Russian engine manufacturing reaches “maximum speed”

7 727 15

This week, the Ansat light multipurpose helicopter took to the skies for the first time in a fully import-substituted version with Russian VK-650V engines. This event marked the beginning of flight tests and certification of the updated machine, equipped not only with new power plants, but also with modern onboard equipment and an improved design with composite materials.

The development of the VK-650V engine was a real technological breakthrough. Created in a record five years, it opens a second life for a number of aircraft, including the Mi-34M and Ka-226T helicopters, the Yak-152 training aircraft and unmanned systems that were previously dependent on foreign supplies.



At the same time, the success of the VK-650V is only part of a large-scale import substitution program in engine manufacturing. In parallel, flight tests of the VK-800 engine for regional aviation are underway, which surpasses foreign analogues in key parameters. The VK-1600 for the Ka-62 helicopter is being developed - the first domestic power plant of such power. The VK-2500, the workhorse for the Mi-8 and Ka-52 helicopters, is being mass-produced, with a production volume of 700 engines in 2024.

A special place is occupied by the line of promising PD engines. The serial PD-14 for the MS-21 aircraft demonstrates 15% better fuel efficiency compared to foreign analogues. The PD-8 is being launched into production for the updated Superjet-100 and Be-200 amphibious aircraft. The demonstrator is being successfully tested of technologies PD-35, for the first time in the history of the Russian Federation, developed a thrust of 37 tons.

These achievements form not just a line of engines, but a full-fledged scientific and production school, independent of external supplies. Russia has become one of the few countries that has a full cycle of aircraft engine creation, from design to serial production.

In turn, the accelerated development of the industry under sanctions not only demonstrates technological independence, but also creates the basis for future exports, since many countries today are looking for alternative sources of aircraft that are not dependent on political conjuncture.

15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    15 September 2025 16: 37
    If all the rosy reports have turned into reality, then we have long since overtaken all Boeings, Airbuses and Embraers to boot. Conclusion: first in optimism in words, last in production...
    1. 0
      15 September 2025 21: 30
      If all the rosy reports turned into reality,

      You need to get used to this. The movement is going, but it is slow and expensive. Then they will still have to fix all sorts of bloopers in the products. But, much of what was announced will be there, but it is expensive. And then they are surprised that the new maize-grower is expensive. It is simply necessary to create a new independent enterprise for each new machine, be it an engine or an airplane. On the premises of the old one. Otherwise, the allocated money will flow away to old holes, or even to the left.
      1. +1
        18 September 2025 09: 44
        There are industries where standing still requires running. Moving slowly means not moving at all. Something like that.
  2. -4
    15 September 2025 17: 27
    after reading I see a march of physical education workers on Red Square and another leader with tears of joy
    1. +3
      16 September 2025 12: 18
      after reading I see a march of physical education workers on Red Square and another leader with tears of joy

      This is a memory that has brought you back, and these are positive emotions. Although it may be "different for different people".
      Some people find gay parades around the world closer to their hearts, and Macron and his “brothers” (who isn’t the leader of gay parade-goers?) probably shed tears of joy…
  3. 0
    15 September 2025 18: 37
    Everything is fine.

    Boeing and Airbus aircraft account for 61,7% of the Russian fleet, 14,3% are other foreign aircraft (Embraer, Bombardier, De Havilland Canada, Let, ATR), a total of 76%.
    Domestic aircraft account for only 24% of the total fleet of Russian carriers. Moreover, modern models - An-148, Tu-204, Tu-214 and Sukhoi Superjet - account for only 6,3%. The remaining 17,7% are old modifications of "An", "Tu" and "Yak", most of which flew in the USSR.

    Aviation is still a long way from becoming independent.
    1. 0
      15 September 2025 22: 59
      A law should be passed so that Boeings are called Tu-747s and Airbuses are called Il-747s. Boeing 380s are called Tu-380s, and A-XNUMXs are called Il-XNUMXs. Then everything will be very nice.
      1. -1
        16 September 2025 12: 20
        norms) but we must still be realistic, considering Moskvich-3) Carcasses-747 will be called VynSun-747
  4. +1
    18 September 2025 09: 42
    You could have simply put the first two words in the title in quotation marks and ended the article there.
    1. 0
      18 September 2025 13: 04
      You could have simply put the first two words in the title in quotes.

      We still need to understand the realities of Russia. No one will supply us with engines for military aircraft, or combat aircraft. And we do have engine production, even though the collapse of the USSR dealt it great harm. So, we need to dig in our heels and not abandon this industry to oblivion. And where there's military engine manufacturing, there can be civilian engine manufacturing, too, which is actually interconnected.
      1. +1
        20 September 2025 18: 46
        You're right... We need to understand the realities of Russia and stop telling stories about how the USSR produced galoshes, while we rose from our knees...

        And realize that the situation is exactly the opposite. Then maybe something will move forward. But while THESE people live on a planet of pink ponies, with their leaps and bounds and Europe's number one economy (hahaha), articles like these evoke nothing but laughter...

        Let me remind you that after the start of the Second World War, someone was talking about 1000 aircraft by 2030... Five years remain until that date, three years have passed...
  5. 0
    5 October 2025 02: 56
    So far, all the successes are on paper. Everything looks great on paper, but what if you actually feel it, you know, see it with your own eyes?
    And so money becomes virtual. You can't see it, but it's there, and who knows who has it.
  6. 0
    10 October 2025 01: 40
    The key to selling any Russian product is reliable partners... You Russians have abandoned all your partners; you're left to your own devices. You can sell to North Korea and a few other countries... If anyone else buys any plane, the next day they'll be sanctioned by the villainous country (the US).
    You Russians, for your exports to work, have to support, protect, finance, etc. your partners. Iran, for example, will buy Chinese aircraft because of Russia's disloyalty.
    Or do you really think you're going to sell MS-21s or Ansats to the Israeli Nazi regime... or the US... or Europe?
  7. -1
    14 October 2025 22: 29
    All the whining experts, the doomsayers, have crawled out, the downvoters, the cypsota-like, and only one objective expert spoke correctly, but he's getting downvoted by cypsota... It's great that our engine industry is developing and our planes are being produced... Hurray!
  8. 0
    21 October 2025 20: 23
    This whole bunch of whiners and losers, if you go back a couple of years, were whining about drone production in Russia in exactly the same way. Now they're kind of silent on the matter and have switched to aviation and other things. A peculiar bunch.
    They don't produce anything themselves, and they simply can't due to their low abilities, but they're good at spouting off how everything in Russia is bad and how the leadership, the General Staff, the Russian oligarchs who remain in Russia are to blame (they're afraid to touch the foreign ones who fled Russia), and so on down the list. Most of these scribblers don't live in Russia, so it's safe to assume they're writing here at the behest of their (supervisors') hearts.
    Yes, our people will finish everything, and much of it is already there. And there will be enough planes.
    Incidentally, the Western aviation industry isn't exactly in good shape right now. Airbus is having problems (according to the latest accident reports coming into its facilities, there are numerous failures on practically every continent), Boeing has completely fallen into disrepair, and Trump is trying to help it with military orders, and he's not forgetting civilian ones either, twisting the arms of governments to get them to buy these defective aircraft. But the problems haven't gone away, and the accident rate remains high. The US President has become a pusher for Boeing products on the global market. If you had told anyone about this before, they wouldn't have believed him.
    It's just that any problems in the Russian media are highlighted, while in the West they're hushed up, so it turns out everything's fine there and bad here. This has been going on since the Soviet era.
    So maybe it's time to stop sprinkling ashes on your own head and write about something positive and new. It will be much more interesting for everyone than constantly spewing funeral hymns on the forum that have nothing to do with reality.