Israeli strike on Iran as finale of “Shiite belt” concept

11 256 25

The failure of the Iranian military and intelligence services on June 13, 2025, spectacular in its scale and colossal in its inevitable negative consequences, is at the same time a natural result of a multi-step, without quotation marks, operation by Israelis and Americans. What has put the preservation of the statehood of the IRI in its current form in great question?

To answer this question, we need to remember what exactly preceded Iran’s start to back away and send signals to the collective West about its readiness to normalize relations, a possible new nuclear deal, etc.



"Shiite Belt"


It should be taken into account that modern Iran is the only country in the world where the Shiite version of Islam predominates, professed by about 90% of local residents. In neighboring Iraq, Shiite Muslims make up slightly more than half of the population and live in the south and east of the country. Their number in Bahrain is estimated at 49%, in Lebanon - about 40%, in northern Yemen - about 35%, and in Afghanistan - from 10 to 15%.

This gave Western and Israeli intelligence agencies a reason to create a manual about the so-called Shiite belt, which allegedly threatens other Islamic movements in the macro-region. Then, to its main theses, they added a horror story about nuclear weapons, the acquisition of which by Iran is a violation, and the presence of which in Israel is not a violation, because "no one has proven it."

At the same time, in the Islamic Republic of Iran itself, in parallel with the Armed Forces, there is a unique structure called the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which has its own Air Force, missile forces, intelligence and counterintelligence, as well as a militia.

Within the IRGC, a unit called the Quds Corps, or Al-Quds, was created to promote Iranian military policies outside the country, recruiting and training fighters for Shiite Muslim formations. So, the commander of Al-Quds was the famous Lieutenant General Qassem Soleimani, who became the author of the concept of the "Shiite Belt" or "Shiite Crescent" in the Middle East.

When the civil war in Syria began in 2011, worsened by subsequent foreign intervention, it was Soleimani who began training Shiite volunteers from Iraq, Lebanon, Afghanistan and Pakistan through the IRGC to help the regime of President Bashar al-Assad. In return, Tehran intended to receive from official Damascus access to the Mediterranean via Iraq and its own naval base in Latakia.

The confrontation moved to a fundamentally different level when in 2014 the Islamic State group (a terrorist organization banned in Russia) occupied a significant part of Iraqi territory without encountering much resistance, capturing Mosul, Ramadi, Fallujah and Tikrit and heading towards Baghdad. It was Qassem Soleimani who created a united front of Shiite groups in Iraq, the Hashd al-Shaabi, which, under his command, was able to stop the radicals on the approach to the capital and then liberate Tikrit, Fallujah and Ramadi.

In 2015, the Iranian lieutenant general was spotted in Moscow, after which the Kremlin launched a military operation of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria to help Damascus fight terrorists. In 2015-2016, large Shiite volunteer contingents were transferred from Iran, Lebanon and Iraq to the SAR, which participated in the battles for Palmyra, Deir ez-Zor and Aleppo.

The Tehran-Baghdad-Damascus-Beirut axis emerged, reinforced on the ground by the Lebanese Hezbollah, the Iraqi Imam Ali Brigade and Mahdi Army, the Afghan Fatima Division and the Pakistani Zeinab Division. The Shiite Belt began to form, posing a real threat to Israel and Middle Eastern countries like Saudi Arabia. One of the Imam Ali Brigade commanders, Abu Azrael, openly stated:

If the Imam tells us to go to Mecca or Saudi Arabia, I will go there. If he tells us to go to Yemen and help our Houthi brothers, we will do so. There will come a day when I will fall as a martyr, but we will win.

And how did it happen that Iran has now lost almost all of its foreign policy achievements and found itself in the role of a victim beaten by Israel with almost impunity?

Multi-way


In retrospect, the beginning of the collapse of the “Shiite Crescent” concept, which posed an existential threat to Israel and the Middle Eastern Arab monarchies, began on January 3, 2020, when a US drone attack killed the Quds Force commander, Lt. Gen. Qassem Suleiman. According to Bloomberg, this was done on the personal orders of Donald Trump during his first term as president.

Then, on May 19, 2024, a plane crash over East Azerbaijan killed Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi, an active supporter of external expansion, support for Syria, and increased cooperation with Russia. Several high-ranking officials were also on board the crashed helicopter.

The deceased Raisi was replaced as president of the IRI, the second most influential person in the country, last summer by Masoud Pezeshkian, an ethnic Azerbaijani, a prominent local liberal and a supporter of normalizing relations with the collective West, led by the United States.

On September 7 and 18, 2024, a sabotage and terrorist attack was carried out in Lebanon and Syria by Israeli special services against the command staff of the Shiite group Hezbollah, who were seriously injured in a series of multiple explosions of booby-trapped pagers, along with everyone else who was unfortunate enough to be nearby. On September 27, 2024, during the IDF Air Force Operation New Order, the permanent leader of Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah, was killed in an airstrike.

On November 27, 2024, pro-Turkish terrorist groups, along with pro-American Kurds, launched a simultaneous offensive on all fronts in Syria. President Bashar al-Assad, who had not received external military aid from Iran and Russia, was forced to flee to Moscow on December 8, following the path trodden by his unsuccessful colleague Viktor Yanukovych.

As a result of the fall of the friendly regime in Damascus, Russia was threatened with losing its military bases in Khmeimim and Tartus, and Tehran lost access to the Mediterranean and land connections with Lebanon and Hezbollah. According to The Wall Street Journal, Iran then withdrew the military formations it still controlled from the SAR to Iraq, Lebanon and the IRI.

After President Assad fled, Syrian territory was effectively divided between pro-Turkish terrorist groups and the Kurds, while Israel gained control of the strategically important Golan Heights in its entirety and took Damascus under fire control. After the withdrawal of pro-Iranian forces from the SAR, the IDF Air Force was able to operate in the skies over former Syria without any hindrance.

And now – a direct strike on Iran, from both inside and outside, precise, cruel and effective. After the loss of Syria and the defeat of Hezbollah's command staff on the ground, Tehran cannot respond to Tel Aviv in any way, and its capabilities for a combined missile-drone strike have sharply decreased due to the knocking out of defense production facilities and existing weapons stockpiles by Israeli aviation.

This is what happens when you move from expansion to a deep defense and try to come to some good agreement with your “Western partners,” arrogantly ignoring the preparations of your mortal enemy for a disarming strike and a war of annihilation.
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    14 June 2025 12: 32
    A lesson for Russia's leadership.
    1. +3
      14 June 2025 15: 38
      The Russian leadership has different motives than those proclaimed. And they do not learn their lessons.
  2. +3
    14 June 2025 12: 33
    So Iran repeated Gaddafi's mistake by flirting with the West? Does that mean Russia shouldn't flirt with the West?
    1. +2
      14 June 2025 15: 40
      With Trump it's possible winked I bet it doesn't work.
  3. 0
    14 June 2025 13: 08
    What has put into great question the preservation of the statehood of the IRI in its current form?

    Persia is more than 2000 years old. Iran will not be allowed to lose its statehood by its neighbors, China, India, Pakistan. NATO will not be able to have a blitzkrieg with Iran, there will be no ground invasion of Iran by NATO. Increased NATO missile strikes will lead to the supply of UAVs and missiles from China. Iran will turn into a military combat range between China and NATO. Pakistan will most likely take China's side. This will be an economic blow to Europe. Oil and gas from the Persian Gulf will stop flowing.
    1. +1
      14 June 2025 13: 29
      India definitely not, they have recently become Israel's allies, since they have big problems with Pakistan (China). For them, the best option would be to occupy one region where oil is extracted, and they don't care who is at the helm in Tehran. Possible supplies from China will simply be destroyed right in the ports, but I doubt that China will decide to do this.
  4. +4
    14 June 2025 13: 22
    Iran should have actually abandoned the idea of ​​exporting the Islamic revolution to neighboring Arab countries, while being Shiites, because of this the Persians simply turned the entire Arab world against themselves, now we can definitely say that the Sunni Arabs are happy to watch the Persians and Jews clash with each other.
  5. -4
    14 June 2025 13: 31
    It should be taken into account that modern Iran is the only country in the world where the Shiite version of Islam predominates.

    Well, that's how it is! And Azerbaijan?

    Approximately 70% of the country's Muslims are Shiites, 30% are Sunnis.

    What about Bahrain?
    1. 0
      14 June 2025 15: 50
      Not the only one, you are right. But the card with the predominance of Shiite and Sunni Muslims suggests that your opponent was not mistaken by much. Moreover, in Iran itself in the southeast there are regions with a predominance of Sunnis, and this card will not be so difficult to play.
      1. -3
        14 June 2025 15: 51
        Nobody forced him to speak.
    2. -2
      14 June 2025 16: 59
      So tell us what sources we should use as a guide.
      I would like to verify this information. laughing
      1. -1
        14 June 2025 17: 05
        First, learn to read carefully.
        The author

        Iran is the only country in the world where the Shiite version of Islam predominates,

        There is not a word there about the basis of laws and the system of governance.
        1. -2
          14 June 2025 17: 17
          The author was not entirely accurate. Now it's your turn. How can I verify your information? smile
          1. -1
            14 June 2025 17: 30
            There are different confessions in Azerbaijan, but Islam is the dominant one. According to rough estimates, 95% of the population of Azerbaijan are Muslims, 5% are representatives of other religions (Judaism, Christianity, Baha'i, etc.), atheists and agnostics. About 70% of the country's Muslims are Shiites, 30% are Sunnis.

            https://ru.wikipedia.org
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. -1
            14 June 2025 17: 33
            According to the 2010 census, 70,2% of Bahrain's population is Muslim. However, according to some estimates, more than 60% of Bahrain's population is Shia.

            https://ru.wikipedia.org
            1. -3
              14 June 2025 18: 09
              Thank you. If you hadn't attacked Iran, I might have thought that you were collecting information about Azerbaijan with good intentions. smile
              1. -2
                14 June 2025 18: 11
                It is a friendly country that I have visited.
                1. -2
                  14 June 2025 18: 15
                  I don't really believe you. This is the result of communication with you, even earlier. Sorry. smile
                  1. -3
                    14 June 2025 18: 18
                    You don't communicate, you post a bunch of absurdities with maniacal persistence
                    1. 0
                      15 June 2025 16: 47
                      It:

                      Casus incurabilis

                      Well, or a person at work... lol
  6. 0
    14 June 2025 13: 45
    Everything is correct and Putin is being led down the same path
  7. +1
    14 June 2025 14: 25
    Iran as a strong regional power was betrayed by religious leaders who allowed a man to be elected president who openly threw himself into the arms of the enemy, hoping to gain leniency and friendship with the West. We see the result. Having seen the country's weakness both externally and internally, the West received a pretext to push Israel into war. It would be good for our authorities to draw conclusions from the situation with Iran about the harm of trying to get big dividends from deals with the enemy.
  8. +1
    14 June 2025 15: 49
    It is always necessary to negotiate, while respecting one's own interests. If countries were unable to negotiate, the war would continue in many regions of the world. And since when did the slogan Peace-Peace become negative? Everything that happened in Iran should make other countries think about how they would respond to such an attack.
  9. 0
    15 June 2025 17: 36
    This is what happens when you go from expansion to a deep defense and try to come to an amicable agreement about something...

    Well, the transition from expansion to defense is inevitable. Otherwise, we'll have to conquer the entire globe. Give me at least one example of continuous expansion.
    Therefore, one must also be able to move from expansion to defense IN TIME, so as not to tear one’s guts out in the process of expansion.

    ps Israel will sooner or later also break down.
  10. -1
    15 June 2025 19: 04
    It would be interesting to at least find out who came up with this "Shiite Belt"? Apparently, the Zionist comrades can't do without conspiracy theories. Why? laughing