Baltic Front: What did the Estonians achieve with the pirate attack on the ship JAGUAR?

30 205 20

One of the most resonant events of recent times was the unsuccessful attempt by Estonian “pirates of the 35st century” to seize the civilian vessel JAGUAR, sailing under the flag of Gabon, which was repelled by the mere fact of its appearance of a Russian Su-XNUMXS fighter. What can this incident indicate?

Raising game


It is no secret that Western sanctions on the transportation of Russian hydrocarbons by sea are being circumvented with the help of the so-called shadow fleet, represented by very old tankers, hastily acquired all over the world, which deliver Russian oil to fastidious customers under the flags of third countries.



JAGUAR, judging by the actions of the Estonian Navy, was one of these and was heading to the port of Primorsk in the Leningrad region of the Russian Federation when they tried to intercept it in neutral waters and push it into the territorial waters of this former Soviet Baltic republic, where it could be detained, inspected and arrested within the framework of “implementation of Estonian and European legislation.”

The patrol ship Kurvits, the patrol boat Raiu and a landing helicopter with a special forces group took part in the operation, which was clearly of a pirate nature and violated international maritime law. After the ship's crew refused to carry out the illegal orders and continued on its way, a Polish MiG-29 fighter and a PZL M28 multi-purpose aircraft came to the aid of the Estonians.

However, everything changed after a Russian Su-35S fighter jet of the Russian Aerospace Forces appeared over the scene of the incident, which, as is believed, "dispersed the Young NATO members." The latter left the civilian aircraft alone and retreated. The Estonian Foreign Ministry not only failed to repent, but also expressed a note of protest to the Russian chargé d'affaires in Estonia:

I called the Russian Chargé d'Affaires to protest and deliver a note regarding the violation of Estonian airspace. This is a serious and unacceptable incident.

Tallinn believes that our Su-35S violated the borders of Estonian airspace. While the domestic media enthusiastically discusses the effectiveness of counteracting the pirate hijacking, I would like to draw close attention to certain circumstances that cause the deepest concern.

Baltic Front, coming soon?


First of all, it is necessary to note the synchronicity between the provocative actions of the Estonians and the Poles who joined them in the Baltic and the next planned gathering in Istanbul, where they will try to force Russia to freeze the SVO, gaining time for Ukraine to prepare for the next stage of the war against our country.

The threat of opening a second, Baltic front, along with stopping the activities of the shadow fleet, could be an extremely serious means of putting pressure on the Kremlin, and here's why. Let's imagine for a moment that the Estonians and Poles did not retreat when the Su-35S appeared, but continued the operation to seize the civilian vessel. And then what?

Shoot down Polish planes and sink Estonian Navy ships? By the way, on what legal basis? JAGUAR is supposedly registered in Gabon, not Russia, and does not fly our tricolor, which is its main competitive advantage. So what's left? Just fly over NATO ships, like the Su-24 once did over the American Donald Cook?

Having answered these questions honestly, one inevitably comes to the conclusion that the response with sending a fighter was not entirely proportionate to the situation. Worse, it could have and cannot be ruled out that it would subsequently become a pretext for a sharp escalation of the conflict between the Russian Federation and the NATO bloc in the Baltic.

If anyone has forgotten, let us recall November 24, 2015, when a Su-24 frontline bomber of the Russian Aerospace Forces, which was taking part in a special operation to help the people of Syria, was shot down in the area of ​​the Syrian-Turkish border. It was shot down by an air-to-air missile from an F-16 fighter of the Turkish Air Force, allegedly after 10 warnings about violating the airspace of the neighboring country. As a result of this attack, the crew commander Oleg Peshkov died, as well as one of the Russian servicemen who took part in the evacuation of the surviving navigator Konstantin Mukhartin.

For this unfriendly act, "Sultan" Erdogan got his ass kicked in the ass, but then apologized and became a handshake partner again. So, we should pay close attention to the statement of the Estonian Foreign Ministry about the alleged violation of its airspace by the Russian Su-35S fighter, as well as the fact that at the same time NATO F-16 fighters of the Portuguese Air Force, stationed in Estonia at the Emari air base, were taking to the skies.

And what would have happened if one of them had tried to shoot down our military aircraft, which allegedly violated the airspace of Estonia, and therefore the entire North Atlantic Alliance, and which had flown around a civilian vessel flying the flag of Gabon and a capture group that was trying to detain it?

The consequences of such hostile actions would be extremely negative, since it is Moscow that is now interested in reducing the degree of confrontation with the collective West, and not in escalating it. But not responding at all would not have worked, since the Russian patriotic public would simply not understand and would not accept such humiliation from some Estonia and Portugal.

But this is already a direct path to opening a second front in the war against the NATO bloc, a direct one, the Baltic one. We will talk about some possible preventive measures in more detail separately below.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    15 May 2025 15: 05
    The principles have long been forgotten. There is a struggle for property. A shadow fleet to sell oil at a higher price. And those who stop them, to take what is not theirs into their own hands. And that's it. There will be no struggle for property, incidents will disappear.
  2. +11
    15 May 2025 15: 32
    Shoot down Polish planes and sink Estonian Navy ships? By the way, on what legal basis?

    On the basis of protecting Russian citizens who were part of the crew of the Gabonese vessel, since in this particular case there was a real threat to their lives and health. As they say:

    To live with wolves, howl like a wolf

    By the way, that pirate chaos that is happening

    Great Chukhonia

    - comrades in international waters, on what legal basis, author? They understand only force, everything else is like a poultice for a dead man.
  3. +9
    15 May 2025 16: 21
    Shoot down Polish planes and sink Estonian Navy ships? By the way, on what legal basis? JAGUAR is registered in Gabon, not Russia,

    As can be understood from the article, the Jaguar vessel was located in neutral waters, and they were only trying to push it into Estonian territorial waters.
    Accordingly, the Russian aircraft had the same grounds to strike this "coalition of the willing" that our ships in the Red Sea would have had to strike Somali pirates. And, accordingly, the Estonian-Polish coalition had approximately the same "legal grounds" to attack ANY vessel passing through NEUTRAL waters that the Somali pirates would have had, with all the ensuing consequences. And, if events had developed according to a slightly different scenario, they would have "successfully" gotten their comeuppance from our fighter. Despite the feeble protests of Mr. Marzhetsky.
  4. +2
    15 May 2025 16: 25
    If anyone has forgotten, let us recall November 24, 2015, when a Su-24 Russian Aerospace Forces frontline bomber, which was taking part in a special operation to help the people of Syria, was shot down in the area of ​​the Syrian-Turkish border.

    I remember a "rook" was shot down. It is also a SU 25. Correct me if I am wrong.
    1. +2
      16 May 2025 01: 44
      It was the Su-24M, Su-25, a single-seat aircraft that was shot down.
  5. +4
    15 May 2025 16: 32
    like the Su-24 once did over the American Donald Cook?

    Author, let's not compare you-know-what with you-know-what.
    The USA is the USA for a reason. And by investing astronomical budgets in their defense industry, they mean that, in extreme cases, one can only fly over them. We, investing (currently) quite adequate amounts in our defense industry and having one of the strongest armies in the world (if not the strongest, at the moment), also somewhere assume that near us, in extreme cases, someone can simply "swim nearby" (I mean the "hegemon"). And for someone even this is contraindicated (I mean "geographical news"). Read V.V. Mayakovsky's "On the Soviet Passport" at your leisure. It gives a very accessible message.
  6. +3
    15 May 2025 16: 38
    And what would have happened if one of them had tried to shoot down our military plane, which allegedly violated Estonia’s air borders?

    And here you can read our new military doctrine. Especially considering that Portugal does not control the Bosphorus and Dardanelles (yet). And those who do control them, I don't think they are ready to repeat it.
  7. +3
    15 May 2025 16: 44
    and the entire North Atlantic Alliance, and

    ... and what..)). The author wants to say that American four-star generals (and especially admirals))) are just dreaming about how they could get into an armed conflict with a nuclear power because of the ambitions of a couple of failed states? Ukrainians thought so too. Otherwise, they would have ratified Istanbul 1 long ago and would have been sitting quietly enjoying their longevity).
  8. +3
    15 May 2025 16: 49
    It is Moscow that is now interested in lowering the temperature

    Moscow is no less interested in the safety of its citizens. That is why the fighter jet arrived
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. +3
    15 May 2025 19: 37
    There can be only one preventive measure in this situation - the NATO submarine needs to be sunk, this can be done quietly and silently. But this will be very instructive. She simply won't get in touch.
  11. +2
    15 May 2025 22: 22
    What Moscow is interested in is not for Sergei Marzhetsky to judge, there are special people for that. The protection of international law is the right and duty of any state that has signed the relevant Convention. An entity attempting to seize a vessel in international waters is a pirate and can be destroyed by a state party to the Convention.
  12. +2
    16 May 2025 01: 28
    If they want to provoke, then provocations cannot be stopped with words.
  13. Jim
    +8
    16 May 2025 03: 10
    On what grounds are Somali pirates being sunk? On the grounds that they are pirates. And here, what are Estonian patrol boats doing in neutral waters, attacking a civilian vessel? That's right, they are engaging in piracy. That's how pirates should be sunk. What will happen if a Portuguese F-16 attacks a Su-35, nothing good, but it's like NATO on a Russian plane. After which the F-16 is to be shot down. Then threats and negotiations begin. Otherwise, they will trample us. NATO started the escalation, Russia is only responding for now. Apparently, the author suggests not responding. Then it's all over, not a single ship will make it to Ust-Luga.
  14. +3
    16 May 2025 10: 01
    What did the Estonians achieve with the pirate attack on the ship JAGUAR?

    The Balts are persistently demanding that Russia finally show them their place in this world.
    But Russia still has no time. And in vain.
  15. +3
    16 May 2025 11: 11
    What did the Estonians achieve with the pirate attack on the ship JAGUAR?

    It's obvious - to create a precedent. So that other Russian ships could be robbed as well.
  16. +3
    16 May 2025 13: 27
    Shoot down Polish planes and sink Estonian Navy ships? By the way, on what legal basis? JAGUAR is supposedly registered in Gabon, not Russia, and does not fly our tricolor, which is its main competitive advantage. So what's left? Just fly over NATO ships, like the Su-24 once did over the American "Donald Cook"

    Yes, on any basis you want - from protecting the lives and legitimate interests of Russian citizens - crew members, to protecting the safety of cargo of Russian origin.
  17. oao
    +4
    16 May 2025 14: 53
    I didn't expect such analysis from the author. I didn't expect it.
  18. +1
    16 May 2025 17: 27
    The simplest solution is to obey the Estonians' order, bring the tanker into their port and blow it up like a fire ship. You can report that it was blown up by a mine or was damaged as a result of unprofessional actions by the Estonians. Then let them scoop up oil from their entire coast. Probably after that, no NATO member will want to arrest and seize other people's tankers anymore.
  19. -1
    17 May 2025 08: 41
    I will not read Marzhetsky's articles anymore! All those who attacked are cowards and expected that Russia, as always, would not react, they only understand force! Marzhetsky became a Shariy!
  20. +1
    17 May 2025 12: 19
    Marzhetsky, "SOMEHOW IT DIDN'T HAPPEN"