around the bush confuse you. This is just a trumpeting being broadcast through the media. The European economy, due to the Cold War, has fallen into a very bad state, and they are now simply confused and don't know what to do, hence all their empty rhetoric for self-satisfaction.
      So our leadership acted very correctly and in a timely manner. So, should we blame them? Although, perhaps Russia's leadership is not your leadership.
    7. -2
      21 October 2025 20: 38
      You're criticizing the government elected by the Russian people. Those in power are those who received the majority of votes. And if you conduct a poll yourself, without anyone interfering, you'll see for yourself that the overwhelming majority supports it. What's wrong with you?
      Maybe you want a president who recently won a Nobel Prize (the Venezuelan lady)? Read what she wrote about what would happen to the country if she became president. Or do you want something like Argentina? Okay, so who are YOU, YOU specifically, proposing to rule? Maybe Khodorkovsky or someone like him who settled in the West, or someone else like him? Maybe (it's already been proven and there's evidence that she's beyond reproach) Navalny's wife? So who are you proposing to rule Russia today?
      1. +2
        23 October 2025 08: 00
        Quote: svoroponov
        You're criticizing the government elected by the Russian people. Those in power are those who received the majority of votes. And if you conduct a poll yourself, without anyone interfering, you'll see for yourself that the overwhelming majority supports it. What's wrong with you?

        In Ukraine, too, those elected by the people rule.
        1. -1
          23 October 2025 17: 40
          They ruled. According to their own constitution, all rights granted to them by the people have already expired, and they are illegitimate. New elections are needed, and right now they are nothing.
          1. +2
            24 October 2025 14: 15
            Quote: svoroponov
            They ruled. According to their own constitution, all rights granted to them by the people have already expired, and they are illegitimate. New elections are needed, and right now they are nothing.

            According to the Ukrainian constitution, elections may not be held during a state of war or emergency.
    8. +2
      25 October 2025 17: 35
      Do you trust this government, whose children have lived their entire lives in Europe and the US, holding dual citizenship there, so much that you're ready to mobilize and go to the front? Or perhaps you think they'll now return their money, stored in banks in "unfriendly" countries, to Russia, sell their villas and yachts, and transfer the proceeds to their homeland (though where else is their homeland?). Are you ready to fight to the death or toil 12 hours a day in a hazardous industry for the power of the 10 richest clans in Russia, the Rotenbergs, the Gutserievs, and their ilk? If only for them.

      According to RBC Daily, approximately 80% of private businesses in Russia are owned by foreign beneficiaries, a figure that, with a margin of error of plus or minus 10%, is accepted by most experts. According to Rossiyskaya Gazeta, foreign investors, including those from the US and Europe, own approximately 1 million hectares of agricultural land in Russia, despite the lack of legal grounds for doing so. These lands are located primarily in the south of the country, in the Black Earth Region, the Volga Region, Siberia, and the Far East.

      Read on and you'll learn a lot of new and interesting things about our long-plundered and sold-out Soviet Motherland: https://kapital-rus.ru/news/420035-zapadu_neobhodimo_vyrvat_zuby_oni_ukradut_u_nas_300_milliardov_a_my_/
  3. +8
    19 October 2025 18: 03
    The author naively cited the OKSVA as an example, but was embarrassed to explain that these letters denoted units of the Soviet Army that fought in Afghanistan. A limited contingent of Soviet troops in Afghanistan. Why was he embarrassed? Because those who fought there were conscript soldiers and sergeants. Yes, after six months of training, but they were conscripts. What's stopping us from reinstating the two-year conscription period? Only a lack of political will. We've been dealing with this lack of "political will" for four years now. As a result, we now have two armies in our country: one fighting, the other serving conscription. Absurd.
    1. -1
      22 October 2025 16: 26
      Those who have been trained and conscripted fight; they're called contract soldiers. And those who are conscripted are basically still in training. That's all correct. And as for political will, it's not for you to talk about. Otherwise, if you applied it thoughtlessly, you'd have been at the front a long time ago. Show your will and get sent to the Northern Military District. Or are you not in Russia?
      1. -2
        22 October 2025 20: 49
        I've fought my battles. I have combat experience, so I can judge this professionally, unlike you. Any military professional understands that the Russian Federation doesn't have sufficient forces and resources for LBS. Because for people like you: mobilization is impossible, extending the length of service is impossible, conscripts are impossible, because they're children. And anyway, this isn't a war, it's a military conflict. Thanks to people like you, we'll continue to dawdle until the next "deal."
        1. 0
          23 October 2025 17: 58
          So you're a bad soldier, and who knows where you've "fought," anyway. Especially since you're not an officer. Otherwise, you'd know what tactics and strategy are, and what they're based on. Talk to career military personnel; they'll explain it to you.
          1. 0
            23 October 2025 18: 04
            So, I don't understand what I did wrong? If you've already contacted career military personnel and already understand tactics and strategy, where did I go wrong? Why do you think I'm a bad soldier? Give me the facts. You've resorted to personal attacks. It's mean and even cowardly.
            1. -1
              23 October 2025 18: 23
              What's right about that? Based on the capabilities of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the country itself, as well as the ability of NATO countries to supply Ukraine, and their own economic situation, a decision has been made to wage a war of attrition (our intelligence and analytical capabilities are among the best in the world). Therefore, the country's leadership is making deliberate decisions rather than spontaneously. Moreover, war is easier to wage when your logistics are close at hand. Furthermore, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have created strong defenses in the Donetsk and Luhansk agglomerations. To prevent our men from being lost in attacks against them and elsewhere, a general strategy is selected across fronts and in each specific case, the best tactics for overcoming enemy defenses are determined, and the necessary resources and forces are determined.
              So I'm not getting personal. I'm simply showing that what I'm talking about is happening, as it's taught and explained to conscripts and, in more detail, at military academies. If you don't know this, then the question arises as to whether it's true what you claim to have fought in the war. Those guys who fought can fully appreciate tactics and strategy, what's happening, and why our command's decision was the right one.
  4. +1
    19 October 2025 18: 06
    Why is there no law on the pre-war period? Why don't they call things by their proper names? Lawyers are in charge, lawyers are playing the game, but life is outside the game! The main thing is that their hands are untied, and the fact that everything is proceeding according to the laws of social development, that their role is being minimized, is simply the manipulation of public opinion that conceals. The weakening of central and federal authority doesn't end well.
    1. +1
      20 October 2025 16: 48
      Why are you writing to us about laws? You need to submit an initiative to the Russian Duma. And what does "pre-war period" mean? For Russia, it's always pre-war. There's such a thing as a "threat period." But you can address this to your governor and your military commissar. They're in the know.
  5. +22
    19 October 2025 18: 16
    Or maybe close the St. Petersburg football Zenit project (50 billion per year)?
    1. -9
      19 October 2025 18: 25
      And what will this achieve? Did you read the article? This money, God willing, will last for a couple of weeks of war!
    2. +9
      19 October 2025 18: 27
      Gazprom won't allow Voronezh's Fakel to overtake Zenit.
    3. +2
      19 October 2025 22: 16
      Zenit doesn't have a budget anywhere near that size. The 2025/2026 budget is set at 20 billion. I'm not pro-Zenit, I'm pro-information.
      People go to them in St. Petersburg, 30-50 thousand per match. That's by far the highest attendance in the Russian Premier League. So let's not be so sweeping... I've never been a fan of Zenit, and I don't like having eight foreign players out of 11 on the field. For example, Lokomotiv has seven to nine Russian players in the starting lineup, while CSKA has six to seven, and the results are excellent.
      1. 0
        23 October 2025 08: 04
        Quote: Glagol1
        Zenit doesn't have a budget anywhere near that size. The 2025/2026 budget is set at 20 billion. I'm not pro-Zenit, I'm pro-information.
        People go to them in St. Petersburg, 30-50 thousand per match. That's by far the highest attendance in the Russian Premier League. So let's not be so sweeping... I've never been a fan of Zenit, and I don't like having eight foreign players out of 11 on the field. For example, Lokomotiv has seven to nine Russian players in the starting lineup, while CSKA has six to seven, and the results are excellent.

        People haven't been going to matches for 30 for a long time. It's not like playing Real Madrid.
  6. +4
    19 October 2025 18: 24
    if the Russian army is replenished with 100-200 thousand fresh bayonets

    How many bayonets will be used to storm Verkhniy Lars and the Kazakh border?
    1. -1
      20 October 2025 16: 52
      You alone are enough to storm Verkhniy Lars and the Kazakh border. You can begin. Just before the assault, ask yourself: Is it worth it? And what will you achieve if there is no danger from there threatening your state.
      1. -1
        20 October 2025 18: 20
        What nonsense are you spouting? Have you forgotten what happened during the first mobilization? A couple million particularly creative people pulled off this maneuver. I'm not on their side, anyway. Yes, I don't live in Russia. But when people ask me where to run in the event of a war (and there's definitely a war going on in Russia right now), I always answer, "Have you forgotten the way to the military registration and enlistment office?"
        1. -1
          23 October 2025 18: 06
          The answer is good, but for a citizen of his own country.
          Well, according to border guards, just under a million completed the maneuver. Some left a little earlier. True, up to half have already returned. Those who stayed behind were either for work, or those who planned not to return and decided to become residents of other countries, or those who hate Russia.
  7. -13
    19 October 2025 18: 36
    Quote: Watching
    The government entered this war thoughtlessly, unprepared, knowing the enemy's capabilities only at random, as if going for a walk, and now, having fought for almost as long as the Great Patriotic War, this strange government is only beginning (one would hope) to understand the full gravity and seriousness of the situation into which it plunged the country through thoughtlessness and imperial arrogance.

    It's complete bullshit. This started a long time ago and lasted a long time. We just need to remember everything. The government prepared for this as thoroughly as possible, which is why everything is going quite smoothly. There are reserves, there are opportunities (our foreign partners aren't surprised; everyone is on staff).
    1. +4
      20 October 2025 03: 35
      If we were to "recall the whole thing," it's worth starting with the early 2000s, when everything could have been resolved with Ukraine simply and painlessly, at a cost orders of magnitude lower than today's. Human losses were out of the question, and hydrocarbon revenues easily allowed for it. But either the leadership was blind, or something else... The end result is what we have. They haven't even appointed scapegoats, aren't appointing them, and won't do so under these circumstances.
      1. -3
        20 October 2025 17: 02
        You are very far from the reality of what was in Ukraine at that time, in the 2000s.
        You're simply unfamiliar with the Ukrainian character and mentality: greed, cunning, corruption, indifference, and stubbornness. These are the traits of various peasants who primarily lived on Ukrainian soil and later rose to power themselves or their descendants. These traits were nurtured in them over centuries, which once helped them survive. But times have changed, but the traits remain.
      2. -2
        20 October 2025 21: 53
        What happened in the early 2000s? Why not in early 1991 or 1922?
        1. 0
          21 October 2025 13: 01
          Does every question send you into a panic? How do you explain a downvote for a question?
        2. 0
          22 October 2025 16: 34
          After 2000, the Ukrainians' true nature was clearly exposed, and it became clear that they had defined themselves as Anti-Russia and that war was inevitable. Since the 90s
          There was a period of unrest, and things were worse in Russia than in Ukraine. But when it became clear in Ukraine that Russia was beginning to rise and strengthen and was much richer by various measures, then all of this manifested itself in accordance with their mentality.
  8. +6
    19 October 2025 19: 44
    The government, due to its incompetence, is creating its own problems. But it stubbornly refuses to even try to fight scientifically. Because the goal of the SVO is not what we're told. The only thing such a government fears is giving the people weapons. And the more mobilized, the more armed and trained fighters there are. Therefore, mobilization will occur. Our losses are high. Everything is going according to plan.
    1. +1
      20 October 2025 17: 07
      The army is the people, a conscious people, to whom the government has given weapons. If you want weapons, join the army or become a career soldier.
      In Ukraine, the government gave the people weapons. And what's the result? Read their criminal records; it's enough to make you shudder. Now they don't know how to take these weapons away. Is that what you want?
  9. -2
    19 October 2025 21: 42
    Quote: vlad127490
    There is not a single legal document (decree, law, regulation) on the "SVO".
    What is "SVO"?
    Regarding "WHO" there is the law "On counteracting terrorism" dated 06.03.2006 N 35-FZ.
    There is Resolution of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation dated February 22, 2022 No. 35-SF "On the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation outside the territory of the Russian Federation."
    The issue of Ukraine is ambiguous for Russia. Is Ukraine a forcibly seized piece of territory in 1991, or is it a legitimate, independent state? As you can see, Ukraine's status depends on the will of Russia's political authorities, and that shouldn't be the case.
    The unilateral appeal “To the parliaments and peoples of the world” adopted by the Supreme Council of Ukraine on December 5, 1991, which declared that “Ukraine considers the 1922 Treaty on the Creation of the USSR to be invalid and inoperative in relation to itself,” is null and void, since in 1936 a new Constitution of the USSR was adopted, with the entry into force of which the 1924 Constitution of the USSR ceased to be in effect, including the 1922 Treaty on the Formation of the USSR. The 1922 Treaty on the Formation of the USSR did not exist as an independent legal document.
    The withdrawal of the Republic of Ukraine from the USSR was possible only with a positive decision received at the USSR Referendum and the implementation of the USSR Law of April 3, 1990 No. 1409-I “On the procedure for resolving issues related to the withdrawal of a union republic from the USSR”.
    The USSR Constitution of 1977 was adopted by all the peoples of the USSR, and only the entire people of the USSR could give permission for Ukraine to leave the USSR.
    The withdrawal of Ukraine without a national referendum in the USSR and failure to comply with the law of April 3, 1990 No. 1409-I is a criminal offense that has no statute of limitations.
    The Treaty "On Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership between the Russian Federation and Ukraine" dated May 31, 1997 ceased to be valid on April 1, 2019 due to its denunciation by Ukraine. The termination of this Treaty releases the Russian Federation from any obligation in relation to Ukraine.
    The UN has not recognized Ukraine's borders, meaning Ukraine has no borders in international space. A state without borders is not a state.
    Question: On what territory are our soldiers fighting? Is this the liberation of Russian territory or the occupation of foreign territory? When will the Russian government decide? Or is it afraid to acknowledge either side.

    If we follow this logic, then absolutely all previously adopted laws and agreements can be repealed. It's like, "Alaska was sold incorrectly. Take your money back with interest." The residents of Anchorage will burst out laughing...
    1. -1
      19 October 2025 23: 11
      You can start laughing. Laughing at yourself. You're justifying criminal acts.
  10. -3
    19 October 2025 21: 47
    Quote: Serj Iff
    The author naively cited the OKSVA as an example, but was embarrassed to explain that these letters denoted units of the Soviet Army that fought in Afghanistan. A limited contingent of Soviet troops in Afghanistan. Why was he embarrassed? Because those who fought there were soldiers and sergeants on conscript service. Yes, after six months of training, but they were conscripts. What's stopping us from reinstating the two-year conscription period? Only a lack of political will. We've been dealing with this lack of "political will" for four years now. As a result, we now have two armies in our country: one fighting, the other serving conscript service. Absurd.

    Do you have any male children under 30 years of age?
    1. +1
      20 October 2025 13: 01
      Serving in the army is an honorable duty in all countries. But in many countries, like America, those who haven't served in the army aren't accepted into government positions. And in Israel, even women are required to serve. You definitely haven't served in the army if you think a man under 30 isn't really a man, just a child.
      1. 0
        20 October 2025 14: 22
        Well, getting your face caught in a drone's ditch for the benefit of the financial capital of all sides in the conflict is quite an honor, yeah. Only the children of the nouveau riche of all stripes, both here and there, don't consider military service honorable and won't deign to join the army. Again, what are you or your child going to fight for? In 22, 60% of material wealth, money, land, and real estate in Russia belonged to 1% of the population. Is that why you want to "honorably" fight? During WWII, people went to their deaths knowing the state would take care of their families, they would have housing to live in, not subsidized mortgages, their children would have free education, not subsidized student loans, their parents would receive the best medical care on the planet, not paid oncology and ophthalmology, as they do now, everyone would have jobs with decent wages, not near the minimum wage, as in the regions now, you could retire at 55, not 65 or 60 – so what's the point of fighting for the Forbes list on the Russian side for the average person? This list has increased its wealth by 2.5 times since 22 during the war, and show me even one person who buys tanks or planes for the Russian Navy or even ordinary uniforms?
        1. -1
          20 October 2025 15: 45
          Info for understanding.
          V. Katasonov.
          https://svpressa.ru/economy/article/456606/
          In the extractive industry, the federal government owned 2005% of the authorized capital in 51,9. But in 2023, the federal government's share was only 0,3%!
          If you have a contract to do something and you get paid money for it, then it's called work.
          If you don't like it, don't sign the contract. You can't refuse military service, but you can refuse the contract.
        2. +2
          20 October 2025 15: 47
          Well, yes, put your bayonets to the ground and go home. We've been through that before. And what happens next? Well, you'll obviously become Mr. Zelensky's lackeys. And then Russia will simply cease to exist. But apparently that suits you just fine. But history teaches us that we must first defeat the external enemy, and then deal with the Forbes list. That's what we need to go to war for.
          1. 0
            20 October 2025 18: 00
            You're the one with history wrong - in 17, you first dealt with the Forbes list, both local and international, then negotiated with an external enemy, Germany. You initially got the unfavorable Brest-Litovsk Treaty, but with it, time, and, shortly afterward, you drove the Germans out of Ukraine and the remaining invaders from the north and farther afield. Study history before you scribble stupid comments. Let's get back to the present - Russia, with its current demographics, won't exist in 30-40 years. "But apparently that suits you just fine."
            1. 0
              20 October 2025 18: 15
              And I still don't get it: "What are you suggesting?" Study history or correct demographics. You're just a chatterbox. But you can't offer anything concrete. You're genuinely offended or humiliated.
          2. +1
            23 October 2025 08: 12
            Quote: Serj Iff
            Well, yes, put your bayonets to the ground and go home. We've been through that before. And what happens next? Well, you'll obviously become Mr. Zelensky's lackeys. And then Russia will simply cease to exist. But apparently that suits you just fine. But history teaches us that we must first defeat the external enemy, and then deal with the Forbes list. That's what we need to go to war for.

            No country can be conquered militarily, against the will of its people. The US, for example, defeated the Iraqi armies, crushed the Taliban, bombed the Vietnamese, and ultimately left with nothing. The USSR fought in Afghanistan for 10 years and also left. The same will happen in Ukraine.
        3. -4
          20 October 2025 17: 21
          How elementary it all is. It can all be boiled down to something, like blaming various oligarchs and the government. But it's all simple: you're a coward and justify it by writing some reasons and citing someone. Or maybe you're simply Ukrainian or have Ukrainian blood in your family.
          Question: Okay, so they didn't start the Second World War. Five years later, all of Europe, including Ukraine, well-fed and armed, would have attacked Russia. War would have still come to us, but at a much more serious level for us. So you'd be writing: "Why didn't they start earlier?" And the government would have been bad again.
          Well, there's another reason for your swearing: simple envy that there are those who are rich or have become rich thanks to their abilities and hard work, while you were unlucky, born into the wrong family, and were given no gifts by nature, the plague deprived you. Hence the dissatisfaction with everything and everyone in life.
          1. 0
            20 October 2025 17: 49
            Why the swearing? These are facts. Under capitalism, the poor are driven to war for the interests of the rich. That's a fact. The ruling class divides markets and spheres of influence, the average person is told on TV that they are fighting for unity and the homeland, but somehow the oligarch and the worker are, to put it mildly, not at all united in their labor relations, and the homeland with its rivers, forests, and lakes is fenced off with 3-meter-high fences with the sign "Do not enter, private property." Is it cowardice not to be willing to die for this? They showed the Tsar the finger – we will all die to the last one? Sorry, there's something wrong with your logic. Regarding the EU attack, Russia has been systematically reducing the number of nuclear warheads since 2000. Our nuclear deterrent forces, both in stockpiles and on alert, will of course attack us, even the soft and tasty ones, at this rate of nuclear weapons reduction and population decline, at a rate of a million a year.
            1. 0
              20 October 2025 17: 56
              There, in the SVO, it's not just the poor (according to you), there are plenty of wealthy guys and people from quite well-off families. There are also plenty of people in power. You simply don't know anything or aren't interested. And you write like that just to blurt out something.
              Maybe you should go there yourself under a contract, and then write to us here, but not your speculations, but what is really there.
              1. 0
                20 October 2025 18: 05
                You apparently read my comment but didn't understand a word. Read it again and think about what I wrote. Are oligarchs, billionaires, and their children participating in this war?
            2. -1
              3 November 2025 17: 48
              Yes, "The Law of Conservation of Matter":
              https://t.me/HUhmuroeutro/56602
      2. 0
        22 October 2025 16: 42
        Who are you explaining this to? Only cowards avoid the draft, and for health reasons. Judging by what's written, most of the people here are like that, under these two articles.
        And those who criticize the government are those who have achieved nothing in terms of their skills, abilities, and "talents"—that is, those who have failed to realize their potential in life. Also, those who are envious and angry, or have inflated self-esteem. Or those who want to improve their well-being by writing such opinions to order.
    2. -1
      20 October 2025 21: 58
      What are you talking about? The country, the Motherland, is in trouble. Which strings are you trying to pull? Losing a son at 30 or 50 is painful for parents, but a citizen's duty.
  11. +2
    19 October 2025 21: 49
    Quote: k7k8
    The government isn't taking revenge on the people. The government must organize the people. The government should have prepared the people for war, not marched on Kharkiv and Kyiv in a parade. The government should have fully studied the socio-political situation in Ukraine. The government should have worked with civil society, not just poured money into businesses. The government has done none of this. But whether the people like it or not, the government must correct its mistakes. Otherwise, it's not a government, but a bunch of prostitutes.

    Last month's elections showed that the people are quite satisfied with the "government".
    1. +2
      20 October 2025 00: 07
      You completely misunderstand the Russian worldview. For Russians, for Russians, power isn't a local official, or even the leadership of a federal subject (even a province). For a Russian, power is only Moscow (or, previously, St. Petersburg). Who's on the ground there, what local officials do or don't do, is completely irrelevant. Yes, they'll blame the local slackers for mistakes, shortcomings, and bungling, but they'll expect Moscow to resolve any issues. This is neither good nor bad. It's just the way it is. Russia may be a Eurasian country, but its Eastern, power-centric characteristics, unlike Western countries, which are more characterized by autonomy, clearly predominate there. This is the root of many of Russia's ills.
      1. 0
        20 October 2025 15: 48
        All the troubles of Russian citizens stem from political illiteracy.
      2. 0
        22 October 2025 16: 50
        You're simply writing nonsense because you're not Russian. Those in power are those elected by the people, starting at the local level. And often, much depends on them locally, not on some distant Moscow. You're simply repeating the playbook of those who criticize the Russian government from abroad, word for word. It's time to stop relying on other people's narratives, unless, of course, you have anything to do with them.
        1. 0
          23 October 2025 00: 54
          Listen, pseudo-Russian. Stop spouting nonsense. How could you, who are nostalgic for your homeland from afar, know who I am?
          1. -2
            23 October 2025 18: 46
            It's immediately obvious from your appearance. True Russian citizens and Russians love and defend Russia, their homeland, no matter where they are, while it's the pseudo-Russians and non-Russians who sling mud at it. Is that enough for you? And the fact that someone, at some point, for various reasons and circumstances, found themselves outside of Russia is irrelevant.
            1. 0
              23 October 2025 20: 38
              I hope you can show me where I've been throwing mud at Russia. If not, then you, my friend, are a chatterbox.
  12. +1
    20 October 2025 00: 18
    That's why the state reserve exists - to use it in difficult times.
  13. +2
    20 October 2025 00: 33
    Presumably, they will save on mobilized personnel.

    That would be stupidity on a global scale. If you fight like everyone else, you should be paid no less than everyone else. Regardless of how you got there.
  14. +1
    20 October 2025 02: 54
    Quote: k7k8
    You completely misunderstand the Russian worldview. For Russians, for Russians, power isn't a local official, or even the leadership of a federal subject (even a province). For a Russian, power is only Moscow (or, previously, St. Petersburg). Who's on the ground there, what local officials do or don't do, is completely irrelevant. Yes, they'll blame the local slackers for mistakes, shortcomings, and bungling, but they'll expect Moscow to resolve any issues. This is neither good nor bad. It's just the way it is. Russia may be a Eurasian country, but its Eastern, power-centric characteristics, unlike Western countries, which are more characterized by autonomy, clearly predominate there. This is the root of many of Russia's ills.

    Again, the same old model: the tsar is good. The boyars are bad?
    A 64-year-old guy recently said on Channel One during prime time that his pension is 11,000 rubles, and it's not enough to feed his 16-year-old son. He had to take a job as a security guard, which also pays 15 a month. I wonder who he voted for?
    1. -2
      20 October 2025 08: 46
      Quote: AC130 Ganship
      Again, the same old model: the tsar is good. The boyars are bad?

      No. You still haven't understood anything. And it's the 64-year-old guy's own fault that he only gets a social pension. He even had a son at 50, the smart-aleck. It seems he doesn't know how to do anything else. My 50 rubles pension is basically enough for me. And I always go to the polls. Because I have to vote, so people like you don't get their hands on the wheel. Then it's all over for sure.
  15. -4
    20 October 2025 03: 54
    As was recently mentioned, why was it necessary to develop nuclear weapons if the Kremlin's top brass is so afraid of using them? Poland and Romania could have been incinerated long ago, creating a nuclear buffer.

    If I'm mobilized, I'll simply flee to another country. There's nothing that unites me and millions of others like me with Russia. I'm also a millennial, and Zoomers' attitude toward Russia isn't just neutral, it's sharply negative.

    The deputies seem to believe that patriotism exists on an empty stomach, and they believe that a person without property, without savings, without a home, without a family, and without children would somehow stay and go to war, rather than take everything he has on the card, exchange it for dollars, and flee to Vietnam, Kazakhstan, or Serbia. They'll be very surprised.
    1. +1
      20 October 2025 09: 50
      Quote: Kuramori Reika
      Nothing unites me and millions of people like me with Russia.

      Judging by your nickname, definitely. This isn't your country. But it is my country. And you can go wherever you want. You're not citizens and you're not people. You're a tumbleweed without a clan or tribe.
    2. +1
      20 October 2025 11: 04
      He'll take everything he has on the card, exchange it for dollars, and head off to Vietnam, Kazakhstan, or Serbia. They'll be very surprised.

      when they get "robbed" there 🤕
    3. +2
      20 October 2025 13: 11
      ...to a person without property, without savings, without housing, without a family and without children...

      If you're mobilized and try to run away, your own comrades will shoot you on the spot. So better get going now.
    4. 0
      20 October 2025 17: 59
      You're a coward, and you've admitted it here. Better get out of Russia now; you don't care where you live. So live somewhere else.
  16. +3
    20 October 2025 05: 56
    Well, if the authorities decide to force people into trenches for free or for next to nothing, then I think we'll get Verkhniy Lars 2. Even more people will flee the country. That's definitely not right; it's better to leave it as is.
  17. +6
    20 October 2025 09: 49
    Quote: it's good that someone is always to blame
    Well, we have an infinite amount of trust in her, so maybe she'll have fun picking her nose for another 10 years, we'll support her.

    There has been no trust in the current government for a long time.
    1. 0
      20 October 2025 18: 01
      And where is your current government? Most of them aren't Russian citizens, and some have never even been to Russia.
  18. +1
    20 October 2025 12: 33
    Ready to take a step forward
    You have a unique opportunity. Repeat.
  19. The US certainly has a trump card – tomahawks, but Russia also has a trump card – seized businesses that can be transferred to American shareholders.
    1. 0
      20 October 2025 18: 06
      If you were to compare what and how the majority of citizens of the USA live, then Russia would seem like paradise to you all.
      Tomahawks are not a panacea. In Syria, out of more than 100 launched, 59 from ships alone, only 11 hit their targets, including one that hit a village, which didn't reach very far. Where the rest went remains a mystery. They say the Bedouins are collecting them in the deserts, and there are quite a few on the Mediterranean seabed. So this missile hasn't been a trump card for a long time; it's perfectly interceptable by our air defenses.
      That's a different matter. It has a nuclear variant, a decent range, and it's classified as a nuclear weapon. And who knows what the Ukrainians, with the help of the British, could attach to its non-nuclear variant and launch it, and then claim that America handed Ukraine nuclear weapons. And that would be a nuclear war with the US, without a doubt. And no one would be making peace with that. Do you really want a nuclear war, or are you far away, somewhere in Australia or some distant island? Don't worry, everyone will get their fill. If not right away, then a little later. You don't want your offspring to be born with various pathologies, but that's definitely what will happen if you survive.
  20. +1
    20 October 2025 14: 03
    Quote: Glagol1
    Zenit doesn't have a budget anywhere near that size. The 2025/2026 budget is set at 20 billion. I'm not pro-Zenit, I'm pro-information.
    People go to them in St. Petersburg, 30-50 thousand per match. That's by far the highest attendance in the Russian Premier League. So let's not be so sweeping... I've never been a fan of Zenit, and I don't like having eight foreign players out of 11 on the field. For example, Lokomotiv has seven to nine Russian players in the starting lineup, while CSKA has six to seven, and the results are excellent.

    181 million euros is the price of the Zenit players that Gazprom paid for them alone. So let's not discuss the 20 billion... The expenses of the bankrupt Gazprom are as classified as those of the once-thieving Ministry of Defense...
  21. -2
    20 October 2025 14: 44
    It seems (and unfortunately, it's true) that Russia's leadership is fighting only with the people on the front lines. It doesn't give orders to destroy the enemy's bridges, logistics, infrastructure, energy, or command and control. It's possible to "fight" to the last Russian and still not win. And is winning even the goal?
  22. +2
    20 October 2025 15: 52
    Quote: Serj Iff
    Serving in the army is an honorable duty in all countries. But in many countries, like America, those who haven't served in the army aren't accepted into government positions. And in Israel, even women are required to serve. You definitely haven't served in the army if you think a man under 30 isn't really a man, just a child.

    In what "all" countries? Most countries have a 100% contract-based military. Russia considered introducing a similar model in the 90s, but then changed its mind because it was too expensive. As a result, only the Airborne Forces were converted to a contract-based military.
    Well, to answer your question, I started my military service, when a soldier was paid 3 rubles a month, and I finished as a first-class specialist with 12 rubles.
    1. -1
      20 October 2025 18: 28
      Who told you such nonsense? There were already many contract soldiers serving in the Strategic Missile Forces in the late 90s.
  23. 0
    21 October 2025 02: 37
    Quote: k7k8
    Who told you such nonsense? There were already many contract soldiers serving in the Strategic Missile Forces in the late 90s.

    A lot is how much in %? 5? 10?
  24. 0
    21 October 2025 02: 48
    Quote: svoroponov
    If you were to compare what and how the majority of citizens of the USA live, then Russia would seem like paradise to you all.
    Tomahawks are not a panacea. In Syria, out of more than 100 launched, 59 from ships alone, only 11 hit their targets, including one that hit a village, which didn't reach very far. Where the rest went remains a mystery. They say the Bedouins are collecting them in the deserts, and there are quite a few on the Mediterranean seabed. So this missile hasn't been a trump card for a long time; it's perfectly interceptable by our air defenses.
    That's a different matter. It has a nuclear variant, a decent range, and it's classified as a nuclear weapon. And who knows what the Ukrainians, with the help of the British, could attach to its non-nuclear variant and launch it, and then claim that America handed Ukraine nuclear weapons. And that would be a nuclear war with the US, without a doubt. And no one would be making peace with that. Do you really want a nuclear war, or are you far away, somewhere in Australia or some distant island? Don't worry, everyone will get their fill. If not right away, then a little later. You don't want your offspring to be born with various pathologies, but that's definitely what will happen if you survive.

    How often do you visit the US to compare their standard of living?
    We won't take black people from Missouri or Alabama who have no intention of working at all and will spend their entire lives on welfare.
    But the average engineer's salary is around $150 per year (of which they pay about 30% in taxes). In the absence of free healthcare, many employers offer good health insurance for the entire family.

    An American told me a year ago that a good contract specialist (that is, self-employed) in IT Network Security asks for $300-$350 an hour for an interview in New Jersey. And he's forced to hire Indians who don't understand anything at all for $130.
    A worker with no education (school, and not always completed) starts at a car factory for $28 an hour. After three to five years, they're already making $40-45. Plus a ton of benefits, a super-powerful union that the employer fears, and so on. Is that enough comparison for now? I can continue.
  25. 0
    21 October 2025 11: 19
    Ultimately, greed won out over the Kremlin Duma "reframing" campaigners. Seriously, why waste so much money on the war effort from the greedy paws of budget collectors when you can whip up any deal with a flick of the wrist, and voila—the money is in the hands of those who need it, and law-abiding citizens are on the frontier. Brilliant!
  26. -1
    22 October 2025 03: 16
    I'm not going to fight until "Leopold" (GDP) starts fighting for real. No deals or underhanded dealings with the West. And stop calling the US partners. It's time to call a spade a spade: the US is Russia's adversary. And some European countries are adversaries too!
    1. -2
      30 October 2025 23: 00
      Quote: Sergei N
      I'm not going to fight until "Leopold" (GDP) starts fighting for real. No deals or underhanded dealings with the West. And stop calling the US partners. It's time to call a spade a spade: the US is Russia's adversary. And some European countries are adversaries too!

      I love when people swear - it means they know what they are doing and they have a line
  27. +1
    22 October 2025 11: 07
    Well, the master was told to do it without asking anyone, so it will be.
    So they destroyed the Union, carried out pension reform, carried out mobilization (which they had previously denied), and started a geostrategic game...
    So it will be now.

    Just like there, classic:

    The Tsar ordered, the boyars sentenced...
  28. -1
    23 October 2025 16: 40
    I've long ago stated that Russia needs an Israeli reservist card; there's no other way. First, compulsory service for at least a year, with training in a military specialty, then permanent specialization for a month or two at the state and employer's expense. This applies to both men and women. Russia has no allies; it will never have any, especially given its vast territory. Everyone will want a piece of the action, garnished with some form of "democracy."