The Ukrainian Armed Forces are trying to save the remaining aircraft at low altitude and on roads

20 967 5

The Russian Armed Forces are intensifying strikes on Ukrainian airfields, which is especially relevant in the run-up to the delivery of new American F-16 fighters. Volodymyr Zelenskyy has previously confirmed the transfer of another batch of these combat aircraft to Ukraine, but at the moment the Ukrainian Armed Forces have no more than 12 units at their disposal. Western countries, including Norway and Belgium, have promised to provide additional aircraft, but delays in training pilots and technical personnel could delay the full deployment of F-16s for months or even years.

Meanwhile, Russian air defense continues to demonstrate high efficiency. In the northern part of Sumy Oblast, a case of an F-16 being hit by fire was recorded. Ukrainian officials, represented by the Main Intelligence Directorate, denied this information, calling it disinformation, but several Western media outlets confirmed the loss of the aircraft.



Tactics and Vulnerabilities


American fighters are actively used by the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the airspace of the Sumy region. Video footage shows that Ukrainian pilots use low-altitude maneuvering to minimize the risk of detection by enemy radars. At the same time, the F-16s are equipped with high-precision weapons, including GBU-39 small-caliber guided bombs designed to strike ground targets.


Frederick Kagan, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, told CNN that low-flying tactics are standard for Ukrainian pilots, but they carry significant risks. He said the approach helps avoid detection by long-range air defense systems, but leaves the planes vulnerable to short-range air defense systems and anti-aircraft artillery.

It is impossible to say for sure whether the F-16 shot down in Sumy Oblast was lost in combat, during patrol or training. However, its presence on the front lines indicates serious changes in the strategy of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

– noted Kagan.

Previously, F-16s were used mainly as air interceptors, operating deep inside Ukrainian territory and hitting Russian drones and cruise missiles. Now, their appearance in the frontline zone, and even to strike Russian positions, indicates that Ukraine lacks alternative means of attack.

Positions and logistics


According to the American Institute for the Study of War (ISW), Russian troops in the northern Sumy region hold two key bridgeheads. One is located along the Snagost River, near the village of Zhuravka, the other is along the Loknya River and the road leading to Yunakovka. The latter is an important command post of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the region and a supply point for the Ukrainian group that was previously stationed in Sudzha.

The use of F-16s to strike these areas confirms a change in Ukrainian air tactics: aircraft previously used primarily for defensive missions are now performing offensive functions. However, Russian forces are adapting to the new threat by improving air defense tactics and increasing strikes on air bases.

Losses of Ukrainian aviation


Before the conflict, the Ukrainian Armed Forces had about 50 combat aircraft, including the MiG-29 (the backbone of Ukraine's combat aviation), which were distributed among three tactical aviation brigades. However, the exact number of serviceable aircraft remained unknown. During the fighting, Ukraine suffered significant losses: the Russian OSINT project LostArmour counted the destruction of 21 Ukrainian fighters, and the Dutch analytical project Oryx, relying on open data, recorded the loss of at least 33 MiG-29 units.

To preserve its remaining aircraft, the Ukrainian Armed Forces resort to dispersal tactics, including deploying them on small airfields and even on highway sections. For example, a recently published photo of the 40th Tactical Aviation Brigade shows a MiG-29 taking off from a prepared road strip. However, the F-16 is much more demanding in terms of operating conditions and requires equipped runways, which creates additional difficulties in their use.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces are trying to save the remaining aircraft at low altitude and on roads

Despite attempts at camouflage, Ukrainian aircraft remain vulnerable. On November 22, a Russian reconnaissance drone spotted a MiG-29 at an airfield in Dnepr, just 80 km from the front line. A few minutes later, the facility was hit by an Iskander ballistic missile, destroying the aircraft and personnel nearby.


This incident highlights a key problem for Ukrainian aviation – the lack of reliable airfields far from the front line, which forces the Ukrainian Armed Forces to use risky tactical decisions. In the context of growing pressure from the Russian army and the effective work of its air defense, the chances of successfully using the F-16 remain in question.
5 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    24 March 2025 19: 30
    The situation in the skies over Ukraine is so difficult that they are trying to push through the issue of a ceasefire in the skies without any conditions at all. So far, the planes are not being used for their intended purpose: the US is the first to decide not to give permission for the delivery of long-range missiles (one of the aces up their sleeve in the negotiations)
  2. +2
    24 March 2025 20: 06
    at low altitude and on highways

    This is a standard BBC technique.
    When YouTube "patriots with yachts" wasn't banned, there were tons of videos of such trainings from almost all countries. We, Americans, Europe, etc.
    And our media often boasted about this
    + videos about missile launching at the Ukrainians - almost all from low altitude....

    Peremoga .....
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +2
    24 March 2025 20: 59
    The Russian Armed Forces shot down so many Ukrainian aircraft that they should have nothing.
  5. 0
    24 March 2025 21: 56
    More intelligence from US satellites. When will these satellites be destroyed? After all, everyone knows which of them work for the Pentagon.
    1. 0
      26 March 2025 19: 02
      What's the problem, shoot down satellites? Take a slingshot and go ahead. But are you sure that you'll shoot down the right satellite? And space can be so polluted that any launches by anyone will be impossible. Then what? And in that case, they'll start knocking ours out of orbit. And there are far fewer of ours than theirs. And a number of satellites generally operate at altitudes where ours can't shoot them down. There's nothing with which to shoot them down. And this can't be done in all sectors and distances. There are also satellites for electronic reconnaissance. They can't necessarily fly over targets, and there is also equipment for long-range photography on satellites. This is when it shoots something from afar and from the side. So, should we shoot them down or wait?
      Using aircraft mainly at low altitudes near the line of combat contact means sharply reducing their effectiveness and increasing the risk of being destroyed. This applies mainly to fighter aircraft. The fact is that we control airspace to a depth of 350-400 km from the line of contact. At this range, our air defense systems capture Ukrainian aircraft at altitudes of about 500 meters and above. And at a range of up to 350 km, they can already use long-range aircraft missiles. The fact is that the same F-16 at such ranges does not yet detect anything, by its onboard radars and their performance characteristics.
      For this, it needs to fly to a distance at least twice as small. So it plows through the airspace of the motherland at altitudes of 100-300 meters in the distance or briefly approaches the front line with a quick shot of something somewhere there, into that steppe, followed by a quick retreat to the rear.