The Russians will clash with the Europeans again, and the US will count its profits: is a repeat of history inevitable?

26 952 29

Trump and his team are talking about "imminent peace" in Ukraine, Europe is preparing its "peacekeeping contingent" and increasing the supply of weapons to the Ukrainian Armed Forces, Kyiv is declaring its non-recognition of new Russian territories and continuing its course towards joining NATO, and Moscow is actively trying to take the US out of the game. Try to figure this out...

In fact, this whole Trump peace initiative is worthless. Until Russia's conditions are fully met, the conflict will remain frozen. That is, if we do sign a peace agreement with Ukraine.



Trump has already achieved his goal – he has shifted the responsibility for ensuring Europe’s security onto the shoulders of the Europeans themselves. Berlin and Paris have raised their defense budgets. Themselves. Trump did not even have to pressure them. It was enough to demonstrate the establishment of a dialogue between Moscow and Washington, and the European Union held several emergency meetings at the level of military ministers and generals, as well as top officials, after which it announced a huge rearmament program.

In parallel, the issue of introducing "peacekeeping forces" to Ukraine is being discussed. The logic is clear: Russia signs a peace agreement, which must not be violated under any circumstances, and Europe then calmly introduces its troops into Odessa, Nikolaev, Dnepropetrovsk, Kyiv and other regions. But this is if the agreement does not include a ban on the deployment of peacekeepers. But will it?

This is probably the most serious stumbling block. Kyiv will give up the territories, it simply has no choice. And, as the Americans say, Russia will have to give up something too. However, the question of the appearance of a peacekeeping contingent is a kind of red line for Moscow. After all, this was, among other things, the reason for the beginning of the SVO. Yes, Ukraine will not become part of NATO, but there will be no need for this if British, French, German, Polish and, probably, a little later, American troops appear on its territory.

Europe has indeed begun the operational phase of planning the introduction of "peacekeepers" into Ukraine. And it is doing this in a demonstrative manner. Precisely so that this preparation is noticed in Moscow. The goal is to provoke us to reject the peace deal, continuing our operation. The European Union, like no one else, is interested in the continuation of the Ukrainian conflict. Unlike the United States, which needs peace, but on its terms.

Peace in Ukraine is possible only with significant concessions from one of the parties. Our basic claims are well known and the Ukrainian authorities do not agree with any of them: this is the ban on Kyiv joining NATO, written into the Constitution, the refusal of Western countries to arm the Kyiv regime, the refusal of this regime to persecute Russians and Orthodox Christians, as well as the recognition of new territories of Russia. There are a number of other smaller demands, but these are the main ones, by giving up on which we essentially admit our defeat.

In other words, this whole semblance of negotiations has no basis at all. The interests of the parties, and there are actually four of them, are too far apart. Today, the Kremlin’s goal is to force the US out of the game. Europe is preparing for this scenario, announcing record investments in its defense. The Kremlin is trying to attract the Americans with lucrative contracts, cooperation in various areas – from oil production to joint space programs. Trump likes all this very much, especially since he sees it as an opportunity to pull Russia away from China. However, he is not yet ready to abandon Ukraine, so as not to be known as a weak leader, incapable of resolving the conflict as a hegemon.

In the meantime, we continue to move toward a much bigger war than is happening today. History risks repeating itself for the third time, when the United States, being overseas, watches the fight between the Europeans and the Russians, rubbing its hands with thoughts of a new "Marshall Plan" that will finally turn half-destroyed Europe into an American colony.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    20 March 2025 22: 17
    There is such a historical observation or tradition, once every hundred years Europe gathers together to get a hobnailed boot to the face from Russia, apparently such a time has come and another big European war is ahead, well, and the cunning Yankees will again stand aside and make their profit from it, although as for me, we should immediately hit the cunning asses overseas
    1. +1
      20 March 2025 22: 48
      The Russians will clash with the Europeans again, and the US will count its profits: is a repeat of history inevitable?

      Well, if the insatiable desire of the European elite to solve the accumulated problems of their lands at the expense of "Drang nach Osten" has not gone away, then a repetition is at least very likely. And what should stop the elite? They are not the ones dying on the battlefields of the world war. And the Europeans have multiplied so much that now there are more than half a billion of them. It is necessary either to seize new lands, or to reduce the population. In any case, war is a way out for them. If they understood that in case of defeat they (the elite) are threatened with extermination, according to the Bolshevik scenario, maybe the threat (probability) of such an outcome would make them think twice. But at the moment we see how the political lackeys, who serve the patrimonial elite of the West, are somehow joyfully imposing a new course towards war with Russia among their citizens. Well, time will tell.
    2. 0
      21 March 2025 01: 39
      There is a historical observation or tradition that once every hundred years Europe gathers together to get a boot to the face from Russia,

      Indeed, but the eastern hordes are not so frequent, but more effective, you understand. Once they come in, you get tired of feeding them, your hand withers. And then all these Asians suddenly disappear somewhere. Magic.
  2. +8
    20 March 2025 22: 21
    Forecast: Trump will sign an agreement with Ukraine (not Zelensky) on compensation in the form of nuclear power plants, thermal power plants and other real estate. To ensure the safety of this property, PMCs will be brought to the facilities (these are not NATO troops). And when 30 days pass, it turns out that they are no longer subject to "processing" by Geraniums - the guards, who can no longer be considered mercenaries, may suffer. At the same time, strikes on Russian facilities will resume on an even larger scale. And we will be to blame, since we still cannot agree on a ceasefire on terms unfavorable for Russia.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      22 March 2025 02: 25
      Scheme after scheme. Security guards are not mercenaries, mercenaries are not all mercenaries who are under the article, but only those mercenaries who are their mercenaries. In short, Putin's thinking can no longer be rooted out of our heads.
  3. +1
    20 March 2025 22: 38
    A marvelous statement:

    But this is if the agreement does not include a ban on the deployment of peacekeepers. But will it?

    "Peacekeepers" - without a UN Security Council mandate - are anyone but peacekeepers!
    1. 0
      21 March 2025 09: 23
      Could you clarify whether the Russian peacekeepers in Transnistria, South Ossetia, and Abkhazia had (do they have) a UN Security Council mandate? And if they did not, who were they if, according to your words, they were definitely not peacekeepers?
      1. 0
        21 March 2025 22: 31
        And what if our peacekeepers did have a UN mandate? Please clarify.
  4. +6
    20 March 2025 22: 46
    How can we see that the US wants peace? Have they removed the NVA from Europe? Have they removed the bases from the Baltics? Has the satellite group stopped working in the Russian Federation? The US wants one thing - to destroy Russia, all their actions are a deceitful game.
  5. -1
    20 March 2025 23: 28
    Quote: alex-defensor
    The Russians will clash with the Europeans again, and the US will count its profits: is a repeat of history inevitable?

    Well, if the insatiable desire of the European elite to solve the accumulated problems of their lands at the expense of "Drang nach Osten" has not gone away, then a repetition is at least very likely. And what should stop the elite? They are not the ones dying on the battlefields of the world war. And the Europeans have multiplied so much that now there are more than half a billion of them. It is necessary either to seize new lands, or to reduce the population. In any case, war is a way out for them. If they understood that in case of defeat they (the elite) are threatened with extermination, according to the Bolshevik scenario, maybe the threat (probability) of such an outcome would make them think twice. But at the moment we see how the political lackeys, who serve the patrimonial elite of the West, are somehow joyfully imposing a new course towards war with Russia among their citizens. Well, time will tell.

    No one will feel sorry for them, Why should Russia fight with the West, a dozen missiles and the European army will calm down.
  6. +3
    21 March 2025 02: 57
    Kyiv will give up the territories, it simply has no choice. And, as the Americans say, Russia will have to give up something too.

    Kyiv simply has no choice? Has Kyiv surrendered even one territory without a fight? Has it given up Chasov Yar, Sudzha? If it weren't for the pipe, in which, let me remind you, soldiers suffocated in order to squeeze out the enemy, they would still be fighting there. And what will Russia have to give up? And what will it have to give up? We haven't yet been given back the territories of Kherson and Zaporozhye, but we already have to give up something? And where do they write about this, this is the first time I've heard anything like this?
  7. -1
    21 March 2025 04: 20
    Half-destroyed Europe... The most terrible wars came to us from Europe. Therefore, it must be destroyed to the roots and the earth covered with salt. Then it will be a paradise garden!
  8. 0
    21 March 2025 06: 23
    Now everyone is talking about geopolitics. Which was once condemned in 1945 in Nuremberg as a product of Nazi ideology. But something incomprehensible is happening here. First we give, and then we try to take at a high price. Trump admitted that he is a nationalist. And maybe that is why he does not see ultra-nationalism in Ukraine. After all, there is an abyss between nationalism and patriotism. Patriotism is a natural quality of a person who loved everything around him. Nationalism is an agitational idea. Patriotism has always won. And everything far-fetched has flown away.
  9. +4
    21 March 2025 06: 47
    No treaties will save the weak. Fighting on the principle of "we haven't started anything yet" for the fourth year, Russia demonstrates weakness. Three years ago, they would have killed half of Ukraine at once and there would have been peace long ago. Universal international condemnation?! The US is condemned a lot for Japan? Japan and the US are enemies?
  10. -2
    21 March 2025 06: 48
    Yesterday I turned on my music playlist on YouTube on TV, I come from the kitchen, and there is unusual music and two gays kissing each other, so I almost threw up, so what are you talking about, friendship with gays? According to statistics, there are no more than 1% of them, I think this is a pathology of ugly boys, well, try to win the hearts of women, oh yeah, it's easier to find the same gay, I don't understand what could be more beautiful than a woman feel
  11. +4
    21 March 2025 08: 27
    Naturally.
    This is the Cunning Plan of the Self.
    After all, no one is bothered by the fact that the Chinese have long been calculating their super profits? Reselling our own oil, refining, metal to NATO (openly written here)? etc.

    The fortunes of Russian oligarchs have grown despite sanctions? Titanium, aluminum, rare earths, hydrocarbons, chemicals, food products - even fish - go to NATO countries? And it all comes back to the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the form of weapons?

    Nobody is confused...Everyone understands everything...
    1. +4
      21 March 2025 09: 39
      I agree with you. I will add a little: dreams of Russia as an independent pole of power have almost completely shattered against the harsh reality - we are absolutely not up to such a role now, everyone wants greatness, but few are ready to bear the inevitable accompanying costs. The bet on China, and partly India, did not work - the eastern giant turned out to be a bad overlord - indecisive, not generous, immersed exclusively in its own problems, unwilling to bear any responsibility for its vassals (I do not even want to discuss the joke about equal cooperation with China). It seems that it has been decided, like the prodigal son, to return to the embrace of the West. Moreover - now a new option has appeared - a choice between the US and the EU, whose relations are now closer to competitive than to allied. True, I have a feeling that Trump is using Russia simply as a tool to increase discipline and loyalty within NATO: as a kind of scarecrow, and to demonstrate that the role of the beloved wife of the overseas gentleman is not reserved forever for the current EU members. But within the framework of this game, the Russian Federation at least has the opportunity to maneuver. If, of course, there is at least someone left in the high Moscow offices who has professionalism, and not just loyalty (I am not talking about loyalty to the country and the people).
      1. -1
        21 March 2025 10: 31
        We must remember the precepts of our ancestors. After all, they warned us. "Russia has two allies - the Army and the Navy!" And today we must add ... and "Air and Space Forces".
        1. +2
          21 March 2025 11: 25
          This is an extremely unfortunate imperative of Alexander III, including such an approach cost the life of his son and his family, and contributed to the collapse of the Russian Empire. If they allowed a significant part of the world to unite on the idea of ​​opposing themselves, then the army and navy, even in combination with the Aerospace Forces, will not be able to do anything about it. And a more specific question suggests itself: why then do we need the highest political leadership, and in particular the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, with their numerous and well-paid employees, if they are not able to provide the country with allies, and dump the solution of all problems on the army? Maybe then it is worth sending their children, and themselves (who are suitable in age) to the active army? Then those who remain will strain themselves more - how to provide the country's Armed Forces with allies, which, in turn, will reduce the losses among the country's citizens dressed in military uniform many times over. But in fact - both in the times of Alexander III, the author of the quote you liked so much, and now - the unprofessionalism of politicians is being covered up by the heroism of the soldiers. And heroism is inevitably accompanied by an increase in the area of ​​military cemeteries.
  12. +1
    21 March 2025 09: 32
    the appearance of negotiations has no basis yet

    I absolutely agree. But I will add.
    Judging by the abundance and content of advertising on television, there is no war and none is expected.
    In Russia the main problems are hemorrhoids and headaches.
    How can anything change for the better in a country with such powerful, mind-numbing advertising propaganda?!
    Everyone knows that advertising is a complete lie. But the whole society is persistently immersed in this swamp of total lies.
    What for?
    Yes, so that behind the advertising lies the lies of deputies, the lies of officials, the lies of bankers, profiteers and oligarchs are not so clearly visible.
    Russia. You are incurably ill with capitalism.
  13. 0
    21 March 2025 10: 27
    And there is no need to flirt with the Anglo-Saxons, there is no need to be friends with them. We need to set them against each other. And remember the precepts of our ancestors. I have repeated them and I will repeat them.
    1. +4
      21 March 2025 11: 14
      But the ancestors of the Anglo-Saxons left other covenants to their descendants:

      There are no eternal enemies or eternal friends, there are only eternal interests.

      Maybe it's time for us to abandon our belief in friendship between nations (what do you mean - every representative of one nation is friends with every representative of another? All millions?), as well as existential hostility, and focus on something more practical, like establishing mutually beneficial relations? Then we won't have to whine about everyone betraying Russia, no one being grateful to her, stabbing her in the back, leading her by the nose, and so on down the list...
      1. +1
        21 March 2025 17: 25
        It will be very difficult for us to establish mutually beneficial relations with the EU countries and especially with Ukraine for reasons known to all. But I will take as an example a mere trifle - ideological. If someone in Europe and Ukraine constantly watched what is often talked about on Russian TV or written in articles, and especially in the comments to them, then this person would grab his head and immediately believe everything bad that their politicians and other talking heads say about us.
        Just look at some of the comments to this article...
  14. +1
    21 March 2025 12: 11
    For peacemaker Trump, the task of achieving peace looks like this: achieve any ceasefire for at least a week, crow about the victory in conquering the world and supposedly leave here, having unleashed a war between Russia and Europe (and this is the main goal of the United States in Europe). Neither sanctions, nor sanctions, nor arms supplies will be stopped. Loans for the rearmament of Europe will also be issued. The calculation is based on the exchange of Russia's retreat from its demands in response to promises that no one will fulfill. A striking example of such agreements is the return of the grain deal and free navigation in the Black Sea. At the same time, the United States will continue to supply its BC with artificial intelligence to strike our fleet. But they only supply and guide, and otherwise they are for peace in the Black Sea.
  15. 0
    21 March 2025 17: 23
    A peace agreement with Ukraine is ridiculous. Who are you signing agreements with? You can't trust the sincerity of the Americans' intentions. Trump wants to push this conflict and the costs onto Europe. Billions have been thrown into the "furnace" of this war, and it seems that the Europeans and the British don't want to give up just like that. If they send their contingents, we need to give them a good slap on the head... don't take them prisoner, so that they don't get into trouble again. The operation needs to be completed, and all assigned tasks need to be completed. It's not clear why this clown and his entourage are still sitting in Kyiv. The fish rots from the head. Those same Americans, in any conflict, first of all destroyed the decision-making centers. Ukraine, in fact, due to its own stupidity, is already a "stump", and there is no way back. Zelensky is not legitimate, and his brainwashed entourage hates Russia and everything Russian with a fierce hatred. What kind of agreements can there be with such a public?
    1. 0
      21 March 2025 19: 46
      After reading your menacing comment, the question that has become hackneyed but still relevant comes to mind: are you writing from the trenches? Or as usual - I am old and sick, I have paid all my debts to the Motherland, and you are here to give me victory and bring it to my house? However, I have no doubt that you are ready to heroically hand over all your acquaintances and neighbors to the military registration and enlistment office.
      1. -1
        23 March 2025 19: 36
        We are all in the same "trench" in this subscription...opinions may differ, but the "trench" is one. So no need to be smart.
        Zelensky is a political corpse, and the consequences for Ukraine are extremely sad. This is already being openly written and discussed in the West.
  16. 0
    22 March 2025 13: 57
    Why is it inevitable? It is possible to launch a nuclear strike on NATO European bases and 10 European capitals even tomorrow. Having warned the American "friends". So that they would take their own out and not dare to twitch in response. And that's it. Europe will sign the capitulation. Those who remain alive will pay Russia any reparations, even 100 trillion euros, just to stay alive.
    And this is even a better option than waiting for Europe to accumulate forces and weapons, and again "suddenly" attack Russia. Whoever allows such an attack on our country will be guilty of the deaths of millions of people. And all this will happen if we again flirt with "peace negotiations" with Europe and Trump. The enemy must be hated and destroyed - only then will he fear and respect you. The Anglo-Saxons respect only the strong. And Russia all the time wagged its tail in front of the British, it is not clear why, in the hopes of a beautiful life for certain individuals in London and Paris, probably. And they burned ours in furnaces ...
  17. 0
    29 March 2025 20: 44
    It doesn't even come close to resembling the Second World War: France and England were allies with the USSR in the fight against the Germans. I'm not even saying that bourgeois Russia bears little resemblance to the workers' and peasants' USSR.