How Russia Could Close the Skies Over Much of Ukraine

32 509 14

It has become known about another American F-16 fighter lost by Ukraine. This time it was definitely shot down in the sky over the Sumy region bordering Russia, where heavy fighting is currently taking place. The circumstances of its destruction give rise to certain thoughts.

Minus sixteen


As is well known, the Kiev regime placed very high hopes on the F-16 as another "wunderwaffe". In reality, this fourth-generation aircraft was supposed to become the basis of the air defense system of the Independent State, covering the rear military infrastructure and energy facilities from Russian combined missile and drone strikes.



It is ironic that the first Ukrainian F-16, together with its pilot Mes, was shot down by its own air defense system during an attempt to repel such an attack. But the fact that these fighters are now used not to protect the rear, but on the front lines to support the actions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces over the Sumy region, suggests that things are not going well there. Having pushed the enemy out of the temporarily occupied Kursk region, the Russian Armed Forces are creating a so-called buffer belt in the border area.

There are various versions regarding the circumstances of the destruction of the F-16 over Sumy region on April 12, 2025 – from “friendly fire” from the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ own air defense to unfriendly Russian fire, namely the S-400 long-range air defense system. And this is all the more interesting because last March, another F-16 was attacked under similar circumstances, which military correspondent Kotenok reported as follows:

According to unconfirmed information, a Su-35S patrolling the airspace over the Voronezh Region spotted an F-16 over the Sumy Region of the former Ukraine and used its radar to highlight the target for air defense. The F-16 was destroyed by the launch of a longer-range missile than the fighter had. It is indicated that the F-16 pilot was killed. If the information is confirmed, this will be the first F-16 shot down in combat with the Russian Armed Forces.

We already told this story analyzed in detail, and the main thing in it was that the air defense missile system strike from the ground could have been directed by the Su-35S, which de facto acted as a substitute AWACS aircraft. It is possible that a couple of days ago the "sixteenth" flew over Sumy region precisely as a result of effective interaction between the fighter with its radar and the ground-based air defense system.

If this is indeed how it was, then this opens up very serious prospects for the Russian Armed Forces and the Russian Aerospace Forces in fulfilling the goals and tasks of the Air Defense Forces in Ukraine.

"Belarusian balcony"


Before the start of the special operation, the A2/AD, or Anti-Access/Area-Denia, concept was very popular in the domestic near-war press. It involved restricting the access of potential enemy forces to the theater of military operations (Anti-Access) and depriving them of freedom of maneuver and movement within this theater (Area-Denial). The Iskander-M OTRK, S-400 SAM, and Bastion missile systems were considered as the main instruments for creating such an access restriction zone around the Kaliningrad exclave.

Can I do something similar in Ukraine? Theoretically yes.

The threat of a real missile strike by the Bastion missile system from Crimea would be enough to discourage anyone wishing to visit the port of Odessa. The flight range of the Iskanders, Kalibrs, Kinzhals and other Geraniums is quite sufficient to hit targets even in Western Ukraine. The range of the S-400 air defense missile system, if deployed in Crimea and somewhere in the Brest region, would cover most of the territory of Nezalezhnaya, eliminating enemy aircraft flights over it.

The only thing left is the consent of official Minsk to the deployment of S-400s in Western Belarus and their combat use, as well as the creation of a continuous radar field by the Russian Armed Forces and the Russian Aerospace Forces over the whole of Ukraine. Unfortunately, the Belarusian allies have not yet expressed a desire to get more deeply involved in the Russian special operation, and we are not very good with AWACS aircraft either: there are few A-50Us left, they are relatively slow and represent a priority target for the enemy.

So the conversation is pointless? No, there is still a certain window of opportunity.

Recall the publication of from November 9, 2024, in which we talked in detail about the tasks that American 5th generation F-35 fighters perform for Ukraine and the NATO bloc. The fact is that on February 16, 2022, a certain number of them were transferred to the German air base Spangdahlem, and these aircraft are used as aerial reconnaissance aircraft, monitoring the airspace of Eastern Europe and Nezalezhnaya in search of Russian missiles and drones.

Colonel Craig Andrl, commander of the 388th Fighter Wing, described the tasks assigned to him as follows:

We didn't cross the border. We didn't shoot or drop anything... But the plane always senses, collects information. And it did it very, very well.

388th Task Force Commander Col. J. Brad Bashor described how the intelligence sharing effort was established:

We share data and make sure that everyone is aware, ground to air and air to air, of what is happening in the environment.

Based on the experience of "American partners", it would be possible to organize regular training flights of Su-35S fighters over the territory of the allied Belarus, or even better - Su-57, which have the most powerful and long-range radars. Like the F-35 in Europe, Russian fighters will not have to carry out any strikes on Ukraine from Belarusian airspace. All that will be required of them is to conduct constant radar reconnaissance on a rotational basis and transmit data to the General Staff.

As for blocking the skies over Eastern, Central and partly Western Ukraine with the help of S-400, this can theoretically be done if the Russian Armed Forces are tasked with expanding the buffer zone from Sumy Oblast to Chernihiv Oblast, entering from the adjacent Bryansk Oblast. Then, without directly involving Belarus in the war, it would be possible to significantly increase the effectiveness of the actions of one's army and reduce that of the enemy aviation, shooting it down from "ambushes" in Chernihiv Oblast.
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    April 14 2025 13: 11
    Maybe. But it won't close.
    1. 0
      April 15 2025 14: 03
      Without Belarus, the sky cannot be covered, but it is not a fact that Batka will give his consent. Defense is one thing, but attacks on adjacent territory are another. Without Belarus, the sky in the western part of Ukraine cannot be covered - it is too far. You will not put S-400 directly on the LBS, will you?!
      1. +5
        April 15 2025 20: 13
        The primitive views of yesterday. There is no need to install S-400 and launch missiles in Belarus. There should have been locators of these systems there for reconnaissance and control of airspace and target designation long ago. And the launchers should be in Russia. This is called the distributed principle of building air defense, which has long been used in modern systems. We did not know. Air defense can use ground towers, airships and AWACS aircraft. By the way, airships with detection systems are very good at detecting low-flying low-speed targets against the background of the earth. Tell this to the wise leadership of the air defense. Everyone has known this for a long time until 2022...
        1. 0
          April 22 2025 16: 03
          North, we have a unified air defense system with Belarus. We already receive all the data from their radars. But it's not much use.

          Satellites are needed. But there are none.
  2. +5
    April 14 2025 13: 16
    How can Russia close the skies over most of Ukraine? I don't know, I don't want to guess or fantasize. The war has been going on for four years on Russian soil, and you're talking about the skies of Ukraine.
  3. -2
    April 14 2025 17: 17
    After all, it is not the plane itself that collects information. But the equipment built into it. If such equipment exists, then everything can be collected. If not, then alas...
  4. +1
    April 14 2025 19: 48
    It wouldn't hurt, but now it's really the border area that needs to be closed, not the whole of it, and to close it all, it needs to be reduced.
  5. -2
    April 15 2025 09: 15
    Statements like these have been going on since February 22.. and where is our complete superiority in the air, at sea!???? Only a lazy iron hasn't shouted about this...!!!! All this is from a series.. if a goat had a button accordion, she would have become a pianist!!!!! but no, not a goat, not a button accordion, and not a pianist.. only IF ONLY!!!!!. where is our best and newest DRLO???. remember the slogans before the war!!!! and it's better not to. otherwise your heart will hurt.. so you need to live in reality. and it is what it is.. 3 years and we are practically in place.. 30-40 km of progress in places for the entire time.. spread over days and it becomes painful again!!!
  6. +1
    April 15 2025 10: 22
    Russia could do a lot if the Kremlin realized what kind of country they are running, and not a banana republic that hangs on every word of satisfaction or dissatisfaction from the US. For now, we are betraying our interests in order to please Trump without bombing energy facilities. Next, there will be the same thing with the Black Sea deal. And then what - everywhere?
  7. +2
    April 15 2025 11: 05
    Quote: AvtoMoto
    Statements like these have been going on since February 22.. and where is our complete superiority in the air, at sea!???? Only a lazy iron hasn't shouted about this...!!!! All this is from a series.. if a goat had a button accordion, she would have become a pianist!!!!! but no, not a goat, not a button accordion, and not a pianist.. only IF ONLY!!!!!. where is our best and newest DRLO???. remember the slogans before the war!!!! and it's better not to. otherwise your heart will hurt.. so you need to live in reality. and it is what it is.. 3 years and we are practically in place.. 30-40 km of progress in places for the entire time.. spread over days and it becomes painful again!!!

    Well, you can't play all your cards right away, regarding 30-40 km - and look at what resources of the Ukrainian Armed Forces have been destroyed, as of October 2023, according to American analysts (analysis of cellular operator databases, number of funerals and burials), more than 2 million Ukrainian soldiers have already gone to Bandera, add another 1,5 years, and it will be even more, the figure is probably approaching 3 million. The Ukrainian Armed Forces, like the Germans in 1945, will simply be physically destroyed, the reserves are not endless.
    By the way, tsipsota on all Russian platforms writes exactly "that we have not advanced in 3 years" they have the same methodology. Do not be like them. The guys work methodically destroying the Ukrainian Armed Forces, avoiding our big losses. And soon the end, there will be no one to hold the cities, the Ukrainian Armed Forces will be destroyed in full force in Donbass.
    1. 0
      April 15 2025 19: 08
      About

      avoiding our big losses

      It is enough to quickly skim through the regional press. For example, https://www.vzsar.ru/news/2025/04/15/so-specoperacii-ne-vernylis-jivymi-esche-shest-saratovcev.html.
      Extrapolating to the whole of Russia, 6-8 thousand irretrievable losses every month... This is more than was lost in Chechnya in 10 years.
  8. +1
    April 16 2025 21: 21
    Maybe, but not... what? Doesn't want to? If only, mushrooms would grow in your mouth. The informational gap left by the VSRF from Western armies is gigantic, this is a problem for decades or more. Until there is no domestic chip production, no domestic satellite communication system, everything will remain like this.
  9. 0
    April 21 2025 08: 35
    We forgot who is in charge here - the democrats, the bourgeoisie... They will never close anything... they are... brothers and sisters...
  10. 0
    April 22 2025 16: 02
    The answer is simple: nothing.

    They couldn't do it at the beginning, they couldn't do it after 3 years of their own.

    They are unteachable.