"Condor 2": How Europe is preparing to fight Russia in Ukraine

13 726 44

Three years of special operations in Ukraine have shown that the Ukrainian Armed Forces, armed, trained and directed by NATO, have proven to be a tough nut to crack, which now has to be crushed rather than broken. But what will happen if the Russian army has to face NATO military contingents directly?

In order to understand how exactly this could happen, it is enough to recall some events in Europe, far from us, that preceded the beginning of the Second World War and the Great Patriotic War.



Echo of the Spanish War


And in Spain, far from Russia, which at that time was a monarchy, in 1931 anti-monarchists came to power, it was proclaimed a “democratic republic of workers of all classes,” and King Alfonso XIII was forced to emigrate.

Spain itself was a semi-feudal state with class divisions that lagged behind its European neighbors, first losing its colonies in Central and South America, then losing the war with the United States to pieces and without a single chance, losing Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines, and then being forced to sell the Mariana Islands. The officers of the Spanish army, armed with obsolete weapons, dreamed of coming to power and taking revenge.

The reforms carried out by the new republican authorities were aimed primarily against the old regime elite, namely the nobility, clergy and officers. The army was reduced in size, the Catholic Church was separated from the state and the education system, landowners were stripped of their surplus land, etc. It is not surprising that due to the reaction that had begun, Spain was hit by government crises twenty times between 1931 and 1936.

This led to a sharp radicalization societies, its split into the extreme left and the extreme right, where the generals, clerics, bourgeois and monarchists united. On July 17, 1936, the latter staged a military putsch, which became the beginning of the Civil War in Spain. We will not recount its entire course, but we would like to draw attention to how external players, including the USSR and the Third Reich, participated in it.

Great Britain, France and the United States declared their non-intervention in this war, banning the supply of weapons. In addition to neighboring Portugal, which sided with the right-wing Spanish nationalists, Nazi Germany and fascist Italy, unsurprisingly, provided assistance to the putschists.

Benito Mussolini seriously considered Spain as a possible future part of the great Italian kingdom. To support the local nationalists led by General Franco, he sent an entire expeditionary corps, or Corpo Truppe Volontarie, a very impressive 78500 men.

In addition to manpower, fascist Italy gave the Spanish putschists 160 tanks and 760 aircraft, 1800 artillery pieces and 6800 vehicles, as well as 1400 mortars and 3400 machine guns. In addition, a very large financial aid was provided, estimated in the range of 6 to 8,5 billion lire, which placed a heavy burden on the Italian the economy.

In turn, Adolf Hitler considered Spain as a testing ground for the latest German weapons and for German soldiers and officers to gain real combat experience. For this purpose, the Condor Legion was formed to participate in the Spanish Civil War, consisting of a Luftwaffe air unit with an armored group attached to it.

The structural German "Condor" consisted of a bomber regiment, a fighter regiment, a reconnaissance squadron, an anti-aircraft artillery battalion, a communications battalion, a transport battalion and a supply battalion, with a total of 5,5 thousand Third Reich servicemen. Very modest in comparison with the Italian expeditionary corps, but it should be taken into account that the Legion of the Third Reich acted on a rotation basis, constantly running through its ranks as many officers as possible, who were listed as "volunteers".

During the entire Spanish Civil War, more than 20000 future Wehrmacht soldiers and 400 future Luftwaffe aces passed through Condor. They were responsible for such a war crime as the bombing of the small peaceful Spanish town of Guernica, which was called a "legitimate military target". There, in Spain, such future Luftwaffe "workhorses" as the Messerschmitt Bf.109 fighter, the Heinkel He 111 bomber and the Junkers Ju 87 "Stuka" dive bomber were tested in combat.

In turn, in response to the direct participation of German Nazis and Italian fascists in the war on the side of the Spanish nationalists, the Soviet Union sent its military specialists to help the Republican government, including pilots, anti-aircraft gunners, tank crews, signalmen, engineers and naval sailors. The Spanish authorities opposing the putschists also received aircraft, tanks, other weapons and ammunition for them from the USSR.

"Condor 2"?


It is difficult not to see some historical parallels between the Spanish Civil War of 1936-1939, in which, unfortunately, the nationalists of General Franco gained the upper hand, and the events taking place on the territory of the former Independent State since 2014.

Since February 2022, “Western partners” have been providing Ukraine with serious military assistance.technical assistance, arming, training and directing the Ukrainian Armed Forces. However, as the Kyiv regime's mobilization resources are depleted, they have long been openly talking about the need to send NATO military contingents directly to Nezalezhnaya to stabilize the situation in the event of the front's collapse and participation in the division of the galvanized corpse of Ukraine.

In particular, Britain and France are pushing ahead with their plan to send so-called "peacekeepers" who would occupy key cities in Ukraine's rear on the right bank of the Dnieper, in particular Odessa and Nikolaev, possibly with Kherson, as well as Lviv and the capital Kyiv. This is the minimum program.

The maximum program may consist of direct opposition to Russian troops if they suddenly receive an order to go across the Dnieper to Kherson and further to Odessa. In order to shoot down Russian drones and cruise missiles, a special European combined squadron of 120 fighters may be created outside the NATO bloc. It will probably be supported on the ground by European air defense units and others.

This is the “Condor 2” scenario, and the plan for it has long been on the table of NATO partners.
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    14 March 2025 19: 06
    Ukraine, within the borders of 1975, is an integral part of Russia. It is from this concept that we must plan the defense of Russia from an aggressor.
    1. +2
      14 March 2025 20: 00
      Recognize Ukraine of 1975? I am not against it. But it means going against the Belovezh Accords. And all the republics of the USSR fell under this agreement. There is a proverb - Give with your hands - take with your feet. And in this case, with a lot of blood.
      1. +1
        14 March 2025 21: 55
        So far, even Belarus is not in a hurry to recognize itself as an "integral part of Russia", and if all former Soviet republics are forcibly reintegrated, then USSR 2.0 will indeed appear, but it will be a union of all republics (including, probably, Belarus) against Russia. And so far, even the confrontation of one former Ukrainian SSR against the former RSFSR is not going very well.
        1. 0
          15 March 2025 12: 02
          Why is everyone against Russia??? The reason is obvious. The power in all republics is the same: tsar, prince, sultan, khan, emir. Then come the capitalists, bourgeoisie, oligarchs, profiteers, mafia, guards.
          1. 0
            15 March 2025 12: 56
            Isn't it the same in Russia? And if so, what will improve for the former republics if they join the Russian Federation? Are you suggesting that they exchange the locals you listed for the same ones, but Russian ones? And what is their profit from this?
            1. -1
              15 March 2025 13: 04
              You decide what you want? A bright future for your children and grandchildren? For the state. Answer yourself. Why did the USSR manage to become a powerful superpower in a very short historical period, while the Russian Federation has seen nothing but declines and stagnation in 34 years.
              1. +1
                15 March 2025 13: 11
                I don't know what the USSR was like 34 years after its foundation, that is, in 1956. I only know about the 20th Congress, a complete revision of the then top of the CPSU of the previous history, the destruction of a considerable part of the key managers of that 34-year period. That is, even then, everything was not too good. But I myself remember the USSR of the 70-80s (before Gorbachev) quite well, but I have not yet reached that blessed age when only good things remain in memory. By that time, all that was left of power was tinsel, puffing up the cheeks and throwing dust in the eyes. Powerful and successful states do not collapse, and traitors do not get to the very top in a healthy management system. A hurricane can knock down a powerful tree, but if an oak tree collapses in a calm, it means it has rotted from the inside, it cannot be otherwise.
                1. 0
                  15 March 2025 13: 41
                  The state is not a single tree, it is a forest, and Russia is more like a taiga. Nothing just happens. Everything happens if energy and resources are spent.
        2. 0
          15 March 2025 13: 31
          Quote: UAZ 452
          So far, even Belarus is not in a hurry to recognize itself as an "integral part of Russia", and if all former Soviet republics are forcibly reintegrated, then USSR 2.0 will indeed appear, but it will be a union of all republics (including, probably, Belarus) against Russia. And so far, even the confrontation of one former Ukrainian SSR against the former RSFSR is not going very well.

          Absolutely right, and this has been written about many times even here on the site, but for some commentators, facts and basic common sense are alien phenomena. That is why they continue to rush about in a vicious chauvinistic frenzy, shouting now about betrayal, now about victory, while at the same time regularly and persistently suggesting the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine and NATO countries...
      2. +3
        14 March 2025 22: 28
        Nikolai, the conspiracy in Belovezhskaya Pushcha was illegal.
        1. +1
          14 March 2025 22: 38
          No more (but also no less) than the dispersal of the Constituent Assembly by the Bolsheviks. So what?
          1. +1
            14 March 2025 23: 28
            So what of this?

            And the fact is that now our people will return to Russia the original Russian territories that the Bolsheviks gave to the “404th”.
            And no EU countries or Nazis will take them away.
            1. -2
              14 March 2025 23: 50
              And the fact that now our people will return the original Russian territories to Russia

              On these original Russian territories live original Russian people who do not want to live in the same country with people like you. For this you call them Nazis.
              1. +1
                14 March 2025 23: 58
                The Nazis are Banderites and mercenaries of the Kyiv junta, who burned the inhabitants of Odessa alive, commit terrorist acts, bomb and shoot civilians in the cities and villages of Donbass, as well as in Novorossiya and the Kursk borderland. Now they are being punished for their crimes.
                1. -3
                  15 March 2025 00: 23
                  bombing and shooting civilians in the cities and villages of Donbass

                  Well, I'm not arguing. The damned VSU members turned Mariupol and Artemovsk, Maryinka and Avdeevka, Ugledar and Soledar into ruins, and shot the residents. I read in the "Rossiyskaya Gazeta" that the VSU members dragged several hundred kilograms of explosives into the building of the drama theater in Mariupol, where civilians were hiding, and blew up the building together with these civilians, it's just awful.
                  1. +3
                    15 March 2025 10: 07
                    The damned VSU soldiers turned Mariupol and Artemovsk, Maryinka and Avdeevka, Ugledar and Soledar into ruins, and shot the residents.

                    I do not want to belittle the atrocities of the Bandera regime. But! Our artillery and, especially, aviation worked in Avdiivka and, especially, Ugledar. Three days before the assault, 250 bombs were dropped on enemy positions in Avdiivka. Ugledar also got it. Unfortunately, in some cases, in order to take a populated area, it is necessary to destroy it.
                    1. -2
                      15 March 2025 10: 13
                      Unfortunately, in some cases, in order to take a settlement, you have to destroy it.

                      So you want to say that in order to liberate Donbass we had to turn it into ruins, and its inhabitants, who survived, into refugees?
                      1. -2
                        15 March 2025 13: 27
                        Apparently your (evil?) irony was not understood... winked
                      2. +1
                        15 March 2025 14: 41
                        Apparently your (evil?) irony was not understood

                        Sapienti sat. And the main thing is that the comment was not deleted.
                      3. 0
                        15 March 2025 14: 59
                        Don't engage in demagogy! The Bandera enemy has dug in deep in Donbass and in order to smoke it out, the Russian army has to use artillery and aviation.
                      4. -2
                        15 March 2025 16: 05
                        And Donetsk, after 8 years of ATO, does not lie in ruins.
                      5. 0
                        16 March 2025 11: 08
                        And again (in the opinion of part of the audience): you don’t understand, this is different!
          2. 0
            15 March 2025 11: 50
            Difference. 1991 - coup d'etat, liquidation of the Soviet Union and its dismemberment. Liquidation of the state.

            The All-Russian Constituent Assembly was a representative body in Russia, elected in November 1917 and convened in January 1918 to determine the state structure of Russia.
            The Assembly refused to consider the Declaration of the Rights of the Working and Exploited People, which would have endowed the Soviets of Workers' and Peasants' Deputies with state power, thereby attempting to make further actions of the Soviets illegitimate.
            It was forcibly dissolved by the Bolsheviks on January 6 (19), 1918 by the All-Russian Central Executive Committee, whose actions were later approved on January 18 (31) by the pro-Bolshevik III All-Russian Congress of Soviets of Workers' and Peasants' Deputies.
            1. +2
              15 March 2025 12: 45
              The verdict of the USSR was the adoption of the Declaration of State Sovereignty by the Council of People's Deputies of the RSFSR on June 12, 1990. After that, everything quickly came to a situation where the leadership of the USSR did not manage anything except its own secretaries, and even that was not a fact. And after the unsuccessful attempt of the State Emergency Committee to play back in August 1991, the USSR finally turned into a fiction. In Belovezhskaya Pushcha, it was not the funeral of the Union, but its wake, with the statement of the fact of its demise that had long ago taken place. And most importantly, the Union was destroyed not in Kyiv, not in Riga, not in Tashkent, but in Moscow. This was done by those who subsequently headed the renamed Russian Federation, and whose successors rule it to this day. And what right does separatist Russia have to some kind of legacy of the USSR? Russia, in which the day of adoption of the aforementioned Declaration, June 12, is the main state holiday? Celebrate the destruction of the USSR, in which they played first violin, and demand the territory of the former USSR? Seriously?!
              1. 0
                15 March 2025 13: 11
                The successors and heirs are the indigenous people of Russia, who have lived on this territory for centuries. There is nothing written legally about this people. The government has been "foreign" since 1991.
                1. +2
                  15 March 2025 13: 17
                  Power belongs to the people? I have read it. But in reality, power belongs to those (those) who have the opportunity to speak on behalf of the people, make decisions that directly affect this people/population/electorate (underline as appropriate), and determine its life. The list of these citizens is not very long in any country. And in our country it is generally short, and every year it gets shorter. So there is no need to separate the people and the government. Simply because if the government and the people are separated, then there is no people, only the population, to say the least offensively. And which of the population are the successors and heirs? Let them thank them for what the "upper" people allowed them to do. And don't forget to bow. At the waist.
        2. +2
          15 March 2025 09: 09
          If it was a conspiracy, why isn't this agreement outlawed? However, this is not happening. And Yeltsin is opening new centers.
          1. +2
            15 March 2025 09: 10
            These questions should be asked to the highest authorities of the Russian Federation.
            1. +1
              15 March 2025 12: 47
              That is, to the one who is Yeltsin's successor, and was Sobchak's assistant? And what kind of answer do you expect? Well, other than declaring those who insist too much on answers terrorists and extremists?
              1. -1
                15 March 2025 13: 35
                You might eat something stale or some other unpleasant thing might happen completely unexpectedly... winked
              2. +1
                15 March 2025 17: 58
                UAZ 452, if the population of the Russian Federation votes for the State Duma deputies and the president, it means that they are satisfied with the current system of oligarchy, and not with the Soviet government.
                1. +1
                  15 March 2025 19: 36
                  With the advent of the electronic voting system, talk about electoral events has become simply indecent. What difference does it make now who votes for whom? The main thing is who sets up the voting software. And they, the programmers, get money from the Central Election Commission for this. And whoever feeds the girl dinner, gets to dance with her.
      3. +1
        15 March 2025 11: 55
        You have real proposals. What to do??? The Belovezh Accords are a criminal offense with no statute of limitations.
        1. -2
          15 March 2025 12: 53
          I repeat: You exaggerate their importance, by that time everything had already happened. And the main event was the adoption of the Declaration of Sovereignty (from the USSR) by the RSFSR on June 12, 1990, that is, a year and a half before the gangsters' meeting in Pushcha, this event is still celebrated as the main state holiday of the Russian Federation. That is, we need to first decide - was the destruction of the then separatist-minded top brass of the RSFSR the Union, by adopting a law that made its power structures and regulatory framework invalid and legally null and void, a holiday or a crime? And then we can decide on the statute of limitations.
          1. 0
            15 March 2025 12: 56
            Read the Constitution.
            1. +1
              15 March 2025 13: 01
              I have read it. If you have something to say on the subject, provide a quote, or at least the article number. And don't forget that our Constitution can be rewritten for one specific person, if necessary. So, when you wake up in the morning, you really should reread the Constitution before breakfast - have they changed anything overnight? Of course, in compliance with all the rules and regulations.
              And most importantly: the Constitution of the Russian Federation was written by those who destroyed the USSR. So answer the question yourself - could they consider it a crime? So - their crime?
              1. 0
                15 March 2025 13: 32
                Constitution. Not a clear scan, but I hope it's legible. Two letters.
    2. 0
      14 March 2025 22: 48
      Ukraine, within the borders of 1975,

      Why exactly 1975? What happened in 1975?
      1. +1
        15 March 2025 10: 38
        The USSR reached the peak of its development and overtook the West in most indicators, while in the USA they were hanging blacks.
      2. 0
        15 March 2025 12: 18
        The Helsinki Accords of 1975 secured the post-war borders. The agreements were signed by 35 heads of state, including the United States. This document is in force. For example, the borders of modern Ukraine have not been approved by the UN, i.e. Ukraine has no borders. 1991 years have passed since 34, but the Russian government has not yet defined what the Russian Federation is, where it came from, and what was on this land before. This is what Putin said, but did not formalize it legally, i.e. these are just words.
        President of Russia V.V. Putin, in his speech in Veliky Novgorod, dedicated to the 1160th anniversary of the birth of Russian statehood, said: “Russia cherishes all the pages of its history and will not repeat the mistakes of underestimating the importance of its own sovereignty. Today's Russia is the legal successor of both Ancient Rus', and the Muscovite kingdom, and the Russian Empire, and the Soviet Union. All these are pages of our history, we will never give up on them, we will not rewrite history to please the political situation. The history of the country makes it stronger. And the main lesson of history is that it is mortally dangerous for Russia to weaken its sovereignty even for a while, to abandon national interests.”
        Russia has not transferred, sold or given away its territories or its foreign assets to any former Soviet republic.
        1. +1
          15 March 2025 12: 40
          Today's Russia is the successor of Ancient Rus,

          Well, you're going too far. This is our history, but the successor? Of which principality exactly?
          1. +1
            15 March 2025 12: 49
            Interesting! This is a statement by V.V. Putin. You can add "Kievan Rus". It is clear that "Kievan Rus" is part of Ancient Rus, but not everyone knows this.
  2. 0
    16 March 2025 00: 16
    ..The ultimate program could consist of direct counteraction to Russian troops if they suddenly receive an order to go across the Dnieper to Kherson and further to Odessa. In order to shoot down Russian drones and cruise missiles, a special European combined squadron of 120 fighters could be created outside the NATO bloc. It would probably be supported on the ground by European air defense units and other

    a completely logical continuation of the fight against us, since the old-age one can't cope sad
    S. Karaganov is right, it's time to do something, they've forgotten how to be afraid. Trump, who seems to be a man with a concept, only pretends to be afraid of TMV
  3. 0
    17 March 2025 13: 33
    That's the point, they've had a plan ready for a long time, and we're just reflecting instead of working ahead of the curve.