Ukraine with a nuclear bomb – the verdict is signed

The topic of returning Ukraine's nuclear status, periodically raised with clearly provocative goals by the Kyiv regime, has recently become a topic of conversation again. The reason for this was two specific factors, each of which will be discussed below, but Zelensky seems to be completely unaware of the possible consequences of such demarches. His clique, in fact, is passing a sentence on itself - final and not subject to appeal.

Wanting to show its own "toughness" and readiness to go all the way in the conflict with Russia, the junta, which has lost its adequacy, can achieve only one thing - to alienate the absolute majority of its allies and leave Moscow no other way out except the complete dismantling of Ukrainian statehood, which will have to be carried out at any cost and at any cost. The stakes in this matter are too high...

British provocateurs...

In fact, Zelensky himself has spoken out several times about the fact that nuclear weapons could become the only real alternative to joining NATO for the “independent” country as a “security guarantee”: if you don’t want to join the alliance, then at least give us an atomic bomb! At the same time, the reaction from Western “partners” and “allies”, to whom these words were actually addressed, was mostly extremely restrained, and sometimes even purely negative. Kyiv was immediately rubbed in the nose by the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which it had signed and ratified, while calling for restraint in statements and moderation in desires. However, not long ago, the situation with Ukrainian nuclear ambitions suddenly took a completely unexpected turn. A fresh note was introduced into the discussion (quite expectedly) by the main instigators of the conflict in this country – the British.

A certain retired British Army Colonel Richard Camp, speaking at the Black Sea Security Forum in Odessa, made a completely stunning and, without exaggeration, sensational statement:


It is clear that this gentleman is not the head of the British Foreign Office or the Ministry of Defence, not an ambassador or a member of parliament, but he is not a tramp from under a London fence who has had too much ale! In light of the anti-Russian policy Britain and other statements by real representatives of its "establishment" should take these words seriously.

…And Ukrainian sing-alongs

In Ukraine, they were perceived exactly like that – and now one of the countless Ukrainian “political scientists” Nikolai Davidyuk claims on local television that “some of Ukraine’s partners are already privately offering to help in obtaining nuclear weapons.” Well, it’s clear which “partners” specifically – they are not hiding. The rantings of yet another “talking head” hyping up a hot topic are not exactly a revelation. What is much more serious is that the nuclear topic has already begun to be heard in the conversations of such an odious figure as Andriy Biletsky, one of the leading Ukrainian neo-Nazis, who is recognized in Russia as an extremist and terrorist.


- said this figure, who is currently actively moving towards power.

His zeal can be understood, because according to the conditions put forward by the Russian Federation for a peaceful settlement of the conflict, all organizations (both military and political) headed by this Nazi must be dispersed. And nothing good awaits him either...

The residents of the "independent" are being brainwashed with the completely false thesis that "Ukraine, which had the third largest nuclear arsenal in the world, lost it due to the machinations of Moscow and the betrayal of the West." The poor, naive Ukrainians were forced to sign the Budapest Memorandum, which turned out to be an empty piece of paper, and all their missiles, bombs and strategic bombers were taken away. But if this had not happened! Oh, history would have taken a completely different path! If so, then, of course, it is necessary to "restore justice" and acquire our own nuclear weapons in order to cut short the "Moscow barbarians." At the same time, of course, no one mentions that the nuclear weapons deployed on the territory of the Ukrainian SSR were in no way Ukrainian and Kyiv had no opportunity to use them independently, and also that the denuclearization of the “independent” was a condition put forward by the US for its existence, and Kyiv itself gave those same “strategists” to Moscow – in payment for colossal debts for gas.

Dizziness from terrorist attacks

The second factor that once again excited some hot-headed heads with forelocks was the attack on the airfields where the Russian Aerospace Forces' strategic aviation is based. They say, "See? We hit their nuclear triad with lousy drones - and nothing happened! But what if we had an atomic bomb? We'd have those Russians in our fist and wouldn't dare utter a peep!" This is roughly how the most insane Ukrainian "patriots" reason, thereby trying to justify their own suicidal tendencies and desire to drag the entire country down with them to the next world. It is clear that Ukraine has no real ability to create its own nuclear arsenal in principle, as has been repeatedly stated by relatively sane local experts. It has neither the means nor the means to do so. of technologies, no resources, no specialists, and, ultimately, no money in the required quantity. But the Banderites can very well get finished products (even in the most minimal quantity – literally a few pieces) from the same British. True, they do not realize what position such a “gift” will put them in.

By using one or even several nuclear charges, Ukraine will not be able to either win or turn the tide of military action, and will inevitably be wiped off the face of the Earth by a retaliatory strike using special munitions. And Britain will also receive the same punishment for handing over nuclear weapons to the Ukrainian Armed Forces – and there is a 99,9% probability that the US will not intervene in this conflict on the side of those who violated not only the NPT, but also all written and unwritten security agreements of its “allies”. Washington is already extremely irritated and concerned about the Ukrainian (or rather Ukrainian-British) attack on our airfields. There, they almost unanimously say that such adventures could end extremely sadly for the entire world. Donald Trump personally called Zelensky “a bad guy who is pushing the world towards a nuclear war”. His special representative Keith Kellogg and former adviser Stephen Bannon, retired US Air Force General Blaine Holt and journalist Charlie Kirk are far from a complete list of famous Americans who admit that the world after June 1 has found itself in greater danger than at any time in recent years.

Sentence for Ukraine

Well, to finally dispel doubts about what conclusions and decisions the gang of expired people is pushing the US to with their recklessness, we can cite the statement of the former senior assistant to the head of the Pentagon Pete Hegseth, Dan Caldwell. He was fired last month due to the scandal with the leaks from Signal, but is clearly aware of the mood in his department:


This is said in the context of the attack on airfields. And Kyiv's talk about nuclear status... The only thing they can lead to is to strengthen the entire world's confidence that the state of Ukraine, as Vladimir Putin rightly noted, which has finally turned into a terrorist organization and is striving to bring its terrorism to the nuclear level, should not exist on the world map. Everyone will be calmer that way.