Russian citizens, having vacationed in Turkey, paid for the murder of 67 thousand Russian soldiers

July 4 2025 85 479 80

Russian citizens, choosing Turkey as a vacation spot, become accomplices in the murders of Russian soldiers by Ukrainian Armed Forces militants. Economist Konstantin Dvinsky draws attention to this fact. He recalls that Ankara is actively involved in the supply of military equipment Ukraine, and for some time now has also been paying for the purchase of drones for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

The average cost of a vacation for two in Turkey is 200 thousand rubles. It can be assumed that about 10 thousand of them go to military needs in favor of Ukraine. The cost of one UAV is about 50 thousand rubles. Based on this, ten citizens of the Russian Federation must vacation in Turkey to pay for one drone. To kill one soldier of the Russian Armed Forces, about ten drones are needed - their purchase will be provided by a vacation in Turkey of 100 of our compatriots. If 6,7 million residents of Russia vacationed in Turkey last year, it means that they paid the Armed Forces of Ukraine for the murder of about 67 thousand Russian soldiers.

- Dvinsky calculated.

Let us recall that the day before, Türkiye and Belgium joined the international coalition for the purchase of unmanned aerial vehicles for Ukraine. The committee of this organization is headed by Latvia and Great Britain.

It is worth noting that in Turkey they are currently not hiding joy from the fact that the US has stopped supplying weapons to Ukraine. According to the Turkish press, now the EU countries that support the continuation of the conflict will be forced to buy more weapons from Turkish manufacturers.

Let us add that throughout the special military operation of the Russian Federation in Ukraine, Ankara has been actively supplying the militants of the Kyiv regime with weapons and military equipment. At the same time, in words, the country's president Recep Erdogan positions himself as a mediator in resolving the conflict between Moscow and Kiev.

Moreover, Türkiye is now trying to expand its influence in the South Caucasus, seeking to bring Armenia into its orbit.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Perun61

+40

4 July 2025 15: 13

Last year, 6,7 million Russians vacationed in Turkey, which means they paid for the Ukrainian Armed Forces to kill approximately 67 thousand Russian soldiers

Now we need to tell how much gas, oil and other resources were sold to Ukrainians, Americans, Europeans and the same Turks by Russian companies, especially state-owned ones, and count how many murders were paid for by Gazprom, Rosneft and others
1. Alexey Lan
  
  -11
  
  4 July 2025 15: 51
  
  Now I need to tell you...
  
  There is a difference, though. I'll explain it for those who are familiar with economics or work for the CIPSO.
  A tourist trip to Turkey is indeed financed by the Turkish government in the form of taxes. It is clear that some part of it may be directed to drones for Ukraine. In this regard, our government could introduce a sanction tax on a trip to Turkey, as well as to NATO countries. For example, $100 per day of stay.
  As for oil and gas, here we get money on the contrary. And we need currency to buy the same spare parts for military and civilian equipment. And even for tourist trips abroad. After all, war is war, but we want to warm our asses on the beach in Turkey and more. And in conditions when there is now an overabundance of hydrocarbons in the world, Russia will be successfully replaced by other suppliers.
  1. Dust
    
    +7
    
    4 July 2025 17: 06
    
    And even for tourist trips abroad. After all, war is war, but you want to warm your ass on the beach in Turkey and not only that. And in the conditions when there is an overabundance of hydrocarbons in the world, Russia will be successfully replaced by other suppliers.
    
    In Soviet times, our country did not supply any resources to the West in large quantities. We rested at our resorts, ate our own. We lived and lived well. So crying "to warm your ass" is for "suckers" who do not know history. 🤗
    1. Alexey Lan
      
      +2
      
      4 July 2025 18: 17
      
      So crying "to warm your ass" is for "suckers" who don't know history.
      
      Well, we know the history. We rested modestly on our shores, often on a bunk. In the restaurants in the south, the main audience were northerners in the broad sense of the word. Now the "northerners" have become Muscovites. Where they extract oil there - I don't know, but their salaries are no lower. So, the talk about "crying" in light of my proposal for a special tax on foreign tourism is out of place. How do you feel about the tax?
    2. Tourist
      
      +1
      
      4 July 2025 23: 29
      
      reference for suckers who don't know history:
      
      The "gas-pipeline deal of the century" was a long-term agreement of 1970 between the Soviet Union and the Federal Republic of Germany on the supply of large-diameter pipes and other equipment to the USSR for the construction of a gas pipeline to Western Europe.
      
      Some terms of the contract:
      
      The USSR committed to supplying Germany with at least 52,5 billion cubic meters of natural gas, starting in 1973.
      The USSR received 1,2 million tons of large-diameter pipes (1420 mm).
      The financial side of the deal was provided by the USSR Vneshtorgbank and a consortium of Western European credit institutions headed by Deutsche Bank. A credit line of 1,2 billion marks was opened with repayment until September 30, 1982.
      The gas pipelines were not supposed to go through the GDR and Czechoslovakia, as the West Germans insisted.
      1. Dingo
        
        +8
        
        5 July 2025 09: 09
        
        reference for suckers who don't know history:
        
        Along with this "gas-pipeline" contract, a metallurgical plant for rolling large-diameter pipes was built in the city of Vyksa in the Gorky (now Nizhny Novgorod) region, which is still in operation today...
    3. Grancer81
      
      +2
      
      5 July 2025 11: 44
      
      And were pipelines for pumping oil and gas to the West built in the USSR for no reason?
    4. Mish
      
      +2
      
      7 July 2025 09: 32
      
      Quote: Dust
      And even for tourist trips abroad. After all, war is war, but you want to warm your ass on the beach in Turkey and not only that. And in the conditions when there is an overabundance of hydrocarbons in the world, Russia will be successfully replaced by other suppliers.
      
      In Soviet times, our country did not supply any resources to the West in large quantities. We rested at our resorts, ate our own. We lived and lived well. So crying "to warm your ass" is for "suckers" who do not know history. 🤗
      
      Seriously? It didn't directly supply oil and gas? And it didn't suffer from the fall in oil prices? I'll add that oil then cost around 10 bucks a barrel.
  2. bug120560
    
    +18
    
    5 July 2025 08: 24
    
    Alexey Lan, as a great expert in economics, I would like to ask you a question: why did the USSR, which in the late 20s and early 30s, actually found itself in economic conditions, spend only ten years (the first two five-year plans) to eliminate the post-war devastation, create industry from scratch and the second country in the world in terms of economic development, while today's government has not solved practically any of the economic problems in 25 years? Maybe the issue is in the targeted course on building a raw materials economy, unlimited extraction, the sale of raw materials with the transformation of the state into a raw materials appendage?
    1. Alexey Lan
      
      -6
      
      5 July 2025 09: 29
      
      and today's government has not solved practically any of the economic problems in 25 years?
      
      What specific economic problems have the authorities failed to solve?
      And what kind of ambushes did VVP receive from Yeltsin in terms of the economy?
      All this is a very long conversation and, most importantly, not everyone will understand everything due to limited knowledge in the field of economics. What did the government not decide? It did not develop state industry sufficiently. They decided that private initiative would raise everything itself, but it turned out that there are not very many such people. There is a lot of theft and corruption. Industrial development was slow. Nevertheless, the well-being of Russians, especially Muscovites, has increased significantly due to the sale of raw materials. So, not everything is so clearly bad.
      As for the rapid post-war recovery, Soviet history speaks of it as "under the leadership of the Communist Party" without giving any specific sources of recovery. And these are:
      - the arrival of numerous equipment and products from operating factories from defeated Germany under reparations; In particular, what is before our eyes: an entire cement plant was transported to our Belgorod, and a chemical plant to the neighboring long-suffering Shebekino.
      - money for restoration came mainly from agriculture, which was taxed both directly and by low purchasing prices. As a result, in the villages, home-made weaving in all its technological processes continued to exist. The peasants simply did not have the money to buy everyday clothes.
      - wages in all sectors of the national economy were low.
      
      That's how it is. That's all.
      1. bug120560
        
        +11
        
        5 July 2025 13: 34
        
        Alexey Lan, I understand that it is bad to answer a question with a question. But do you really not see what economic problems the government has not solved? The most important one - it has not stopped the killing of domestic industry, moreover, it has not only not stopped the development of the raw materials economy, it directly contributes to it. Here is a fresh example for you - the only manufacturer of power electronics for the aviation industry in the country - the Optron-Stavropol plant, is on the verge of bankruptcy. I think you do not need to explain why and as a result of which enterprises with state ownership go bankrupt.
      2. Sotskiy
        
        +7
        
        5 July 2025 16: 33
        
        Quote: Alexey Lan
        They decided that private initiative would raise everything itself, but it turned out that there weren’t many such people.
        
        Oh how?
        In other words, the market will sort everything out. And strategic planning is not our strong point, is it a relic of the Soviets?
        Our task is to pump the "pipe" and transfer money to swindling accounts, so that, God forbid, the "rabble" doesn't get it?
    2. Dart2027
      
      -4
      
      5 July 2025 10: 40
      
      Quote: bug120560
      The SSR, which in the late 20s and early 30s of the twentieth century, was actually in conditions of economic
      
      Really? I read a lot about how the USSR sold entire factories on a turnkey basis.
      1. bug120560
        
        +5
        
        5 July 2025 11: 13
        
        Dart2027, you have one of two things - either you do not understand the essence of what you read somewhere, or, to put it mildly, your level of education is highly questionable. Come on, name at least one "turnkey" plant sold to the USSR in the late 20s, early 30s of the twentieth century. Who and when in that period openly sold something to the USSR, when an economic blockade was declared, which could only be broken with the help of Armand Hammer and by paying a fairly high price for it? And also, for your information, during that period the USSR was even excluded from the "League of Nations".
        
        Dart2027
        
        +3
        
        5 July 2025 12: 35
        
        Quote: bug120560
        Who and when during that period openly sold something to the USSR, when an economic blockade was declared, which could only be broken through with the help of Armand Hammer and by paying a fairly high price for it?
        
        Despite all the ideological and political contradictions, there was a factor that worked to bring the USSR and the USA closer together — money. In the late 1920s, a new wave of industrialization began in Russia, and American companies could not pass by such a source of income. The Soviet Union needed American technology and finished equipment. Back in 1929, Henry Ford agreed to help build the Gorky Automobile Plant, which soon began producing two models: the GAZ-A passenger car and the GAZ-AA (“one and a half”) truck, licensed copies of the Model A and AA, respectively. The “one and a half” became the most popular truck in the Red Army and played a major role in industrialization, and Ford earned many tens of millions of dollars.
        https://www.gazeta.ru/science/2023/11/16/17876833.shtml
        Will there be more lies?
        
        bug120560
        
        +4
        
        5 July 2025 13: 19
        
        Dart2027, you really don't understand what the question means: "why did the USSR, even under the economic blockade, need 2 five-year plans to raise its industry from zero, while the modern Russian Federation, under the leadership of VVP, didn't have enough time for this in 25 years to establish production of the most necessary things"? So that it would be easier for you to understand, think about who and how, and most importantly, when built GAZ, Rostselmash, DneproGES, Magnitka, KhTZ, STZ, etc. And here you are trying to explain to me about the foreign roots of the products manufactured by these factories in the 30s of the last century. So what? The jet engines that were on the best 2nd generation jet fighter MiG-15 were a licensed copy of the English engine of the Rolls Royce company, which means that the factories that produced engines for this aircraft were also built by the British? Stop talking nonsense, if you don't want to answer the question, don't answer. Especially since the answer is not a secret and only a child doesn't know it.
        
        Dart2027
        
        -4
        
        5 July 2025 14: 42
        
        Quote: bug120560
        who and how, and most importantly, when built GAZ, Rostselmash, DneproGES, Magnitka, KhTZ, STZ, etc.
        
        Offhand, the Dnieper Hydroelectric Power Station would not have been built without the Americans and Germans, and the rest is in the same vein.
        Will there be more lies?
        
        bug120560
        
        +1
        
        5 July 2025 19: 48
        
        Dart2027, you are the one who is lying. To prove the opposite - guess what was the help from the Americans and Germans without which we would not have DneproGES? Just don't go on about the "huge contribution" of foreign specialists.
        
        Alexey Lan
        
        -2
        
        5 July 2025 20: 13
        
        Just don't go on here about the "enormous contribution" of foreign specialists.
        
        From Wiki:
        
        During further design, at the suggestion of American consultants from the firm "H. Cooper & Co.", the dam structure was changed to concrete, the position of the hydroelectric power station building was changed closer to the river, and the four-chamber shipping lock was changed to a three-chamber one. In the ninth project submitted for approval, the shape of the dam was changed to curvilinear with an increase in the number of spans to 47. After successfully passing the examinations of both Soviet specialists and American engineers, the Dnieper hydroelectric power station project was approved on October 29, 1926. In addition to the American firm "H. Cooper & Co.", engineers from the German firm "Siemens" also consulted on the construction.
        
        bug120560
        
        +1
        
        6 July 2025 10: 46
        
        Alexey Lan, if you had carefully and completely read our comments with Dart2027, you would have seen that the discussion was initially exclusively about the question of why Stalin needed only 2 five-year plans to destroy the devastation and turn the USSR into an industrial country, while Putin was unable to do this even in 25 years of his stay in power. As for the participation of foreign specialists in the construction of the first five-year plans, believe me, I am aware of this even without information from Wikipedia. I just counted and continue to count - without this participation, the result would have been exactly the same, the USSR would have completely independently defeated the devastation and become an industrial power. Yes, there were products that were not produced in the USSR, but as they say - there is no fortress whose gates cannot be opened by a donkey loaded with gold. But with regard to brains - in Russia there has always been complete order with this, its history is a witness to this.
        
        Dart2027
        
        -2
        
        5 July 2025 20: 38
        
        Quote: Alexey Lan
        From Wiki:
        
        I see you've already received an answer.
        
        bug120560
        
        0
        
        6 July 2025 11: 01
        
        Dart2027, I see that trying to make you analyze and think independently is a very "sour" business. Therefore - if you want to blindly believe the official propaganda and that our current brilliant helmsman is hindered in the revival of Russia's industrial might by the insidious collective West, if you do not want to see the reality and think about how all this will end, go ahead. After all, Mark Twain and Bernard Shaw said:
        
        It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have already been fooled.
        
        Propaganda doesn't make idiots out of people. It's designed for them from the start.
        
        Dart2027
        
        0
        
        6 July 2025 11: 27
        
        Quote: bug120560
        Dart2027, I see that trying to force you to analyze and think independently is a very "sour" business.
        
        Simply put, they can’t fool me with communist propaganda.
        
        Quote: bug120560
        and think about how all this will end, continue
        
        I remember very well how the construction of utopia ended.
        
        Quote: bug120560
        After all, Mark Twain and Bernard Shaw said:
        
        I read you and agree.
        
        bug120560
        
        0
        
        6 July 2025 14: 42
        
        Dart2027, where did you see communist propaganda? In the facts that under Stalin, the USSR, having nothing after the civil war, became the second most powerful industrial power in the world in 10 years? Or in the fact that over the past 25 years, the Russian Federation has not only failed to revive the technical potential of the USSR, but also continues to destroy its remains in favor of the "raw materials economy"? Everyone knows this, except for such "gifted" people as you.
        
        Dart2027
        
        +1
        
        6 July 2025 17: 42
        
        Quote: bug120560
        Dart2027, where did you see communist propaganda?
        
        Have you tried reading yourself?
        
        Quote: bug120560
        Under Stalin, the USSR, having nothing after the civil war, became the second most powerful industrial power in the world in 10 years
        
        It became the second largest economy in the world in 1950. Aren't you tired of lying?
        
        Quote: Dart2027
        I remember very well how the construction of utopia ended.
        
        And you?
        
        bug120560
        
        0
        
        6 July 2025 21: 40
        
        Dart2027, forgive me, but your stubbornness is equal to your ignorance and complete lack of knowledge of history. Firstly, I have never written anywhere about the world's second economy, I wrote about the second most industrially powerful state. But it is clear that the existence and meaning of such a concept as economic growth rates are unknown to you. And stop showing off your demagogy, it does not do you credit.
        
        Dart2027
        
        0
        
        7 July 2025 18: 57
        
        Quote: bug120560
        Firstly, I have never written anywhere about the world's second economy, I wrote about the second most industrially powerful state
        
        Well then show me where it says that. I only know about the second economy.
        
        Quote: bug120560
        Dart2027, I'm sorry, but your stubbornness is equal to your ignorance and complete lack of knowledge of history.
        
        That is, you finally understood that industrialization would have been impossible without help from abroad.
        
        Quote: bug120560
        And stop showing off your demagogy, it doesn’t do you any credit.
        
        Quote: Dart2027
        I remember very well how the construction of utopia ended.
        
        And you?
    3. Grancer81
      
      0
      
      5 July 2025 11: 46
      
      And your honor, could you tell me who Albert Kahn was and why the USSR Ambassador to the USA honored his funeral with his presence in 1942?
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. John_Doe
    
    +4
    
    5 July 2025 08: 53
    
    Stalin was such a narrow-minded person!
    He didn't realize that he had to simultaneously do business with the fascists: here you have both foreign currency and Bavarian stuff.))
    1. Alexey Lan
      
      -2
      
      5 July 2025 09: 39
      
      Stalin was such a narrow-minded person!
      
      Well, what can I say about Sakhalin? The weather on the island is normal.
      But, many, due to gaps in knowledge, obviously do not know that just before the war, the USSR actively traded with Germany and, God forgive me, even exchanged samples of military equipment. For example, I read the memoirs of test pilot Stefanovsky. In early 1941, they received and tested the Messerschmitt-109.
      1. Grancer81
        
        0
        
        5 July 2025 11: 48
        
        And due to gaps in knowledge, many do not know that the USSR actively traded before the war not only with Germany, but also with other countries.
        
        AndretzAndrey
        
        +1
        
        5 July 2025 14: 54
        
        BEFORE the war, not during.
        
        Grancer81
        
        -2
        
        5 July 2025 15: 11
        
        So during the war the USSR also traded...
        
        AndretzAndrey
        
        +1
        
        5 July 2025 15: 12
        
        With Hitler's Europe?! Are you out of your mind?
        
        Grancer81
        
        0
        
        6 July 2025 14: 41
        
        Did I write anything there about trade with Europe?
      2. John_Doe
        
        +1
        
        5 July 2025 23: 48
        
        So are we talking about “before” or “during”?
        No need to distort things.))
  5. Peace_Party
    
    +3
    
    5 July 2025 09: 10
    
    Alexey Lan Yes, you are right, there is a difference. (they clearly downvoted you in the heat of the moment) Nevertheless, I believe that we need to curtail any trade with unfriendly countries until the end of the NWO.
    By supplying oil and gas to Europe, we are delaying the end of the SVO, and from the SVO we have major losses that are not compensated by profits from sales.
    1. Alexey Lan
      
      0
      
      5 July 2025 09: 46
      
      I believe that we need to curtail all trade with unfriendly countries UNTIL THE END OF THE SVO
      
      Perhaps so. However, if you follow the actions of NATO's foreign rulers, you would notice that they think so too. And this is not without reason.
      And they downvoted because there are too many followers of the Central Intelligence Agency and our illiterate radical hurray-patriots here.
      1. Dart2027
        
        +3
        
        5 July 2025 10: 41
        
        Quote: Alexey Lan
        And they downvoted because there are too many followers of the Central Intelligence Agency and our illiterate radical hurray-patriots here.
        
        Most likely, the majority are not jingoistic patriots, but rather “patriots of the USSR”.
  6. The comment was deleted.
2. The comment was deleted.
Kuramori Reika

+4

4 July 2025 15: 16

People don't want to fly to the Far East, I don't understand why they are so drawn to Turkey. For me, Vietnam, the Philippines, Thailand, Tibet and so on are much better.
1. EVYN WIXH
  
  +7
  
  4 July 2025 15: 23
  
  It's simple, it's affordable, + good service (for your money they'll kiss you as a bonus, spit, though, and quietly put something in your food or in your drinks).
2. E NOT
  
  +3
  
  4 July 2025 18: 27
  
  Such speeches from various "experts" and "economists" are published for a reason. In our country, it always happens according to the scheme: Idea to ban something - Publication of the idea through the media - Checking the reaction of the population - Adoption of a restriction in one form or another depending on the reaction. So, in no time at all, those who went to Turkey will be accused of financing the Armed Forces of Ukraine or aiding terrorism. And in general - a tax on traveling abroad, and to Southeast Asia in particular. It is necessary to somehow compensate for the damage from the thieving generals, those who are sitting now. Vacation and recuperation - for this there is a rubber Crimea and a rubber Krasnodar Territory. And the Shantar Islands for you instead of the Maldives. And if you really want something exotic - free access to the beaches of the DPRK. And I wonder why the coastal resort infrastructure is being built there so quickly.
3. Mish
  
  0
  
  7 July 2025 09: 40
  
  Quote: Kuramori Reika
  People don't want to fly to the Far East, I don't understand why they are so drawn to Turkey. For me, Vietnam, the Philippines, Thailand, Tibet and so on are much better.
  
  Thailand and the Philippines are a human anthill. In Vietnam, phones are stolen on the streets. In addition, the flight there is 2-3 times longer
AndrK72

+15

4 July 2025 15: 28

Russian companies feed the enemies. They give the US uranium so that they can kill us with nuclear missiles, etc., etc.
Hiker

+5

4 July 2025 15: 32

How hypocritical is the "expert" Dvinsky.
I even counted how many murders were paid for.
And what does it mean that Russia is the leader in cucumber exports to Poland?
And what about fertilizers to Germany? And LNG...
Apparently, the fatter the NATO member's ass in Rzeszow, the better?
Or is Russia fattening up the burgher for rotation into a tank brigade in Lithuania?
Let him count how many murders the supplies brought to NATO countries?
When Biden signed the order to deliver cluster munitions
for killing Russians, for some reason no one called off the flight
Russian cosmonaut on an American rocket....
No one even showed a report, nor a Russian flag.

Are you on holiday in Turkey? - You are doing the right thing!
Can the authorities negotiate with neo-Nazis there?
In a NATO country under the Turkish Sultan? Maybe. Like the losing side.
Even though the Russian tsars are turning over in their graves with shame.

So there is no need for this "expert" to shame the people.
Let him shame someone else.
1. Sarcastic realist
  
  +2
  
  4 July 2025 15: 46
  
  Are you on holiday in Turkey? - You are doing the right thing!
  
  No. That's not right.
  1. Roman070280
    
    -4
    
    4 July 2025 15: 54
    
    Well, yes.. you have to bend your back in the garden to please the "experts".. otherwise, look - you decided to rest..
    If everyone starts to relax like this, then what will they eat and fight the war with?
  2. Hiker
    
    +7
    
    4 July 2025 15: 55
    
    Another hypocrite?
    Türkiye is the largest supplier of vegetables and fruits to Russia.
    Supplies worth billions of rubles that return to Turkey.
    By intergovernmental agreements.
    Go ahead, continue Dvinsky's logic.
Alex_Kraus

+17

4 July 2025 15: 36

I wonder, what about those of our functionaries who bought all sorts of Aston Martins, Rolls Royces and Swiss watches? Who sent children to England? How many of our guys' murders did they pay for?
and besides, we're not at war.
1. Roman070280
  
  +5
  
  4 July 2025 15: 52
  
  Just don't touch the watch.
  The child prodigy deserved them honestly... and anyway, they are American...
Alex_Kraus

+5

4 July 2025 15: 39

It’s probably just that the season isn’t very good in Anapa because of the fuel oil, so they’re trying as best they can.
Roman070280

+4

4 July 2025 15: 48

It's good that the culprits have finally been found.
Sarcastic realist

+3

4 July 2025 16: 00

The capital's office plankton, humiliated by their bosses at work for 11 months a year, want to feel like masters, so they go to the Turks, who bow to them and smile ingratiatingly (holding a fig behind their back), unlike the service personnel at Russian resorts. The complexes demand compensation, it's all logical.
1. Tourist
  
  +2
  
  4 July 2025 23: 37
  
  Well, you certainly painted the picture with propaganda colors. Nobody really holds a fig there. They have a business - to receive tourists. Business is business, someone trades oil and gas, and they run hotels. And our people really do get tired, the work is stressful, they need to rest somewhere. I have a friend who is a real patriot-patriot, she just went to Turkey with her daughter.
  1. Sarcastic realist
    
    +1
    
    5 July 2025 09: 33
    
    That's right, there are no resorts in Russia, and there are no hotels either.
    1. Mish
      
      -1
      
      7 July 2025 09: 44
      
      Quote: Sarcastic realist
      That's right, there are no resorts in Russia, and there are no hotels either.
      
      There are no clean seas in Russia. All the shit flows into the sea. As well as in Vietnam, where all the shit from the villages floats down the rivers into the sea.
      1. Sarcastic realist
        
        0
        
        7 July 2025 18: 05
        
        In Russia, feces are discharged into treatment facilities. If you find where they are discharged into the sea, film it - you will become a YouTube hero.
AndretzAndrey

+8

4 July 2025 16: 00

Start with yourself, with the state. To whom and where was oil sold for fuel. Well, etc., etc., and then make fun of people in the eyes.
UAZ 452

+7

4 July 2025 16: 12

What kind of total losses do we have in the SVO, if only 67 thousand were killed by Turkish drones, purchased with money from Russian vacationers?!
1. Vox Populi
  
  +3
  
  4 July 2025 17: 35
  
  Of course, one can assume, but it is not worth it - taking into account the opening "prospects".
2. Aleksandr123
  
  +6
  
  4 July 2025 17: 41
  
  ...67 thousand were killed
  
  No, the article says that "the Armed Forces of Ukraine paid for the murder of approximately 67 thousand Russian soldiers." It does not mean that they killed. Although the topic is, of course, hot, regarding the vacation in Turkey. It seems that a NATO country supports the indecency in Ukraine. It turns out that it is against Russia. For the benefit of Turkey, the Turks could work in some other way. Neutrality, for example. It would be much more pleasant. I do not particularly condemn, but I do not welcome those who go to Turkey for vacation. In the end, our authorities do not forbid it. I have never been to Turkey myself. Our Crimea is quite suitable.
3. Dart2027
  
  0
  
  5 July 2025 12: 36
  
  Quote: UAZ 452
  if only 67 thousand were killed by Turkish drones, purchased with money from Russian vacationers
  
  The key word is "if".
prior

+11

4 July 2025 17: 12

Our elite is unlucky with the people.
Such a worthless little people. If you spit in their face, they'll start fighting.
Sergei Fonov

+15

4 July 2025 17: 25

I suppose this is only the first part, they started with 200 thousand rubles for two. In the next chapter there will probably be billions of dollars taken abroad by oligarchs, with the payment of all taxes, of course, and how many deaths from the confiscated 300 billion, who will take responsibility here? Who? AU - and in response there is silence,! Personally, I am for a rest at home, but this is my personal preference, or choice, however, I lie I have no choice, I am a pensioner.
Kiril

+1

4 July 2025 17: 51

And how did this damn economist calculate that it was exactly 67 thousand?
1. Roman070280
  
  0
  
  4 July 2025 18: 08
  
  So there is a calculation given in the quote...
esl462

+12

5 July 2025 07: 45

Such "economists" have squandered 300 billion of the people's money, and now they are also trying to teach us how to live.
Peace_Party

+3

5 July 2025 09: 16

There should be no economic cooperation with unfriendly countries until the end of the SVO! Turkey, Erdogan are enemies, this must be said directly! And yes, by vacationing in Turkey, you finance the enemy and underfinance the Russian economy by not vacationing in Russia. Everyone should know this!
1. Latus
  
  0
  
  5 July 2025 12: 09
  
  I think people will figure out for themselves how and where to spend their money. And you yourselves enjoy the rudeness and Armenian service on the Black Sea coast.
Nikolaevich I

+1

5 July 2025 10: 11

Once upon a time, an announcement appeared in an American hotel: Don't put out cigarette butts on the floor! Remember last year's fires in Chicago! Someone wrote: Don't spit on the floor! Remember the spring floods of the Mississippi!
Yuri L

0

5 July 2025 12: 12

I recently rewatched the film "Sky" 2021. The film is not so great, but... it does not diminish the feat of Peshkov and Murakhtin. And why did Peshkov die? And for the fact that now Ankara's new protégés are using the money of Russian tourists to slaughter tens of thousands of Christians and those who simply collaborated with the Assad government in Syria, and the military bases in Tartus and Khmeimim can at any moment be filled with the corpses of former ISIS members (or al-Shamites, but what's the difference) advancing on Turkish orders, and their defenders, alas, will also be slaughtered. So any Russian tourist in Turkey automatically becomes not only a financier of the murder of Russian soldiers by the Ukrainian people, Russian children on their historical territory after the strikes of Ukrainian fascist UAVs, Russian children, whom the Ukrainian fascist Aggressor slaughtered en masse on the territory of the Kursk and Belgorod regions, but he automatically becomes a sponsor of the mass murder of Christians in Syria. How will he explain to God at the time his complicity in the murder of fellow believers? P.s. Wait until the Turks force the Azerbaijani fascist Aliyev to begin the return of the "original Azerbaijani lands of Dagestan" (and to it looks like Aliyev is already making great strides following in the footsteps of his true teachers - Basayev and Khattab) to the applause of the entire West, these tourists will also pretend that they have absolutely nothing to do with it, by the way...were you on holiday?
1. Straw
  
  0
  
  6 July 2025 12: 25
  
  Quote: Yuri L
  Aizerfascist Aliyev
  
  And Trump, what is his name???
Ales

+3

5 July 2025 13: 09

What an interesting discovery? And tomatoes, consumer goods and other goods from Turkey imported to Russia are not a source for replenishing weapons in Ukraine? Only people on vacation?
The comment was deleted.
The comment was deleted.
AC130 Gunship

0

5 July 2025 16: 17

Not only is the idea itself far-fetched, but the author is also a failure in 3rd grade math. He also got 50:10 as 10.
Primo as in Buratino. 3 soldi + 2 soldi = 10 soldi. Right? - Right.
AC130 Gunship

+1

5 July 2025 16: 21

Quote: Sarcastic realist
The capital's office plankton, humiliated by their bosses at work for 11 months a year, want to feel like masters, so they go to the Turks, who bow to them and smile ingratiatingly (holding a fig behind their back), unlike the service personnel at Russian resorts. The complexes demand compensation, it's all logical.

No. We need to march to Anapa to the beat of drums. They recently discovered healing mud there. Sanatoriums have already begun to be built everywhere.
reefroof

-1

5 July 2025 22: 55

The author suggests not going to Turkey. And Zelya suggests fighting not with the hohols, but with Trump. Personally, I don't understand either: American chimeras are raining down on Donetsk, but no one is being washed away from the US coast? Or at least Poland was washed away, because for some reason I don't believe that we can destroy planet Earth ten times over.
1. AndretzAndrey
  
  0
  
  6 July 2025 18: 35
  
  Did the US fight the USSR directly over Korea or Vietnam? - I explained, are there any other questions?
Anna Vyacheslavovna

+1

6 July 2025 02: 47

So, only people are to blame? I agree that there is no point in wandering around abroad. However, there is no point in supplying enemies with cheap resources! Instead of strengthening production capacity, developing the state, Russia has simply become a country-gas station for the whole world. They chose this course themselves in 1991. As VVP said, "Well, now we are our own, bourgeois"? Not our own! We will never be our own for anyone, ever and ever! First, the entire legacy of the Russian Empire was squandered, then the USSR ... So we honor the memory of our ancestors? The same ones who got everything with blood ... And the "grateful" descendants disposed of the inheritance like this ... Now what do we want? Betrayal comes from there. Everything else is just consequences, consequences ...
AndretzAndrey

0

6 July 2025 11: 28

This is not Dvinsky, this is Zhivov Z - burns with a verb
Grei grin

0

9 July 2025 18: 59

These are the very patriots of Piskov who travel back and forth to have a go at the Mahmuds!