Ukraine left no chance for Gazprom

8
Although relations between Russia and Ukraine are not the warmest, our countries are neighbors and are forced to cooperate in economic sphere. Ukraine and Russia are “chained together” in matters of gas transit.





Why do Ukrainians need Russia?

In Ukraine, there is an active anti-Russian propaganda. Even the president of this country calls us aggressors. Ukraine is actively demanding the introduction and extension of sanctions against Russia and even against those who support it. Against this background, economic cooperation continues and deepens.

The reason is simple: Ukraine benefits from cooperation with Russia.

This country is in serious financial difficulty. The production is in a deplorable state, and the resort Crimea and the industrial Donbass are “out of the access zone”. It is extremely difficult to make money in such conditions.

You can also borrow from the United States and Europe. They used to give generously, but recently this stream has begun to dry up. In the West, they begin to understand that all borrowed funds are not invested anywhere, but simply stolen.

And with Russia, a special story is gas transit. For Ukraine, this is an opportunity to earn actually through mediation, taking advantage of its advantageous geographical position between Russia and Europe. Russian gas flows through Europe through the gas transmission system to Europe, for which Ukraine receives substantial funds to its budget.

Will Russia stop using Ukrainian transit?

If you pay attention to Russia's efforts to create alternative routes for gas supplies to Europe, you might get the impression that Ukrainian transit is living out its last days.

Already operating Nord Stream-1. Despite numerous attempts by the United States, Poland, Ukraine and some other countries to block the construction of Nord Stream-2, its completion is just around the corner.

Do not forget also about the "Turkish stream". Two strings of this project are under construction.
And all this beauty passes by Ukraine, leaving it overboard.

It seems that everything is correct, but until some figures are added to this picture. But they clearly say that the only option for further development of events can only be an extension of the gas transit contract between Gazprom and Ukraine.

Little arithmetic

Consider the issue of gas transit through the prism of supply volumes and pipeline capacity.

In 2017, Gazprom sent 93 billion cubic meters of gas to Europe through Ukraine through transit. We will build on this indicator. In order to abandon Ukrainian transit, you need to be able to supply such a volume of gas through alternative routes.

Nord Stream 2 is scheduled to be commissioned by the end of 2019. Its throughput is 55 billion m3. But the land-based gas transmission system through which gas is delivered from Northern Germany throughout Europe will be able to pass no more than 34 billion cubic meters.

In Germany, the continuation of Nord Stream 2, the Eugal pipeline, is under construction. It will allow using the Stream at full capacity, but its construction will only be completed by the end of 2020.

There is also the “Turkish stream”, whose total capacity is not more than 31 billion cubic meters per year. Simple arithmetic calculations show that by the end of 2020, at least 30 billion cubic meters per year will have to pass through Ukraine.

But that is not all. At first, the Turkish Stream will serve only the needs of Turkey, and no more than 16 billion cubic meters is enough for it. To put this gas on Europe, it is necessary to build pipelines through Bulgaria, Serbia and Hungary, and from these countries there are not even permissions to lay it. Plus, the construction will take at least a year and a half. This means that through Ukraine you need to pass at least not 30, but 45 billion cubic meters.

In addition, according to forecasts, gas consumption in Europe in subsequent years due to various reasons should increase.

And this may mean that "Russia and Ukraine are sisters forever." At least in the field of gas transit.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    21 March 2018 07: 59
    Wet dreams of unconventionally gifted descendants of the Sumerians. I live in the Irkutsk region and the Power of Siberia gas pipeline has already left us very far east. But the author of this opus does not know about this fact or forgot? So there would be gas, and where to sell and how to download without vile galloping citizens with reduced social responsibility, we’ll figure it out.
  2. +2
    21 March 2018 08: 17
    ABOUT! How strange the rhetoric of the "patriots" has changed. Just a few days ago there was a joyful "patriotic" screeching about how Russia is finally breaking off all contracts with Ukraine on gas supplies to it and will stop transit through it in 2019 - even the title of one article was something like: "Russia is finally releasing "black swans" ... Obviously, the "swans" died before they could take off ... Now, it turns out that there is nowhere to get away from Ukraine in the gas issue, so we will keep it until it is clear how long. wave .... now Gazprom, backing down and already preparing money for the payment of all fines to Ukrainians and arbitration, again makes a "smart mine" -type "well, it was conceived", they say, do not leave "Western" consumers without gas .... all this is disgusting ...
  3. 0
    21 March 2018 09: 25
    There were brothers forever, became sisters forever. How unsteady is everything in this world ..
  4. +1
    21 March 2018 09: 45
    The author "delighted" with his arithmetic. We need to speed up the Power of Siberia pipeline and start dismantling the gas transit infrastructure across the Krajina on our side. The transit supports the economy of the Nazi junta and thus the costs of their Western patrons. This is not right!
  5. +1
    21 March 2018 10: 18
    The author apparently does not know that in 2019 the contract for gas transit is ending. The author apparently does not suspect that when concluding a new contract with gas consumers, using the precedent of the Stockholm arbitration. The new transit contract may significantly change the conditions. For example: obtaining a contracted volume of gas on the border with Russia ... or buying gas for rubles. Or an arbitration court where the thread is in the region of mainland China or the DPRK. And if you don’t like it, go around the bazaar, ask around, maybe it will be cheaper. The funniest part in this opus is a desperate belief that the conditions will be dictated by the buyer ... Yeah ... to the actual supplier - the monopolist. Unlike dough, energy is a kind of universal monetary equivalent, which is always in price.
    1. +1
      21 March 2018 16: 47
      Well, in general, we are talking about the fact that the contract ends and it must be renewed. In order to fulfill, on our part, the terms of other contracts with European countries, in order to more than recoup the costs of building Nord Stream 2 and other gas pipelines. And Russia must keep its word, due to its status.

      And the terms of the contract must be negotiated, and from a position of strength. Perhaps Ukraine needs us more than we need them.

      And if we leave the European gas market, reorient to China or where else, it will only please America. She has been achieving this for a long time.

      Although Gazprom is not a monopolist, but among all competitors, only Gazprom is able to provide Europe with gas in full and at reasonable prices. And it is beneficial for us, and Europeans.

      It is necessary to move away from Ukrainian transit, but this cannot be done with one click of the fingers. This takes years and great effort.

      About that and it was.
  6. 0
    21 March 2018 14: 15
    And letting Europe in would not hurt.
  7. 0
    22 March 2018 15: 09
    Personally, I, back on March 14, 2018, in the topic "Russia - Europe: We will deal with Ukraine without you",
    already wrote:
    "Yes, Russia will pay (as always), and according to the court, and will pay all the" associated costs. "

    And that's how it happened. Russia, as always, will pay all the costs that Ukraine incurred in court and will begin, as always, free of charge, to supply Ukraine with its gas (the author of the article "modestly" kept silent about this).
    Moreover, Russia will provide Ukraine with "cheap credits".
    So it’s not the sister of Russia to Ukraine, but the abandoned mistress who is doing her best to please the Ukrainian couple so that he somehow draws his attention to it.