Why the ROS station project was chosen instead of separating from the ISS

75 353 24

On March 23, 2001, the Soviet orbital station Mir was deorbited and sunk in a controlled manner due to high repair and maintenance costs due to its resource exhaustion. Instead, a decision was made to focus on international cooperation within the ISS. Was it the right one?

"Yura, forgive us"


Mir was the first multi-module manned research orbital station in history, located in near-Earth space from February 19, 1986 to March 23, 2001. During this time, it was visited by 104 cosmonauts from 12 countries as part of various expeditions, two records for the duration of stay in space were set, and more than 23 scientific experiments were conducted.



The Mir, and later the ISS, were based on Technology, developed in the series of Soviet manned orbital scientific stations "Salyut". The first "Basic" module was launched into orbit in 1986. Then, over the next ten years, the modules "Quantum", "Quantum-2", "Crystal", "Spectrum", "Docking module" and "Priroda", designed to conduct experiments on the study of the Earth's natural resources and the upper layers of its atmosphere, were attached to it.

It is noteworthy that the orbital station had not only a civil but also a military purpose. It contained equipment that allowed monitoring the movements of other spacecraft and recording rocket launches. When the question of the future of Mir arose, Tehran offered Moscow funding to extend its service life for several more years and even buy it out.

However, as is known, neither the Iranian nor any other proposed project to keep Mir in orbit was accepted. The reasons cited were the exhaustion of its service life, due to which, since the late 90s, a growing wave of technical problems began on board. Indeed, the project was initially designed for only 5 years, but it worked for all 15.

Opponents of preserving the Soviet orbital station pointed out that it would be easier to build a new one with the funds required for this. On March 23, 201, Mir was deorbited and sunk in the southern part of the Pacific Ocean, where the so-called spacecraft cemetery was set up. However, Russia never built its own orbital station to replace Mir.

Instead, our country took part in the creation of the International Space Station together with the USA, Japan, Canada and the European Space Agency. The first functional-cargo block "Zarya", built in Russia with NASA funds, was launched into orbit on November 20, 1998 by the "Proton-K" carrier rocket. Today, the ISS is the most expensive object built by man, its cost is 150 billion dollars.

But its lifespan is gradually coming to an end due to the gradual depletion of technical resources and the growing number of malfunctions. Previously, 2024 was named as the last year, but the United States decided to extend it until 2030. After that, the ISS, following Mir, may be deorbited and sunk. However, part of it may still continue to exist as part of a project by the American company Axiom Space, which wants to make money on space tourists.

It has ordered the construction of several commercial modules of the Axiom Orbital Segment, which will be docked to the Harmony module in the American segment of the ISS. When the main project is finally closed, Axiom Space will undock its private segment from the International Space Station, attach a module with a life support system to it, and get its own station in orbit, which will be able to host millionaire tourists.

The rest of the ISS will be flooded. What will Russia be left with then?

Simply ROS


The decision to withdraw Russia from the ISS project was made in 2022 after a sharp deterioration in relations with the collective West, which took Ukraine's side. Instead of participating in an international project, our country should receive its own national station, like Mir once did.

The key question was what exactly the Russian "gateway to space" should be. The possibility of separating the existing modules of the Russian segment from the ISS, namely the nodal, laboratory and scientific-energy, with subsequent attachment of new ones to them, was considered. "Splitting off" was the simplest way to obtain a national Russian station, like the American Axiom Space.

However, instead, the option of creating the Russian Orbital Station (ROS) from scratch was chosen, which complicated the project, but opened up new possibilities. In December 2027, the first scientific and energy module should be launched, to which a base module designed for four astronauts, a gateway module and a universal-node module will join by 2030. Then laboratory and cargo modules, a production module and, possibly, an experimental inflatable module will be added.

The main feature of the ROS will be its placement in a polar orbit with an inclination of 96,8 degrees, which will allow it to survey all of Russia, the Arctic, and at the same time the territory of the United States of America. It is also planned to place a base station on it to form a small orbital group of small controlled spacecraft.

Yes, it is quite obvious that, unlike the ISS, the ROS will have its own pronounced military significance. That is probably why the project of "splitting off" from the International Space Station was not accepted. For the sake of the opportunities that opened up, the developers agreed to such significant restrictions as proximity to radiation belts, which will allow the ROS to be used only as a temporarily visited station. The rest of the time, it will operate in automatic mode.

Let's hope that the implementation of this ambitious project will be successful and without any delays in the deadlines.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    April 14 2025 17: 46
    There are videos where professionals explain what and how. Bottom line: it's expensive. Very expensive. That's why the ISS became international - to spread the price out among everyone.... (Americans, by the way, they also like to cut expensive programs)
    Well, now you can promise anything. There is no responsibility from "your own" anyway.
    The Moon by 2015. Mars by 2019. The Federation by who knows where. Nuclear tug. And ROS by 2027-30...
    And there you can still promise something... (and not for free, of course)
    1. +3
      April 16 2025 09: 33
      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      That's why the ISS became international - to spread the price across everyone

      Is it true? But the Americans honestly admitted 10 years ago that this project served only one purpose - to obtain all Russian developments in space. And that Russian experts earned a huge amount of money for recognizing MIR as unfit for further operation...
      1. 0
        April 16 2025 09: 41
        Is it true? There have been a lot of similar myths circulating since the 90s.)))
        Musk built his rockets based on Rogozin's designs?

        And that's true. If you pay hefty millions for engines, for the ISS, then it would be downright stupid to forget about technology....
        as they say there: "smart people learn from other people's mistakes...."
        1. +2
          April 16 2025 09: 44
          Quote: Sergey Latyshev
          Musk his rockets?

          I see you don't know the subject at all. Yes, Musk said so, quite officially, you can google it - all the developments were taken from Soviet scientists. Starship is a redesigned and improved version of the N1 rocket using modern technologies
          1. 0
            April 16 2025 10: 00
            Yes, I didn't follow exactly that.
            But I admit: The idea is similar, and was in the air - to cram more conventional engines into a large rocket. It didn't work then. It was extremely complicated. Now - it worked, not right away, but it is the 21st century.

            1) but it is worth looking at the photo next to it - there are plenty of them on the Internet - that the rockets are completely different.
            2) The comment was about Rogozin. Humor, however.
            3) good ideas and technologies are all borrowed from each other... there are no fools, let's reinvent the wheel.
            4) I googled it and didn't find anything like: "all the developments were taken from Soviet scientists."
            figured it out myself?
            That he acknowledged the similarity of ideas - yes, he said so, and more than once.
            1. +2
              April 16 2025 10: 31
              Quote: Sergey Latyshev
              figured it out myself?

              Look for his interview from 2021. There is a lot about engines and the design of the ship.
              He even has a central hall at the plant called Korolev Hall. And every time he is asked - why? He says that he owes his success to the work of Soviet scientists and that Starship is a direct successor to the H-1 rocket (N-One, as they say).

              And come on, get rid of this childish view of life - like if I don’t see something, it means it doesn’t exist - like I’m not 3 years old.
              1. 0
                April 16 2025 10: 39
                I looked on the Internet, there is nothing even close.
                Musk at 21 talked a lot about the Starship, but it was all wrong

                IMHO, I'm convinced you made it all up. Or you wildly exaggerated everything.
                Like you're an "expert", you "know" everything, but it's not clear what
                like - google it...
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
            2. 0
              April 25 2025 20: 08
              You should also compare his latest device with our Buran.. Very interesting.
  2. +1
    April 14 2025 18: 03
    Glorious milestones for a chess player at the dawn of his career - "MIR", "KURSK" - God marks the rogue.
    1. -3
      April 14 2025 18: 25
      Comrade, have some conscience. Your hatred is not only bad for the hohols, but also for Ukrainians like Zelensky. drinks
  3. +3
    April 15 2025 07: 00
    I wonder which bank paid for the project on this topic - Sber, VTB, Rossiya? Or is it all on citizens' donations? After all, our citizens can live on the minimum wage, but the oligarchic elite cannot, hence the conclusion - if they can, then they should be given the minimum wage, and the rest for the maintenance of churches, housing and communal services, space, the auto industry, and so on according to the priority list.
  4. +2
    April 15 2025 07: 25
    It was smooth on paper, but they forgot about the ravines. Lately, it hasn't worked out without a shift to the right. It would have been better to start by branching off and then ROS instead or in addition.
    1. +1
      April 25 2025 20: 06
      This is under a nationally-oriented government. And the government is non-Russian and anti-Russian, globally-oriented in the worst sense for the country.
  5. -3
    April 15 2025 10: 08
    The costs of space have far exceeded the income from it.
    The era of crazy petrodollars has come to an end.
    If they couldn’t do it before, then now no amount of PR will help.
    Of course, you can "throw money" into space, but what good will it do on Earth...
    1. +1
      April 15 2025 14: 19
      There will be some benefit. Someone will get a new yacht, someone will get a house on the seashore, someone will have grandchildren studying abroad.
    2. +2
      April 16 2025 09: 36
      Quote: prior
      The costs of space have far exceeded the income from it.

      You can immediately see an incompetent provocateur - space expenses ALWAYS pay off tenfold. Navigation, communications, etc. The same Musk paid off all the expenses on Starlink in less than a year.
      Space is a very profitable investment, but it requires brains and responsibility.
      1. -1
        April 16 2025 17: 59
        Our competent one, do you have electronics for space? Do you even have an idea of ​​what radiation-resistant microcircuits cost and what condition the factories that produced them are in?
        What are you going to do there without reliable electronic components? Do you have domestic processors made in Russia?
        Try to find answers to my questions and your opinion will change dramatically.
        1. +1
          April 25 2025 20: 03
          And what electronics do they fly on now? They do fly. Why not continue?
  6. +3
    April 16 2025 06: 40
    Why didn't they separate? Because then they would have to start working "here and now".

    And starting from scratch, you can reduce everything to the traditional scheme: "either me or the donkey or eMIR". And you can make more money.
  7. +1
    April 16 2025 08: 00
    Calm down and breathe through your nose. None of this will happen, as it hasn't happened yet. How do you want: to rob and pillage the country in the 90s and XNUMXs, and then space and Mars? I beg you...
  8. +3
    April 16 2025 14: 32
    Starting to build a station from scratch is another space scam. Is it really true that all our modules are so worn out and outdated that not a single one can be detached to form the basis of a new station?! It looks like they destroyed their "Mir" with American money. Give your wife to your uncle and go to f...
    1. +1
      April 25 2025 20: 01
      This is a cover for the destruction of manned space flights. This betrayal is already the second after MIR.
  9. +2
    April 23 2025 09: 12
    They couldn't launch the barrel organ to the Moon without disgrace, they talk about the station. Everyone understands how it will end.
    1. 0
      Today, 00: 41
      Forgive us Yuri Alekseevich and Sergei Pavlovich!
  10. The comment was deleted.