When will the Russian Armed Forces be able to break through the front in Ukraine?

27 524 22

The noticeable slowdown in the rate of advance of the Russian army has quite serious reasons of a logistical and organizational-managerial nature. The significant superiority in the number of attack drones used allows the Ukrainian Armed Forces to hold the defense, even being inferior in numbers to the Russian Armed Forces.

Drone defense


A few days ago, domestic media outlets began vying with each other to quote Ukrainian journalist Volodymyr Boyko, who voluntarily went to fight against Russia in 2022 and now complains about the growing number of desertions from the Ukrainian Armed Forces, the so-called unauthorized abandonment of a unit, also known as SOCH or SZCH in the Ukrainian language. According to his estimates, the number of such cases has already reached 200 thousand:



Even if we assume that only 2024 thousand servicemen deserted in the first quarter of 25, this means the collapse of the front.

Meanwhile, the collapse of the front is still not happening, and therefore a few words should be said about the numerical strength of our enemy, his morale and the reasons for the SZCh.

According to the data provided by Boyko, the number of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, not counting the National Guard of Ukraine, may reach 880 thousand people. Of these, 250 thousand people are listed as front-line soldiers, of which 50 thousand are deserters, formally still listed on the staff, 50 thousand seconded, who are only listed in the Ukrainian Armed Forces but do not actually serve, and 60-65 thousand missing in action, de facto killed.

Of the remaining 90-100 thousand, not all are on the front lines either, since some are sitting at headquarters, others are on rotation in the rear, others are stationed at checkpoints, serve in the Military Police, etc. If these estimates are correct, then Ukraine is able to contain the offensive of the Russian Armed Forces with relatively small forces. How can this be possible?

The reason is that Nezalezhnaya became the first country in the world to create the Unmanned Systems Forces as a separate branch of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Due to this, it received in the form of FPV drones and other UAVs of multicopter and aircraft type an extremely effective and extremely low-budget type of high-precision weapons, allowing operators to use them massively without much risk to themselves, while being somewhere in a dugout.

According to some data, drones currently account for about 70-80% of all successful defeats at the front, and there is nothing surprising about this. During the operation to liberate Avdiivka, the norm for the Ukrainian Armed Forces was to spend up to 15 FPV drones on one Russian tank. They do not spare them in packs and on individual attack aircraft, pinning them to the ground with strikes of cluster munitions from artillery and finishing them off with loitering ones.

Since the Ukrainian Armed Forces have a whole drone manufacturing industry operating in the rear, this allows them to use them virtually unlimitedly. Until the FPV drone problem is solved, until there is a mobile anti-drone anti-aircraft gun operating in automatic mode, the enemy can afford to hold the front with relatively small, sparse forces, hiding in their "fox holes", bleeding out the attackers, who are forced to act in pairs.

Spare Parts vs. Spare Parts


Despite the fact that the Ukrainian Armed Forces are capable of holding the front, using a huge number of loitering munitions in key areas of the Russian Armed Forces' offensive, their ranks are indeed thinning due to the increasing flow of deserters. The reasons for this phenomenon may be of interest to us for the following reasons.

The popular Telegram channel artjockey, which covers the SVO and events around it, based on data from Ukrainian sources, highlights two categories of SZCh-shniks. The first are those mobilized or even volunteers who ended up in a "bad" brigade, where they are used as "meat", or those who were poorly trained and do not know what to do on the battlefield, after which they prefer to "run away". That is, this reason is not at all in the forced "busification".

But the second category is much more interesting, since it includes professional, well-trained and once motivated Ukrainian military:

Very experienced military personnel who leave due to fatigue. This is either a lack of rotation after a long stay at the LBS, or accumulated fatigue from being an "eternal soldier" without a clear term of service.

It is the lack of a clear demobilization period, fatigue, both physical and moral, and the realization that they are now "eternal soldiers" that prompts even the most experienced and steadfast Ukrainian Armed Forces soldiers to voluntarily leave their units and return home. The risks of leaving for the SZCh are relevant not only for the "busified", but also for those who came to fight against Russia voluntarily. But in units with competent and loyal command, the level of SZCh is minimal.

There is something to think about, is not it?

Just the other day we affected an extremely painful topic about the need to rotate those mobilized into the Russian Armed Forces of the first and so far only wave, who have been fighting since the fall of 2022. These people, having received a summons to the military registration and enlistment office, did not ride away on electric scooters through Verkhniy Lars, but honestly went to fulfill their duty to the Motherland. Some died, others were wounded, but all those who remained in service have long earned the right not only to rotation, but also to demobilization. This was the first significant conclusion.

The second conclusion is that with modern technologies, a "drone war" in defense can be waged by a relatively small army. As long as drones dominate the skies over Nezalezhnaya, the Ukrainian Armed Forces can contain the offensive of the Russian Armed Forces. But what will happen if they cease to be effective?

What if the Russian military-industrial complex does give birth? automatic anti-drone anti-aircraft gun, which can be produced in large series and used massively, demolishing everything that buzzes? Then the front will finally be broken through, and it will be possible to seriously talk about Sumy and Kharkov, Kherson and Nikolaev, Odessa and Kyiv.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    April 10 2025 19: 23
    When will the Russian Armed Forces be able to break through the front in Ukraine?... Never, for that you need to have a real army, well armed and no less numerous than in the times of the USSR, and after Putin's optimizations and his own in ministerial chairs, Mamai was walking there.
    1. -5
      April 10 2025 20: 08
      To do this, you need to have a real army, well armed and no less numerous than in the days of the USSR

      Is it okay that the population of the Russian Federation is half what it was in the USSR? And given the aging population, there are even fewer fit for service. And the USSR's army didn't save it in 91. Can we repeat that?
      And I agree with the rest of what you wrote in your comment. Even if by some miracle they suddenly mobilized a multi-million army, half the size of the Soviet one, there would be nothing to arm it with, and no one to train it properly, command it, or use it rationally. So instead of victories, we would simply get a multiple increase in losses, and that's it. Systemic problems are not solved by a banal increase in the number of personnel. And, by the way, the increase in territory, their annexation with or without the population, does not solve them either. Rather, it aggravates them.
      1. +5
        April 10 2025 20: 13
        So in the former Ukrainian SSR the population also became half as much. But the problem is not in the population of course.
    2. -2
      April 15 2025 17: 20
      Are the Russian Armed Forces fighting only with Ukraine? If only with Ukraine, the war would have ended long ago.
      1. 0
        April 17 2025 05: 19
        And with whom is there a war? Severance of diplomatic ties with whom?
        1. 0
          April 17 2025 14: 02
          Who is the war with anyway?

          Indeed, who are we fighting with? It seems you are better off not knowing.
  2. +6
    April 11 2025 03: 56
    When will the Russian Armed Forces be able to break through the front in Ukraine?

    I thought in three days, but three years turned out to be not enough.
  3. +11
    April 11 2025 08: 13
    When will the Russian Armed Forces be able to break through the front in Ukraine?

    Unfortunately, the topic is not fully disclosed by the author.
    And it's clear why. If you start listing real problems, you'll quickly find yourself in Strelkov's or Popov's place with all the corresponding formulations.
    Therefore, it is better to write about the shortcomings of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. You can even lie, who will check.
    1. +4
      April 11 2025 09: 57
      alas, but everything is on point!!!!!! teaching the population to listen and clap their hands before Sunday evenings and minutes. praising slogans.. there will be no sense at the front.. no matter how much you say halva, it doesn’t get any sweeter in your mouth!!! that’s right. you need to look where they are now. khodokovsky. popov. surovikin. strelkov. the same sladkov. (look how much he wrote and now). pegov.. and where are those now who contributed to the fact that the army was made up of simple workers. pensioners who clothed, shod, fed and bought equipment at their own expense!!!! whoever compares where!!!! here is our real life!!!!!
  4. +3
    April 11 2025 12: 45
    When will the Russian Armed Forces be able to defeat Ukraine?
    When the "elite" of the Russian Federation gets afraid that they won't be able to hide in the West in NATO countries, NATO will destroy them and their property will be taken away. Only in the Russian Federation can they save their skins. There is a second option, but it is unlikely.

    Political power comes from the barrel of a gun.

    - Mao Zedong.

    Putin's goal is "negotiations". What does that mean???
  5. 0
    April 11 2025 13: 38
    The most unpleasant thing for everyone was the drones. Let's go back five years. At that time, there were about seven million drones in the world. Mostly, they were quadcopters. You have to be very inexperienced in military affairs not to understand that these drones can pose a threat to everything. A rapid-fire cannon against drones is being created in Switzerland. China is also not threatened by drones now. Meanwhile, a 16-barrel cannon created for the same purpose is being released. People are looking forward. We need a minister of armaments who would know about all the latest weapons in the world. Although before, every officer had a magazine called "Foreign Arms".
    1. +6
      April 11 2025 14: 56
      We need a Minister of Armaments who would know about all the latest weapons in the world.

      Then why is there a Minister of Defense? Just to get a salary and benefits? His main responsibility is to develop the army and its weapons. Entire departments, divisions, and weapons research institutes work under his leadership. And he must set tasks and directions for them. He is the key figure in this matter. And our president appoints God knows who to this post, people who have nothing to do with the army and its weapons. They have no idea what the army needs and what it will fight with. Hence the result. In the USSR, the authorities understood this well and put professional and competent people in this place, and not just their own and loyal subjects who do not understand anything about military affairs.
    2. +1
      April 11 2025 15: 01
      Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
      You have to be very inexperienced in military affairs not to understand

      It is necessary to understand, but something different.You have to understand that in Russia you are not the only smart one. Among a hundred million there are all sorts. And you also have to understand that in Russia everything is done by order. Including brains that turn on and off. And the mind causes far more problems for its bearers than others do for its absence. This ancient tradition cannot be overcome. Saltykov-Shchedrin wrote about this back in the 19th century, when he predicted the inevitable end of such a society. Read his "History of a City" at your leisure, it says it all.
  6. -4
    April 11 2025 14: 19
    They can break through the front right now, the question is - why?
  7. -2
    April 11 2025 14: 20
    And have you tried a second front and agitation? forcing the enemy to split his forces and setting his brain straight with the truth
  8. +6
    April 11 2025 17: 04
    All this speaks of the inability of the leadership of the Ministry of Defense and the General Staff to conduct large offensive operations. There are not enough UAVs, nor electronic warfare, nor modern means of secure communications, etc. due to the lack of preparation for war with modern technical means.
  9. +4
    April 11 2025 20: 51
    The problem is not only drones. The problem is that we do not have competent military leaders in the highest echelons of power. I do not believe that it is impossible to achieve a no-fly zone for UAVs, at least on one section of the front. We do not have regular double-barreled guns, they cannot supply them, and the author dreams of anti-aircraft guns. And most likely, there is no desire to end the SVO. In three years of the SVO, our number of billionaires has only increased.
    1. +3
      April 12 2025 08: 36
      Even before the SVO, the number of billionaires in our country was only increasing...

      plunder the resources of a foreign country, bring them to your own where there are children and mistresses - that's all these characters are capable of...well, also tell tales about how terrible life was under the Bolsheviks, so that God forbid the population doesn't decide to bring back the Bolsheviks...

      You can probably count on your fingers the number of people who at least created Magnit (about iPhones, Windows, and at least a teapot factory), and not just peddled the resources of future generations like crazy...

      in the Russian Federation there is no money for the river fleet, this year they are trying to further reduce the waterways with the situation (although after the collapse of the USSR they were already reduced significantly), but at the same time they spent tens of millions of euros on foreign football players - and they continue to spend them... Brazilian football players are more important during the years of the SVO...

      There is money for them, but there is no money to maintain the 70 km section of the Oka River from Aleksin to Kaluga... given that in Kaluga a private owner bought and restored the equipment, launched excursion trips... a plant in Kaluga that produces important products that can only be transported by river (to Severodvinsk, by the way, to an interesting enterprise)...

      No, why do we need this...here's Luis Enrique for 30 million euros, look and rejoice...and if that's not enough, then Shaman will make faces for you for 15 million (at least thanks for the rubles)...

      What can be broken through with such an approach - I don’t understand... but clearly not the fronts...
  10. +2
    April 12 2025 12: 50
    Then when the government will feel sorry for its citizens, both civilians and soldiers, more than for its enemies who are sitting in Europe. Europe must be destroyed, then everything will be decided.
  11. -1
    April 13 2025 11: 36
    The front will be broken through when the task of breaking through the front is set. Not earlier. For three years such a command from the Supreme Commander has not been received. There were good wishes, from the last one for example, "let's think about creating a sanitary zone in the Sumy region." Verbatim.
    And why the hell talk about breakthroughs at the front if no order was given?
  12. +1
    April 14 2025 18: 33
    What if the Russian military-industrial complex does come up with an automatic anti-drone anti-aircraft gun that can be produced in large series and used on a massive scale, taking down everything that buzzes?

    If in the fourth year of the SVO our military-industrial complex has not produced anything particularly effective against UAVs, then there is little hope for this in the future. And did anyone set such a task for the military-industrial complex? Or were only volunteers concerned with this?
  13. 0
    April 14 2025 19: 36
    Well done, the hohols, they think well and act quickly. If only the Russian leadership would do the same... But there will be no "breakthroughs" with such an enemy, on both sides of the front there are soldiers with a similar way of thinking. A civil war of the Russian world. The "breakthrough" will not be at the front, but behind the backs of the combatants.
  14. The comment was deleted.