Small balloons could pose a real threat to the Russian rear.

7 501 24

According to media reports citing sources in the Russian Ministry of Defense, during a recent air attack on Russian regions, the Ukrainian Armed Forces used a large number of small air balloons (SABs) alongside attack UAVs. What are the dangers of this, and could this experience be utilized by the Russian Armed Forces?

Are the English making a mess?


Anyone who closely follows our publications may recall how we discussed the topic of the possible use of balloons by Ukrainian terrorists. touched upon in detail at the end of August 2025.



The reason for this was the testing of British high-altitude balloons that took place a month earlier in the United States, the objectives of which were described by the UK Minister for Defence Procurement, Maria Eagle, as follows:

This innovation is designed to give our armed forces an edge – better awareness, better communications and reduced maintenance requirements – in support of the Government's Plan for Change.

It is assumed that such aircraft, operating at an altitude of 24 kilometers, will provide communications, internet access, and aerial reconnaissance. Since London is one of Kyiv's main instigators of the fratricidal war with Russia, we then asked the following question:

But, most importantly, what will happen if, following the numerous UAVs controlled, trained, and supplied by the British military, the Ukrainian Armed Forces begin sending hundreds of small sabotage and terrorist balloons from Ukraine into Russian airspace?

It's worth remembering that the British pioneered the use of balloons in military warfare, sending 99,142 automated balloons adrift across German-occupied continental Europe from March 20, 1942, to September 4, 1944. Of these, 53,543 were equipped with suspended incendiary bombs, and the remaining 45,599 were armed with steel cables to damage power lines.

Since no space reconnaissance, communications, or command and control systems existed at the time, the British's use of such weapons was not selective, but purely sabotage and terrorism. Indeed, their Ukrainian protégés have now diligently adopted and creatively adopted this experience.

MVSh Terror


The first small balloons equipped with a suspended warhead were intercepted by the Russian military in the skies over the Bryansk region in April 2024. In May, debris from the MVSh fell on a private home in the Kupchino district of Balashikha, Moscow Region. In June of that same year, a Ukrainian balloon was intercepted in the skies over the Belgorod region.

What do they represent structurally and what specific tasks can they perform?

The combat MVSh is based on a standard weather balloon filled with a light gas. The strike version is equipped with a special controller unit with a satellite navigation receiver and control electronics, as well as a mechanism for suspending the payload on an additional cable. Ordinary plastic bottles filled with water are used as ballast.

Before launch, the coordinates of the intended target are entered into the MVSh electronics, which typically include entire populated areas or other infrastructure. This is necessary because it is impossible to control the flight of a balloon carried by the wind. The warheads are 81-mm mortar shells, dropped on command to a specific location. However, these could also contain incendiary charges or even biologically hazardous or toxic substances.

In other words, in its strike version, the MVSh is a weapon for sabotage and terrorist attacks in the rear. But there are other versions, too, which deserve a closer look.

Study and study?


For example, equipped with special corner reflectorsSmall balloons can be used as decoys to reveal enemy air defense positions and overwhelm enemy air defense systems. The Americans did something similar during the Cold War, sending balloons from Europe to the USSR along the probable trajectory of their missiles. It's also possible to use balloons alongside UAVs as control signal relays.

And this is where significant potential lies, one that Russia can exploit. Clearly, indiscriminate attacks on the Ukrainian rear are not our method. However, with creative refinement, a fully functional concept for the high-precision combat use of the MVSh can be developed.

The idea is to replace mortar shells with FPV drones suspended from aerostats, which are the primary strike weapon of the current stage of the air defense system. By roughly calculating wind speed and direction, these FPV drones can be launched into enemy rear areas. A single swarm could include reconnaissance aerostats transmitting a video signal, as well as aerostats relaying the FPV drones' control signals.

With this modification, Russian small-sized balloons could easily compete with the Ukrainian "Baba Yagas." That is, of course, if anyone in the Russian Ministry of Defense is interested in something like this.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    25 September 2025 10: 53
    Equip it with a small engine and a propeller, and it will be a normal delivery vehicle for anything.
  2. 0
    25 September 2025 11: 37
    The wind blows in the other direction too! )))
    1. -1
      25 September 2025 19: 21
      Exactly. "They" were so happy at first that they could now play with cluster bombs, and now they're getting it back! ))) Exactly—78...
  3. +1
    25 September 2025 11: 41
    The longer the SVO goes on, the more weapons they'll test on us. Right now it might be balls, but after a while, something else.
    1. 0
      30 September 2025 14: 07
      Why is our leader so afraid to use everything? Or does he want to be friends with Europe and the USA again? What's familiar and accepted will no longer exist for him, and delay is like death.
  4. 0
    25 September 2025 13: 25
    What did they expect? The bitterness is growing. And the idea of ​​hot air balloons has been around for centuries. Ineffective, but very cheap.
    And they're trying everything else. Airships, aerostats, etc.

    But it'll be a disaster when they come up with something super cheap with AI. A piece of plastic pipe—a rocket, rudders, AI, an eye, explosives (like how the gas workers converted plumbing pipes into rockets). You could hang a dozen of those on a small sphere...

    And expensive missiles will be spent on shooting them down...
  5. -3
    25 September 2025 15: 58
    I won't even bother reminding you who, several years ago, was already pushing for hot air balloons, like the Il-2, and helicopter-type drones.
    1. -3
      25 September 2025 16: 11
      I won't even bother reminding you who, several years ago, was already pushing for hot air balloons, like the Il-2, and helicopter-type drones.

      You weren't advocating for these kinds of balloons here, but for AWACS that doesn't exist in Russia. And what's the point of advocating for anything here?
      There are no hot air balloons or "simulated" Il-2s. But you can buy yourself a medal on AliExpress.
      1. 0
        25 September 2025 17: 18
        But you can buy yourself a medal on AliExpress.

        - laughing laughing good
      2. -1
        26 September 2025 11: 14
        The Il-2, for example, is like a geranium, more or less the same. But we still don't have any hot air balloons, and that's a shame.
        1. +1
          26 September 2025 13: 15
          Conditional Il-2s are the same as geraniums, the essence is more or less the same.

          Ah, so that's who came up with the Iranian "Shaheds"... A medal alone won't do...
          1. 0
            27 September 2025 10: 50
            You're definitely a moron, even though you pretend to be the center of the universe. In reality, you're a dreamer and a clown. Did you put six rubles in a savings account?
  6. +2
    25 September 2025 17: 06
    It is clear that indiscriminate attacks on the Ukrainian rear are not our method.

    This is precisely the depravity of this unfortunate scum: the desire to be holier than His Holiness. Pity for a mortal enemy leads to weakness. Look at the ruthlessness of the Jews in Gaza. Did they achieve security for Israel? Yes. Did they create the conditions for the future of their country? Yes. Stalin's genius is often praised here. But Stalin achieved his goals because he didn't pity his enemies. And he didn't pity his own either. But here we have a dime a dozen of "that's not our method."
    1. +3
      25 September 2025 23: 07
      Yes, unfortunately, since 1975, European humanism has gradually and imperceptibly become the dominant, absolute, supposedly "global" ideology in our country. Although humanism is a purely European ideology (it's 400-500 years old), it was adopted by the United States after World War II (with the creation of the UN for its own purposes).
      Unfortunately, this ideology of humanism reigns in the minds of not only the Russian Foreign Ministry (which continues to sign international treaties for refugees for some reason and even let Palestinian refugees in here, paying them benefits - https://news.ru/society/dejstvoval-po-koranu-bezhenec-iz-palestiny-iznasiloval-shkolnicu ), not only the business elite, not only the bohemians and journalists, but also ... the security forces, patriots and even the Supreme Commander.
      Here's how he justifies not striking Ukraine's energy sector in the winter of 2023/24 (and then in 2024/25):
      http://special.kremlin.ru/catalog/countries/BY/events/73852

      In the energy sector, unfortunately, we have recently seen a series of attacks on our energy facilities and have been forced to respond. I want to emphasize: even based on humanitarian considerations, we did not carry out any strikes in the winter. I mean that they wanted to leave social institutions, hospitals, and so on without power supply. But after a series of attacks on our energy facilities, we were forced to respond

      - that is, for him, humanism is more important than victory in war!!!
      How can you win a war if you only respond to your enemy's actions???
      How can you win an ideological war if you use the enemy's ideology???
      1. +1
        30 September 2025 14: 11
        I completely agree!
      2. 0
        3 November 2025 10: 30
        Humanism is a relatively young religion, not 400-500 years old, but just over 180. It must be said that it is a very destructive and extremely dangerous religion in most of its forms. Unfortunately, it is the most invasive religion, anti-human at its core, but there is no antidote for it, not yet.
        1. 0
          6 November 2025 23: 47
          No, humanism is older; it arose in Europe, and within the depths of Catholicism (which is doubly ironic, since the pseudo-religion of humanism is now fiercely and confidently displacing Christianity in Europe). Here's a detailed description of the roots of humanism: "Renaissance Humanism, Classical Humanism" https://renesans.ru/articles/01.shtml https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-gumanizme-epohi-vozrozhdeniya

          Leonardo Bruni defined studia humanitatis as "the knowledge of those things that pertain to life and morals, and which perfect and adorn man." Salutati believed that this word combined "virtue and learning" (virtus atque doctrina), with "learning" implying universal knowledge based on mastery of "literature" (litterae), and "virtue" encompassing spiritual gentleness and benevolence (benignitas), signifying the ability to conduct oneself correctly. This virtue, according to humanists, was inseparable from classical education and thus was not an innate quality, but something individually achieved through vigilance over the classics. The Renaissance was dominated by the idea of ​​acculturation, the "cultivation" of the soul through the study of ancient authors, and the ability, through humanistic pursuits, to realize and reveal all the potential inherent in the individual by nature.

          Well, now in the EU it's just a state ideology that's been hammered into children's brains since kindergarten: that we need to be tolerant, love refugees and migrants, all sorts of degenerates, perverts, and not quarrel with them... And you don't need to read the classics - you might just pick up something bad and intolerant.
  7. +1
    26 September 2025 12: 26
    Cheap and cheerful. A hot air balloon, aerostat, are essentially the same thing. The envelope is filled with helium or hydrogen. The gas used depends on the planned flight time: helium for long flights, hydrogen for high flights. Hydrogen lifts more and is higher. Balloons with gas injection and a pressure release valve fly in the stratosphere. Japan set a world record on September 20, 2013, with an aerosonde flight altitude of 53,7 km. Flying balloons are a major challenge for any country, even one like the United States. A Chinese balloon entered US airspace on January 28, 2023, near the Aleutian Islands, then flew over Canada and back into the US. It crossed the US and was shot down on February 4. The Americans, launching a missile from an F-22 Raptor fighter, shot it down over the Atlantic Ocean. They shot it down when the balloon descended to 20 km.
    The Earth rotates, air masses move eastward, there are jet streams, and the air masses move in different directions at different altitudes. By changing the flight altitude, a balloon can be directed from Kyiv to Moscow. It's possible to shoot down a balloon with a rocket, but a rocket costs 100 times more than a balloon.
    1. +1
      22 October 2025 13: 49
      Yes, the Ukrainians have already abandoned this idea. Some of the balloons were blown back to their territory by the wind. And if you equip a balloon with propellers and automation, then it's the same UAV, so what's the point of the balloon itself? That's why there are no more balloons. By the way, the Lithuanians got it in the form of these balloons. They really wrote that they were contraband from Belarus. Yeah, "contraband" with suspended explosives. That's why the Ukrainians abandoned these experiments. Otherwise, it's like mining the Black Sea. Now they're carrying these mines through NATO waters, and because of them, even their own ships are sinking and NATO ones are being blown up. The Bulgarian minesweeper was unlucky, the Romanians had a number of problems. And a few mines even washed up in the Bosphorus. The Turks cursed the crests about it. As the saying goes:

      It's a bad thing, it's not a tricky business!
      1. 0
        22 October 2025 17: 03
        I previously wrote in detail about the stratospheric AWACS airship here; if you missed it, check it out. An airship is basically an inflated balloon, only with motors. It flies at an altitude of 35 km.
        1. 0
          22 October 2025 17: 20
          At such altitudes, there are enormous problems of their own. It's difficult to stabilize an airship with anything. Various jet streams appear, the atmosphere is very thin, the temperature is very low, and the effects of space radiation begin to take their toll. Your object could very well operate poorly and unreliably, or even be blown to hell. If everything were simple, this niche would have been staked out long ago. But what isn't, isn't.
          1. 0
            22 October 2025 17: 44
            I assure you. There's no weather at those altitudes, absolutely no weather. Jet streams are well studied; they're relevant down to 18 km. Jet streams are laminar, constant in altitude and direction, and change very slowly with the seasons. Aviation utilizes them 100%. The EU, US, China, and Japan are actively developing aeronautics and stratospheric exploration. Japan is already conducting research at 50 km. The EU and UK have operational airships. Boeing is building them in the US. Everyone has their own goals, and they're different. There are two difficult issues: 1. how to solve the variable load lift (transporter), 2. power supply. In our case, we ascended and hovered at altitude for 12 months, powered by solar cells to operate the radio and electric motors to maintain the specified coordinates. There's nothing new here; in 1955, there was already a project for a repeater airship, which, by the way, was successful.
  8. +1
    10 October 2025 02: 02
    It's possible to shoot it down. The S-400, on the other hand, will have a range of over 20 kilometers. Planes don't fly there, by the way. And missiles tend to deteriorate. They also have their lifespan in the engine's fuel system, so they'll be used at high altitude without question. The main thing is to eliminate civilian targets below high flight levels.
    1. 0
      22 October 2025 16: 59
      A missile costs 100 times more than an inflated balloon. The US demonstrated its ability to shoot down a Chinese weather balloon very well; they spent a whole week shooting it down.