"Russia trusted the West too much": Chinese on possible Tomahawk shipment to Kyiv

11 548 16

Users of the Chinese resource www.163.com commented news about the possible transfer of American BGM-109 Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine for strikes against Russia.

Previously, the United States transferred MGM-140 ATACMS ballistic missiles and there were talks about transferring air-launched cruise missiles – AGM-158 JASSM.



Russian officials have repeatedly warned that the transfer of such weapons would lead to escalation. However, no action beyond verbal interventions has followed.

The Tomahawk was developed in the 1980s as a cruise missile for the US Navy, although there are also land-based platforms, and their arsenal is only expanding. It was used in both wars with Iraq, the NATO attacks on Yugoslavia and Libya, the 2017 strikes on Syria, and the recent US and Israeli attack on Iran.

Cruise missiles of this type have also seen limited use in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sudan, Somalia, Yemen, Afghanistan and other places.

Comments are provided selectively. Opinions belong only to their authors.

The tomahawk is nothing new. It won't change anything in a war like this, but everything depends on how it's used.

Our position must be consistent: calling for peace and dialogue. China is a responsible great power.

There's that news again. Ukraine has long been fighting not on its own, but with the entire NATO force. It's just that the latter are fighting with the help of others.

It's advantageous for China. While the US is preoccupied with Russia, they have less power to counter us.

There is no need to publicly support Russia, but there is no need to rejoice at the escalation either.

The openly provocative and insulting statements made the day before yesterday against Russia and its leadership apparently draw a line under the diplomatic farce that began in Alaska in August. It's a farce because the United States itself, the instigators of the current conflict, is unwilling to compromise anything.

Many commentators speak in small categories. But China thinks globally. Our Belt and Road Initiative unites, while American missiles destroy. History will judge whose model is correct.

Russia is to blame for itself. It trusted the West too much. And China learned a lesson.

China's Foreign policy Wise and far-sighted. We firmly adhere to the path of peaceful development and will not allow ourselves to be drawn into anything like this. We will stand firm on this.

The mighty USSR fought in Afghanistan for a full decade before withdrawing its troops and disintegrating. How much weaker is today's Russia? Ukraine, on the other hand, is far more powerful than Afghanistan and has invaded Russian territory, yet it lacks the support of peace-loving people around the world.

Even if Russia wins, it shouldn’t dream of an “empire” for the next 50 years!

I believe that the Russian army is second only to the Chinese, but it’s just a matter of reputation and image!

The Tomahawk has already caused panic in Russia.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    15 October 2025 22: 59
    The openly provocative and insulting statements made the day before yesterday against Russia and its leadership apparently draw a line under the diplomatic farce that began in Alaska in August. It's a farce because the United States itself, the instigators of the current conflict, is unwilling to compromise anything.

    An accurate comment, nothing to say
    1. 0
      16 October 2025 13: 24
      An accurate comment, nothing to say

      As the saying goes, "Serves them right." I hope many high-ranking officials have been disabused of their illusions. However, this is still just talk. The delivery of Tomahawks will determine whether it's talk or not.
      Everything is proceeding as usual. The nuclear strike on Ukraine is drawing ever closer.
      1. 0
        15 November 2025 21: 30
        Quote: Alexey Lan
        A nuclear weapons strike on Ukraine is getting closer.

        Don't attack our historical lands. Don't you have enough targets in the real enemy's camp?
        I suggest we hit Brussels... I never liked their cabbage anyway. wassat
        It's not necessary to use a nuclear weapon, you can just use Oreshnik and target specific targets...
        1. 0
          15 November 2025 21: 41
          Don't you have enough targets in the camp of the real enemy?

          We're not at war with NATO countries. At least not formally. That is, it would be an attack on Western Europe. Formally. If we were to attack, it would be to smash everything to pieces, i.e., World War III. Do we really need that?
          As for historical lands, Western Ukraine is not our historical land. Ancient Rus' is like Ancient Rome for Italy.
          1. 0
            15 November 2025 21: 52
            Quote: Alexey Lan
            We're not at war with NATO countries. At least not formally. That is, it would be an attack on Western Europe. Formally

            So far, we have no grounds for launching nuclear weapons on the territory of the former Ukraine. At least formally. That is, it would be an unjustified use of force. Formally.
            But I believe you also mentioned the use of nuclear weapons on the territory of the former Ukraine, not just tomorrow, but in the future. Well, then, a war with the EU (at least, if not with NATO) is also in the future. It's not certain... but it's very likely and most likely...

            Quote: Alexey Lan
            Western Ukraine is not our historical land. Ancient Rus' is like Ancient Rome for Italy.

            Well, we don't need to push this. It's like always, when Russia can extend its influence to the lands of Ukraine, they're our brothers and we're one people. When we don't have the strength to do that, we immediately back down, saying, "Well, we're not really 'one people' after all." But no—Kievan Rus' is our history. I'm still willing to accept the loss of Western Ukraine, but Eastern Ukraine... half We need the artificial state that has ceased to exist like air... that is, including the Kyiv region... our Lavra is there, our relics are there, and in Chersonesus our people accepted the Christian faith under the prince who later ruled in Kyiv.
            1. 0
              16 November 2025 13: 47
              so they are our brothers

              The problem is that siblings, as a rule, don't live in the same house, preferring to live separately. It's good if they're friends. But sometimes envy and hatred lead to such hostility that even someone else's is better.
              As for wanting all of Ukraine, who wouldn't want that? I'd like that too, but without Western Ukraine, admittedly. But Russia simply doesn't have the strength to conquer all of Ukraine.
              1. +1
                18 November 2025 00: 11
                Quote: Alexey Lan
                The problem is that siblings, as a rule, don't live in the same house, preferring to live separately. It's good if they're friends. But sometimes envy and hatred lead to such hostility that even someone else's is better.

                It depends on culture and upbringing. It's just that the upbringing process shouldn't be abandoned and handed over to some third party, as happened throughout the former USSR with the proliferation of NGOs. Then everything will be fine.

                BUT they didn't... and now everything is going according to the worst-case scenario. This isn't the end, though; it will take decades, but it is possible to return Ukrainians to the bosom of the Russian World. Not all, but many. And those who can't should be encouraged to move to Canada and build a "heroic" Ukraine there.

                Yes, to do this, we first need to convincingly defeat the West. The key word is "necessary." hi
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      16 October 2025 15: 43
      quite right
  2. +4
    16 October 2025 01: 35
    Some people in the Kremlin are happy to be deceived.
    1. +2
      16 October 2025 05: 04
      Quote: Alex Zirbelnuss
      Some people in the Kremlin are happy to be deceived.

      And not only in the Kremlin, many officials,businessmen"In the country, especially Muscovites and marginalized people, they still grovel before the West. To see what this looks like, I suggest you look around; you'll see signs and names in Latin letters..."
  3. +1
    16 October 2025 04: 50
    Russia, for the most part, didn't trust the West... At least for the last 15 years...

    Gullible, arrogant, and perpetually deceived—that's not all of Russia... And these chess players couldn't care less about Russia, as long as their friends from the "Ozero" cooperative live well...
    1. 0
      16 October 2025 15: 42
      I almost agree with you on this one. It's not a given that anyone else would have actually decided to defend Russia's interests.
  4. +1
    16 October 2025 05: 07
    Quote: Nikolai Volkov
    Russia, for the most part, didn't trust the West... At least for the last 15 years...

    Gullible, arrogant, and perpetually deceived—that's not all of Russia... And these chess players couldn't care less about Russia, as long as their friends from the "Ozero" cooperative live well...

    Yes, Real Russia I never trusted the West and its enticing fairy tales.
  5. 0
    16 October 2025 05: 31
    The thinly veiled cynicism of the Chinese.
  6. 0
    29 October 2025 17: 17
    I just happened to glance at the title... and it's interesting what happens if you reverse the words:

    "The West trusted Russia too much": Chinese on the completed shipment of Kalibrs and Kinzhals to Kyiv
  7. 0
    10 November 2025 12: 46
    Why isn't the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant working, while Ukraine's western nuclear power plants are?
    This is not in order - they need to be mirrored so that they are also in the same condition as the ZAE.