Global Debt: Who Is Everyone Owes and Why It Will Never End

3 381 3

The total debt of the world's governments has reached an astronomical $320 trillion, three times the size of the entire world economy. economicsThis figure continues to grow steadily, affecting both developed and developing countries.

Thus, the US national debt today is more than 36 trillion, Japan's - nine, China's - over 10 trillion, which is equal to 85% of its annual GDP. However, the paradox is not in the numbers themselves, but in the fact that debt has become not a problem, but a fundamental principle of the modern economy.



The history of this indicator goes back to ancient Mesopotamia, where loans in grain or silver were issued at 20-33% per annum. But it was not until the XNUMXth century that debt became an instrument of power.

Empress Catherine II, waging war with Turkey, faced an empty treasury and found a way out: the first paper banknotes and loans abroad. Thus, states discovered the possibility of spending more than they had – a principle that determined the future of the world economy.

By the 20th century, bonds had become a global phenomenon. Two world wars forced countries to borrow on an unprecedented scale: first to fight, then to rebuild.

Finally, in 1971, US President Nixon delinked the dollar from gold, ushering in the era of fiat currencies – money backed only by government decree. Since then, debt has fueled economic growth.

Governments today borrow not only for wars, but also to stimulate the economy. But the key question is: who is everyone indebted to?

The answer is unexpected: mostly to themselves. About 70% of the public debt of countries like the US, Japan or the EU is owned by their citizens through banks, pension and insurance funds. The money circulates in a vicious circle: the government issues bonds, banks buy them with citizens' deposits, the interest is returned to the economy, and the cycle repeats.

The rest is a complex web of mutual debts: China buys US bonds, Europe buys American and Chinese bonds, Japan lends to everyone while remaining the largest debtor. This is not a hierarchy, but an endless stream, where debtors and creditors constantly change places.

Why doesn't the system collapse? Because stopping means collapse. If governments stop borrowing, money will stop flowing into the economy, causing a wave of bankruptcies, unemployment, and recession.

The example of Greece, Spain and Portugal in 2008 showed how panic in the debt market results in a 10-25% drop in GDP. The 2020 pandemic has only exacerbated the trend: in a year, global debt has grown by 14 trillion.

But the risks are growing. When debt exceeds 100% of GDP, interest payments eat up more and more of the budget, leaving less for education, health care, and infrastructure. Japan, with its debt at 300% of GDP, has enjoyed stability for decades, but now it too faces rising borrowing costs. If investors lose confidence, the process will snowball.

The main response of governments is to print more money. But this leads to inflation, which is ultimately paid for by the well-being of citizens.

History knows of no examples where such a strategy would not have consequences. However, the world continues to move in this circle, because to stop would mean to collapse everything. Debt has become not an exception, but a rule, and there is no alternative to it yet.

3 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    28 August 2025 09: 23
    There is a nuance. In the US, it is not the government that issues money, but the Federal Reserve System, and the state owes it the most.
  2. -1
    11 September 2025 19: 03
    the world is ruled by bankers, and not just any bankers, but those who control the US Federal Reserve, of course there are other institutional investors in the world, as is mistakenly written here, only they are all front men for those who control the US Federal Reserve, they also own all transnational companies, funds, media, etc., why is that? because in addition to the US Federal Reserve there is also the IMF, and it tightly controls the domestic policies of all countries in the world except for the DPRK and a number of others, in the interests of the US Federal Reserve... that is, the entire combined debt of all countries is actually to the US Federal Reserve..... all the murdered US presidents were murdered for trying to limit the power of banks,

    William Henry Harrison, the President of the United States, in his inaugural address promised to restore the Bank of the United States and expand its lending capabilities by issuing paper currency (the so-called American Henry Clay system), that is, to create a state bank and thereby infringe on private banks.

    Zachary Taylor opposed the creation of a new private central bank because of the "dark history" of the two previous banks, i.e., he opposed the creation of the Federal Reserve.

    Abraham Lincoln played an important role in the creation of the US national banking system.
    During the Civil War, Lincoln faced financial problems and was pressured by some in the banking establishment to issue interest-bearing loans to cover the war effort. However, Lincoln decided not to borrow from bankers or create a national bank that would lend the government the necessary means of payment by printing huge amounts of paper money. So he was assassinated.

    James A. Garfield, the 20th President of the United States (1881–1881), was an opponent of the power of banks.

    In 1881, Garfield declared, "Whoever controls the volume of money in this country is the absolute master of industry and commerce... and when one realizes that the whole system is very easily controlled, in one way or another, by a few influential men at the top, it is not necessary to explain whence come the periods of inflation and depression." He did not live a year with such views.

    The William McKinley Federal Savings and Loan (McKinley Bank Building) in Niles, Ohio. The bank stood on William McKinley's birthplace, which was moved twice before being demolished in 1937. The site is now the McKinley Birthplace Home and Research Center.

    McKinley, as a politician, had connections with the business world and shared the views of the monetarists, who believed that the only correct path was to abandon "cheap money" and make all payments in gold. The president believed in the ability of the market mechanism to self-regulate and was against proposals to use government levers to lead the country out of economic difficulties.

    During Harding's presidency, Secretary of State Charles Evans Hughes, Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover, and Secretary of the Treasury Andrew Mellon developed a foreign policy that included plans to use American banks, such as the John D. Rockefeller-backed Chase National Bank, to replace British financiers in managing and financing world trade.

    Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), as President of the United States during the Great Depression, sought to address the problems of the banking industry and the financial sector.

    On March 6, 1933, FDR decided to declare a 10-day "bank holiday," temporarily closing all banks in the country and freezing all financial transactions. The main goal was to prevent further bank closures.

    During the holiday, the Roosevelt administration developed a plan to assess the health and solvency of each bank. Experienced government officials and banking experts conducted detailed studies of the banks' assets and liabilities.

    John Fitzgerald Kennedy (US President from 1961 to 1963) took some measures against the country's banking system, in particular the Federal Reserve System (FRS).

    On June 4, 1963, Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110, which allowed the government to issue money without the Federal Reserve. The order gave the Treasury Department authority to issue silver certificates backed by silver bullion, silver, or regular Treasury silver dollars.

    Kennedy's Treasurer, James J. Saxon, encouraged expansion of investment and lending powers for non-Federal Reserve banks. He also decided that such banks could guarantee state and local general obligation bonds.

    There is a conspiracy theory that Kennedy was going to deprive the Federal Reserve of its monopoly on money emission and that this decision became the cause of a conspiracy against the president.

    Nicholas II created a system where large banks had nothing to do, so he was overthrown and killed

    However, not everything is so rosy, because bankers have to issue loans, they don’t know how to do anything else, but how can we force everyone to take out loans?
    1 to instill the ideology of consumption so that they buy on credit what they don’t need, first of all, such an ideology of luxury was instilled in the European kings of the 17th-19th centuries and through this all these kings became servants of bankers
    2 to start a war, for example Franco-Prussian, and to lend money to both sides
    3 create a crisis by raising taxes, fines, creating bureaucratic obstacles to business, banning licenses, permits (see RF today) in a crisis everyone will have to borrow money somewhere, this has become so abnormal that everyone is only discussing the discount rate

    I especially feel sorry for President McKinley, beloved by the people of the USA, because he brought the country out of crisis... he was killed because he brought the country out of depression and crisis, and Stalin brought Soviet Russia out of crisis, introduced a strong ruble and refused the services of Western bankers, that's why all the Zipsota and Judaism still throw mud at him... and the peacemaker Tsar Alexander III was killed for peace, because if there is peace then loans are not needed..... now all this is working against the Russian Federation, a war has been unleashed, a crisis and an ideology of consumption... I hope only in God.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. 0
    2 October 2025 08: 54
    Uh... Who knows, aren't our OFZs exactly the same government debt? What about the debt and loans of state-owned entities like Yakutia? Or Gazprom? Are they part of this cycle?
    and how many of their OFZs and other things do we have in % of GDP.