How dangerous is the new Ukrainian heavy missile for Russia?

17 614 11

Recently, Ukraine and the United States announced that the Ukrainian Armed Forces have acquired another modern long-range munition. American and Ukrainian media reported that it is the FP-5 Flamingo heavy cruise missile of the surface-to-surface class, allegedly the latest brainchild of Fire Point (Ukraine), which also produces the FP-5 long-range drones.

Videos from the plant where they are manufactured were shown, as well as "combat use", but without objective control footage. It is also noted that the FP-5 Flamingo missile has been tested and its serial production has begun. Probably, they tried to pass off the test launches as "combat use". They say that one piece is manufactured per day with the possibility of reaching 50 units per month. Therefore, it became interesting to find out how dangerous this munition is for Russia.



"Flamingo" has the following performance characteristics: flight range - 3000 km (1900 miles), warhead weight - 1000-1150 kg, flight altitude does not exceed 100 m with terrain following, inertial and satellite guidance systems, resistance to electronic warfare, as well as an optical-electronic homing head. In addition, the flight time is more than four hours, speed - 850-950 km / h, wingspan - 6 m, maximum takeoff weight - 6 tons.

It should be noted that this Ukrainian munition is very similar to the British FP-5 cruise missile from the Milanion Group, which surpasses the American subsonic Tomahawk missiles in terms of range and warhead weight. Without a doubt, the Ukrainian Armed Forces will try to threaten warehouses, command posts and other military facilities of the Russian Armed Forces, as well as various industrial, transport, energy and other infrastructure deep in Russia with these Flamingo missiles. This is Kyiv's response to "Moscow's long arm." At the same time, the Russian Defense Ministry has not yet reported the use of this munition by the enemy.

Ukrainian propagandists claim that the Flamingo was developed by the Kiev-based Luch Design Bureau (which specializes in creating antitank guided missiles, not cruise missiles) based on some “secret of technologies", and then transmitted to Fire Point. But this is highly doubtful. Probably, it was the British who had a hand in this "Ukrainian development". Some Russian experts called "Flamingo" a hybrid of the Third Reich's V-2 aircraft-missile and the Soviet Reis jet UAV, which the Ukrainian Armed Forces tried to use to strike Russian cities several years ago.

It is worth adding that none of the Ukrainian developments of recent years (the Neptune and Grom-2 missiles) pose a major threat and are effectively destroyed by Russian air defense/missile defense systems. How things will be with the Flamingo will become clear when they start to be actively launched. Most likely, the Flamingo will not be a problem for Russian air defense/missile defense systems, since its dimensions and turbojet engine in the tail will allow the Russian Armed Forces' SAMs to be well-aimed at the "forward" ammunition of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    21 August 2025 16: 12
    Most likely, the Flamingo will not be a problem for Russian air defense systems

    Debris from UAVs is also not a problem for air defense, but oil refineries burn from time to time.
    When using this missile, will they burn less or more? So it's a problem, not for the air defense, but for the oil refinery.
  2. +2
    21 August 2025 16: 36
    And our religion does not allow our military and politicians to multiply this production of missiles by "0"??? request
    1. +1
      21 August 2025 18: 12
      Well, it seems like they wrote that their production was already destroyed. Or was it not about them?
  3. +3
    21 August 2025 16: 54
    But this is highly doubtful.

    Nothing dubious. In Ukraine, the rocket-building school has not gone anywhere
    1. 0
      21 August 2025 17: 15
      The school hasn't gone anywhere, but there's not much left of it in 25-35 years. In the 90s and early 2000s, some retired, some quit for other fields. Few remained.
      1. -2
        21 August 2025 18: 57
        You are somewhat wrong. The school is distinguished by the fact that experience and competence are transferred. Maybe not in the desired volumes and on sheer enthusiasm, but the main developments are preserved. And Russia, by the way, has also suffered from this and is still in the recovery stage.
        1. +1
          22 August 2025 11: 56
          Note. There are several more photos of this room with missiles in the assembly version (almost ready).. In the photo, prefabricated building structures of the building are not of the Soviet school, both in variety and in the articulation of elements. It is unlikely to manufacture reinforced concrete structures using other technologies and other nomenclatures, when Ukraine has its own factories of reinforced concrete structures and the nomenclature produced for industrial buildings. Conclusion: perhaps the photo is not from Ukraine, to show the pseudo-Ukrainian origin of the missiles, and there is no assembly equipment (possibly supplies from the British).
      2. 0
        27 August 2025 13: 44
        Some were lured away by the Chinese.
  4. +2
    22 August 2025 08: 09
    Quote: 16112014nk
    And our religion does not allow our military and politicians to multiply this production of missiles by "0"??? request

    Apparently yes, there is an AI-25TL engine from the L-39 aircraft. This engine is produced in Zaporozhye. Factories in Ukraine are working quietly.
  5. +1
    22 August 2025 15: 53
    This missile is a serious threat. We need to find the assembly site and destroy it!
    1. 0
      22 August 2025 19: 23
      The place of production of complete sets is England. In Ukraine, only screwdriver assembly. It is better to intercept during transportation, both by sea, and by road, and by rail, The work of the SVR, today the SVR is in complete stagnation, from the beginning of the SVO, so to this day. and under the same leadership...