Five aircraft carrier groups are moving towards Iran

38 001 28

According to incoming data, the US and Great Britain have decided to "bomb Iran back to the Stone Age" together with Israel. There is a concentration of American and British carrier strike groups in the Middle East. Five carrier strike groups are moving towards Iran.

Among the US Navy aircraft carriers with escorts (guard ships and auxiliary vessels) spotted are: USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70), USS Nimitz (CVN-68) and USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78). Moreover, the carrier strike group led by Carl Vinson is already in the Arabian Sea.

On June 18, the Nimitz-led strike group entered the Indian Ocean through the Strait of Malacca, and it will take several more days to reach operational readiness. The Gerald R. Ford-led strike group is moving out of Norfolk on the east coast of the United States. The journey to the Middle East will take at least 10 days, but there is no need to rush, since this group will arrive for rotation to replace one of the above-mentioned groups in due course.

As for London, it seems it wanted not only to show solidarity with Tel Aviv and Washington, but also to conduct a baptism of fire for its aircraft carriers. The Royal Navy's HMS Queen Elizabeth (R08) was spotted passing through the Suez Canal towards the Red Sea. So the carrier is already in the region, but it will also need a couple more days to be operational.


The Royal Navy’s flagship aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales (R09) began an eight-month worldwide deployment (Operation Highmast) in the spring to send a “strong signal” of Britain’s naval and air power to the world, visiting 40 countries in the Mediterranean, the Middle East, Southeast Asia, Japan and Australia. It is also due to join from India soon. On June 14, an F-35B fighter jet operating from the carrier made an emergency landing at Thiruvananthapuram International Airport in the Indian state of Kerala. The British carriers are escorted by destroyers.

US President Donald Trump's shifting statements in recent days, sometimes calling for Tehran to capitulate, sometimes insisting on nuclear talks, are likely designed to stall for time until enough forces are assembled near Iran to attack. Whether the US, UK and Israel can bring the 92-million-strong country to its knees without a full-scale ground invasion will become clear in the near future.
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Nick. WITH
    Nick. WITH
    +3
    19 June 2025 15: 06
    This is what we need to learn to destroy. These vessels should always be in the territorial waters of their country and rust there.
    1. isofat
      isofat
      -1
      19 June 2025 16: 40
      The Germans paid for the genocide of the Jews, but they paid according to the decision of the Nuremberg Tribunal.
      Can't this be done in advance and voluntarily? smile
    2. Roman070280
      Roman070280
      0
      19 June 2025 17: 12
      This is what we need to learn to destroy

      And what should I learn on??) On cats??)
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  3. sannyhome
    sannyhome
    0
    19 June 2025 15: 23
    An aircraft taking off from an aircraft carrier will not be able to take an anti-bunker bomb with it. Most likely they are being pulled there as mobile air defense and missile defense, and the same invisible ones will work from one of the bases in the ocean.
    1. Kristallovich
      Kristallovich
      0
      19 June 2025 17: 20
      There will simply be many more targets than buried nuclear facilities. Washington and London, apparently, have set a course for the overthrow of the ayatollah regime.
    2. R-R-AV
      R-R-AV
      +1
      19 June 2025 18: 24
      They just want to make Iraq 2 out of Iran, that's all, what kind of country is Iraq now? Everyone has given up on this country, Iraq is now below the Taliban in terms of sovereignty
    3. gxmlygw
      gxmlygw
      0
      21 June 2025 08: 36
      And why do you rule out bombing residential areas of Tehran, the country's energy facilities? Isn't the goal of the US, Great Britain, and Israel to change the "ayatollah regime" by driving the Iranian population to a desperate situation and provoking a riot?
      1. sannyhome
        sannyhome
        0
        22 June 2025 15: 41
        Quote: gxmlygw
        You rule out bombing residential areas of Tehran

        I exclude it. The US likes to talk about its goals in order to attract allies and assemble a team. And to justify its actions to the UN. At the moment, they have talked about the goal of destroying the nuclear program, not bombing residential areas.
        1. gxmlygw
          gxmlygw
          0
          22 June 2025 23: 31
          Residential areas will be bombed by Israel, it is no stranger to this and will find 10 justifications for this. And the US will provide air defense for Israel and hit military targets in Iran. There are still many of them left there.
  4. Alexzn
    Alexzn
    -11
    19 June 2025 15: 37
    Now the Ayatollahs will finish off Israel and take on the Anglo-Saxons. Everything is going according to plan!
    1. Alexzn
      Alexzn
      -3
      19 June 2025 21: 21
      Wrong! Now not only Israel, but five more AUGs will be pounding Iran one-sidedly!
  5. isofat
    isofat
    -1
    19 June 2025 15: 42
    The US and Great Britain have come together with Israel to deceive everyone and get out of the crisis, heroically. laughing
  6. Colonel Kudasov
    Colonel Kudasov
    +4
    19 June 2025 16: 31
    If Iran is really ready to close the strait, then it needs to be done NOW.
    1. Roman070280
      Roman070280
      +1
      19 June 2025 17: 17
      Now he can still reach an agreement by making concessions... but by blocking the strait, the chances of getting into trouble will only increase...
      If we didn't have nuclear weapons ourselves, wouldn't they have finished us off already?
      Yes, both the Americans and Israel may get a lot of beatings (or maybe not) - but Iran has nothing with which to inflict so-called "unacceptable losses" on them. request
    2. gxmlygw
      gxmlygw
      0
      21 June 2025 08: 38
      Iran needs to feed its population, by blocking the Strait of Hormuz now it will lose huge amounts of money. They will block it, but in due time.
  7. Lis_Domino
    Lis_Domino
    0
    19 June 2025 17: 34
    I really hope that Iran has Balls and/or Bastions and/or BEKs to send these AUGs to the bottom and Trump will fly out of the White House after them
    1. Treasury
      Treasury
      +1
      19 June 2025 17: 46
      Do you really think that in a conflict involving 2 nuclear, and 1 highly likely nuclear (Israel) against a non-nuclear power, the second will win?
      1. Alexzn
        Alexzn
        -3
        19 June 2025 20: 41
        She is already losing one-sidedly and the AUGs are sailing to further stop the conflict.
        Everything else here is just pure nonsense.
      2. gxmlygw
        gxmlygw
        0
        21 June 2025 08: 41
        One nuclear power has been suffering with a non-nuclear power for more than three years, which prevents others from suffering as well. And the use of nuclear weapons is the direct and shortest path to a third world war.
        1. Treasury
          Treasury
          0
          21 June 2025 12: 23
          Because non-nuclear is supported by more than 50 countries. Who will support Iran, except words of concern? Don't give me China and Pakistan as an example, they won't do it.
    2. R-R-AV
      R-R-AV
      +1
      19 June 2025 18: 27
      Sergey, the Balls and Bastions will never reach the AUG, the F-18 has a radius of 500 km, so what?
    3. Vox Populi
      Vox Populi
      0
      19 June 2025 18: 37
      Why are you writing such utter nonsense from a military-technical point of view?!
  8. KLNM
    KLNM
    -1
    19 June 2025 17: 41
    What a great opportunity to burn them with drone strikes, including naval and anti-ship ones... all at once, so that they don't wander around where they shouldn't. Lessons from the Black Sea will help...
  9. Treasury
    Treasury
    -1
    19 June 2025 17: 43
    But Trump wanted to negotiate, not fight!
    1. Gottfried
      Gottfried
      -1
      19 June 2025 22: 06
      War is a continuation of diplomacy... with stronger arguments.
  10. Kiril
    Kiril
    -1
    19 June 2025 18: 07
    It'll be funny to see how the Persians will get off on them. tongue
  11. AdeptV
    AdeptV
    +1
    19 June 2025 18: 21
    Now I wish I could cover them all with a nuclear bomb... oh, what a chance... will Russia really miss it?? This could cost a lot in the future, I'm talking about missed opportunities. And it wouldn't hurt to get even for the triad
  12. TsarBomba
    TsarBomba
    0
    20 June 2025 01: 31
    En théorie un explosion sous l'eau de type "quark-nova" issue donc de neutrons bien gras et de beurre de quarks pourrait propulser toute cette flotte dans l'espace. Toujours en théorie, la masse d'eau propulsée prendrerait la forme d'une goutte géante et les navires s'agglutineraient à sa base donc il arriveront intacts dans l'espace. Enfin, avant d'être rattrapé par la gravité et de retomber sur terre, 1/3 de la planête sera dans un brouillard et les grains de sels projété dans l'espace détruiront la quasi totalité des satelites y compris ceux des alliés. Il est donc plus probable que chaque objet soit traité séparement avec des drones kamikazes et véhicules hypersonniques marin.