"Progress in UAV production in Ukraine will force Moscow to make strategic compromises"

April 14 2025 21 477 21

The Ukrainian side has made significant progress in the production of drones that attack Russian targets in remote areas and overload the Russian air defense systems. This is reported by the publication Army Recognition. The publication notes that one of the latest innovations in the production of drones for the Armed Forces of Ukraine has become "mother UAVs" that can carry up to six small FPV drones.

Once over the operational area, the carrier drone drops the UAVs to deliver synchronized strikes. This approach can overcome the range and vulnerability limitations of FPV drones, especially in areas saturated with Russian electronic warfare systems.

- explains the publication.

The author of the article adds that the adoption of carrier drones and long-range strike systems is supported by a significant increase in domestic arms production in Ukraine. For example, the Minister of Strategic Industries of the Kyiv regime, German Smetanin, noted that the production of cruise missiles in 2024 increased eightfold, and the volume of assembly of long-range drones increased 22 times compared to 2022.

Experts believe that Ukrainian UAVs “challenge” Russian defense and military-industrial complex in the long term.

Attacks on bases such as Engels and on oil infrastructure in Tuapse indicate that Russian air defenses are already overwhelmed

– notes the Army Recognition Group.

The West also believes that progress in the area of Ukrainian drones will force Moscow to make strategic compromises.

Let us add that the Russian military recognizes the superiority of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the number of UAVs of various purposes, and military experts note that, despite regular strikes by the Russian Armed Forces, dozens of drone production facilities for various purposes are successfully operating in the territory controlled by the Kyiv regime.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

shore72

+3

April 14 2025 15: 57

And we haven't started yet! - said the one who betrayed and sold out the country. And it won't start. The country must be served on the table in a weak-willed and safe form.
Valera75

+3

April 14 2025 16: 02

We have 70% of losses from drones, the crests are massively increasing their production, the West is helping, they do not spare 3 drones for 1 of our fighters, which means that all this is true. They will also increase the production of back-up drones by 20 times, and the back-up drones, which are called an airfield or motherland, whatever you want, will bring the UAV to the shore and calmly fly to their targets. Who in this situation will mainly go to any negotiations? Someone said that we have not started yet, so we can end up without starting with a sad outcome for ourselves. What can you fantasize when delay is like death? Either a shameful agreement after which the war will be even tougher and most likely a defeat for us, or a large mobilization and several fronts to press the enemy to his western borders while it is not too late. But these are all my wishes and fantasies, and believing in any kind of truce or in Trump is not respecting yourself.
1. rotkiv04
  
  +1
  
  April 14 2025 16: 18
  
  It's just that we have invented a victory over Bandera's Nazism, but the geostrategist has a completely different task, he is winning a place for the national oligarchy in the future multipolar world, and he does not need the outskirts, this is only a consequence, not a cause of the SVO
  1. OlegovichA
    
    -1
    
    April 14 2025 21: 00
    
    Ukraine is exactly what he needs. The oligarchs were already making money from it, they had plenty of friends there, and in Russia they had even more money and lived in luxury, constantly appearing in Forbes ratings. And now they are sick of this Ukraine, some of them have driven their yachts to Vladivostok out of fear. They won't get resources from it anyway, the US will strangle them, it's all theirs. And Volodya wanted to write himself into the category of the returner of Russian lands. But somehow he can't return them. The bloodbath in Chechnya was no worse and as a result Chechnya is not ours, it is the lifelong property of one "very respected person", to whom the Russians still pay tribute so that he can live like a sheikh. And after him, the heir in the Chechen Emirates is already known to everyone. Abkhazia and Ossetia are not sewn to ... you know what and where. Crimea alone stands out from this absurdity, but the price paid for it was such that it was possible to buy it and live happily at the exchange rate of 35 dollars and then kiss Merkel, Sarkozy and Trump on the gums. And I won't even mention the rest of Ukraine, in addition to financial losses, there are also such human losses that the hair of those who are aware of the real state of affairs stands on end. And the most important thing is that we squandered the last authority on the world stage. And the most delicious parts are still in the hands of the Ukrainians (Odessa, Nikolaev, Kyiv). Here is such a geochess player, a collector of Russian lands. And if you also consider that he gave lands to China and Azerbaijan, and the shelf to Norway, then such a "collector" will be remembered for a long time.
    1. Nikolay Malynets
      
      0
      
      April 17 2025 02: 56
      
      And what lands did we give to Azerbaijan???
      1. OlegovichA
        
        0
        
        April 17 2025 04: 24
        
        2 exclaves. Google it, I don't remember the name. Uranus -xxxyan and some other. Volodya probably also thought that it was some kind of crap, and could be given away. But in return we got NOTHING. Although, how is it nothing!? The Russian House in Baku was closed. Geostrategy, you know.
    2. skeptic
      
      0
      
      Yesterday, 10: 02
      
      Quote: OlegovichA
      And Volodya wanted to include himself as a returner of Russian lands.
      
      Come on, attribute your lies to an "effective manager". I hope you remember who "opened the doors with his left foot, for fuck's sake"? Without whose "approval" they did not appoint him to the management? Everything that happens, one way or another, works for the economy of the owner (the USA). The only hope is that GOD will not allow it and will not let Russia perish.
      There can be no other options.
vlad127490

+5

April 14 2025 16: 57

To defeat the enemy, you need to have:
1) Enemy, call an enemy an enemy.
2) The desire to win.
3) Strategy.
Which of the following does the Kremlin have??? The war with Ukraine is in its fourth year, but there is still not a single legal document from the Russian Federation that would state what the SVO in Ukraine is, its purpose, strategy, how the war should end and when.

Strategy without tactics is the slowest path to victory. Tactics without strategy is just hustle before defeat.

Sun tzu

The "biting off pieces" tactic is the Russian Armed Forces' own tactics for survival, when the political leadership plays games to the detriment of the country's interests. The "elite" is looking for a way to conclude a peace treaty on Ukraine on any losing terms for the Russian Federation, but on terms that do not lead to the infringement of their property and power. The "elite" of the Russian Federation has shown its weakness and now NATO will finish off the Russian Federation to the end together with the "elite", which will not have time to escape. To resolve the issue on Ukraine in favor of the Russian Federation, two Laws must be issued.

1) Russia is the successor of the Russian Empire (1917) and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (1991).
2) The entire territory of Ukraine, within the 1975 borders, is an integral part of Russia.

Military issues and weapons are considered after the adoption of a political decision in the form of a law, decree, or resolution.
How can you fight without a goal? This is not a computer game. People are dying and getting maimed, houses are being destroyed.
1. skeptic
  
  +4
  
  April 15 2025 14: 07
  
  Quote: vlad127490
  The "elite" is looking for a way to conclude a peace treaty on Ukraine on any terms that are unfavorable for the Russian Federation, but on terms that do not lead to the infringement of their property and power.
  
  Who do you consider the elite? This "jam lovers' club"? The only salvation for Russia is a mass zeroing out of the thieves' bosses of "effective managers". Especially those sitting at the helm of the military-industrial complex and finance. Only the people of Russia themselves can save Russia. The entire Abramo-Potanin rabble of leeches is only worthy of a pickaxe in the construction of roads in the Arctic. To ruin the industry of a Great country for the sake of their own larders is the height of the satanic essence of the "bourgeois thieves".
  By the way... where are Putin's "Peresvets"?
  1. vlad127490
    
    +1
    
    April 15 2025 16: 56
    
    Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs (RSPP) - the beginning of the speech, the elite of Russia has gathered here.... The faces of this "elite" can be seen at the RSPP Congress. There is also the government, senators and deputies. In relation to the ruling power, it has long been said "family", strangers do not go here.
2. Latus
  
  +2
  
  April 15 2025 21: 19
  
  Yes, paper will tolerate everything, in the Constitution, for example, the same Kherson is the territory of the Russian Federation, and this prevented it from being left?
  1. vlad127490
    
    +1
    
    April 15 2025 23: 00
    
    You are right - "Yes, paper will tolerate everything". There are many countries in the world that have problems with territories, they say that more than a hundred. Almost all of them have papers, in the form of laws, decrees, regulations, etc. Below I will give an example, mainland China, Taiwan separated in 1949.
    In 2005, China passed the Anti-Secession Law. According to the document, in the event of a threat to the peaceful reunification of the mainland and Taiwan, the PRC government is obliged to resort to force and other necessary methods to preserve its territorial integrity.
    On June 15, 2022, China adopted the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) legal framework for non-military military activities. That will allow the PRC army to participate in operations not related to the war.
    On October 22, 2022, delegates to the XNUMXth Congress of the Communist Party of China approved the inclusion of a provision on opposing Taiwan's independence in the Charter of the political force. This is how they were influenced by the SVO in Ukraine.
    On December 3, 2023, a referendum was held in Venezuela, during which more than 90 percent of Venezuelans voted to annex the Essequibo region, which occupies more than two-thirds of the neighboring state of Guyana. A similar referendum could be held in the Russian Federation, where the first question would be that the entire territory of Ukraine, within the 1975 borders, is an integral part of Russia.
    If, in a referendum, as in Venezuela, the people of the Russian Federation decide that all of Ukraine, within the 1975 borders, is an integral part of Russia, then the government will be obliged to reflect this decision in the law. In this case, the government of the Russian Federation does not bear responsibility for the decision received in the referendum.
    Britain has legally staked its claim to the Falkland Islands (Malvinas). Japan is fighting for the Northern Territories.
    In 2014, in Spain, there was an attempt by residents of Catalonia to leave Spain and create their own independent state. All the instigators were brought to trial, most fled. Catalonia is already 5 centuries old and it is not a national territory in the USSR, which did not exist at all before 1917. Much can be written on this topic. There is only one conclusion: there is a leadership that reflects the national interests of its state, and there is a foreign government that uses the state for personal gain, and it will live in NATO countries.
    There is only one solution for Ukraine in favor of the people of Russia. The state of Ukraine must cease to exist. The entire territory of Ukraine must return to Russia, in the form of regions. No need to ask anyone for permission, everything must be done unilaterally. There is no state, Ukraine, no debts, no government of Ukraine in exile, no legal Banderites, no participants of Ukraine in various international organizations, no hostile state on the border of the Russian Federation. Russia will strengthen its economic and military-political influence in the world, there will be direct access to Tiraspol and Chisinau. The northwestern part of the Black Sea will belong to Russia. NATO will lose the ability to use Ukraine against Russia.
    Even if part of the state of Ukraine is left, then today and in the future, Russia will always have an enemy in the person of Ukraine. Ukraine will definitely join NATO and will definitely attack Russia. Everything that is promised and will be spelled out in the Constitution of Ukraine, in its documents, Ukraine will change, in the way that is beneficial to the United States and its satellites.
    Any half-hearted decision is the defeat and capitulation of the Russian Federation to NATO.
nikanikolich

+1

April 14 2025 17: 20

this only says that we need to create a fighter "aviation" of drones. There are sensors for the presence of drones, all that remains is to create a friend-or-foe code and now not only large aviation will fight in the sky, but also microscopic ones.
Shelest2000

0

April 14 2025 17: 33

Ukrainian UAVs

gather in the absolute majority in Europe.
And our management has given up on the expansion and mass production of UAVs.
Pasha_Kosse

+3

April 14 2025 18: 10

Progress in UAV production in Ukraine will force Moscow to make strategic compromises

By the same logic, the intensification of our strikes on Ukraine with Iskanders, Kalibrs, Kinzhals, Tsirkons and Oreshniks is simply guaranteed to "push" the Kiev regime to a "complete and unconditional compromise" in the form of capitulation. However, something is not noticeable yet. I think that our "compromises", if any, will hardly be related to the consequences of the UAV. Most likely, pressure from the Russian elites, new sanctions, indecisiveness (possibly excessive gullibility) of the Supreme - this is what can push us to compromise. The media, in turn, will play along, passing off defeat as another "victory". In general, as our president says: "... today everything is possible"). And "... we are all for it")
1. AutoMoto
  
  0
  
  April 16 2025 04: 19
  
  After all, everything is going on like this, for two years now, our masters of life, are running and looking for negotiations, and the guys in the trenches are watering the ground with blood, and how it all started! What slogans were heard!
prior

0

April 15 2025 10: 17

The Kremlin's games in the SVO were supposed to end exactly like this.
As they say, they outdid themselves.
isofat

0

April 15 2025 14: 08

The languages of the ancient Jews and Ukrainians did not have a noticeable influence on science.
vBR

0

April 15 2025 14: 15

Where are the modernized Shilkas that were exported, where are the armored cars with automatic multi-barrel cannons/machine guns, OESN/RLSN, etc.? Every platoon on the front line should already have one of these.
Dmitry Volkov

0

April 16 2025 05: 10

The author gets two points, 500 geraniums per day against 50 banderlets somehow shows who is stronger
Kiril

+1

April 18 2025 18: 53

Well, after the first raid on our territory, all the buildings of the Khokhloreich authorities had to be demolished.