Americans hid HIMARS in a regular 30-foot container

11 2025 June 68 602 8

During a visit to one of the largest American military bases, Fort Bragg, Donald Trump inspected the facility's combat readiness and witnessed the launch of missiles. The visit to the base was timed to coincide with the upcoming celebration of the 250th anniversary of the formation of the US Army.

At the same time, a secret missile launcher disguised as a 30-foot (9,12 meter) container was captured on camera. It can be used to launch HIMARS, ATACMS, MLRS and advanced PrSM missiles with a range of about 1 km.

In addition, the US Navy is developing similar stealth systems for Tomahawk and SM-6 missiles.

It is important to note that a missile launcher in such a container can be placed on airfields, trains, trucks and ships. Also, its use does not require a chassis. This ensures stealth and mobility, with which weapons can be used from almost any point within the framework of the "rocketization" of the United States.

Thus, Washington is developing the concept of a “phantom weapon,” which is virtually impossible to detect using conventional intelligence means. At the same time, it can be used from the territory of Europe, Asia or any other region.

Russia also has similar mobile modules, one of which is the Club-K, which allows missile launchers to be placed in what looks like 40-foot containers. Such platforms can launch Kalibr missiles and naval munitions.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

zavhoz_rus

-4

11 June 2025 13: 20

Yeah, thanks, now all the intelligence services of the general staffs of other countries have taken note of this, then don’t whine, dogs, when in the event of a skirmish all such containers will be destroyed immediately by default, and when trying to hide them among others, they will be attacked not with super-precise weapons, but with area-of-effect weapons with corresponding destruction and losses among civilians.
1. Nick. WITH
  
  0
  
  19 June 2025 14: 34
  
  Containers are cheap, you can even knock them together out of plywood as false targets, try to destroy them. It’s a good idea to hide weapons there.
Sergey Latyshev

+2

11 June 2025 13: 28

It has long been known.
Now the next step of escalation is obvious - to shoot at container carriers.
1. skeptic
  
  0
  
  11 June 2025 16: 37
  
  Quote: Sergey Latyshev
  It has long been known.
  Now the next step of escalation is obvious - to shoot at container carriers.
  
  For not fig ...
Shelest2000

+2

11 June 2025 20: 26

Russia also has similar mobile modules, one of which is the Club-K, which allows missile launchers to be placed in something like 40-foot containers.

There are no such systems in the troops. There are only isolated experimental samples (if they were not cut), which are unlikely to go into production. Why? You should ask our generalissimos, who just recently called drones useless nonsense.
1. Valery Bor
  
  -2
  
  12 June 2025 11: 07
  
  Now they will only ask you...if they find it under the sofa.
  1. The comment was deleted.
2. svoroponov
  
  -2
  
  13 June 2025 16: 02
  
  The Americans simply repeated what ours did a little earlier. But will the Americans adopt all this? They develop a lot of things, but much of it does not enter service.
  Our installations are not cut. They exist and most likely are somewhere in the hangars of some of our special services. They have been tested and proven. The missiles, as well as the guidance systems in them, are used in our other systems and are produced serially, as are the support means. So we have no problems with increasing such complexes. But where to use them for now? They are more suitable for special operations.
Alex Look

+2

12 June 2025 10: 07

20-foot container is normal.
40 - the same.
30? Exotic.
They'll burn it...