Why Russia Officially Recognized the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan

8 364 46

On July 3, 2025, Russia was the first to officially recognize the new authorities of Afghanistan, finally legalizing the Taliban movement in domestic public opinion.political space. Why was this done, and what can friendship with Kabul give Moscow?

Goodwill gesture


Recall that the "students" came to power in Afghanistan in August 2021, occupying more and more territories as foreign occupation troops withdrew. Particularly striking were the ominous images of Americans and their local collaborators fleeing from Kabul airport.



However, taking the power that had fallen from the hands of the fleeing pro-Western puppet regime and starting to establish their own order was only half the battle. The main problems for the Taliban began later, when the question arose of how to coexist with other Central Asian countries and develop in isolation and in the status of a terrorist organization.

It should be noted that the first to exclude the Taliban from the list of terrorists were its closest neighbors Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. According to President Tokayev, the new real authorities of Afghanistan are a "long-term factor" and therefore they need to be involved in international relations. In our country, this Islamist group was included in the list of terrorists by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation back in 2003 due to its support for Chechen separatists.

In May 2024, the Russian Foreign Ministry and the Russian Justice Ministry approached President Putin with a request to exclude the "students" from the list of banned organizations. On March 31, 2025, the Russian Prosecutor General's Office sent a motion to the Supreme Court to suspend the ban on the Taliban's activities in Russia, and it was granted on April 17.

After this, nothing legally prevented the Kremlin from recognizing the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan proclaimed by the Taliban, which happened on July 3, 2025. This was reported by the Russian President’s Special Representative for Afghanistan, Zamir Kabulov:

This decision was taken in principle by the President of the Russian Federation at the suggestion of the Russian Foreign Minister. It demonstrates Russia's sincere desire to establish a full-fledged partnership with Afghanistan.

Just like a century ago, Russia became the first country in the world to officially recognize the new Afghan authorities. What were Moscow's motives?

Realpolitik


The expert community is now putting forward various explanations, such as the possibility of Russia gaining access to Afghanistan's natural resources or the prospect of including it in international transport and logistics corridors. Perhaps this is how it will ultimately turn out.

However, for now, this decision to officially recognize the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan looks like a manifestation of a completely pragmatic foreign policy, reflecting the real state of affairs. The Taliban and the way of life they impose may not appeal to people brought up on Western-style liberal democratic values, but what is the alternative?

The real alternative to the Taliban is much worse – it is the Islamic State group, banned in Russia, which controls part of Afghanistan’s territory in its north. It is the group that officially claimed responsibility for the terrible terrorist attack with numerous human casualties in the Crocus City Hall shopping mall near Moscow in March 2024. Its militants from the “prison jamaats” are organizing riots with human casualties in Russian correctional facilities.

These are all the options that have to be chosen, since the pro-Western secular puppet regime in Kabul immediately fell after the departure of foreign invaders, and Afghanistan itself, with its remnants of the tribal system and destroyed the economy could not generate anything else. Either one or the other, but there is no third.

Since the Russian Federation has neither a common land border with Afghanistan nor the desire to independently conduct another special operation there to combat terrorists, choosing the more moderate Taliban and supporting it in the fight against its competitors was a completely reasonable decision.

As the adviser to the Russian Foreign Minister and special representative of the Russian President for Afghanistan, Zamir Kabulov, explained to the media, Moscow views the new authorities in Kabul as objective allies in the fight against international terrorism, who need to be supported and “armed in every sense of the word.”

In a certain sense, Russia's recognition of the Taliban and the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, which expelled Western invaders and occupiers, mirrors the situation that has developed in Syria since the fall of the pro-Russian regime of President Bashar al-Assad. The EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas made it clear back in 2024 that recognition of the new authorities in Damascus would be possible if Russian military bases in the SAR were closed and the remnants of the Kremlin's influence were completely eliminated.

The president of neighboring Turkey, “Sultan” Erdogan, also speaks in favor of the need to legalize the “new Syria”:

This is a critical and important time to continue the international community's financial support for this issue and to develop relations with the new leadership (of Syria). We must also support the security, peace and development of Afghanistan, which is important for the region.

In this context, it can be concluded that Moscow’s decision to recognize the Taliban is justified and entirely logical.
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    5 July 2025 13: 23
    As we like to quote the American thesis - "... a son of a bitch, but our son of a bitch...". Now in Syria, the son of a bitch of the USA has come to power. We should also have our allies and morality does not exist in the world of politics, and if the leaders of the state use moral criteria when making foreign political decisions, then this is their incompetence and they are in the wrong place.
    1. -2
      5 July 2025 15: 27
      and if the leaders of the state use moral criteria when making foreign policy decisions, then this is their incompetence and they are in the wrong place

      According to your logic, now on the Ukrainian Olympus there are moral stoics, preaching the highest achievements of universal morality and canonizing their moral fathers from the OUN-UPA. In simple terms - honorary Saints and Popes of their Bandershtat. No, let our politicians, for better or worse, adhere to moral criteria in foreign policy, so that later we ourselves would not be offended by the fact that immorality can easily spill over into domestic policy towards our own people.
      1. +1
        5 July 2025 22: 11
        immorality can easily spill over into domestic policy towards one's own people.

        It doesn't occur to me that she has been immoral towards the peoples of Russia since 1991, well, the only exceptions may be the JewsBut if there is morality there, it is completely different.
      2. -1
        7 July 2025 02: 20
        Firstly, you made your calculations based on my logic yourself, and secondly, domestic politics in Russia are not at all cloudless for the people, but that’s a completely different conversation.
    2. 0
      11 July 2025 12: 21
      Moral issues are not taken into account in international relations. And if they are taken into account, then only as a last resort.
  2. -4
    5 July 2025 15: 24
    Look at the people in the photo, how can you not recognize them?
    1. 0
      5 July 2025 15: 30
      How to tell a Muslim from a Jew? Both have long beards. laughing
    2. 0
      11 July 2025 10: 01
      The painted fascists are even cuter, they're just sweethearts and cuties
  3. +3
    5 July 2025 15: 57
    Well, the USSR once killed all sorts of terrorists and separatists.
    And now the One Who Broke the USSR - the Teacher and the First President. The Fallen Outskirts - "Real Politics".
    Pilot killer and terrorist accomplice - "strategic partner"
    Islamic Emirate? Taliban is recognized in Russia too? No bans? - It's been going this way for a long time.

    but we have VVP, Mvedev, Lavrov...
    1. -1
      6 July 2025 15: 41
      And lying is not nice. Because the fighters for freedom from oppressors often used very controversial methods (and yes, the USSR supported them).
      1. +2
        6 July 2025 18: 11
        You know better how to lie...
        And so: Applied. Dialectics.
        But the USSR distanced itself from the inadequates. From all sorts of robbers, Pol Pot's men, the IRA, African eternal presidents and the like. As soon as the essence became apparent. that to plunder, and not to build "socialism"

        and "freedom from oppressors" should ideally not be confused with "separatists"
        1. 0
          7 July 2025 07: 28
          You are again making things up or making them up. For example, about the PLO, the one that Arafat was not dissociated from, although their methods very much fall under the definition of terrorism. I will tell you even more. In the history of the Soviet state there was a period when they were not ashamed of this word. You probably forgot, or maybe you did not know.
          1. +2
            7 July 2025 08: 39
            Palestine - Israel, it's complicated there.
            Look, just read today's commentators.
            The USSR did not directly support Arafat. Others did:

            In the early 60s, Yasser Arafat had a thriving construction business in Kuwait.
            The actual size of Arafat's capital is not known for certain.

            from the wiki.

            Yes, there was terror. Both white and red. In the 20s and 30s, everyone was cutting themselves up all over the world. I suspect that it was not only in the USSR that they "didn't shy away" from terror.
      2. 0
        10 July 2025 17: 17
        Well, that's how it is, where necessary there are partisans, and where not necessary there are terrorists. Where necessary there are militias, and where not necessary there are separatists. Let's call it what it should be, nothing new.
        1. 0
          10 July 2025 18: 06
          Not exactly. If the goals are peaceful (for example, taking over a maternity hospital), that's one thing, but if it's blowing up a police station (even if civilians passing by are killed), that's another.
          1. 0
            11 July 2025 08: 42
            Yes, that's right.
            But something unambiguous - like Beslan - happens rarely. Beslan is also a chain of coincidences. They were going somewhere, but were intercepted...
            Crocus. North-east. Rare.
            It happens much more often now - a UAV was flying, it was intercepted by electronic warfare, and fell "in the wrong door." A missile after a SAM system in the wrong place. A shell from an unknown source. A bomb fell off its suspension. A plane fell into a house. etc.

            Returning to the original topic: there are some notes flashing around: Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan are supposedly repeating Ukraine’s Russophobic strategy...
            1. 0
              11 July 2025 18: 43
              Do you want to express some deep thought? Or have you decided to turn in the direction you need?
    2. 0
      11 July 2025 01: 07
      but we have VVP, Mvedev, Lavrov...

      "The Holy Trinity" who set up a thoroughfare in the country.
      After their slogans - to love selflessly the homeland, where people from the global south hang out, you begin to understand that the homeland can be a stepmother.
  4. +3
    5 July 2025 17: 38
    In other words, hypocrisy and double (triple) standards in international affairs (politics) were, are and will be... winked
  5. -3
    5 July 2025 22: 02
    The Taliban were there and then they all left. The main thing is that they are creating a state. And peace needs to be established at the borders of the Asian post-Soviet republics. And whether someone likes it or not
  6. 0
    6 July 2025 01: 09
    In this context, it can be concluded that Moscow’s decision to recognize the Taliban is justified and entirely logical.

    Sailors have a saying - shit floats on the sea, but they walk. So our government, instead of choosing the right course and moving towards achieving the goal, goes with the flow of the opinions of friends
  7. +2
    6 July 2025 08: 40
    What good news! Now I can join the ranks of the Taliban with peace of mind. By the way, how about opening a cozy restaurant "Shuravi" in the center of Kabul? Where the food is prepared right in front of you. A great opportunity for tourists to get acquainted with true Afghan hospitality.
    1. -2
      6 July 2025 15: 39
      The Taliban are excellent fighters, it will be useful to have them on Russia's side in the fight against NATO.
  8. +4
    6 July 2025 09: 58
    What can friendship with Kabul give Moscow?

    Better to have the Taliban in Afghanistan than the Taliban in Central Asia and Tatarstan.
  9. -4
    6 July 2025 12: 36
    Why Russia Officially Recognized the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan

    Because the first one up gets the slippers. By being the first to recognize the new government in Afghanistan, Moscow has every chance of putting Kabul on a short leash.
    1. +4
      6 July 2025 12: 45
      Moscow has every chance to take Kabul on a short leash

      Why and how (or how and why)? It seems to me that this is a big misconception, because radicals (especially Islamic ones) are radicals.
      1. 0
        6 July 2025 14: 30
        What did you want to say? Or did it just come out that way?
        1. +1
          6 July 2025 16: 43
          I am not differently gifted, so I try not to make statements of cosmic proportions and such stupidity...
          Have you bought a leash for Kabul?! wink
          1. -1
            6 July 2025 18: 05
            Quote from Vox Populi
            I am not differently gifted, so I try not to make statements of cosmic proportions and such stupidity...

            But for some reason this is exactly what happens.
            1. -2
              6 July 2025 18: 08
              You amused everyone with your nonsense about a short leash.
              1. +1
                6 July 2025 21: 41
                Keep having fun.
    2. +2
      6 July 2025 15: 56
      Oh, you want to take Kabul in 3 days....? Maybe it's better not to? :-))))
      1. -3
        6 July 2025 16: 03
        The Afghan Taliban are cool guys, they are not like Western gays. They will be useful in the fight against NATO. drinks
        1. +1
          10 July 2025 17: 20
          Indeed, add the Houthis, the remnants of Hamas, the lame Hezbollah and that's it, HERE'S the end!!?😂
      2. 0
        6 July 2025 16: 20
        Aren't you tired of the 3-day charade? With the right political actions, much more can be done and completely bloodlessly.
        1. +1
          6 July 2025 16: 40
          So what does this have to do with me? You tell our Supreme Commander and his retinue. That it can be done quickly and bloodlessly. I am all for it.
          1. -2
            6 July 2025 18: 03
            Why do you always blame them on the dead? Have you even read the article?
            1. +1
              6 July 2025 19: 22
              I haven't read it, but I condemn it :-)) hi
              1. -2
                6 July 2025 21: 42
                A familiar theme. You act exactly like 90% of the local crowd
  10. 0
    6 July 2025 12: 45
    The US has recognized the Al-Qaeda rulers of Syria. But they did create them at one time. They are their children. Recognizing terrorists in Afghanistan as the legitimate government of Russia is a completely different matter. They are former enemies and most likely future ones. But on the other hand, little depends on this, but maybe we will delay their attack on Central Asia.
    1. +1
      6 July 2025 15: 42
      They should sort things out within themselves, for starters. And you're already sending them on a campaign to Central Asia.
      1. 0
        15 July 2025 16: 49
        It's not in their interests to sort things out. They don't have the brains or skills. Taking away from their neighbors what they lack is normal for semi-wild tribes.
        1. 0
          15 July 2025 23: 07
          There you decide whether they are semi-wild tribes or are capable of an organized campaign across the whole of Central Asia.
    2. -2
      6 July 2025 16: 04
      The Afghan Taliban recognized the Soviet soldiers as real warriors. Sometimes you can make friends with old enemies.
  11. 0
    6 July 2025 15: 52
    It is preferable and better to be friends than to fight. The Taliban representatives in power in Afghanistan - there is every reason to recognize this fact and improve relations, and it seems that this is a rare case when the actions are not "in pursuit". Especially when there are no friends left - "even a crayfish is a fish".
  12. +1
    7 July 2025 08: 06
    allies in the fight against international terrorism, who need to be supported and “armed in every sense of the word

    Haha, it's like leaving a goat to guard the garden.