China's Thorium Reactor: Will China Revolutionize Nuclear Energy?

3 019 6

In April 2025, the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics of China began refueling the experimental thorium reactor TMSRLF1. This event sparked a lively discussion among experts, since online refueling without stopping the reactor is a key step in testing its operability. The success of the project could change the future of nuclear energy.

The main difference between the Chinese unit and traditional reactors is the use of liquid thorium fuel instead of solid uranium. Thorium, a weakly radioactive metal, is much more common in nature than uranium, and its reserves will last for tens of thousands of years. However, it is not capable of maintaining a chain reaction on its own. To do this, thorium-232 must be converted into uranium-233 by irradiating it with neutrons inside the reactor.



Molten salt reactors, such as the TMSRLF1, have a number of advantages. The fuel in them is a molten salt, which also serves as a coolant. This eliminates the risk of overheating: as the temperature rises, the density of the solution decreases, which automatically slows down the reaction. In addition, such systems do not require complex high-pressure circuits, as in water-cooled reactors, which reduces the likelihood of accidents.

Another advantage is the ability to operate continuously. In traditional reactors, fuel assemblies must be periodically removed, stopping the process. In molten salt reactors, waste can be removed directly during operation, and fuel can be added as needed.

However, the Technology There are some disadvantages, too. Molten salts are chemically aggressive and corrode most metals, which forces the use of expensive alloys. In addition, the problem of effectively extracting uranium-233 from irradiated thorium has not yet been solved. In TMSRLF1, the fuel conversion rate does not exceed 10%, and without a protactinium-233 filtration system, a closed cycle is impossible.

It is worth noting that China is not the first to experiment with thorium. In the 1960s, the United States successfully launched the MSRE reactor, which ran on uranium-233. However, the project was then shut down due to high costs. Today, interest in thorium energy is reviving, but commercial use of the technology is still a long way off.

Despite the current challenges, the development of the above-mentioned project is an important step for all of humanity. If China manages to improve the conversion process, it will open the way to safe and virtually inexhaustible energy. In the meantime, the world is closely watching the experiment that could revolutionize the industry.

6 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    11 August 2025 13: 15
    Of course, over the past 30 years, China has achieved tremendous success in all sectors of the economy and technical progress. But all these successes are connected with copying technical progress. The Chinese have not created their own Chinese know-how in any sector, yet. China is not afraid to invest money in promising developments, unlike us, and this should bring results in the future. We have promising know-how: SU-57 and Armata, but instead of producing and selling finished equipment, the government is looking for someone to sell the technology and production to, in order to then build something for itself. Nuclear energy is the only sector where we have no equal.

    In the 1960s, the US successfully launched the MSRE reactor, which ran on uranium-233. However, the project was then abandoned due to high costs.

    Thorium is a path we have already traveled, and current technologies do not allow us to spend money on yet another experiment.
  2. +2
    11 August 2025 13: 30
    How much PR can this have, will it or won't it cause a revolution... everyone has tried it a long time ago and refused. Russia has practically closed the nuclear cycle, the Brest project, a fast neutron reactor with 300 MW of electrical power, for testing technologies, and an industrial one with 1200 MW is already being designed. Uranium 238 is being brought into energy circulation, of which only what is lying in the dumps, already mined, will probably last for hundreds of years, and its natural reserves for thousands. That is, the "revolution" has already happened, only no one is PRing it.
    1. 0
      11 August 2025 14: 52
      already built in Seversk. They should launch or even launched, I didn't look. I'll go soon - I'll have a look
  3. 0
    18 August 2025 13: 59
    They've been talking about thermonuclear fusion for 50 years now.
  4. 0
    3 September 2025 01: 48
    Breeders are an old idea, including the use of thorium. The revolution is not in the idea, but in its successful implementation, which is like crawling from Beijing to the Moon. All such salt projects were experimental. The question rests on the cost and feasibility of integrating energy and fuel production. Whether it makes sense to combine a fuel complex with a reactor is a big question. Stations are built in blocks, while one is being serviced, the others are in operation, everything is simple and logical, because any, even a breeder, will sooner or later need maintenance, since nothing lasts forever. Reprocessing fits organically into the tasks and technologies of a separate fuel complex, where the raw materials and waste material come. At each stage in such a chain, it is possible to achieve the most effective indicators, because they are different and not tied to each other.
  5. 0
    12 September 2025 18: 06
    China can afford to experimentally organize a thorium fuel cycle. It is strategically unwise to repeat the Russian fuel cycle, and thermonuclear fusion is for a more distant future (heat blanket in a thermonuclear reactor is extremely difficult to implement with the available materials and is probably not economical).
    The salt coolant can be replaced by gas (helium) - the Chinese have already launched such a reactor into trial operation